## Summary
We currently accept `--index-url /path/to/index` on the command line,
but confusingly, not in `requirements.txt`. This PR just brings the two
in sync.
## Test Plan
New snapshot tests.
## Summary
This is what I consider to be the "real" fix for #8072. We now treat
directory and path URLs as separate `ParsedUrl` types and
`RequirementSource` types. This removes a lot of `.is_dir()` forking
within the `ParsedUrl::Path` arms and makes some states impossible
(e.g., you can't have a `.whl` path that is editable). It _also_ fixes
the `direct_url.json` for direct URLs that refer to files. Previously,
we wrote out to these as if they were installed as directories, which is
just wrong.
By splitting `path` into a lockable, relative (or absolute) and an
absolute installable path and by splitting between urls and paths by
dist type, we can store relative paths in the lockfile.
## Summary
Given `install -e dagster`, we need to assume that the user meant
`install -e ./dagster`, even though `install dagster` should _not_ be
treated as `install ./dagster`. I suspect pip will change this in the
future (since `pip install dagster` does _not_ meant `pip install
./dagster`) but for now it's what users expect.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3994.
## Summary
This will help prevent bugs like #3934 by unifying the implementations
for editables and non-editable unnamed requirements. Specifically, both
of these now go through the same parsing paths and use the same struct
representations (with the exception that the editable flag is flipped in
the first case):
```
-e ./foo/bar
./foo/bar
```
We also now support PEP 508 in editable URLs. It turns out this is just
a limitation in pip, so it's correct to support it. For example, this
now works:
```
-e black[d] @ file://${PROJECT_ROOT}/scripts/packages/black_editable
```
Closes#3941.
Closes#3942.
With the change, we remove the special casing of workspace dependencies
and resolve `tool.uv` for all git and directory distributions. This
gives us support for non-editable workspace dependencies and path
dependencies in other workspaces. It removes a lot of special casing
around workspaces. These changes are the groundwork for supporting
`tool.uv` with dynamic metadata.
The basis for this change is moving `Requirement` from
`distribution-types` to `pypi-types` and the lowering logic from
`uv-requirements` to `uv-distribution`. This changes should be split out
in separate PRs.
I've included an example workspace `albatross-root-workspace2` where
`bird-feeder` depends on `a` from another workspace `ab`. There's a
bunch of failing tests and regressed error messages that still need
fixing. It does fix the audited package count for the workspace tests.
## Summary
There are a few behavior changes in here:
- We now enforce `--require-hashes` for editables, like pip. So if you
use `--require-hashes` with an editable requirement, we'll reject it. I
could change this if it seems off.
- We now treat source tree requirements, editable or not (e.g., both `-e
./black` and `./black`) as if `--refresh` is always enabled. This
doesn't mean that we _always_ rebuild them; but if you pass
`--reinstall`, then yes, we always rebuild them. I think this is an
improvement and is close to how editables work today.
Closes#3844.
Closes#2695.
When parsing requirements from any source, directly parse the url parts
(and reject unsupported urls) instead of parsing url parts at a later
stage. This removes a bunch of error branches and concludes the work
parsing url parts once and passing them around everywhere.
Many usages of the assembled `VerbatimUrl` remain, but these can be
removed incrementally.
Please review commit-by-commit.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3715.
## Test Plan
```
❯ echo "/../test" | cargo run pip compile -
error: Couldn't parse requirement in `-` at position 0
Caused by: path could not be normalized: /../test
/../test
^^^^^^^^
❯ echo "-e /../test" | cargo run pip compile -
error: Invalid URL in `-`: `/../test`
Caused by: path could not be normalized: /../test
Caused by: cannot normalize a relative path beyond the base directory
```
## Summary
If a user includes markers after an editable, we now ignore them (rather
than including them in the parsed URL). This matches pip's behavior. In
the future, we could further improve by respecting them, but that
_would_ be a deviation from pip.
For example, given:
```
-e ./scripts/packages/black_editable ; python_version >= "3.9" and python_ver
```
We now split at the first whitespace (just before the `;`), parse
everything before, and throw out everything after.
This logic also extends to extras. So given:
```
-e ./scripts/packages/black_editable[dev, colorama]
```
We'll now parse this as the URL
`./scripts/packages/black_editable[dev,`, and throw out ` colorama]`.
Instead, you need to do:
```
-e ./scripts/packages/black_editable[dev,colorama]
```
(I.e., remove the space.)
