> NOTE: The PRs that were merged into this feature branch have all been
independently reviewed. But it's also useful to see all of the changes
in their final form. I've added comments to significant changes
throughout the PR to aid discussion.
This PR introduces transparent Python version upgrades to uv, allowing
for a smoother experience when upgrading to new patch versions.
Previously, upgrading Python patch versions required manual updates to
each virtual environment. Now, virtual environments can transparently
upgrade to newer patch versions.
Due to significant changes in how uv installs and executes managed
Python executables, this functionality is initially available behind a
`--preview` flag. Once an installation has been made upgradeable through
`--preview`, subsequent operations (like `uv venv -p 3.10` or patch
upgrades) will work without requiring the flag again. This is
accomplished by checking for the existence of a minor version symlink
directory (or junction on Windows).
### Features
* New `uv python upgrade` command to upgrade installed Python versions
to the latest available patch release:
```
# Upgrade specific minor version
uv python upgrade 3.12 --preview
# Upgrade all installed minor versions
uv python upgrade --preview
```
* Transparent upgrades also occur when installing newer patch versions:
```
uv python install 3.10.8 --preview
# Automatically upgrades existing 3.10 environments
uv python install 3.10.18
```
* Support for transparently upgradeable Python `bin` installations via
`--preview` flag
```
uv python install 3.13 --preview
# Automatically upgrades the `bin` installation if there is a newer patch version available
uv python upgrade 3.13 --preview
```
* Virtual environments can still be tied to a patch version if desired
(ignoring patch upgrades):
```
uv venv -p 3.10.8
```
### Implementation
Transparent upgrades are implemented using:
* Minor version symlink directories (Unix) or junctions (Windows)
* On Windows, trampolines simulate paths with junctions
* Symlink directory naming follows Python build standalone format: e.g.,
`cpython-3.10-macos-aarch64-none`
* Upgrades are scoped to the minor version key (as represented in the
naming format: implementation-minor version+variant-os-arch-libc)
* If the context does not provide a patch version request and the
interpreter is from a managed CPython installation, the `Interpreter`
used by `uv python run` will use the full symlink directory executable
path when available, enabling transparently upgradeable environments
created with the `venv` module (`uv run python -m venv`)
New types:
* `PythonMinorVersionLink`: in a sense, the core type for this PR, this
is a representation of a minor version symlink directory (or junction on
Windows) that points to the highest installed managed CPython patch
version for a minor version key.
* `PythonInstallationMinorVersionKey`: provides a view into a
`PythonInstallationKey` that excludes the patch and prerelease. This is
used for grouping installations by minor version key (e.g., to find the
highest available patch installation for that minor version key) and for
minor version directory naming.
### Compatibility
* Supports virtual environments created with:
* `uv venv`
* `uv run python -m venv` (using managed Python that was installed or
upgraded with `--preview`)
* Virtual environments created within these environments
* Existing virtual environments from before these changes continue to
work but aren't transparently upgradeable without being recreated
* Supports both standard Python (`python3.10`) and freethreaded Python
(`python3.10t`)
* Support for transparently upgrades is currently only available for
managed CPython installations
Closes#7287Closes#7325Closes#7892Closes#9031Closes#12977
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Unlike regular packages, specifying all `__init__.py` directories for a
namespace package would be very verbose There is e.g.
https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/tree/main/src/poetry, which has
18 modules, or https://github.com/googleapis/api-common-protos which is
inconsistently nested. For both the Google Cloud SDK, there are both
packages with a single module and those with complex structures, with
many having multiple modules due to versioning through `<module>_v1`
versioning. The Azure SDK seems to use one module per package (it's not
explicitly documented but seems to follow from the process in
https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/python_design.html#azure-sdk-distribution-packages
and
ccb0e03a3d/doc/dev/packaging.md).
For simplicity with complex projects, we add a `namespace = true` switch
which disabled checking for an `__init__.py`. We only check that there's
no `<module_root>/<module_name>/__init__.py` and otherwise add the whole
`<module_root>/<module_name>` folder. This comes at the cost of
`namespace = true` effectively creating an opt-out from our usual checks
that allows creating an almost entirely arbitrary package.
For simple projects with only a single module, the module name can be
dotted to point to the target module, so the build still gets checked:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = "poetry.core"
```
## Alternatives
### Declare all packages
We could make `module-name` a list and allow or require declaring all
packages:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["cloud_sdk.service.storage", "cloud_sdk.service.storage_v1", "cloud_sdk.billing.storage"]
```
Or for Poetry:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = [
"poetry.config",
"poetry.console",
"poetry.inspection",
"poetry.installation",
"poetry.json",
"poetry.layouts",
"poetry.masonry",
"poetry.mixology",
"poetry.packages",
"poetry.plugins",
"poetry.publishing",
"poetry.puzzle",
"poetry.pyproject",
"poetry.repositories",
"poetry.toml",
"poetry.utils",
"poetry.vcs",
"poetry.version"
]
```
### Support multiple namespaces
We could also allow namespace packages with multiple root level module:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["cloud_sdk.my_ext", "local_sdk.my_ext"]
```
For lack of use cases, we delegate this to creating a workspace with one
package per module.
