<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Update [schemars
0.9.0](https://github.com/GREsau/schemars/releases/tag/v0.9.0)
There are differences in the generated JSON Schema and I will [contact
the author](https://github.com/GREsau/schemars/issues/407).
## Test Plan
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
This allows you to specify requires-python on individual dependency-groups,
with the intended usecase being "oh my dev-dependencies have a higher
requires-python than my actual project".
This includes a large driveby move of the RequiresPython type to
uv-distribution-types to allow us to generate the appropriate markers at
this point in the code. It also migrates RequiresPython from
pubgrub::Range to version_ranges::Ranges, and makes several pub(crate)
items pub, as it's no longer defined in uv_resolver.
Fixes#11606
This includes some initial work on adding Pyodide support (issue
#12729). It is enough to get
```
uv pip compile -p /path/to/pyodide --extra-index-url file:/path/to/simple-index
```
to work which should already be quite useful.
## Test Plan
* added a unit test for `pyodide_platform`
* integration tested manually with:
```
cargo run pip install \
-p /home/rchatham/Documents/programming/tmp/pyodide-venv-test/.pyodide-xbuildenv-0.29.3/0.27.4/xbuildenv/pyodide-root/dist/python \
--extra-index-url file:/home/rchatham/Documents/programming/tmp/pyodide-venv-test/.pyodide-xbuildenv-0.29.3/0.27.4/xbuildenv/pyodide-root/package_index \
--index-strategy unsafe-best-match --target blah --no-build \
numpy pydantic
```
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Closes#13253
## Test Plan
```sh
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.7.3, <0.8"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.7.3, <0.8` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
hint: Update `uv` by running `uv self update`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.7.3"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.7.3` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
hint: Update `uv` by running `uv self update`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = "<0.7"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `<0.7` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.4,<0.7"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.4, <0.7` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Add configuration documentation for the build backend and make it the
preview default.
The build backend should generally work with default configuration
unless you want specific features such as flat layout or module
renaming, there is only a dedicated configuration, but no concept or
guide page for the build backend. Once the build backend is stable, we
can update the guide documentation to explain that uv defaults to its
own build backend, but other build backends are also supported.
The uv build backend becomes the default in preview, giving it more
exposure from users and preparing it to make it the default proper. The
current documentation retains warnings that the build backend is in
preview.
To see current uses of `uv_build` on GitHub:
https://github.com/search?q=path%3A**%2Fpyproject.toml+uv_build%3E%3D0&type=code
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This adds `poetry-core` as a build backend choice.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
Part of #8607. This is a pure refactor aimed at paving the way for
supporting the `default-extras` configuration in the `pyproject.toml`
file.
The `ExtraSpecification` struct has been refactored to align more
closely with the
[`DependencyGroups`](256b100a9e/crates/uv-configuration/src/dependency_groups.rs (L9))
struct.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
This PR adds `uv export` support for [PEP
751](https://peps.python.org/pep-0751). We don't yet expose a way to
consume the generated lockfile, but it's a first step.
The logic to go from `uv.lock` to "flat set of packages to include, with
markers telling us when to include them" is all shared with the
`requirements.txt` export (and extracted in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12956). So most of the code is just
converting from our internal types to the PEP 751 schema.
Closes#12929
## Summary
Untag the `config-settings` value to support JSON schema according to
the
[docs](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/settings/#config-settings).
```toml
[tool.uv]
config-settings = { editable_mode = "compat" }
```
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Verified using the "Even Better TOML" extension with paths to old and
new `uv.schema.json`.
## Notes
I could not reproduce the issue with either the `taplo` (on which Even
Better Toml is built, afaik) and `check-jsonschema` CLI tools; with both
old and new versions of the `uv.schema.json` validated the
`pyproject.toml`.
Maybe for these there is some additional regularization going on and
that's also how a breaking case ended up in the docs?
I'm unsure on how to test for this.
After about an hour, the Even better TOML VSCode extension was the only
way to reproduce failing validation.
Let me know if I can do something else.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Currently, `uv init` works without a `git` executable, and with a
working `git` executable, but not with a broken `git`, be it from GitHub
Action's Windows CI or from the shim we insert.
`uv init` calls git twice: Once `git rev-parse` to check whether a git
repo already exists, and then `git init` (if there is no git repository
yet and no `--vcs none`).