This _also_ matches pip's behavior. I could "fix" this but I'm unsure if
I should -- it means requirements files will be parseable by uv that
won't work with pip. Open to input. My gut reaction is that we _should_
properly support `-e ./scripts/packages/black_editable[dev, colorama]`
even if pip would reject it, but `requirements.txt` is
implementation-defined so it'd be a "deviation".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3604.
## Summary
Ensures that we track the origins for requirements regardless of whether
they come from `pyproject.toml` or `setup.py` or `setup.cfg`.
Closes#3480.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1343. This is kinda a first
draft at the moment, but does at least mostly work locally (barring some
bits of the test suite that seem to not work for me in general).
## Test Plan
Mostly running the existing tests and checking the revised output is
sane
## Outstanding issues
Most of these come down to "AFAIK, the existing tools don't support
these patterns, but `uv` does" and so I'm not sure there's an existing
good answer here! Most of the answers so far are "whatever was easiest
to build"
- [x] ~~Is "-r pyproject.toml" correct? Should it show something else or
get skipped entirely~~ No it wasn't. Fixed in
3044fa8b86
- [ ] If the requirements file is stdin, that just gets skipped. Should
it be recorded?
- [ ] Overrides get shown as "--override<override.txt>". Correct?
- [x] ~~Some of the tests (e.g.
`dependency_excludes_non_contiguous_range_of_compatible_versions`) make
assumptions about the order of package versions being outputted, which
this PR breaks. I'm not sure if the text is fairly arbitrary and can be
replaced or whether the behaviour needs fixing?~~ - fixed by removing
the custom pubgrub PartialEq/Hash
- [ ] Are all the `TrackedFromStr` et al changes needed, or is there an
easier way? I don't think so, I think it's necessary to track these sort
of things fairly comprehensively to make this feature work, and this
sort of invasive change feels necessary, but happy to be proved wrong
there :)
- [x] ~~If you have a requirement coming in from two or more different
requirements files only one turns up. I've got a closed-source example
for this (can go into more detail if needed), mostly consisting of a
complicated set of common deps creating a larger set. It's a rarer case,
but worth considering.~~ 042432b200
- [ ] Doesn't add annotations for `setup.py` yet
- This is pretty hard, as the correct location to insert the path is
`crates/pypi-types/src/metadata.rs`'s `parse_pkg_info`, which as it's
based off a source distribution has entirely thrown away such matters as
"where did this package requirement get built from". Could add "`built
package name`" as a dep, but that's a little odd.
## Introduction
PEP 621 is limited. Specifically, it lacks
* Relative path support
* Editable support
* Workspace support
* Index pinning or any sort of index specification
The semantics of urls are a custom extension, PEP 440 does not specify
how to use git references or subdirectories, instead pip has a custom
stringly format. We need to somehow support these while still stying
compatible with PEP 621.
## `tool.uv.source`
Drawing inspiration from cargo, poetry and rye, we add `tool.uv.sources`
or (for now stub only) `tool.uv.workspace`:
```toml
[project]
name = "albatross"
version = "0.1.0"
dependencies = [
"tqdm >=4.66.2,<5",
"torch ==2.2.2",
"transformers[torch] >=4.39.3,<5",
"importlib_metadata >=7.1.0,<8; python_version < '3.10'",
"mollymawk ==0.1.0"
]
[tool.uv.sources]
tqdm = { git = "https://github.com/tqdm/tqdm", rev = "cc372d09dcd5a5eabdc6ed4cf365bdb0be004d44" }
importlib_metadata = { url = "https://github.com/python/importlib_metadata/archive/refs/tags/v7.1.0.zip" }
torch = { index = "torch-cu118" }
mollymawk = { workspace = true }
[tool.uv.workspace]
include = [
"packages/mollymawk"
]
[tool.uv.indexes]
torch-cu118 = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu118"
```
See `docs/specifying_dependencies.md` for a detailed explanation of the
format. The basic gist is that `project.dependencies` is what ends up on
pypi, while `tool.uv.sources` are your non-published additions. We do
support the full range or PEP 508, we just hide it in the docs and
prefer the exploded table for easier readability and less confusing with
actual url parts.
This format should eventually be able to subsume requirements.txt's
current use cases. While we will continue to support the legacy `uv pip`
interface, this is a piece of the uv's own top level interface. Together
with `uv run` and a lockfile format, you should only need to write
`pyproject.toml` and do `uv run`, which generates/uses/updates your
lockfile behind the scenes, no more pip-style requirements involved. It
also lays the groundwork for implementing index pinning.