## Implementation
Due to the more complex options for the module name, I'm moving
verification on deserialization later, dropping the source span we'd get
from serde. We also don't show similarly named directories anymore.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I follow the advices from the IDE spell checker and grammar checker, fix
some typos, and improve the docs.
Extends https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/13841 — I'll drop that
commit later after that pull request merges but it's small.
I find the split into a "Configuration" section awkward and don't think
it's helping us. Everything moved into the "Concepts" section, except
the "Environment variables" page which definitely belongs in the
reference and the "Installer" page which is fairly niche and seems
better in the reference.
Before / After
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80d8304b-17da-4900-a5f4-c3ccac96fcc5"
width="400">
The motivation here being a reduction in the length of the navigation. I
don't think we did this in the first place because we didn't have the
capability to do another nested level, but now we're doing that for
Projects.
By default, uv uses only a lower bound in `uv add`, which avoids
dependency conflicts due to upper bounds. With this PR, this cna be
changed by setting a different bound kind. The bound kind can be
configured in `uv.toml`, as a user preference, in `pyproject.toml`, as a
project preference, or on the CLI, when adding a specific project.
We add two options that add an upper bound on the constraint, one for
SemVer (`>=1.2.3,<2.0.0`, dubbed "major", modeled after the SemVer
caret) and another one for dependencies that make breaking changes in
minor version (`>=1.2.3,<1.3.0`, dubbed "minor", modeled after the
SemVer tilde). Intuitively, the major option bumps the most significant
version component, while the minor option bumps the second most
significant version component. There is also an exact bounds option
(`==1.2.3`), though generally we recommend setting a wider bound and
using the lockfile for pinning.
Versions can have leading zeroes, such as `0.1` or `0.0.1`. For a single
leading 0, we shift the the meaning of major and minor similar to cargo.
For two or more leading zeroes, the difference between major and minor
becomes inapplicable, instead both bump the most significant component:
- major: `0.1` -> `>=0.1,<0.2`
- major: `0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.1,<0.0.2`
- major: `0.0.1.1` -> `>=0.0.1.1,<0.0.2.0`
- major: `0.0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.0.1,<0.0.0.2`
- minor: `0.1` -> `>=0.1,<0.1.1`
- minor: `0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.1,<0.0.2`
- minor: `0.0.1.1` -> `>=0.0.1.1,<0.0.2.0`
- minor: `0.0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.0.1,<0.0.0.2`
For a consistent appearance, we try to preserve the number of components
in the upper bound. For example, adding a version `2.17` with the major
option is stored as `>=2.17,<3.0`. If a version uses three components
and is greater than 0, both bounds will also use three components
(SemVer versions always have three components). Of the top 100 PyPI
packages, 8 use a non-three-component version (docutils, idna, pycparser
and soupsieve with two components, packaging, pytz and tzdata with two
component, CalVer and trove-classifiers with four component CalVer).
Example `pyproject.toml` files with the top 100 packages: [`--bounds
major`](https://gist.github.com/konstin/0aaffa9ea53c4834c22759e8865409f4)
and [`--bounds
minor`](https://gist.github.com/konstin/e77f5e990a7efe8a3c8a97c5c5b76964).
While many projects follow version scheme that roughly or directly
matches the major or minor options, these compatibility ranges are
usually not applicable for the also popular CalVer versioning.
For pre-release versions, there are two framings we could take: One is
that pre-releases generally make no guarantees about compatibility
between them and are used to introduce breaking changes, so we should
pin them exactly. In many cases however, pre-release specifiers are used
because a project needs a bugfix or a feature that hasn't made it into a
stable release, or because a project is compatible with the next version
before a final version for that release is published. In those cases,
compatibility with other packages that depend on the same library is
more important, so the desired bound is the same as it would be for the
stable release, except with the lower bound lowered to include
pre-release.
The names of the bounds and the name of the flag is up for bikeshedding.
Currently, the option is call `tool.uv.bounds`, but we could also move
it under `tool.uv.edit.bounds`, where it would be the first/only entry.
Fixes#6783
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Add documentation about Python versions to Tools concept page
## Test Plan
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Jay Qi <jayqi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
The current instructions say
> prefix a Git-compatible URL (i.e., that you would use with git clone)
with git+.
But this does not work with the URL that Github gives you when you
choose Clone -> SSH via the UI, which is of the form
`git@github.com:astral-sh/uv.git`. If you prefix this with `git+`, i.e.
`git+git@github.com:astral-sh/uv.git`
it does not work.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Add configuration documentation for the build backend and make it the
preview default.
The build backend should generally work with default configuration
unless you want specific features such as flat layout or module
renaming, there is only a dedicated configuration, but no concept or
guide page for the build backend. Once the build backend is stable, we
can update the guide documentation to explain that uv defaults to its
own build backend, but other build backends are also supported.
