When stderr is not a tty, we currently don't show any messages for build
or large downloads, since indicatif is hidden. We can improve this by
showing a message for:
* Starting and finishing a large download (>1MB)
* Starting and finishing a build
Downloads are limited to 1MB or unknown size to keep the logs concise
and not scroll the entire terminal away for a download that finishes
almost immediately.
These messages are not captured in the tests since their order is
non-deterministic (downloads and builds race to finish).
There are no "tick" messages for large downloads yet, we could e.g. show
an update on runnning downloads every n seconds.
Part of #11121
**Test Plan**
```
$ uv venv && FORCE_COLOR=1 cargo run -q pip install numpy --no-binary :all: --no-cache 2>&1 | tee a.txt
Using CPython 3.13.0
Creating virtual environment at: .venv
Activate with: source .venv/bin/activate
Resolved 1 package in 221ms
Building numpy==2.2.2
Built numpy==2.2.2
Prepared 1 package in 2m 34s
Installed 1 package in 6ms
+ numpy==2.2.2
```
```
$ uv venv && FORCE_COLOR=1 cargo run -q pip install torch --no-cache 2>&1 | tee b.txt
Using CPython 3.13.0
Creating virtual environment at: .venv
Activate with: source .venv/bin/activate
Resolved 24 packages in 648ms
Downloading setuptools (1.2MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12 (13.2MiB)
Downloading torch (731.1MiB)
Downloading nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12 (20.1MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cufft-cu12 (201.7MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12 (23.5MiB)
Downloading nvidia-curand-cu12 (53.7MiB)
Downloading nvidia-nccl-cu12 (179.9MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cudnn-cu12 (634.0MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cublas-cu12 (346.6MiB)
Downloading sympy (5.9MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cusparse-cu12 (197.8MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cusparselt-cu12 (143.1MiB)
Downloading networkx (1.6MiB)
Downloading nvidia-cusolver-cu12 (122.0MiB)
Downloading triton (241.4MiB)
Downloaded setuptools
Downloaded networkx
Downloaded sympy
Downloaded nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12
Downloaded nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12
Downloaded nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12
Downloaded nvidia-curand-cu12
[...]
```
## Summary
This is attempting to solve the same problem surfaced in #11208 and
#11209. However, those PRs only worked for our own managed Pythons. In
Gentoo, for example, they disable the managed Pythons, which led to
failures in the test suite, because the "base Python" returned after
creating a virtual environment would differ from the "base Python" that
you get after _querying_ an existing virtual environment.
The fix here is to apply our same base Python normalization and
discovery logic, to non-standalone / non-managed Pythons. We continue to
use `sys._base_executable` for such Pythons when creating the
virtualenv, but when _caching_, we perform this second discovery step.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11237.
This is a rewrite of the groups subsystem to have more clear semantics,
and some adjustments to the CLI flag constraints. In doing so, the
following bugs are fixed:
* `--no-default-groups --no-group foo` is no longer needlessly rejected
* `--all-groups --no-default-groups` now correctly evaluates to
`--all-groups` where previously it was erroneously being interpretted as
just `--no-default-groups`
* `--all-groups --only-dev` is now illegal, where previously it was
accepted and mishandled, as if it was a mythical `--only-all-groups`
flag
Fixes#10890Closes#10891
## Summary
If you `uv run` from the same directory via multiple processes at the
same time, some of them will fail as they'll see an "incomplete" virtual
environment.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11219.
I think `UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` is too complicated for use-cases where
the user wants to sync to the active environment. I don't see a
compelling reason not to make opt-in easier. I see a lot of questions
about how to deal with this warning in the issue tracker, but it seems
painful to collect them here for posterity.
A notable behavior here — we'll treat this as equivalent to
`UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` so... if you point us to a valid virtual
environment that needs to be recreated for some reason (e.g., new Python
version request), we'll happily delete it and start over.
## Summary
This PR removes the ephemeral `.pth` overlay when using a cached
environment. This solution isn't _completely_ safe, since we could
remove the `.pth` file just as another process is starting the
environment... But that risk already exists today, since we could
_overwrite_ the `.pth` file just as another process is starting the
environment, so I think what I've added here is a strict improvement.
Ideally, we wouldn't write this file at all, and we'd instead somehow
(e.g.) pass a file to the interpreter to run at startup? Or find some
other solution that doesn't require poisoning the cache like this.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11117.
# Test Plan
Ran through the great reproduction steps from the linked issue.
Before:
After:
## Summary
I'm not sure that this has much of an effect in practice, but currently,
when we return a virtual environment, the `sys_base_executable ` of the
parent ends up being retained as `sys_base_executable` of the created
environment. But these can be, like, subtly different? If you have a
symlink to a Python, then for the symlink, `sys_base_executable` will be
equal to `sys_executable`. But when you create a virtual environment for
that interpreter, we'll set `home` to the resolved symlink, and so
`sys_base_executable` will be the resolved symlink too, in general.
Anyway, this means that we should now have a consistent value between
(1) returning `Virtualenv` from the creation routine and (2) querying
the created interpreter.
## Summary
It turns out that we were returning slightly different interpreter paths
on repeated `uv run --with` commands. This likely didn't affect many (or
any?) users, but it does affect our test suite, since in the test suite,
we use a symlinked interpreter.