## Changes
This PR implements:
* Reading and lowering `project.dependencies`,
`project.optional-dependencies` and `tool.uv.sources` into a new
requirements format, including:
* Git dependencies
* Url dependencies
* Path dependencies, including relative and editable
* `pip install` integration
* Error reporting for invalid `tool.uv.sources`
* Json schema integration (works in pycharm, see below)
* Draft user-level docs (see `docs/specifying_dependencies.md`)
It does not implement:
* No `pip compile` testing, deprioritizing towards our own lockfile
* Index pinning (stub definitions only)
* Development dependencies
* Workspace support (stub definitions only)
* Overrides in pyproject.toml
* Patching/replacing dependencies
One technically breaking change is that we now require user provided
pyproject.toml to be valid wrt to PEP 621. Included files still fall
back to PEP 517. That means `pip install -r requirements.txt` requires
it to be valid while `pip install -r requirements.txt` with `-e .` as
content falls back to PEP 517 as before.
## Implementation
The `pep508` requirement is replaced by a new `UvRequirement` (name up
for bikeshedding, not particularly attached to the uv prefix). The still
existing `pep508_rs::Requirement` type is a url format copied from pip's
requirements.txt and doesn't appropriately capture all features we
want/need to support. The bulk of the diff is changing the requirement
type throughout the codebase.
We still use `VerbatimUrl` in many places, where we would expect a
parsed/decomposed url type, specifically:
* Reading core metadata except top level pyproject.toml files, we fail a
step later instead if the url isn't supported.
* Allowed `Urls`.
* `PackageId` with a custom `CanonicalUrl` comparison, instead of
canonicalizing urls eagerly.
* `PubGrubPackage`: We eventually convert the `VerbatimUrl` back to a
`Dist` (`Dist::from_url`), instead of remembering the url.
* Source dist types: We use verbatim url even though we know and require
that these are supported urls we can and have parsed.
I tried to make improve the situation be replacing `VerbatimUrl`, but
these changes would require massive invasive changes (see e.g.
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/3253). A main problem is the ref
`VersionOrUrl` and applying overrides, which assume the same
requirement/url type everywhere. In its current form, this PR increases
this tech debt.
I've tried to split off PRs and commits, but the main refactoring is
still a single monolith commit to make it compile and the tests pass.
## Demo
Adding
d1ae3b85d5/pyproject.json
as json schema (v7) to pycharm for `pyproject.toml`, you can try the IDE
support already:
[dove.webm](c293c272-c80b-459d-8c95-8c46a8d198a1)
In *some* places in our crates, `serde` (and `rkyv`) are optional
dependencies. I believe this was done out of reasons of "good sense,"
that is, it follows a Rust ecosystem pattern where serde integration
tends to be an opt-in crate feature. (And similarly for `rkyv`.)
However, ultimately, `uv` itself requires `serde` and `rkyv` to
function. Since our crates are strictly internal, there are limited
consumers for our crates without `serde` (and `rkyv`) enabled. I think
one possibility is that optional `serde` (and `rkyv`) integration means
that someone can do this:
cargo test -p pep440_rs
And this will run tests _without_ `serde` or `rkyv` enabled. That in
turn could lead to faster iteration time by reducing compile times. But,
I'm not sure this is worth supporting. The iterative compilation times
of
individual crates are probably fast enough in debug mode, even with
`serde` and `rkyv` enabled. Namely, `serde` and `rkyv` themselves
shouldn't need to be re-compiled in most cases. On `main`:
```
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.685
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.278s
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 3.948s
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 0.321s
```
So while a from-scratch build does take significantly longer, an
incremental build is about the same.
The benefit of doing this change is two-fold:
1. It brings out crates into alignment with "reality." In particular,
some crates were _implicitly_ relying on `serde` being enabled
without explicitly declaring it. This technically means that our
`Cargo.toml`s were wrong in some cases, but it is hard to observe it
because of feature unification in a Cargo workspace.
2. We no longer need to deal with the cognitive burden of writing
`#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", ...)]` everywhere.
Previously, uv-auth would fail to compile due to a missing process
feature. I chose to make all tokio features we use top level features,
so we can share the tokio cache between all test invocations.
## Summary
I'm surprised we haven't hit this before, but apparently we don't allow
comments after `--index-url`, `-e` entries, etc., in the
requirements.txt parser.
Closes#3011.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Needed to prevent circular dependencies in my toolchain work (#2931). I
think this is probably a reasonable change as we move towards persistent
configuration too?
Unfortunately `BuildIsolation` needs to be in `uv-types` to avoid
circular dependencies still. We might be able to resolve that in the
future.
