e.g.
```
❯ echo "anyio" | cargo run -q -- pip compile - -v
DEBUG uv 0.4.30 (107ab3d71 2024-11-07)
DEBUG Starting Python discovery for a default Python
DEBUG Looking for exact match for request a default Python
DEBUG Searching for default Python interpreter in virtual environments, managed installations, or search path
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.12.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/Users/zb/workspace/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
```
```
❯ cargo run -q -- pip install anyio -v
DEBUG uv 0.4.30 (107ab3d71 2024-11-07)
DEBUG Searching for default Python interpreter in virtual environments
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.12.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/Users/zb/workspace/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
```
vs
```
❯ uv pip install anyio -v
DEBUG uv 0.4.30 (61ed2a236 2024-11-04)
DEBUG Searching for default Python interpreter in system path
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.12.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/Users/zb/workspace/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
```
```
❯ echo "anyio" | uv pip compile - -v
DEBUG uv 0.4.30 (61ed2a236 2024-11-04)
DEBUG Starting Python discovery for a default Python
DEBUG Looking for exact match for request a default Python
DEBUG Searching for default Python interpreter in managed installations or system path
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.12.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/Users/zb/workspace/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
```
Previously, we'd use the `--reinstall` flag to determine if we should
replace existing Python executables in the bin directory during an
install. There are a few problems with this:
- We replace executables we don't manage
- We can replace executables from other uv Python installations during
reinstall (surprising)
- We don't do the "right" thing when installing patch versions e.g.
installing `3.12.4` then `3.12.6` would fail without the reinstall flag
In `uv tool`, we have separate `--force` and `--reinstall` concepts.
Here we separate the flags (`--force` was previously just a
`--reinstall` alias) and add inspection of the existing executables to
inform a decision on replacement.
In brief, we will:
- Replace any executables with `--force`
- Replace executables for the same installation with `--reinstall`
- Replace executables for an older patch version by default
## Summary
This PR pulls in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8263 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8463, which were originally merged
into the v0.5 tracking branch but can now be committed separately, as
we've made `.env` loading opt-in.
In summary:
- `.env` loading is now opt-in (`--env-file .env`).
- `.env` remains supported on `uv run`, so it's meant for providing
environment variables to the run command, rather than to uv itself.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eduardo González Vaquero <47718648+edugzlez@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
This PR enables `uv sync --all-packages` to sync all packages in a
workspace. It removes a common use-case for the legacy non-`[project]`
packages that we're trying to move away from.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8724.
Updates `uv python install` to link `python3.x` in the executable
directory (i.e., `~/.local/bin`) to the the managed interpreter path.
Includes
- #8569
- #8571
Remaining work
- #8663
- #8650
- Add an opt-out setting and flag
- Update documentation
Refs:
- #8626
## Summary
Current documentation incorrectly suggests that the macOS cache
directory location is `$HOME/Library/Caches/uv`, but that changed in:
- #5806
Updates docs to say this instead:
> <p>Defaults to <code>$HOME/.cache/uv</code> on macOS,
<code>$XDG_CACHE_HOME/uv</code> or <code>$HOME/.cache/uv</code> on
Linux, and <code>%LOCALAPPDATA%\uv\cache</code> on Windows. The <code>uv
cache dir</code> command will show the location of the cache
directory.</p>
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
The changes in this commit introduce the `UV_NO_PROGRESS` environment
variable as an alternative way to control progress output suppression in
uv-cli, equivalent to using the `--no-progress` flag. This enhancement
simplifies configuration in CI environments and automated scripts by
eliminating the need to detect whether the script is running in a CI
environment.
Previously, disabling progress output required either passing the
`--no-progress` flag directly or implementing script logic to detect CI
environments and conditionally add the flag. With this change, users can
now simply set `UV_NO_PROGRESS=true` in their environment to achieve the
same effect.
The changes include:
- Adding the `UV_NO_PROGRESS` environment variable to the `EnvVars`
struct in `crates/uv-static/src/env_vars.rs`.
- Updating the `GlobalArgs` struct in `crates/uv-cli/src/lib.rs` to
include a new `no_progress` field that is bound to the `UV_NO_PROGRESS`
environment variable.
- Adding documentation for the new `UV_NO_PROGRESS` environment variable
in `docs/configuration/environment.md`.
