This fixes a compilation error with tests on current `main`. I didn't
track down the exact provenance, but I'd guess it's the result of a
botched merge. (i.e., Two or more PRs that pass CI independently, but
when merged cause failures.)
I've noticed some non-deterministic test failures when a temp dir looks
like a timestamp
(2016141680).
Running the custom filters for e.g. the temp dirs before the generic
time filters should fix that.
## Summary
This PR modifies the resolver to treat the Python version as a package,
which allows for better error messages (since we no longer treat
incompatible packages as if they "don't exist at all").
There are a few tricky pieces here...
First, we need to track both the interpreter's Python version and the
_target_ Python version, because we support resolving for other versions
via `--python 3.7`.
Second, we allow using incompatible wheels during resolution, as long as
there's a compatible source distribution. So we still need to test for
`requires-python` compatibility when selecting distributions.
This could use more testing, but it feels like an area where `packse`
would be more productive than writing PyPI tests.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/406.
We now show the fully-resolved URL, rather than the URL as given by the
user, _everywhere_ except for the output resolution file (which should
retain relative paths, unexpanded environment variables, etc.).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/687.
Separate branch for rebasing #677 onto main because i don't trust the
rebase enough to force push.
Closes#677.
---
If you install `black` from PyPI, then `-e ../black`, we need to
uninstall the existing `black`. This sounds simple, but that in turn
requires that we _know_ `-e ../black` maps to the package `black`, so
that we can mark it for uninstallation in the install plan. This, in
turn, means that we need to build editable dependencies prior to the
install plan.
This is just a bunch of reorganization to fix that specific bug
(installing multiple versions of `black` if you run through the above
workflow): we now run through the list of editables upfront, mark those
that are already installed, build those that aren't, and then ensure
that `InstallPlan` correctly removes those that need to be removed, etc.
Closes#676.
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Per the title: adds support for `-e` installs to `puffin pip-install`.
There were some challenges here around threading the editable installs
to the right places. Namely, we want to build _once_, then reuse the
editable installs from the resolution. At present, we were losing the
`editable: true` flag on the `Dist` that came back through the
resolution, so it required some changes to the resolver.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/672.
## Summary
Now, after running `pip-install`, we validate that the set of installed
packages is consistent -- that is, that we don't have any packages that
are missing dependencies, or incompatible versions of installed
dependencies.
## Summary
At present, when performing a `pip-install`, we first do a resolution,
then take the set of requirements and basically run them through our
`pip-sync`, which itself includes re-resolving the dependencies to get a
specific `Dist` for each package. (E.g., the set of requirements might
say `flask==3.0.0`, but the installer needs a specific _wheel_ or source
distribution to install.)
This PR removes this second resolution by exposing the set of pinned
packages from the resolution. The main challenge here is that we have an
optimization in the resolver such that we let the resolver read metadata
from an incompatible wheel as long as a source distribution exists for a
given package. This lets us avoid building source distributions in the
resolver under the assumption that we'll be able to install the package
later on, if needed. As such, the resolver now needs to track the
resolution and installation filenames separately.
## Summary
When running `puffin pip-install`, we should respect versions that are
already installed in the environment. For example, if you run `puffin
pip-install flask==2.0.0` and then `puffin pip-install flask`, we should
avoid upgrading Flask. The most natural way to model this is to mark
them as "preferences".
(It's not enough to just filter those requirements out prior to
resolving, since we may not have the _dependencies_ of those packages
installed. We _could_ recursively verify this across the
`site-packages`, but that would be a larger PR.)
## Summary
This PR adds a `pip-install` command that operates like, well, `pip
install`. In short, it resolves the provided dependency, then makes sure
they're all installed in the environment. The primary differences with
`pip-sync` are that (1) `pip-sync` ignores dependencies, and assumes
that the packages represent a complete set; and (2) `pip-sync`
uninstalls any unlisted packages.
There are a bunch of TODOs that I'll resolve in subsequent PRs.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/129.
