Previously, we excluded these and only looked at system interpreters.
However, it makes sense for this to match the typical Python discovery
experience. We could consider swapping the default... I'm not sure what
makes more sense. If we change the default (as written now) — this could
arguably be a breaking change.
This is a fallback mode that we supported when we decided to use PEP 517
builds by default. I can't find a single reference to it on GitHub or in
our issue tracker, so I want to drop support for it as part of v0.3.0.
- Removes "experimental" labels from command documentation
- Removes preview warnings
- Removes `PreviewMode` from most structs and methods — we could keep it
around but I figure we can propagate it again easily where needed in the
future
- Enables preview behavior by default everywhere, e.g., `uv venv` will
download Python versions
This PR migrates uv's use of `chrono` to `jiff`.
I did most of this work a while back as one of my tests to ensure Jiff
could actually be used in a real world project. I decided to revive
this because I noticed that `reqwest-retry` dropped its Chrono
dependency,
which is I believe the only other thing requiring Chrono in uv.
(Although, we use a fork of `reqwest-middleware` at present, and that
hasn't been updated to latest upstream yet. I wasn't quite sure of the
process we have for that.)
In course of doing this, I actually made two changes to uv:
First is that the lock file now writes an RFC 3339 timestamp for
`exclude-newer`. Previously, we were using Chrono's `Display`
implementation for this which is a non-standard but "human readable"
format. I think the right thing to do here is an RFC 3339 timestamp.
Second is that, in addition to an RFC 3339 timestamp, `--exclude-newer`
used to accept a "UTC date." But this PR changes it to a "local date."
That is, a date in the user's system configured time zone. I think
this makes more sense than a UTC date, but one alternative is to drop
support for a date and just rely on an RFC 3339 timestamp. The main
motivation here is that automatically assuming UTC is often somewhat
confusing, since just writing an unqualified date like `2024-08-19` is
often assumed to be interpreted relative to the writer's "local" time.
Resolve#6152
## Summary
## Test Plan
Execution result of `cargo run generate-shell-completion --help`
```bash
Generate shell completion
Usage: uv generate-shell-completion <SHELL>
Arguments:
<SHELL> The shell to generate the completion script for [possible values: bash, elvish, fish, nushell, powershell, zsh]
```
Execution result of `cargo run help generate-shell-completion`
```bash
Generate shell completion
Usage: uv generate-shell-completion <SHELL>
Arguments:
<SHELL>
The shell to generate the completion script for
[possible values: bash, elvish, fish, nushell, powershell, zsh]
```
## Summary
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4537
- First commit avoids overwriting dependencies with different markers.
- Second commit supports adding from requirements files.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
We now persist the `ResolverInstallerOptions` when writing out a tool
receipt. When upgrading, we grab the saved options, and merge with the
command-line arguments and user-level filesystem settings (CLI > receipt
> filesystem).
The loose consensus is that "fetch" doesn't have much meaning and that a
boolean flag makes more sense from the command line.
1. Adds `--allow-python-downloads` (hidden, default) and
`--no-python-downloads` to the CLI to quickly enable or disable
downloads
2. Deprecates `--python-fetch` in favor of the options from (1)
3. Removes `python-fetch` in favor of a `python-downloads` setting
5. Adds a `never` variant to the enum, allowing even explicit installs
to be disabled via the configuration file
## Test plan
I tested this with various `pyproject.toml`-level settings and `uv venv
--preview --python 3.12.2` and `uv python install 3.12.2` with and
without the new CLI flags.
## Summary
I think this seems reasonable... Otherwise, we might not go back to PyPI
to revalidate the list of available versions despite the user passing
`--upgrade`.
## Summary
Resolves#5188. Most of the changes involve creating a new function in
`tool/common.rs` to contain the common functionality previously found in
`tool/install.rs`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
```console
❯ ./target/debug/uv tool upgrade black
warning: `uv tool upgrade` is experimental and may change without warning.
Resolved 6 packages in 25ms
Uninstalled 1 package in 3ms
Installed 1 package in 19ms
- black==23.1.0
+ black==24.4.2
Installed 2 executables: black, blackd
```
Following #5869, the documentation has some less-than-helpful
suggestions to use `uv help python` for details — we should link to the
`uv python` section instead.
