Previously you could get a confusing error message like this:
```
$ docker run ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv run python
error: Could not read ELF interpreter from any of the following paths: /bin/sh, /usr/bin/env, /bin/dash, /bin/ls
```
Now the error message is better:
```
error: Failed to discover managed Python installations
Caused by: Failed to determine the libc used on the current platform
Caused by: Failed to find any common binaries to determine libc from: /bin/sh, /usr/bin/env, /bin/dash, /bin/ls
```
See https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8635.
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
In platform discovery we're parsing the output of the ELF interpreter,
e.g., `/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`. This file is ld, not ldd, which was
incorrectly named in the code.
An alternative is naming everything ELF interpreter instead of ld.so.
Rustfmt introduces a lot of formatting changes in the 2024 edition. To
not break everything all at once, we split out the set of formatting
changes compatible with both the 2021 and 2024 edition by first
formatting with the 2024 style, and then again with the currently used
2021 style.
Notable changes are the formatting of derive macro attributes and lines
with overly long strings and adding trailing semicolons after statements
consistently.
## Summary
These were moved as part of a broader refactor to create a single
integration test module. That "single integration test module" did
indeed have a big impact on compile times, which is great! But we aren't
seeing any benefit from moving these tests into their own files (despite
the claim in [this blog
post](https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html),
I see the same compilation pattern regardless of where the tests are
located). Plus, we don't have many of these, and same-file tests is such
a strong Rust convention.
As per
https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html
Before that, there were 91 separate integration tests binary.
(As discussed on Discord — I've done the `uv` crate, there's still a few
more commits coming before this is mergeable, and I want to see how it
performs in CI and locally).
As described in #4242, we're currently incorrectly downloading glibc
python-build-standalone on musl target, but we also can't fix this by
using musl python-build-standalone on musl targets since the musl builds
are effectively broken.
We reintroduce the libc detection previously removed in #2381, using it
to detect which libc is the current one before we have a python
interpreter. I changed the strategy a big to support an empty `PATH`
which we use in the tests.
For simplicity, i've decided to just filter out the musl
python-build-standalone archives from the list of available archive,
given this is temporary. This means we show the same error message as if
we don't have a build for the platform. We could also add a dedicated
error message for musl.
Fixes#4242
## Test Plan
Tested manually.
On my ubuntu host, python downloads continue to pass:
```
target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/debug/uv python install
```
On alpine, we fail:
```
$ docker run -it --rm -v .:/io alpine /io/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/debug/uv python install
Searching for Python installations
error: No download found for request: cpython-any-linux-x86_64-musl
```
