Address a few pedantic lints
lints are separated into separate commits so they can be reviewed
individually.
I've not added enforcement for any of these lints, but that could be
added if desirable.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This modifies `gourgeist` to allow passing additional k,v pairs to add
to the `pyvenv.cfg` file as proposed in #1697.
I made it allow an arbitrary set of pairs (to decouple from `uv` since
this is mainly a change to `gourgeist`) , but I can slim it down to just
allow just a name and version strings if that's desired.
The `pyvenv.cfg` will also have a `uv = <uv-crate-version>` when a venv
is created via `uv venv` ~~and `uv-build = <uv-build-crate-version>`
when it's created via `SourceBuild::setup`~~.
Example below via `uv venv`:
```ini
home = ...
implementation = CPython
version_info = 3.12
include-system-site-packages = false
base-prefix = ...
base-exec-prefix = ...
base-executable = ...
uv = 0.1.6
prompt = uv
```
Open to any suggestions, thanks!
Closes#1697
## Test Plan
Added new test in `tests/venv.rs` called `verify_pyvenv_cfg` to verify
that it contains the right uv version string. I didn't see tests
configured in `gourgeist` itself, so I didn't add any there.
## Summary
We currently maintain separate untar methods for sync and async, but we
only use the sync version when the user provides a local source
distribution. (Otherwise, we untar as we download the distribution.) In
my testing, this is actually slower anyway:
```
❯ python -m scripts.bench \
--uv-path ./target/release/main \
--uv-path ./target/release/uv \
./requirements.in --benchmark resolve-cold --min-runs 50
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/main (resolve-cold)
Time (mean ± σ): 835.2 ms ± 107.4 ms [User: 346.0 ms, System: 151.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 639.2 ms … 1051.0 ms 50 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/uv (resolve-cold)
Time (mean ± σ): 750.7 ms ± 91.9 ms [User: 345.7 ms, System: 149.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 637.9 ms … 905.7 ms 50 runs
Summary
'./target/release/uv (resolve-cold)' ran
1.11 ± 0.20 times faster than './target/release/main (resolve-cold)'
```
## Summary
This PR adds the `--prompt` option to `venv` subcommand.
The default behavior for `uv venv` is to create a virtual environment in
the current directory with `.venv` name. This is different from `venv` /
`virtualenv` where a user always needs to provide the virtual
environment path. This allows us to define our own behavior in the
default scenario (`uv venv`). We've decided to use the current
directory's name in that case.
Workflows:
| Command | Virtual Environment Name | Prompt |
|--------|--------|--------|
| `uv venv` | `.venv` (default) | Current directory name |
| `uv venv project` | `project` | `project` |
| `uv venv --prompt .` | `.venv` | Current directory name |
| `uv venv --prompt foobar` | `.venv` | `foobar` |
| `uv venv project --prompt foobar` | `project` | `foobar` |
Fixes#1445
## Test Plan
This is my first Rust code and I don't know how to write tests yet.
I just checked the behavior manually:
```
$ cargo build
$ mkdir t
$ cd t
$ ../target/debug/uv venv -p 3.11
$ rg -w t .venv/bin/acti*
.venv/bin/activate.csh
13:setenv VIRTUAL_ENV '/Users/inada-n/work/uv/t/.venv'
20:if ('t' != "") then
21: setenv VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT 't'
23: setenv VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT "$VIRTUAL_ENV:t:q"
38: # in which case, $prompt is undefined and we wouldn't
.venv/bin/activate
48:VIRTUAL_ENV='/Users/inada-n/work/uv/t/.venv'
59: VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT="t"
.venv/bin/activate.fish
61:set -gx VIRTUAL_ENV '/Users/inada-n/work/uv/t/.venv'
73:if test -n 't'
74: set -gx VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT 't'
.venv/bin/activate.ps1
40:if ("t" -ne "") {
41: $env:VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT = "t"
.venv/bin/activate.nu
6:# but then simply `deactivate` won't work because it is just an alias to hide
35: let virtual_env = '/Users/inada-n/work/uv/t/.venv'
50: let virtual_env_prompt = (if ('t' | is-empty) {
53: 't'
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary#1562
It turns out that `hexdump` uses an invalid source distribution format
whereby the contents aren't nested in a top-level directory -- instead,
they're all just flattened at the top-level. In looking at pip's source
(51de88ca64/src/pip/_internal/utils/unpacking.py (L62)),
it only strips the top-level directory if all entries have the same
directory prefix (i.e., if it's the only thing in the directory). This
PR accommodates these "invalid" distributions.
I can't find any history on this method in `pip`. It looks like it dates
back over 15 years ago, to before `pip` was even called `pip`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1376.
First, replace all usages in files in-place. I used my editor for this.
If someone wants to add a one-liner that'd be fun.
Then, update directory and file names:
```
# Run twice for nested directories
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
# Update files
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
```
Then add all the files again
```
# Add all the files again
git add crates
git add python/uv
# This one needs a force-add
git add -f crates/uv-trampoline
```
