First, replace all usages in files in-place. I used my editor for this.
If someone wants to add a one-liner that'd be fun.
Then, update directory and file names:
```
# Run twice for nested directories
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
# Update files
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
```
Then add all the files again
```
# Add all the files again
git add crates
git add python/uv
# This one needs a force-add
git add -f crates/uv-trampoline
```
Instead of dropping versions without a compatible distribution, we track
them as incompatibilities in the solver. This implementation follows
patterns established in https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/pull/1290.
This required some significant refactoring of how we track incompatible
distributions. Notably:
- `Option<TagPriority>` is now `WheelCompatibility` which allows us to
track the reason a wheel is incompatible instead of just `None`.
- `Candidate` now has a `CandidateDist` with `Compatible` and
`Incompatibile` variants instead of just `ResolvableDist`; candidates
are not strictly compatible anymore
- `ResolvableDist` was renamed to `CompatibleDist`
- `IncompatibleWheel` was given an ordering implementation so we can
track the "most compatible" (but still incompatible) wheel. This allows
us to collapse the reason a version cannot be used to a single
incompatibility.
- The filtering in the `VersionMap` is retained, we still only store one
incompatible wheel per version. This is sufficient for error reporting.
- A `TagCompatibility` type was added for tracking which part of a wheel
tag is incompatible
- `Candidate::validate_python` moved to
`PythonRequirement::validate_dist`
I am doing more refactoring in #1298 — I think a couple passes will be
necessary to clarify the relationships of these types.
Includes improved error message snapshots for multiple incompatible
Python tag types from #1285 — we should add more scenarios for coverage
of behavior when multiple tags with different levels are present.
## Summary
This PR adds support for PyPy wheels by changing the compatible tags
based on the implementation name and version of the current interpreter.
For now, we only support CPython and PyPy, and explicitly error out when
given other interpreters. (Is this right? Should we just fallback to
CPython tags...? Or skip the ABI-specific tags for unknown
interpreters?)
The logic is based on
4d85340613/src/packaging/tags.py (L247).
Note, however, that `packaging` uses the `EXT_SUFFIX` variable from
`sysconfig`... Instead, I looked at the way that PyPy formats the tags,
and recreated them based on the Python and implementation version. For
example, PyPy wheels look like
`cchardet-2.1.7-pp37-pypy37_pp73-win_amd64.whl` -- so that's `pp37` for
PyPy with Python version 3.7, and then `pypy37_pp73` for PyPy with
Python version 3.7 and PyPy version 7.3.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/1013.
## Test Plan
I tested this manually, but I couldn't find macOS universal PyPy
wheels... So instead I added `cchardet` to a `requirements.in`, ran
`cargo run pip sync requirements.in --index-url
https://pypy.kmtea.eu/simple --verbose`, and added logging to verify
that the platform tags matched (even if the architecture didn't).
## Summary
`interpreter.version()` returns the `python_full_version`, but the
marker variant uses `python_version` instead of `python_full_version` --
so it's omitting the patch.
## Summary
This PR modifies the resolver to treat the Python version as a package,
which allows for better error messages (since we no longer treat
incompatible packages as if they "don't exist at all").
There are a few tricky pieces here...
First, we need to track both the interpreter's Python version and the
_target_ Python version, because we support resolving for other versions
via `--python 3.7`.
Second, we allow using incompatible wheels during resolution, as long as
there's a compatible source distribution. So we still need to test for
`requires-python` compatibility when selecting distributions.
This could use more testing, but it feels like an area where `packse`
would be more productive than writing PyPI tests.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/406.