## Summary
`uv` was failing to install requirements defined like:
```
file://localhost/Users/crmarsh/Downloads/iniconfig-2.0.0-py3-none-any.whl
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2652.
## Summary
First piece of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/313. In order to
support unnamed requirements, we need to be able to parse them in
`requirements-txt`, which in turn means that we need to introduce a new
type that's distinct from `pep508::Requirement`, given that these
_aren't_ PEP 508-compatible requirements.
Part of: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/313.
Scott schafer got me the idea: We can avoid repeating the path for
workspaces dependencies everywhere if we declare them in the virtual
package once and treat them as workspace dependencies from there on.
## Summary
This PR changes our user-facing representation for paths to use relative
paths, when the path is within the current working directory. This
mirrors what we do in Ruff. (If the path is _outside_ the current
working directory, we print an absolute path.)
Before:
```shell
❯ uv venv .venv2
Using Python 3.12.2 interpreter at: /Users/crmarsh/workspace/uv/.venv/bin/python3
Creating virtualenv at: .venv2
Activate with: source .venv2/bin/activate
```
After:
```shell
❯ cargo run venv .venv2
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.15s
Running `target/debug/uv venv .venv2`
Using Python 3.12.2 interpreter at: .venv/bin/python3
Creating virtualenv at: .venv2
Activate with: source .venv2/bin/activate
```
Note that we still want to use the existing `.simplified_display()`
anywhere that the path is being simplified, but _still_ intended for
machine consumption (e.g., when passing to `.current_dir()`).
## Summary
I tried out `cargo shear` to see if there are any unused dependencies
that `cargo udeps` isn't reporting. It turned out, there are a few. This
PR removes those dependencies.
## Test Plan
`cargo build`
## Summary
This PR ensures that we expand environment variables _before_ sniffing
for the URL scheme (e.g., `file://` vs. `https://` vs. something else).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2375.
## Summary
We now initialize an HTTP client in advance for remote requirements
files. It turns out this adds a significant overhead, even for
operations like auditing the environment (at least on macOS).
This PR makes initialization lazy. After a lot of evaluation, I took the
easiest route, which is: we just pass in `Connectivity`, and then use
the default HTTP client. So we won't respect netrc files and anything
else that we get from our registry client. If we want to keep using the
registry client, we _can_, it's just way more ceremony to pass down a
closure.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2346.
## Test Plan
- Verified that `cargo run pip compile
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ansible/ansible/f1ded0f41759235eb15a7d13dbc3c95dce5d5acd/requirements.txt`
completed without error.
- Verified that `cargo run pip compile
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ansible/ansible/f1ded0f41759235eb15a7d13dbc3c95dce5d5acd/requirements.txt
--offline` failed with an error.
- Verified that `./target/release/uv pip install requests` completed in
0-2ms, rather than hundreds.
This PR tweaks uv to support reading `requirements.txt` regardless of
whether it is encoded as UTF-8 or UTF-16. This is particularly relevant
on Windows where `uv pip freeze > requirements.txt` will likely write a
UTF-16 encoded `requirements.txt` file.
There is some discussion on #1666 where it's suggested that perhaps
we should explicitly not support this. I didn't see that until I
had already put this PR together, but even so, I think it's worth
considering this. UTF-16 is predominant on Windows. It is very easy
to produce a UTF-16 encoded file. Moreover, there is an easy and well
specified way to recognize and transcode UTF-16 encoded data to UTF-8.
I think the downside of this is that it could encourage the use UTF-16
encoded `requirements.txt` files *in addition* to UTF-8 encoded
files, and it would probably be nice to converge and standardize on
one encoding. One possible alternative to this PR is that we provide
a better error message. Another alternative is to ensure that a
`-o/--output` flag exists for all commands (neither `uv pip freeze` nor
`pip freeze` have such a flag) so that users can always write output
to a file without relying on their environment's piping behavior.
(Although this last alternative seems a little sad to me.)
It's also worth noting the [PEP-0508] doesn't seem to mention file
encoding at all. So I think from a "do the standards allow this"
perspective, this change is OK.
Finally, `pip` itself seems to work with UTF-16 encoded
`requirements.txt` files.
I think I personally overall lean towards supporting UTF-16 for
`requirements.txt` files. In part because I think it smoothes out the
UX a little bit, in part because there is no obvious specification
(that I'm aware of) that mandates that these files are UTF-8, and
finally in part because `pip` supports it too.
Fixes#1666, Fixes#2276
[PEP-0508]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0508/
