## Summary
I'm inferring that these are like... the older tag format? See, e.g.:
```
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp27-pypy_73-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp27-pypy_73-manylinux2010_x86_64.whl
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp36-pypy36_pp73-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp36-pypy36_pp73-manylinux2010_x86_64.whl
```
## Summary
This PR modifies the lockfile to omit versions for source trees that use
`dynamic` versioning, thereby enabling projects to use dynamic
versioning with `uv.lock`.
Prior to this change, dynamic versioning was largely incompatible with
locking, especially for popular tools like `setuptools_scm` -- in that
case, every commit bumps the version, so every commit invalidates the
committed lockfile.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7533.
## Summary
I previously made this required, but we now need to be able to create
these from a lockfile that _omits_ versions for dynamic source trees.
They should still be present in most cases, but it's best-effort.
## Summary
After we resolve, we filter out any wheels that aren't applicable for
the target platforms. So, e.g., we remove macOS wheels if we find that
the user only asked to solve for Windows.
This PR extends the same logic to architectures, so that we filter out
ARM-only wheels when the user is only solving for x86, etc.
Closes#10571.
## Summary
This PR extends the thinking in #10525 to platform tags, and then uses
the structured tag enums everywhere, rather than passing around strings.
I think this is a big improvement! It means we're no longer doing ad hoc
tag parsing all over the place.
## Summary
The idea here is to show both (1) an example of a compatible tag and (2)
the tags that were available, whenever we fail to resolve due to an
abscence of matching wheels.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2777.
## Summary
If you have a dependency with a marker, and you add a constraint, it
causes us to _always_ fork, because we represent the constraint as a
second dependency with the marker repeated (and, therefore, we have two
requirements of the same name, both with markers). I don't think we
should fork here -- and in the end it's leading to this undesirable
resolution: #10481.
I tried to change constraints such that we just _reuse_ and augment the
initial requirement, but that has a fairly negative effect on error
messages: #10489. So this fix seems a bit better to me.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10481.
N.B. After fixing #10430, `ArcStr` became the fastest implementation
(and the gains were significantly reduced, down to 1-2%). See:
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/10453#issuecomment-2583344414.
## Summary
I tried out a variety of small string crates, but `Arc<str>`
outperformed them, giving a ~10% speed-up:
```console
❯ hyperfine "../arcstr lock" "../flexstr lock" "uv lock" "../arc lock" "../compact_str lock" --prepare "rm -f uv.lock" --min-runs 50 --warmup 20
Benchmark 1: ../arcstr lock
Time (mean ± σ): 304.6 ms ± 2.3 ms [User: 302.9 ms, System: 117.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 299.0 ms … 311.3 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 2: ../flexstr lock
Time (mean ± σ): 319.2 ms ± 1.7 ms [User: 317.7 ms, System: 118.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 316.8 ms … 323.3 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 3: uv lock
Time (mean ± σ): 330.6 ms ± 1.5 ms [User: 328.1 ms, System: 139.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 326.6 ms … 334.2 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 4: ../arc lock
Time (mean ± σ): 303.0 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 301.6 ms, System: 118.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 300.3 ms … 305.3 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 5: ../compact_str lock
Time (mean ± σ): 320.4 ms ± 2.0 ms [User: 318.7 ms, System: 120.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 317.3 ms … 326.7 ms 50 runs
Summary
../arc lock ran
1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than ../arcstr lock
1.05 ± 0.01 times faster than ../flexstr lock
1.06 ± 0.01 times faster than ../compact_str lock
1.09 ± 0.01 times faster than uv lock
```
## Summary
This appears to be a consistent 1% performance improvement and should
also reduce memory quite a bit. We've also decided to use these for
markers, so it's nice to use the same optimization here.
```
❯ hyperfine "./uv pip compile --universal scripts/requirements/airflow.in" "./arcstr pip compile --universal scripts/requirements/airflow.in" --min-runs 50 --warmup 20
Benchmark 1: ./uv pip compile --universal scripts/requirements/airflow.in
Time (mean ± σ): 136.3 ms ± 4.0 ms [User: 139.1 ms, System: 241.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 131.5 ms … 149.5 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 2: ./arcstr pip compile --universal scripts/requirements/airflow.in
Time (mean ± σ): 134.9 ms ± 3.2 ms [User: 137.6 ms, System: 239.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 130.1 ms … 151.8 ms 50 runs
Summary
./arcstr pip compile --universal scripts/requirements/airflow.in ran
1.01 ± 0.04 times faster than ./uv pip compile --universal scripts/requirements/airflow.in
```
It turns out that we use `UniversalMarker::pep508` quite a bit. To the
point that it makes sense to pre-compute it when constructing a
`UniversalMarker`.
This still isn't necessarily the fastest thing we can do, but this
results in a major speed-up and `without_extras` no longer shows up for
me in a profile.
Motivating benchmarks. First, from #10430:
```
$ hyperfine 'rm -f uv.lock && uv lock' 'rm -f uv.lock && uv-ag-optimize-without-extras lock'
Benchmark 1: rm -f uv.lock && uv lock
Time (mean ± σ): 408.3 ms ± 276.6 ms [User: 333.6 ms, System: 111.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 316.9 ms … 1195.3 ms 10 runs
Warning: The first benchmarking run for this command was significantly slower than the rest (1.195 s). This could be caused by (filesystem) caches that were not filled until after the first run. You should consider using the '--warmup' option to fill those caches before the actual benchmark. Alternatively, use the '--prepare' option to clear the caches before each timing run.
