## Summary
Right now, if you put `upgrade = false` in a `uv.toml`, then pass
`--upgrade-package numpy` on the CLI, we won't upgrade NumPy. This PR
fixes that interaction by ensuring that when we "combine", we look at
those arguments holistically (i.e., we bundle `upgrade` and
`upgrade-package` into a single struct, which then goes through the
`.combine` logic), rather than combining `upgrade` and `upgrade-package`
independently.
If approved, I then need to add the same thing for `no-build-isolation`,
`reinstall`, `no-build`, and `no-binary`.
Replaces https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14092
Adds `tool.uv.extra-build-dependencies = {package = [dependency, ...]}`
which extends `build-system.requires` during package builds.
These are lowered via workspace sources, are applied to transitive
dependencies, and are included in the wheel cache shard hash.
There are some features we need to follow-up on, but are out of scope
here:
- Preferring locked versions for build dependencies
- Settings for requiring locked versions for build depencies
There are some quality of life follow-ups we should also do:
- Warn on `extra-build-dependencies` that do not apply to any packages
- Add test cases and improve error messaging when the
`extra-build-dependencies` resolve fails
-------
There ~are~ were a few open decisions to be made here
1. Should we resolve these dependencies alongside the
`build-system.requires` dependencies? Or should we resolve separately?
(I think the latter is more powerful? because you can override things?
but it opens the door to breaking your build)
2. Should we install these dependencies into the same environment? Or
should we layer it on top as we do elsewhere? (I think it's fine to
install into the same environment)
3. Should we respect sources defined in the parent project? (I think
yes, but then we need to lower the dependencies earlier — I don't think
that's a big deal, but it's not implemented)
4. Should we respect sources defined in the child project? (I think no,
this gets really complicated and seems weird to allow)
5. Should we apply this to transitive dependencies? (I think so)
---------
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
Adds `exclude-newer-package = { package = timestamp, ... } ` and
`--exclude-newer-package package=timestamp`. These take precedence over
`exclude-newer` for a given package.
This does need to be serialized to the lockfile, so the revision is
bumped to 3. I tested a previous version and we can read a lockfile with
this information just fine.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14394
We weren't following our usual "destructure all the options" pattern in
this function, and several "this isn't actually read from uv.toml"
fields slipped through the cracks over time since folks forgot it
existed.
Fixes part of #14308, although we could still try to make the warning in
FilesystemOptions more accurate?
You could argue this is a breaking change, but I think it ultimately
isn't really, because we were already silently ignoring these fields.
Now we properly error.
Adds environment variables for
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14612 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14614
We can't use the Clap `BoolishValueParser` here, and the reasoning is a
little hard to explain. If we used `UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_NO_BIN`, as is our
typical pattern, it'd work, but here we allow opt-in to hard errors with
`UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_BIN=1` and I don't think we should have both
`UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_BIN` and `UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_NO_BIN`.
Consequently, this pull request introduces a new `EnvironmentOptions`
abstraction which allows us to express semantics that Clap cannot —
which we probably want anyway because we have an increasing number of
environment variables we're parsing downstream, e.g., #14544 and #14369.
## Summary
We validate the `uv.toml` when it's discovered automatically, but not
when provided via `--config-file`. The same limitations exist, though --
I think the lack of enforcement is just an oversight.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14650.
## Summary
I think the lack of enforcement here is an oversight. We _do_ already
enforce this for user-level configuration files (contrary to the issue
-- at least, in my testing and from reading the code).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12753.
This PR moves functions for finding user- and system-level config
directories to public functions in `uv_fs::config`. This will allow them
to be used in future work without duplicating code.
## One-liner
Relative find-links configuration to local path from a pyproject.toml or
uv.toml is now relative to the config file
## Summary
### Background
One can configure find-links in a `pyproject.toml` or `uv.toml` file,
which are located from the cli arg, system directory, user directory, or
by traversing parent directories until one is encountered.
This PR addresses the following scenario:
- A project directory which includes a `pyproject.toml` or `uv.toml`
file
- The config file includes a `find-links` option. (eg under `[tool.uv]`
for `pyproject.toml`)
- The `find-links` option is configured to point to a local subdirectory
in the project: `packages/`
- There is a subdirectory called `subdir`, which is the current working
directory
- I run `uv run my_script.py`. This will locate the `pyproject.toml` in
the parent directory
### Current Behavior
- uv tries to use the path `subdir/packages/` to find packages, and
fails.
### New Behavior
- uv tries to use the path `packages/` to find the packages, and
succeeds
- Specifically, any relative local find-links path will resolve to be
relative to the configuration file.
### Why is this behavior change OK?
- I believe no one depends on the behavior that a relative find-links
when running in a subdir will refer to different directories each time
- Thus this change only allows a more common use case which didn't work
previously.
## Test Plan
- I re-created the setup mentioned above:
```
UvTest/
├── packages/
│ ├── colorama-0.4.6-py2.py3-none-any.whl
│ └── tqdm-4.67.1-py3-none-any.whl
├── subdir/
│ └── my_script.py
└── pyproject.toml
```
```toml
# pyproject.toml
[project]
name = "uvtest"
version = "0.1.0"
description = "Add your description here"
readme = "README.md"
requires-python = ">=3.12"
dependencies = [
"tqdm>=4.67.1",
]
[tool.uv]
offline = true
no-index = true
find-links = ["packages/"]
```
- With working directory under `subdir`, previously, running `uv sync
--offline` would fail resolving the tdqm package, and after the change
it succeeds.