By separately handling the cases where git failed during `git rev-parse`
doesn't work vs. where the is no repository when checking for an
existing repo work tree, we can avoid calling `git init` for broken git
and erroring. We have to hardcode the expected git command outputs to be
able to check.
See #12769 for the motivation. We set the 4MB not only for the main
thread, but also for all tokio and rayon threads to fix a stack overflow
while unpacking wheels in production on Windows.
There are two variables for setting the stack size: A new
`UV_STACK_SIZE` that takes precedent, and the existing `RUST_MIN_STACK`.
When setting the stack size, `UV_STACK_SIZE` should be preferred, since
`RUST_MIN_STACK` affects all Rust applications, including build backends
we call (e.g., maturin). The minimum stack size is set to 1MB, the
lowest stack size we observed on a platform (Windows main thread).
Fixes#12769
## Test Plan
Tested manually with the example from #12769
serde needs to be told where to put underscores. someone clearly noticed
this when adding attributes for schemars, but they need to be present
for serde too and then schemars gets them for free.
Strictly speaking this would be a breaking change for anyone who noticed
the parsing was messed up and worked around it. So we add aliases for
backcompat, at least for a few releases.
Fixes#12590
## Summary
I don't know if I actually want to commit this, but I did it on the
plane last time and just polished it off (got it to compile) while
waiting to board.
## Summary
This crate is for standards-compliant types, but this is explicitly a
type that's custom to uv. It's also strange because we kind of want to
reference `IndexUrl` on the registry type, but that's in a crate that
_depends_ on `uv-pypi-types`, which to me is a sign that this is off.
## Summary
This ended up being more involved than expected. The gist is that we
setup all the packages we want to reinstall upfront (they're passed in
on the command-line); but at that point, we don't have names for all the
packages that the user has specified. (Consider, e.g., `uv pip install
.` -- we don't have a name for `.`, so we can't add it to the list of
`Reinstall` packages.)
Now, `Reinstall` also accepts paths, so we can augment `Reinstall` based
on the user-provided paths.
Closes#12038.
At certain points in the code, dependency groups are represented by
`DevGroups*` naming, probably as a historical artifact. This PR updates
the naming.
This includes renaming `uv-configuration/src/dev.rs` to
`uv-configuration/src/dependency_groups.rs`.
Three edition 2021 compatible sets of changes in preparation for the
edition 2025 split out from #11724.
In edition 2025, `gen` is a keyword, so we escape it as `r#gen`. `ref`
and `ref mut` are not allowed anymore for `&T` and `&mut T`, so we
remove them. `cargo fmt` now formats inside of macros, which the 2021
formatter doesn't undo.
## Summary
This is the pattern I see in a variety of crates, and I believe this is
preferred if you don't _need_ an owned `String`, since you can avoid the
allocation. This could be pretty impactful for us?
## Summary
Since we use `SmallString` internally, there's no benefit to passing an
owned string to the `PackageName` constructor (same goes for
`ExtraName`, etc.). I've kept them for now (maybe that will change in
the future, so it's useful to have clients passed own values if they
_can_), but removed a bunch of usages where we were casting from `&str`
to `String` needlessly to use the constructor.
This is a rewrite of the groups subsystem to have more clear semantics,
and some adjustments to the CLI flag constraints. In doing so, the
following bugs are fixed:
* `--no-default-groups --no-group foo` is no longer needlessly rejected
* `--all-groups --no-default-groups` now correctly evaluates to
`--all-groups` where previously it was erroneously being interpretted as
just `--no-default-groups`
* `--all-groups --only-dev` is now illegal, where previously it was
accepted and mishandled, as if it was a mythical `--only-all-groups`
flag
Fixes#10890Closes#10891
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I got a bit confused when testing `[dependency-groups]` because uv's
error message had the same typo I did in my `pyproject.toml`.
I tried to fix it, as well as a few comment I found along the way.
These are noisy relative to the effect they have on the user. It seems
better to prioritize hints on poor resolutions. Notably, it seems hard
to make these "not noisy" ref #11091.
Does not include the "lowest" resolution mode, in which lower bounds are
critical.