Benchmark 2: rm -f uv.lock && uv-ag-optimize-without-extras lock
Time (mean ± σ): 209.4 ms ± 2.2 ms [User: 209.8 ms, System: 103.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 206.1 ms … 213.4 ms 14 runs
Summary
rm -f uv.lock && uv-ag-optimize-without-extras lock ran
1.95 ± 1.32 times faster than rm -f uv.lock && uv lock
```
And now from #10438:
```
$ hyperfine 'uv pip compile requirements.in -c constraints.txt --universal --no-progress --python-version 3.8 --offline > /dev/null' 'uv-ag-optimize-without-extras pip compile requirements.in -c constraints.txt --universal --no-progress --python-version 3.8 --offline > /dev/null'
Benchmark 1: uv pip compile requirements.in -c constraints.txt --universal --no-progress --python-version 3.8 --offline > /dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 12.718 s ± 0.052 s [User: 12.818 s, System: 0.140 s]
Range (min … max): 12.650 s … 12.815 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: uv-ag-optimize-without-extras pip compile requirements.in -c constraints.txt --universal --no-progress --python-version 3.8 --offline > /dev/null
Time (mean ± σ): 419.5 ms ± 6.7 ms [User: 434.7 ms, System: 100.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 412.7 ms … 434.3 ms 10 runs
Summary
uv-ag-optimize-without-extras pip compile requirements.in -c constraints.txt --universal --no-progress --python-version 3.8 --offline > /dev/null ran
30.32 ± 0.50 times faster than uv pip compile requirements.in -c constraints.txt --universal --no-progress --python-version 3.8 --offline > /dev/null
```
Fixes#10430, Fixes#10438
## Summary
If a user provides a constraint like `flask==3.0.0`, that gets expanded
to `[3.0.0, 3.0.0+[max])`. So it's not a _singleton_, but it should be
treated as such for the purposes of prioritization, since in practice it
will almost always map to a single version.
## Summary
The issue here is that we add `urllib3{python_full_version >= '3.8'}` as
a dependency, then `requests{python_full_version >= '3.8'}`, which adds
`urllib3`, but at that point, we haven't expanded
`urllib3{python_full_version >= '3.8'}`, so we "lose" the singleton
constraint. The solution is to ensure that we visit proxies eagerly, so
that we accumulate constraints as early as possible.
Closes
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10425#issuecomment-2580324578.
## Summary
This PR revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7827 to improve
tool resolutions such that, if the resolution fails, and the selected
interpreter doesn't match the required Python version from the solve, we
attempt to re-solve with a newly-discovered interpreter that _does_
match the required Python version.
For now, we attempt to choose a Python interpreter that's greater than
the inferred `requires-python`, but compatible with the same Python
minor. This helps avoid successive failures for cases like Posting,
where choosing Python 3.13 fails because it has a dependency that lacks
source distributions and doesn't publish any Python 3.13 wheels. We
should further improve the strategy to solve _that_ case too, but this
is at least the more conservative option...
In short, if you do `uv tool instal posting`, and we find Python 3.8 on
your machine, we'll detect that `requires-python: >=3.11`, then search
for the latest Python 3.11 interpreter and re-resolve.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6381.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10282.
## Test Plan
The following should succeed:
```
cargo run python uninstall --all
cargo run python install 3.8
cargo run tool install posting
```
In the logs, we see:
```
...
DEBUG No compatible version found for: posting
DEBUG Refining interpreter with: Python >=3.11, <3.12
DEBUG Searching for Python >=3.11, <3.12 in managed installations or search path
DEBUG Searching for managed installations at `/Users/crmarsh/.local/share/uv/python`
DEBUG Skipping incompatible managed installation `cpython-3.8.20-macos-aarch64-none`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3` (search path)
DEBUG Skipping interpreter at `/opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13` from search path: does not satisfy request `>=3.11, <3.12`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.11.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11` (search path)
DEBUG Re-resolving with Python 3.11.7
DEBUG Using request timeout of 30s
DEBUG Solving with installed Python version: 3.11.7
DEBUG Solving with target Python version: >=3.11.7
DEBUG Adding direct dependency: posting*
DEBUG Searching for a compatible version of posting (*)
...
```
Ref https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10344
Not a performance optimization, but the function had become too large.
No logic changes, just code moving around. Looks slightly better when
ignoring whitespace changes.
It's still too complex but i haven't found an apt simplification.
## Summary
When `--upgrade` is provided, we should retain already-installed
packages _if_ they're newer than whatever is available from the
registry.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10089.
## Summary
Sort of undecided on this. These are already stored as `dyn Reporter` in
each struct, so we're already using dynamic dispatch in that sense. But
all the methods take `impl Reporter`. This is sometimes nice (the
callsites are simpler?), but it also means that in practice, you often
_can't_ pass `None` to these methods that accept `Option<impl
Reporter>`, because Rust can't infer the generic type.
Anyway, this adds more consistency and simplifies the setup by using
`Arc<dyn Reporter>` everywhere.
## Summary
This PR extends #10046 to also handle architectures, which allows us to
correctly include `2.5.1` on the `cu124` index for ARM Linux.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9655.