The uv build backend becomes the default in preview, giving it more
exposure from users and preparing it to make it the default proper. The
current documentation retains warnings that the build backend is in
preview.
To see current uses of `uv_build` on GitHub:
https://github.com/search?q=path%3A**%2Fpyproject.toml+uv_build%3E%3D0&type=code
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The PyTorch guide page has this, but it's missing from this example
(which is otherwise identical to the PyTorch guide page). I think it
would be helpful to include it here too.
## Test Plan
Docs.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Signed-off-by: Henry Schreiner <henryschreineriii@gmail.com>
## Summary
Adds note to docs about PEP 751 to documentation as discussed in #12641
## Test Plan
Previewed locally
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Fix broken grammar and hl_lines.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Some simple doc fixes.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
N/A
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Allows `uv python list <request>` to filter the installed list. I often
want this and it's not hard to add.
I tested the remote download filtering locally (#12381 is needed for
snapshot tests)
```
❯ cargo run -q -- python list --all-versions 3.13
cpython-3.13.2-macos-aarch64-none <download available>
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.13/bin/python3.13
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none <download available>
cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none /Users/zb/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3.13
❯ cargo run -q -- python list --all-versions 3.13 --only-installed
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.13/bin/python3.13
cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none /Users/zb/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3.13
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes#12334
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The examples assume that the packages are in the project root directory.
However, they are nested inside `src`, and the commands in the examples
do not work as intended.
I could not find any related issues.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I tested it by executing the commands on my terminal - Linux and Windows
(PowerShell).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Currently, for users to specify at the command line whether to use
uv-managed or system Python interpreters, they use the
`--python-preference` parameter, which takes four possible values. This
is more complex than necessary since the normal case is to either say
"only managed" or "not managed". This PR hides the old
`--python-preference` parameter from help and documentation and adds two
new flags: `--managed-python` and `--no-managed-python` to capture the
"only managed" and "not managed" cases.
I have successfully tested this locally but currently cannot add
snapshot tests because of problems with distinguishing managed vs.
system interpreters in CI (and non-determinism when run on different
developers' machines). The `--python-preference` test in
`tool-install.rs` is currently ignored for this reason. See #5144 and
#7473.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This has come up a few times, so it seems worth addressing. If you
migrate from a flat layout to a `src` layout or vice versa, we now
invalidate the package metadata.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12047
## Summary
This ended up being more involved than expected. The gist is that we
setup all the packages we want to reinstall upfront (they're passed in
on the command-line); but at that point, we don't have names for all the
packages that the user has specified. (Consider, e.g., `uv pip install
.` -- we don't have a name for `.`, so we can't add it to the list of
`Reinstall` packages.)
Now, `Reinstall` also accepts paths, so we can augment `Reinstall` based
on the user-provided paths.
Closes#12038.
These changes add support for
```
uv python pin 3.12 --global
```
This adds the specified version to a `.python-version` file in the
user-level config directory. uv will now use the user-level version as a
fallback if no version is found in the project directory or its
ancestors.
Closes#4972
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
The command `uv python find >=3.11` doesn't work . The version should be
quoted otherwise the terminal interprets the `>` and pipes output to a
file named `=3.11`. I've used single quotes as used on line 90 of this
file.
## Test Plan
Locally
## Summary
Follow up to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/11888 with added
support for uv tool run.
Changes
* Added functionality for running windows scripts in previous PR was
moved from run.rs to uv_shell::runnable.
* EXE was added as a supported type, this simplified integration across
both uv run and uvx while retaining a backwards compatible behavior and
properly prioritizing .exe over others. Name was adjusted to runnable as
a result to better represent intent.
## Test Plan
New tests added.
## Documentation
Added new documentation.
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11998, a user is attempting to
vendor `pydantic-core`. But when they add `pydantic-core = { path =
"src/foo/vendor/pydantic-core" } `, we're installing it as a virtual
package, since `pydantic-core/pyproject.toml` contains `package =
false`.
This PR allows users to mark dependencies as "explicitly a package" or
"explicitly not a package" (i.e., virtual), as a workaround.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11998.
## Summary
The current wording on the [caching
page](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/concepts/cache/#dynamic-metadata) makes
it sounds like defining `cache-keys` in a project adds to the metadata
considered when caching. However it actually replaces the metadata. So
copying the example using the git commit results in only considering the
git commit, not the pyproject.toml, which is likely not what is
typically desired.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
I need to self-review this still.
Updates the "Locking and syncing" page to actually have content on
syncing — which was the original intent, the rest of this file was just
copied out of the "Projects" page when I split it into multiple pages.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ed Morley <501702+edmorley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fixes readme typo in syntax of environments in `pyproject.toml`
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
n/a
Initially it seemed like `app.py` might be slightly more desirable but
people seem to overwhelmingly favour `main.py` as a good "generic" name.
Fixes#7782
