As described in #15179, there are cases where it can be useful to
reinstall the latest patch on upgrade if it is already installed. Using
this flag, you don't need to know ahead of time if you have the latest
patch already.
Closes#15179.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Uses a <3.10-compatible version of `zip` since the `strict` argument was
[added in 3.10](https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/functions.html#zip)
## Test Plan
I executed the `_matching_parents` function in a local 3.9 environment
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Automated update for Python releases.
This picks up dynamically-linked tkinter/libtcl/libtk, which fixes#6893
and a host of similar issues.
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>
Related to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/15113
The case in the linked issue is that we perhaps should not be allowing
`uv run --with` with system interpreters at all. I think we can consider
that, but the issue highlighted that `uv run --with` for a system
interpreter is broken if the base interpreter has custom site packages.
This generalizes beyond system interpreters so we should probably fix
our overlays.
A little spicy. We could consider this breaking, but I can't think of
what workflow it'd break and it matches the spirit of `--isolated`. This
was requested by @ssbarnea
Revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9130
Previously, we allowed scoping conflicting extras or groups to specific
packages, e.g. ,`{ package = "foo", extra = "bar" }` for a conflict in
`foo[bar]`. Now, we allow dropping the `extra` or `group` bit and using
`{ package = "foo" }` directly which declares a conflict with `foo`'s
production dependencies.
This means you can declare conflicts between workspace members, e.g.:
```
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [[{ package = "foo" }, { package = "bar" }]]
```
would not allow `foo` and `bar` to be installed at the same time.
Similarly, a conflict can be declared between a package and a group:
```
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [[{ package = "foo" }, { group = "lint" }]]
```
which would mean, e.g., that `--only-group lint` would be required for
the invocation.
As with our existing support for conflicting extras, there are
edge-cases here where the resolver will _not_ fail even if there are
conflicts that render a particular install target unusable. There's test
coverage for some of these. We'll still error at install-time when the
conflicting groups are selected. Due to the likelihood of bugs in this
feature, I've marked it as a preview feature.
I would not recommend reading the commits as there's some slop from not
wanting to rebase Andrew's branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
We should definitely not pick up user-level installations unless we
can't find uv anywhere else. Otherwise, e.g., we would find a uv
installed with `pipx install uv` before the one matching the uv module.
We regularly get confusing bug reports where a package sometimes works
and sometimes doesn't and it's not clear to the user why. Ultimately, it
turns out that two packages contain the same module and there is a race
condition when installing the two packages. Usually, it's one of the
opencv-python distributions, but recently it's been z3, too. These error
are completely inscrutable to users.
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10708
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11806
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11659
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13435
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13550
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14030
We now warn for top-level modules (pattern: `<identifier>/__init__.py`)
that collide in a single installation, naming the offending wheels.
Checking for `__init__.py` excludes namespace packages.
Test script:
```
uv venv -q && cargo run -q --profile fast-build pip install --no-progress --link-mode clone opencv-python opencv-contrib-python --no-build --no-deps
uv venv -q && cargo run -q --profile fast-build pip install --no-progress --link-mode copy opencv-python opencv-contrib-python --no-build --no-deps
uv venv -q && cargo run -q --profile fast-build pip install --no-progress --link-mode hardlink opencv-python opencv-contrib-python --no-build --no-deps
uv venv -q && cargo run -q --profile fast-build pip install --no-progress --link-mode symlink opencv-python opencv-contrib-python --no-build --no-deps
```
We currently only catch conflicts in a single installation. Should we
prime the lock database with the site-packages contents, and would that
carry overhead?
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
At some places the virtualenv directory was manually removed instead of
using `remove_virtualenv`.
I also adjusted the error type.
#14985
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Follows https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14181
Two goals here
- Remove duplicated logic and make the search order clear
- Resolve user confusion around the searched directories; we previously
only displayed the last attempt, which we rarely expect to be relevant
## Summary
uv will now reject ZIP files that meet any of the following conditions:
- Multiple local header entries exist for the same file with different
contents.
- A local header entry exists for a file that isn't included in the
end-of-central directory record.
- An entry exists in the end-of-central directory record that does not
have a corresponding local header.
- The ZIP file contains contents after the first end-of-central
directory record.
- The CRC32 doesn't match between the local file header and the
end-of-central directory record.
- The compressed size doesn't match between the local file header and
the end-of-central directory record.
- The uncompressed size doesn't match between the local file header and
the end-of-central directory record.
- The reported central directory offset (in the end-of-central-directory
header) does not match the actual offset.
- The reported ZIP64 end of central directory locator offset does not
match the actual offset.
We also validate the above for files with data descriptors, which we
previously ignored.
