## Summary
There are a few ideas at play here:
1. pip always strips versions to the release when evaluating against a
`Requires-Python`, so we now do the same. That means, e.g., using
`3.13.0b0` will be accepted by a project with `Requires-Python: >=
3.13`, which does _not_ adhere to PEP 440 semantics but is somewhat
intuitive.
2. Because we know we'll only be evaluating against release-only
versions, we can use different semantics in PubGrub that let us collapse
ranges. For example, `python_version >= '3.10' or python_version <
'3.10'` can be collapsed to the truthy marker.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4714.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4272.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4719.
## Summary
PEP 517 build isolation https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/843 has not
yet been mentioned in the PIP compatibility documentation. Add a section
for it.
## Test Plan
Visual inspection only
## Open Questions
> in most cases, swapping out `pip install` for `uv pip install` should
"just work".
In the first non-trivial case I tried, it worked for a short time and
then [started
failing](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4069#issuecomment-2186762048).
Is there any data out there on how many top 100 or top 1000 packages
work with PEP 517 build isolation?
How can someone specify `--no-build-isolation` for just one package/line
in `requirements.txt`?
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Users often find themselves dropped into environments that contain
`.egg-info` packages. While we won't support installing these, it's not
hard to support identifying them (e.g., in `pip freeze`) and
_uninstalling_ them.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2841.
Closes#2928.
Closes#3341.
## Test Plan
Ran `cargo run pip freeze --python
/opt/homebrew/Caskroom/miniforge/base/envs/TEST/bin/python`, with an
environment that includes `pip` as an `.egg-info`
(`/opt/homebrew/Caskroom/miniforge/base/envs/TEST/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip-24.0-py3.12.egg-info`):
```
cffi @ file:///Users/runner/miniforge3/conda-bld/cffi_1696001825047/work
pip==24.0
pycparser @ file:///home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/pycparser_1711811537435/work
setuptools==69.5.1
wheel==0.43.0
```
Then ran `cargo run pip uninstall`, verified that `pip` was uninstalled,
and no longer listed in `pip freeze`.
## Summary
Dropped the `--` prefix from the values of the `--index-strategy` option
mistakenly added to documentation in #3138.
## Test Plan
Verified that actually accepted values of `--index-strategy` don't use a
`--` prefix.
## Summary
This index strategy resolves every package to the latest possible
version across indexes. If a version is in multiple indexes, the first
available index is selected.
Implements #3137
This closely matches pip.
## Test Plan
Good question. I'm hesitant to use my certifi example here, since that
would inevitably break when torch removes this package. Please comment!
## Summary
This PR adds support for hash-checking mode in `pip install` and `pip
sync`. It's a large change, both in terms of the size of the diff and
the modifications in behavior, but it's also one that's hard to merge in
pieces (at least, with any test coverage) since it needs to work
end-to-end to be useful and testable.
Here are some of the most important highlights:
- We store hashes in the cache. Where we previously stored pointers to
unzipped wheels in the `archives` directory, we now store pointers with
a set of known hashes. So every pointer to an unzipped wheel also
includes its known hashes.
- By default, we don't compute any hashes. If the user runs with
`--require-hashes`, and the cache doesn't contain those hashes, we
invalidate the cache, redownload the wheel, and compute the hashes as we
go. For users that don't run with `--require-hashes`, there will be no
change in performance. For users that _do_, the only change will be if
they don't run with `--generate-hashes` -- then they may see some
repeated work between resolution and installation, if they use `pip
compile` then `pip sync`.
- Many of the distribution types now include a `hashes` field, like
`CachedDist` and `LocalWheel`.
- Our behavior is similar to pip, in that we enforce hashes when pulling
any remote distributions, and when pulling from our own cache. Like pip,
though, we _don't_ enforce hashes if a distribution is _already_
installed.
- Hash validity is enforced in a few different places:
1. During resolution, we enforce hash validity based on the hashes
reported by the registry. If we need to access a source distribution,
though, we then enforce hash validity at that point too, prior to
running any untrusted code. (This is enforced in the distribution
database.)
2. In the install plan, we _only_ add cached distributions that have
matching hashes. If a cached distribution is missing any hashes, or the
hashes don't match, we don't return them from the install plan.
3. In the downloader, we _only_ return distributions with matching
hashes.
4. The final combination of "things we install" are: (1) the wheels from
the cache, and (2) the downloaded wheels. So this ensures that we never
install any mismatching distributions.
- Like pip, if `--require-hashes` is provided, we require that _all_
distributions are pinned with either `==` or a direct URL. We also
require that _all_ distributions have hashes.