The issue is that on first invocation, we create the virtual
environment, and that returns the path to the `python` executable in the
environment. On second invocation, we return the `python3` executable,
since that gets priority during discovery. This on its own is
potentially ok. The issue is that these resolve to different
`sys._base_executable` values in these flows... The latter gets the
correct value (since it's read from the `home` key), but the former gets
the incorrect value (since it's just the `base_executable` of the
executable that created the virtualenv, which is the symlink).
We now use the same logic to determine the "cached interpreter" as in
virtual environment creation, to ensure consistency between those paths.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11214
Special-cases the first Python executable we find on the `PATH`,
allowing it to be considered during searches for virtual environments.
For some context, there are two stages to Python interpreter discovery
1. We find possible Python executables in various sources
2. We query the executables to determine canonical metadata about the
interpreter
We can't really be "sure" if an executable is a complaint virtual
environment during (1), we need to query the interpreter first. This
means that if you're only allowed to installed into virtual
environments, we'll query every interpreter on your PATH. This is not
performant, and causes confusion for users. Notably, I recently improved
error messaging when we can't find any valid interpreters, by showing
the error message we encounter while querying an interpreter (if any).
However, this is problematic when there's an error for an interpreter
that is not relevant to your search. In
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/11143, I added filtering to avoid
querying additional interpreters, but that regressed some user
experiences where they were relying on us finding implicitly active
virtual environments via the PATH.
In https://github.com/astral-sh/tokio-tar/pull/2, we accidentally
changed the `target_base` from the target base to the parent of the
file. This would cause hardlink unpacking to fail.
Example: A hardlink at `hardlinked-0.1.0/pyproject.toml` pointing to
`hardlinked-0.1.0/pyproject.toml.real` would try pointing to
`hardlinked-0.1.0/hardlinked-0.1.0/pyproject.toml.real` instead and fail
the unpacking.
The actual fix is in astral-tokio-tar, on the uv side there are only tests.
Fixes#11213
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I got a bit confused when testing `[dependency-groups]` because uv's
error message had the same typo I did in my `pyproject.toml`.
I tried to fix it, as well as a few comment I found along the way.
These are noisy relative to the effect they have on the user. It seems
better to prioritize hints on poor resolutions. Notably, it seems hard
to make these "not noisy" ref #11091.
Does not include the "lowest" resolution mode, in which lower bounds are
critical.
With the parallel simple index fetching, we would only acquire one
download concurrency token, meaning that we could in the worst case make
times the number of indexes more requests than the user requested limit.
We fix this by passing the semaphore down to the simple API method.
Looks like the set based prioritize tracking from
https://github.com/pubgrub-rs/pubgrub/pull/313 is a slight speedup.
I assume the changed derivation tree in the error snapshot is due to
out-of-sync virtual package priorities, while the main package priority
defining the solution remains stable.
```
$ hyperfine --warmup 2 "./uv-main pip compile --no-progress scripts/requirements/airflow.in --universal" "./uv-branch pip compile --no-progress scripts/requirements/airflow.in --universal"
Benchmark 1: ./uv-main pip compile --no-progress scripts/requirements/airflow.in --universal
Time (mean ± σ): 115.0 ms ± 4.8 ms [User: 131.0 ms, System: 113.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 108.1 ms … 125.8 ms 25 runs
Benchmark 2: ./uv-branch pip compile --no-progress scripts/requirements/airflow.in --universal
Time (mean ± σ): 105.4 ms ± 2.6 ms [User: 118.5 ms, System: 113.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 101.1 ms … 111.9 ms 28 runs
Summary
./uv-branch pip compile --no-progress scripts/requirements/airflow.in --universal ran
1.09 ± 0.05 times faster than ./uv-main pip compile --no-progress scripts/requirements/airflow.in --universal
```
uv-install-wheel had the logic for laying out the installation and for
linking a directory in the same module. We split them up to isolate each
module's logic and tighten the crate's interface to only expose top
level members.
No logic changes, only moving code around.
As before, these are fine-grained PATs and will expire in 366 days.
They're generated by splitting the token into three parts (by `_`) and
base64 encoding.
## Summary
This lets us drop a dependency entirely. `percent-encoding` is used by
`url` and so is already in the graph, whereas `urlencoding` isn't used
by anything else.
## Summary
This PR adds an additional normalization step to `CanonicalUrl` whereby
we now percent-decode the path, to ensure that (e.g.)
`torch-2.5.1%2Bcpu.cxx11.abi-cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64.whl` and
`torch-2.5.1+cpu.cxx11.abi-cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64.whl` are considered
equal. Further, when generating the "reinstall" report, we use the
canonical URL rather than the verbatim URL.
In making this change, I also learned that we don't apply any of the
normalization passes to `file://` URLs. I inadvertently removed it in
93d606aba2,
since setting the password or URL on ` file://` URL errors -- but now
suppress those errors anyway.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11082.
## Test Plan
- Downloaded a [PyTorch
wheel](https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu-cxx11-abi/torch-2.5.1%2Bcpu.cxx11.abi-cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64.whl)
- `python3.9 -m pip install
torch-2.5.1+cpu.cxx11.abi-cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64.whl --platform
linux_x86_64 --target foo --no-deps`
- `cargo run pip install
torch-2.5.1+cpu.cxx11.abi-cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64.whl --python-platform
linux --python-version 3.9 --target foo --no-deps`
- Verified that the package had the `~` symbol for the reinstall.
## Summary
We now show a custom error if (1) the file doesn't exist at all, or (2)
it's not a PEP 723 script.
In the future, `uv lock --script` should probably initialize the script,
but that requires a more extensive refactor. At present, we just
silently lock the project instead, which is pretty bad!
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10979.