## Test Plan
After creating a uv project using `uv init` in a temp directory in this
project:
```
cargo run cache clean && cargo run venv && UV_NO_PROGRESS=false cargo run sync
cargo run cache clean && cargo run venv && cargo run sync
```
produce the expected default behavior
```
cargo run cache clean && cargo run venv && UV_NO_PROGRESS=false cargo run sync
```
produces the same behavior as having the `--no-progress` flag.
This PR adds support for `tool.uv.default-groups`, which defaults to
`["dev"]` for backwards-compatibility. These represent the groups we
sync by default.
Part of #8090
Adds the ability to include a group (`--group`) in the sync or _only_
sync a group (`--only-group`). Includes all groups in the resolution,
which will have the same limitations as extras as described in #6981.
There's a great deal of refactoring of the "development" concept into
"groups" behind the scenes that I am continuing to defer here to
minimize the diff.
Additionally, this does not yet resolve interactions with the existing
`dev` group — we'll tackle that separately as well. I probably won't
merge the stack until that design is resolved. The current proposal is
that we'll just "combine' the `dev-dependencies` contents into the `dev`
group.
Part of #8090
Adds the ability to add and remove dependencies from arbitrary groups
using `uv add` and `uv remove`. Does not include resolving with the new
dependencies — tackling that in #8110.
Additionally, this does not yet resolve interactions with the existing
`dev` group — we'll tackle that separately as well. I probably won't
merge the stack until that design is resolved.
## Summary
These two sentences in the docs for `--publish-url` seem to basically be
duplicates:
3eda248ef5/crates/uv-cli/src/lib.rs (L4616-L4618)
I found the first to be easier to read, so this commit removes the
second.
## Test Plan
No tests, change is docs-only.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
For example, in:
```toml
[tool.uv]
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
```
We can just omit `[tool.uv]`.
## Summary
Historically, we haven't enforced schema versions. This PR adds a
versioning policy such that, if a uv version writes schema v2, then...
- It will always reject lockfiles with schema v3 or later.
- It _may_ reject lockfiles with schema v1, but can also choose to read
them, if possible.
(For example, the change we proposed to rename `dev-dependencies` to
`dependency-groups` would've been backwards-compatible: newer versions
of uv could still read lockfiles that used the `dev-dependencies` field
name, but older versions should reject lockfiles that use the
`dependency-groups` field name.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8465.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix the flag description: `to detect and with` --> `to detect packages
with`
This PR adds support for `uv lock --dry-run`, as described in issue
#6408.
One thing to note: this functionality, as implemented, isn't limited to
`-U` (if someone adds a dependency to the project's `pyproject.toml`,
the plan will include these changes).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds a first-class API for defining registry indexes, beyond our
existing `--index-url` and `--extra-index-url` setup.
Specifically, you now define indexes like so in a `uv.toml` or
`pyproject.toml` file:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
```
You can also provide indexes via `--index` and `UV_INDEX`, and override
the default index with `--default-index` and `UV_DEFAULT_INDEX`.
### Index priority
Indexes are prioritized in the order in which they're defined, such that
the first-defined index has highest priority.
Indexes are also inherited from parent configuration (e.g., the
user-level `uv.toml`), but are placed after any indexes in the current
project, matching our semantics for other array-based configuration
values.
You can mix `--index` and `--default-index` with the legacy
`--index-url` and `--extra-index-url` settings; the latter two are
merely treated as unnamed `[[tool.uv.index]]` entries.
### Index pinning
If an index includes a name (which is optional), it can then be
referenced via `tool.uv.sources`:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = { index = "pytorch" }
```
If an index is marked as `explicit = true`, it can _only_ be used via
such references, and will never be searched implicitly:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
explicit = true
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = { index = "pytorch" }
```
Indexes defined outside of the current project (e.g., in the user-level
`uv.toml`) can _not_ be explicitly selected.
(As of now, we only support using a single index for a given
`tool.uv.sources` definition.)
### Default index
By default, we include PyPI as the default index. This remains true even
if the user defines a `[[tool.uv.index]]` -- PyPI is still used as a
fallback. You can mark an index as `default = true` to (1) disable the
use of PyPI, and (2) bump it to the bottom of the prioritized list, such
that it's used only if a package does not exist on a prior index:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
default = true
```
### Name reuse
If a name is reused, the higher-priority index with that name is used,
while the lower-priority indexes are ignored entirely.