Wheels from the most recent releases of the top 15,000 packages on PyPI
have been confirmed to pass these checks, and PyPI will also reject ZIPs
under many of the same conditions (at upload time) in the future.
In rare cases, this validation can be disabled by setting
`UV_INSECURE_NO_ZIP_VALIDATION=1`. Any validations should be reported to
the uv issue tracker and to the upstream package maintainer.
Previously, publish would always use the default retries, now it
respects `UV_HTTP_RETRIES`
Some awkward error handling to avoid pulling anyhow into uv-publish.
Specifically, support `UV_NO_EDITABLE=1 uv export`. It's now also
supported in `uv add`, though it's default there anyway and the env var
exists only for completeness.
Fixes#15103
## Summary
1. Given the upcoming 1.89 update, this bumps uv-trampoline to "~1.87"
(closest nightly) from "~1.86" (closest nightly).
2. Adds additional CI check for arm builds now that runners are
available.
I wasn't sure the MSRV policy applies to uv-trampoline, so I didn't go
for higher than ~1.87 nightly.
This PR also fixes a build issue starting after 1.87 where fma and fmaf
symbols were missing.
Temporarily dded `#[allow(clippy::ptr_eq)]` to `close_handles` as this
lint should not trigger anymore in 1.88 and above.
## Test Plan
Existing tests and local build process. I did not commit the built
binaries for security purposes.
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
Previously, `simplify_conflict_markers` assumed that it can remove all
conflict set together, when we need to look at each conflict set
individually. Specifically, `(platform_machine == 'x86_64' and extra ==
'extra-5-foo-b') or extra == 'extra-5-foo-a'` can't be reduced
`platform_machine == 'x86_64'` only because it reduces to true when both
conflict extras are activated.
This case applied in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14805, where
a jax 0.5.3 version was used for `platform_machine != 'aarch64' or
sys_platform != 'linux'` and the conflict extra `cu128`, but jax 0.7.0
for the conflict extra `cpu`.
Only removing the faulty inference regresses lockfiles to much more
verbose markers. To balance the much more conservative inference, I
added `unify_inference_sets` to simplify cases where all conflict
branches reduce to the same marker.
This still regresses some markers. For example `sys_platform == 'win32'`
regresses to `sys_platform == 'win32' or (extra == 'extra-3-pkg-x1' and
extra == 'extra-3-pkg-x2')` in `extra_inferences`, even through x1 and
x2 conflict and the second conjunction could be simplified away.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14805
"Cached request ... is not storable" doesn't make sense from a user
perspective, it's leaking our internal `CachedClient` abstraction. I
think it makes more sense to talk about this as "Response from ... is
not storable"
## Summary
Make the use of `Self` consistent. Mostly done by running `cargo clippy
--fix -- -A clippy::all -W clippy::use_self`.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
No need.
## Summary
This is an alternative to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14944
that functions a little differently. Rather than adding separate
strategies, you can instead say:
```toml
[tool.uv.extra-build-dependencies]
child = [{ requirement = "anyio", match-runtime = true }]
```
Which will then enforce that `anyio` uses the same version as in the
lockfile.
This fixes a regression from 0.8.0 from
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7934 and follows
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/15059
The regression is from [this
change](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7934/files#diff-c7a660ac39628d5e12f388b0cacc7360affa3d7bb21191184d7ee78489675e83),
which was made because we'd otherwise (with the other changes in that
pull request) _filter out_ managed Python interpreters found in virtual
environments.
When `--system` is used we'll convert the default Python preference of
`managed` to `system` which avoids things like `uv pip install --system`
targeting a managed Python installation.
The basic test is
```
uv python install
uv pip install --system anyio
```
Prior to this change, we'd read a managed interpreter from our managed
installation directory and target that. After this change, without
#15059, we'd read a managed interpreter from the PATH and target that.
Both of those experiences are bad, because the managed interpreters are
marked as externally managed. After this change, with #15059, we
properly target the system interpreter.
Since we use `system` instead of `only-system`, if there is not a system
interpreter we'll still retain our existing behavior and use a managed
interpreter. This should limit breakage from the change. Given the
source of the regression, we could probably use `only-system` here. I
don't feel strongly. I think the main benefit of doing so would be that
we'd omit the check for managed installations in error messages when an
interpreter cannot be found?
We can't really add test coverage here because the test suite always has
externally managed interpreters :)
## Summary
I should've noticed this during review -- my bad -- but it looks like
after lowering, we're converting back to `uv_pep508::Requirement`. This
is mostly okay, but it's lossy for some lowerings. For example, we lose
index pinning. With this PR, we now preserve the lowered types
(`Requirement`).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/15037.