Ultimately this is a lot of settings plumbing and a couple minor pieces
of Actual Logic (which are so simple I have to assume there's something
missing, but maybe not!).
Note this "needlessly" use DevDependencyGroup since it costs nothing, is
more futureproof, and lets us maintain one primary interface (we just
pass `false` for all the dev arguments).
Fixes#8590Fixes#8969
## Summary
When `--upgrade` is provided, we should retain already-installed
packages _if_ they're newer than whatever is available from the
registry.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10089.
## Summary
This follows Ruff's design exactly: you can provide a version specifier
(like `>=0.5`), and we'll enforce it at runtime.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8605.
Add a preview option `uv init --build-backend uv --preview` that uses
the uv build backend when generating the project. The uv build backend
is in preview, so the option is also guarded by preview and hidden from
the help message and docs.
For https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3957#issuecomment-2518757563
## Summary
A lot of good new lints, and most importantly, error stabilizations. I
tried to find a few usages of the new stabilizations, but I'm sure there
are more.
IIUC, this _does_ require bumping our MSRV.
When performing a noop sync, we don't need the rayon threadpool, yet we
pay for its initialization:
Be making the initialization lazy, we avoid that cost:
This code runs every time before user code in `uv run`.
This means that before calling rayon, one now needs to call
`LazyLock::force(&RAYON_INITIALIZE);`.
Performance mode (CPU 0 is a perf core):
```
$ taskset -c 0 hyperfine --warmup 5 -N "/home/konsti/projects/uv/uv-main sync" "/home/konsti/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv sync"
Benchmark 1: /home/konsti/projects/uv/uv-main sync
Time (mean ± σ): 4.5 ms ± 0.1 ms [User: 2.7 ms, System: 1.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 4.4 ms … 6.4 ms 640 runs
Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet system without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.
Benchmark 2: /home/konsti/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv sync
Time (mean ± σ): 4.4 ms ± 0.1 ms [User: 2.7 ms, System: 1.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 4.3 ms … 5.0 ms 679 runs
Summary
/home/konsti/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv sync ran
1.03 ± 0.04 times faster than /home/konsti/projects/uv/uv-main sync
```
Power saver mode:
```
$ hyperfine --warmup 5 -N "/home/konsti/projects/uv/uv-main sync" "/home/konsti/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv sync"
Benchmark 1: /home/konsti/projects/uv/uv-main sync
Time (mean ± σ): 28.1 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 15.5 ms, System: 20.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 25.7 ms … 31.9 ms 102 runs
Benchmark 2: /home/konsti/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv sync
Time (mean ± σ): 24.0 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 13.8 ms, System: 9.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 22.2 ms … 28.2 ms 122 runs
Summary
/home/konsti/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv sync ran
1.17 ± 0.08 times faster than /home/konsti/projects/uv/uv-main sync
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us review effectively, please
ensure that:
- The pull request includes a summary of the change.
- The title is descriptive and concise.
- Relevant issues are referenced where applicable.
-->
## Summary
Resolves#9333
This pull request introduces support for the `--no-extra` command-line
flag and the corresponding `no-extra` UV setting.
### Behavior
- When `--all-extras` is supplied, the specified extras in `--no-extra`
will be excluded from the installation.
- If `--all-extras` is not supplied, `--no-extra` has no effect and is
safely ignored.
## Test Plan
Since `ExtrasSpecification::from_args` and
`ExtrasSpecification::extra_names` are the most important parts in the
implementation, I added the following tests in the
`uv-configuration/src/extras.rs` module:
- **`test_no_extra_full`**: Verifies behavior when `no_extra` includes
the entire list of extras.
- **`test_no_extra_partial`**: Tests partial exclusion, ensuring only
specified extras are excluded.
- **`test_no_extra_empty`**: Confirms that no extras are excluded if
`no_extra` is empty.
- **`test_no_extra_excessive`**: Ensures the implementation ignores
`no_extra` values that don't match any available extras.
- **`test_no_extra_without_all_extras`**: Validates that `no_extra` has
no effect when `--all-extras` is not supplied.
- **`test_no_extra_without_package_extras`**: Confirms correct behavior
when no extras are available in the package.
- **`test_no_extra_duplicates`**: Verifies that duplicate entries in
`pkg_extras` or `no_extra` do not cause errors.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
