Add configuration documentation for the build backend and make it the
preview default.
The build backend should generally work with default configuration
unless you want specific features such as flat layout or module
renaming, there is only a dedicated configuration, but no concept or
guide page for the build backend. Once the build backend is stable, we
can update the guide documentation to explain that uv defaults to its
own build backend, but other build backends are also supported.
The uv build backend becomes the default in preview, giving it more
exposure from users and preparing it to make it the default proper. The
current documentation retains warnings that the build backend is in
preview.
To see current uses of `uv_build` on GitHub:
https://github.com/search?q=path%3A**%2Fpyproject.toml+uv_build%3E%3D0&type=code
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The examples assume that the packages are in the project root directory.
However, they are nested inside `src`, and the commands in the examples
do not work as intended.
I could not find any related issues.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I tested it by executing the commands on my terminal - Linux and Windows
(PowerShell).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Initially it seemed like `app.py` might be slightly more desirable but
people seem to overwhelmingly favour `main.py` as a good "generic" name.
Fixes#7782
- Adds a collapsible section for the project concept
- Splits the project concept document into several child documents.
- Moves the workspace and dependencies documents to under the project
section
- Adds a mkdocs plugin for redirects, so links to the moved documents
still work
I attempted to make the minimum required changes to the contents of the
documents here. There is a lot of room for improvement on the content of
each new child document. For review purposes, I want to do that work
separately. I'd prefer if the review focused on this structure and idea
rather than the content of the files.
I expect to do this to other documentation pages that would otherwise be
very nested.
The project concept landing page and nav (collapsed by default) looks
like this now:
<img width="1507" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-14 at 11 28 45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/88288b09-8463-49d4-84ba-ee27144b62a5">