There are a few notable TODOs:
- We don't support hash-checking mode for unnamed requirements. These
should be _somewhat_ rare, though? Since `pip compile` never outputs
unnamed requirements. I can fix this, it's just some additional work.
- We don't automatically enable `--require-hashes` with a hash exists in
the requirements file. We require `--require-hashes`.
Closes#474.
## Test Plan
I'd like to add some tests for registries that report incorrect hashes,
but otherwise: `cargo test`
## Summary
This partially revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/2135 (with
some modifications) to enable users to opt-in to looking for packages
across multiple indexes.
The behavior is such that, in version selection, we take _any_
compatible version from a "higher-priority" index over the compatible
versions of a "lower-priority" index, even if that means we might accept
an "older" version.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2775.
## Summary
This PR would enable us to support transitive URL requirements. The key
idea is to leverage the fact that...
- URL requirements can only come from URL requirements.
- URL requirements identify a _specific_ version, and so don't require
backtracking.
Prior to running the "real" resolver, we recursively resolve any URL
requirements, and collect all the known URLs upfront, then pass those to
the resolver as "lookahead" requirements. This means the resolver knows
upfront that if a given package is included, it _must_ use the provided
URL.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1808.
## Summary
This PR adds limited support for PEP 440-compatible local version
testing. Our behavior is _not_ comprehensively in-line with the spec.
However, it does fix by _far_ the biggest practical limitation, and
resolves all the issues that've been raised on uv related to local
versions without introducing much complexity into the resolver, so it
feels like a good tradeoff for me.
I'll summarize the change here, but for more context, see [Andrew's
write-up](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1855#issuecomment-1967024866)
in the linked issue.
Local version identifiers are really tricky because of asymmetry.
`==1.2.3` should allow `1.2.3+foo`, but `==1.2.3+foo` should not allow
`1.2.3`. It's very hard to map them to PubGrub, because PubGrub doesn't
think of things in terms of individual specifiers (unlike the PEP 440
spec) -- it only thinks in terms of ranges.
Right now, resolving PyTorch and friends fails, because...
- The user provides requirements like `torch==2.0.0+cu118` and
`torchvision==0.15.1+cu118`.
- We then match those exact versions.
- We then look at the requirements of `torchvision==0.15.1+cu118`, which
includes `torch==2.0.0`.
- Under PEP 440, this is fine, because `torch @ 2.0.0+cu118` should be
compatible with `torch==2.0.0`.
- In our model, though, it's not, because these are different versions.
If we change our comparison logic in various places to allow this, we
risk breaking some fundamental assumptions of PubGrub around version
continuity.
- Thus, we fail to resolve, because we can't accept both `torch @ 2.0.0`
and `torch @ 2.0.0+cu118`.
As compared to the solutions we explored in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1855#issuecomment-1967024866, at
a high level, this approach differs in that we lie about the
_dependencies_ of packages that rely on our local-version-using package,
rather than lying about the versions that exist, or the version we're
returning, etc.
In short:
- When users specify local versions upfront, we keep track of them. So,
above, we'd take note of `torch` and `torchvision`.
- When we convert the dependencies of a package to PubGrub ranges, we
check if the requirement matches `torch` or `torchvision`. If it's
an`==`, we check if it matches (in the above example) for
`torch==2.0.0`. If so, we _change_ the requirement to
`torch==2.0.0+cu118`. (If it's `==` some other version, we return an
incompatibility.)
In other words, we selectively override the declared dependencies by
making them _more specific_ if a compatible local version was specified
upfront.
The net effect here is that the motivating PyTorch resolutions all work.
And, in general, transitive local versions work as expected.
The thing that still _doesn't_ work is: imagine if there were _only_
local versions of `torch` available. Like, `torch @ 2.0.0` didn't exist,
but `torch @ 2.0.0+cpu` did, and `torch @ 2.0.0+gpu` did, and so on.
`pip install torch==2.0.0` would arbitrarily choose one one `2.0.0+cpu`
or `2.0.0+gpu`, and that's correct as per PEP 440 (local version
segments should be completely ignored on `torch==2.0.0`). However, uv
would fail to identify a compatible version. I'd _probably_ prefer to
fix this, although candidly I think our behavior is _ok_ in practice,
and it's never been reported as an issue.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1855.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2080.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2328.
## Summary
This PR adds support for pip's `--no-build-isolation`. When enabled,
build requirements won't be installed during PEP 517-style builds, but
the source environment _will_ be used when executing the build steps
themselves.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1715.
