## Summary
This PR enables `uv sync --all-packages` to sync all packages in a
workspace. It removes a common use-case for the legacy non-`[project]`
packages that we're trying to move away from.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8724.
Updates `uv python install` to link `python3.x` in the executable
directory (i.e., `~/.local/bin`) to the the managed interpreter path.
Includes
- #8569
- #8571
Remaining work
- #8663
- #8650
- Add an opt-out setting and flag
- Update documentation
Refs:
- #8626
## Summary
Current documentation incorrectly suggests that the macOS cache
directory location is `$HOME/Library/Caches/uv`, but that changed in:
- #5806
Updates docs to say this instead:
> <p>Defaults to <code>$HOME/.cache/uv</code> on macOS,
<code>$XDG_CACHE_HOME/uv</code> or <code>$HOME/.cache/uv</code> on
Linux, and <code>%LOCALAPPDATA%\uv\cache</code> on Windows. The <code>uv
cache dir</code> command will show the location of the cache
directory.</p>
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
The changes in this commit introduce the `UV_NO_PROGRESS` environment
variable as an alternative way to control progress output suppression in
uv-cli, equivalent to using the `--no-progress` flag. This enhancement
simplifies configuration in CI environments and automated scripts by
eliminating the need to detect whether the script is running in a CI
environment.
Previously, disabling progress output required either passing the
`--no-progress` flag directly or implementing script logic to detect CI
environments and conditionally add the flag. With this change, users can
now simply set `UV_NO_PROGRESS=true` in their environment to achieve the
same effect.
The changes include:
- Adding the `UV_NO_PROGRESS` environment variable to the `EnvVars`
struct in `crates/uv-static/src/env_vars.rs`.
- Updating the `GlobalArgs` struct in `crates/uv-cli/src/lib.rs` to
include a new `no_progress` field that is bound to the `UV_NO_PROGRESS`
environment variable.
- Adding documentation for the new `UV_NO_PROGRESS` environment variable
in `docs/configuration/environment.md`.
## Test Plan
After creating a uv project using `uv init` in a temp directory in this
project:
```
cargo run cache clean && cargo run venv && UV_NO_PROGRESS=false cargo run sync
cargo run cache clean && cargo run venv && cargo run sync
```
produce the expected default behavior
```
cargo run cache clean && cargo run venv && UV_NO_PROGRESS=false cargo run sync
```
produces the same behavior as having the `--no-progress` flag.
Part of #8090
Adds the ability to include a group (`--group`) in the sync or _only_
sync a group (`--only-group`). Includes all groups in the resolution,
which will have the same limitations as extras as described in #6981.
There's a great deal of refactoring of the "development" concept into
"groups" behind the scenes that I am continuing to defer here to
minimize the diff.
Additionally, this does not yet resolve interactions with the existing
`dev` group — we'll tackle that separately as well. I probably won't
merge the stack until that design is resolved. The current proposal is
that we'll just "combine' the `dev-dependencies` contents into the `dev`
group.
Part of #8090
Adds the ability to add and remove dependencies from arbitrary groups
using `uv add` and `uv remove`. Does not include resolving with the new
dependencies — tackling that in #8110.
Additionally, this does not yet resolve interactions with the existing
`dev` group — we'll tackle that separately as well. I probably won't
merge the stack until that design is resolved.
## Summary
These two sentences in the docs for `--publish-url` seem to basically be
duplicates:
3eda248ef5/crates/uv-cli/src/lib.rs (L4616-L4618)
I found the first to be easier to read, so this commit removes the
second.
## Test Plan
No tests, change is docs-only.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix the flag description: `to detect and with` --> `to detect packages
with`
This PR adds support for `uv lock --dry-run`, as described in issue
#6408.
One thing to note: this functionality, as implemented, isn't limited to
`-U` (if someone adds a dependency to the project's `pyproject.toml`,
the plan will include these changes).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds a first-class API for defining registry indexes, beyond our
existing `--index-url` and `--extra-index-url` setup.