For example, given:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://test.pypi.org/simple"
```
The `https://test.pypi.org/simple` index would be ignored entirely,
since it's lower-priority than `https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121`
but shares the same name.
Closes#171.
## Future work
- Users should be able to provide authentication for named indexes via
environment variables.
- `uv add` should automatically write `--index` entries to the
`pyproject.toml` file.
- Users should be able to provide multiple indexes for a given package,
stratified by platform:
```toml
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = [
{ index = "cpu", markers = "sys_platform == 'darwin'" },
{ index = "gpu", markers = "sys_platform != 'darwin'" },
]
```
- Users should be able to specify a proxy URL for a given index, to
avoid writing user-specific URLs to a lockfile:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "test"
url = "https://private.org/simple"
proxy = "http://<omitted>/pypi/simple"
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
First off, congratulations on the 0.3 release! The PEP 723 standalone
scripts support is awesome, and I can already imagine a long tail of
little scripts of my own that would benefit from this functionality.
## Background
I really like the Deno CLI's support for running and installing remote
scripts.
```
deno run <url>
```
```
deno install --name foo <url>
```
I can see parallels with `uv run` and `uvx`. After mentioning this on
Discord, @zanieb suggested I could take a stab at a PR to implement
similar functionality for uv.
## Summary
This PR attempts to add support for executing remote standalone scripts
directly with `uv run`. While this is already possible by downloading
the script (i.e., via curl/wget) and then using uv run, having direct
support would be convenient.
The proposed functionality is:
```sh
uv run <url>
```
Another addition/alternative could be to support running scripts via
stdin:
```sh
curl -sL <url> | uv run -
```
But that is not implemented in this PR.
## Test Plan
I noticed that GitHub and `files.pythonhosted.org` URLs are used in some
of the tests. I've created a personal [GitHub
Gist](https://gist.github.com/manzt/cb24f3066c32983672025b04b9f98d1f)
with the example from PEP 723 for now to test this functionality.
~However, I couldn't figure out how to get the `with_snapshot` config
filter to filter out the tempfile path, so the test is currently
failing. Any assistance with this would be appreciated.~
## Notes
I'm not totally pleased with the implementation of this PR. I think it
would be better to handle the case earlier (and probably reuse the
cache), and avoid mutation, but since run command requires a local path
this was the simplest implementation I could come up with.
I know that performance is paramount with uv so I totally understand if
this requires a different approach or something more explicit to avoid
"inferring" the path. I'm just taking this as an opportunity to learn a
little more Rust and acquaint myself with the code base. cheers!
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <jamslam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kemal Akkoyun <kakkoyun@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds the ability to list available scripts in the environment
when `uv run` is invoked without any arguments.
It somewhat mimics the behavior of `rye run` command
(See https://rye.astral.sh/guide/commands/run).
This is an attempt to fix#4024.
## Test Plan
I added test cases. The CI pipeline should pass.
### Manuel Tests
```shell
❯ uv run
Provide a command or script to invoke with `uv run <command>` or `uv run script.py`.
The following scripts are available:
normalizer
python
python3
python3.12
See `uv run --help` for more information.
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Kemal Akkoyun <kakkoyun@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Improve hints when using the simple index URL instead of the upload URL
in `uv publish`. This is the most common confusion when publishing, so
we give it some extra care and put it more centrally in the CLI help.
Fixes#7860
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This PR adds support for the `UV_FIND_LINKS` environment variable as an
alternative to the `--find-links` command-line option, as requested in
#1839.
## Test Plan
A unit test was added to validate that setting `UV_FIND_LINKS` provided
the same result as a link provided with the `--find-links` command-line
option.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
I have a workflow where I want use `uv` as a dependency solver only, and
manage my environments with external tooling (Nix).
## Test Plan
Manually tested. Automated testing seems excessive for such a trivial
change.
## Problems
It's still not as useful as I'd like it to be.
`uv` uncondtionally creates a virtual environment, something I would
expect that `--no-sync` should disable.
This looks a bit more tricky to achieve and I'm not sure about how to
best structure it.
## Summary
This is another attempt using `module: bool` instead of `module:
Option<String>` following #7322.
The original PR can't be reopened after a force-push to the branch, I've
created this new PR.
Resolves#6638
## Summary
Resolves#7705
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and tested locally.
The snapshots were unstable due to the packages being built in a
non-deterministic order, so I used the quiet flag to suppress the
output.
Another question is whether we should label the build output to indicate
which package it belongs to?