- Additionally, one can use `uv sync --show-settings` to show the
actually-resolved settings - now having the desired path in
`flat_index.url.path`
## Alternative designs considered
- I considered modifying the `impl Deserialize for IndexUrl` to parse
ahead of time directly with a base directory by having a custom
`Deserializer` with a base dir field, but it seems to contradict the
design of the serde `Deserialize` trait - which should work with all
`Deserializer`s
## Future work
- Support for adjusting all other local-relative paths in `Options`
would be desired, but is out of scope for the current PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The new ARM runners report a permission error:
```
Run uvx twine check wheelhouse/*
error: failed to open file `/home/runneradmin/.config/uv/uv.toml`: Permission denied (os error 13)
```
In this PR, a PermissionsError is treated like not finding the file.
I reworked the structure just a bit to avoid calling `err.kind()`
multiple times.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Added a UNIX only test where I set the permissions of the folder
containing the file and try to find it.
---------
Signed-off-by: Henry Schreiner <henryschreineriii@gmail.com>
## Summary
A lot of good new lints, and most importantly, error stabilizations. I
tried to find a few usages of the new stabilizations, but I'm sure there
are more.
IIUC, this _does_ require bumping our MSRV.
## Summary
When you pass a system drive to `Path::join`, Rust doesn't insert a
backslash between the drive and the path itself, so our lookups for
system configuration were failing.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9416.
These settings can only be defined in `pyproject.toml`, since they're
project-centric, and not _configuration_.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8539.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
Look for a system level uv.toml config file under `/etc/uv/uv.toml` or
`C:\ProgramData`.
This PR is to address #6742 and start a conversation.
## Test Plan
This was tested locally manually on MacOS. I am happy to contribute
tests once we settle on the approach.
cc @thatch
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR declares and documents all environment variables that are used
in one way or another in `uv`, either internally, or externally, or
transitively under a common struct.
I think over time as uv has grown there's been many environment
variables introduced. Its harder to know which ones exists, which ones
are missing, what they're used for, or where are they used across the
code. The docs only documents a handful of them, for others you'd have
to dive into the code and inspect across crates to know which crates
they're used on or where they're relevant.
This PR is a starting attempt to unify them, make it easier to discover
which ones we have, and maybe unlock future posibilities in automating
generating documentation for them.
I think we can split out into multiple structs later to better organize,
but given the high influx of PR's and possibly new environment variables
introduced/re-used, it would be hard to try to organize them all now
into their proper namespaced struct while this is all happening given
merge conflicts and/or keeping up to date.
I don't think this has any impact on performance as they all should
still be inlined, although it may affect local build times on changes to
the environment vars as more crates would likely need a rebuild. Lastly,
some of them are declared but not used in the code, for example those in
`build.rs`. I left them declared because I still think it's useful to at
least have a reference.
Did I miss any? Are their initial docs cohesive?
Note, `uv-static` is a terrible name for a new crate, thoughts? Others
considered `uv-vars`, `uv-consts`.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
## Summary
`uv run --project ./path/to/project` now uses the provided directory as
the starting point for any file discovery. However, relative paths are
still resolved relative to the current working directory.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5613.
## Summary
This reverts commit 3060fd22c0.
These are now _never_ shown to users, because `tracing` isn't set up at
that point. I'm going to try and improve the solution more holistically,
but this is better than the status quo.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7573.
## Summary
Added the actual error message to the warning when uv fails to parse
`pyproject.toml`.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5934
## Test Plan
Took the case from the issue:
- have `pyproject.toml` which contains
```
[tool.uv]
foobar = false
```
-
```
$ uv venv --preview -v
```
- Expect the message that contains the actual problem in the
`pyproject.toml` like:
```
warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings discovery: unknown field `foobar`; skipping...
```
## Summary
Previously, we wouldn't respect configuration files in directories
_above_ a workspace root. But this is somewhat problematic, because any
`pyproject.toml` will define a workspace root...
Instead, I think we should _start_ the search at the workspace root, but
go above it if necessary.
Closes: #5929.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4295.
## Summary
If the user puts their configuration in a `pyproject.toml` that _isn't_
a valid workspace root (e.g., it's a Poetry file), we won't discover it,
because we only look in `uv.toml` files in that case. I think this is
somewhat debatable... We could choose to _require_ `uv.toml` there, but
as a user I'd probably expect it to work?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4521.
## Summary
In a workspace, we now read configuration from the workspace root.
Previously, we read configuration from the first `pyproject.toml` or
`uv.toml` file in path -- but in a workspace, that would often be the
_project_ rather than the workspace configuration.
We need to read configuration from the workspace root, rather than its
members, because we lock the workspace globally, so all configuration
applies to the workspace globally.
As part of this change, the `uv-workspace` crate has been renamed to
`uv-settings` and its purpose has been narrowed significantly (it no
longer discovers a workspace; instead, it just reads the settings from a
directory).
If a user has a `uv.toml` in their directory or in a parent directory
but is _not_ in a workspace, we will still respect that use-case as
before.
Closes#4249.