Specifically, you now define indexes like so in a `uv.toml` or
`pyproject.toml` file:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
```
You can also provide indexes via `--index` and `UV_INDEX`, and override
the default index with `--default-index` and `UV_DEFAULT_INDEX`.
### Index priority
Indexes are prioritized in the order in which they're defined, such that
the first-defined index has highest priority.
Indexes are also inherited from parent configuration (e.g., the
user-level `uv.toml`), but are placed after any indexes in the current
project, matching our semantics for other array-based configuration
values.
You can mix `--index` and `--default-index` with the legacy
`--index-url` and `--extra-index-url` settings; the latter two are
merely treated as unnamed `[[tool.uv.index]]` entries.
### Index pinning
If an index includes a name (which is optional), it can then be
referenced via `tool.uv.sources`:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = { index = "pytorch" }
```
If an index is marked as `explicit = true`, it can _only_ be used via
such references, and will never be searched implicitly:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
explicit = true
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = { index = "pytorch" }
```
Indexes defined outside of the current project (e.g., in the user-level
`uv.toml`) can _not_ be explicitly selected.
(As of now, we only support using a single index for a given
`tool.uv.sources` definition.)
### Default index
By default, we include PyPI as the default index. This remains true even
if the user defines a `[[tool.uv.index]]` -- PyPI is still used as a
fallback. You can mark an index as `default = true` to (1) disable the
use of PyPI, and (2) bump it to the bottom of the prioritized list, such
that it's used only if a package does not exist on a prior index:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
default = true
```
### Name reuse
If a name is reused, the higher-priority index with that name is used,
while the lower-priority indexes are ignored entirely.
For example, given:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121"
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "pytorch"
url = "https://test.pypi.org/simple"
```
The `https://test.pypi.org/simple` index would be ignored entirely,
since it's lower-priority than `https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121`
but shares the same name.
Closes#171.
## Future work
- Users should be able to provide authentication for named indexes via
environment variables.
- `uv add` should automatically write `--index` entries to the
`pyproject.toml` file.
- Users should be able to provide multiple indexes for a given package,
stratified by platform:
```toml
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = [
{ index = "cpu", markers = "sys_platform == 'darwin'" },
{ index = "gpu", markers = "sys_platform != 'darwin'" },
]
```
- Users should be able to specify a proxy URL for a given index, to
avoid writing user-specific URLs to a lockfile:
```toml
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "test"
url = "https://private.org/simple"
proxy = "http://<omitted>/pypi/simple"
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
First off, congratulations on the 0.3 release! The PEP 723 standalone
scripts support is awesome, and I can already imagine a long tail of
little scripts of my own that would benefit from this functionality.
## Background
I really like the Deno CLI's support for running and installing remote
scripts.
```
deno run <url>
```
```
deno install --name foo <url>
```
I can see parallels with `uv run` and `uvx`. After mentioning this on
Discord, @zanieb suggested I could take a stab at a PR to implement
similar functionality for uv.
## Summary
This PR attempts to add support for executing remote standalone scripts
directly with `uv run`. While this is already possible by downloading
the script (i.e., via curl/wget) and then using uv run, having direct
support would be convenient.
The proposed functionality is:
```sh
uv run <url>
```
Another addition/alternative could be to support running scripts via
stdin:
```sh
curl -sL <url> | uv run -
```
But that is not implemented in this PR.
## Test Plan
I noticed that GitHub and `files.pythonhosted.org` URLs are used in some
of the tests. I've created a personal [GitHub
Gist](https://gist.github.com/manzt/cb24f3066c32983672025b04b9f98d1f)
with the example from PEP 723 for now to test this functionality.
~However, I couldn't figure out how to get the `with_snapshot` config
filter to filter out the tempfile path, so the test is currently
failing. Any assistance with this would be appreciated.~
## Notes
I'm not totally pleased with the implementation of this PR. I think it
would be better to handle the case earlier (and probably reuse the
cache), and avoid mutation, but since run command requires a local path
this was the simplest implementation I could come up with.
I know that performance is paramount with uv so I totally understand if
this requires a different approach or something more explicit to avoid
"inferring" the path. I'm just taking this as an opportunity to learn a
little more Rust and acquaint myself with the code base. cheers!
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <jamslam@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kemal Akkoyun <kakkoyun@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds the ability to list available scripts in the environment
when `uv run` is invoked without any arguments.
It somewhat mimics the behavior of `rye run` command
(See https://rye.astral.sh/guide/commands/run).
This is an attempt to fix#4024.
## Test Plan
I added test cases. The CI pipeline should pass.
### Manuel Tests
```shell
❯ uv run
Provide a command or script to invoke with `uv run <command>` or `uv run script.py`.
The following scripts are available:
normalizer
python
python3
python3.12
See `uv run --help` for more information.
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Kemal Akkoyun <kakkoyun@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Improve hints when using the simple index URL instead of the upload URL
in `uv publish`. This is the most common confusion when publishing, so
we give it some extra care and put it more centrally in the CLI help.
Fixes#7860
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This PR adds support for the `UV_FIND_LINKS` environment variable as an
alternative to the `--find-links` command-line option, as requested in
#1839.
## Test Plan
A unit test was added to validate that setting `UV_FIND_LINKS` provided
the same result as a link provided with the `--find-links` command-line
option.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
I have a workflow where I want use `uv` as a dependency solver only, and
manage my environments with external tooling (Nix).
## Test Plan
Manually tested. Automated testing seems excessive for such a trivial
change.
## Problems
It's still not as useful as I'd like it to be.
`uv` uncondtionally creates a virtual environment, something I would
expect that `--no-sync` should disable.
This looks a bit more tricky to achieve and I'm not sure about how to
best structure it.
## Summary
This is another attempt using `module: bool` instead of `module:
Option<String>` following #7322.
The original PR can't be reopened after a force-push to the branch, I've
created this new PR.
Resolves#6638
## Summary
Resolves#7705
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and tested locally.
The snapshots were unstable due to the packages being built in a
non-deterministic order, so I used the quiet flag to suppress the
output.
Another question is whether we should label the build output to indicate
which package it belongs to?
## Summary
Similiar to `cargo init --vcs <VCS>`, this PR adds the `--vcs <VCS>`
flag for `uv init`, allowing to create a version control system during
initialization. By default, `uv init` will create a Git repository if
the `--vcs` flag is not provided. Use `--vcs none` to disable this
feature.
Currently, only Git is supported. While Cargo also supports hg, pijul,
and fossil, this initial PR only includes Git. We can add more later if
there are any user requests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for ```uv init --script```, as defined in issue
#7402 (started working on this before I saw jbvsmo's PR). Wanted to
highlight a few decisions I made that differ from the existing PR:
1. ```--script``` takes a path, instead of a path/name. This potentially
leads to a little ambiguity (I can certainly elaborate in the docs,
lmk!), but strictly allowing ```uv init --script path/to/script.py```
felt a little more natural than allowing for ```uv init --script path/to
--name script.py``` (which I also thought would prompt more questions
for users, such as should the name include the .py extension?)
2. The request is processed immediately in the ```init``` method,
sharing logic in resolving which python version to use with ```uv add
--script```. This made more sense to me — since scripts are meant to
operate in isolation, they shouldn't consider the context of an
encompassing package should one exist (I also think this decision makes
the relative codepaths for scripts/packages easier to follow).
3. No readme — readme felt a little excessive for a script, but I can of
course add it in!
---------
Co-authored-by: João Bernardo Oliveira <jbvsmo@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for upgrading the build environment of tools with
the addition of a ```--python``` argument to ```uv upgrade```, as
specified in #7471.
Some things to note:
- I added support for individual packages — I didn't think there was a
good reason for ```--python``` to only apply to all packages
- Upgrading with ```--python``` also upgrades the package itself — I
think this is fair as if a user wants to _strictly_ switch the version
of Python being used to build a tool's environment they can use ```uv
install```. This behavior can of course be modified if others don't
agree!
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6297.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7471.
## Summary
`uv run --project ./path/to/project` now uses the provided directory as
the starting point for any file discovery. However, relative paths are
still resolved relative to the current working directory.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5613.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
close#6272
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
As in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6262
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
