Fix#4774.
## Summary
Change the python interpreter for linux installed with `uv python` to an
optimized one.
## Test Plan
I ran the following command on Linux (glibc) to confirm that an
optimized (not debug built) Python is installed.
```bash
# install python
uv python install 3.12.3
# check build type
uv run python -c "import sysconfig;print(sysconfig.get_config_var('Py_DEBUG'))"
0
```
## Summary
This used to be necessary because we purged the cache in the
`InstallPlan` if the user passed `--reinstall`. _However_, we later
changed the cache to be append-only.
## Test Plan
I ran through the test plan in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/933,
which includes an integration test and running `uv pip install
--reinstall` with:
```text
setuptools
devpi @ e334eb4dc9/devpi-2.2.0.tar.gz
```
Whew this is a lot.
The user-facing changes are:
- `uv toolchain` to `uv python` e.g. `uv python find`, `uv python
install`, ...
- `UV_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` to` UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_DIR`
- `<UV_STATE_DIR>/toolchains` to `<UV_STATE_DIR>/python` (with
[automatic
migration](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4735/files#r1663029330))
- User-facing messages no longer refer to toolchains, instead using
"Python", "Python versions" or "Python installations"
The internal changes are:
- `uv-toolchain` crate to `uv-python`
- `Toolchain` no longer referenced in type names
- Dropped unused `SystemPython` type (previously replaced)
- Clarified the type names for "managed Python installations"
- (more little things)
Fix#4763
## Summary
Modify the Dockerfile to include the uvx binary in the docker image
`ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv`.
## Test Plan
I have verified that the uvx binary is included in the Docker image
built with the following command and can be executed.
```bash
# cd repository root
docker build -t uv:add_uvx .
docker run --rm --entrypoint /uvx uv -V
uv-tool-run 0.2.21
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Closes#4654
## Summary
The purpose of this is to show the entrypoints of each tool when running
`uv tool list` as below:
```
$ uv tool list
black
black
blackd
```
I used the proposed formatting as it was written in #4653 by @blueraft.
I had to use spaces instead of tabs in order to make the test
successful. Indeed in the test we are using a raw string and I did not
manage to make the test pass when escaping the tab in the list.rs file
so I used spaces everywhere.
I had a deeper look into #4653 as well but it is more difficult as we
need to get the version of the tool in the Tool object, I will continue
on this next one later.
Please tell me if anything else is needed I tried to follow the
contribution guidelines but I might have forgotten something.
Have a great day!
## Test Plan
`cargo clippy`
then by using the local version of uv as described in the Readme.md.
```
my-computer :~/mypath/uv$ cargo run -- tool list
Compiling uv-cli v0.0.1 (/mypath/uv/crates/uv-cli)
Compiling uv v0.2.18 (/mypath/uv/crates/uv)
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 18.69s
Running `target/debug/uv tool list`
warning: `uv tool list` is experimental and may change without warning.
black
black
blackd
isort
isort
isort-identify-imports
```
and
`cargo test tool_list`
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Updates default toolchain to
[1.79](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/06/13/Rust-1.79.0.html).
There didn't seem to be any breaking changes besides xwin now requiring
lld llvm linker.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
For now the semantics are such that if the requested requirements from
the command line don't match the receipt (or if any `--reinstall` or
`--upgrade` is requested), we proceed with an install, passing the
`--reinstall` and `--upgrade` to the underlying Python environment.
This may lead to some unintuitive behaviors, but it's simplest for now.
For example:
- `uv tool install black<24` followed by `uv tool install black
--upgrade` will install the latest version of `black`, removing the
`<24` constraint.
- `uv tool install black --with black-plugin` followed by `uv tool
install black` will remove `black-plugin`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4659.
In #3514 and #2755, users had intermittent network errors, but it was
not always clear whether we had already retried these requests or not.
Building upon https://github.com/TrueLayer/reqwest-middleware/pull/159,
this PR adds the number of retries to the error message, so we can see
at first glance where we're missing retries and where we might need to
change retry settings.
Example error trace:
```
Could not connect, are you offline?
Caused by: Request failed after 3 retries
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/uv/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
```
This code is ugly since i'm missing a better pattern for attaching
context to reqwest middleware errors in
https://github.com/TrueLayer/reqwest-middleware/pull/159.
Moving the preview features to top-level concepts and pushing the
pip-compatible interface down.
e.g.
<img width="291" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 7 03 48 AM"
src="500ad97d-899d-4051-b59d-e74786b3a45f">
## Summary
Given:
```text
numpy >=1.26 ; python_version >= '3.9'
numpy <1.26 ; python_version < '3.9'
```
When resolving for Python 3.8, we need to narrow the `requires-python`
requirement in the top branch of the fork, because `numpy >=1.26` all
require Python 3.9 or later -- but we know (in that branch) that we only
need to _solve_ for Python 3.9 or later.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4669.
## Summary
This is required to solve https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4669,
because the `Requires-Python` version can now vary across a resolution.
For example, within certain forks, we might have a more narrow range,
which would allow us to use distributions that would not be allowed for
the global resolution.
This should be fine because `requires-python` is part of the package
metadata, so it should be consistent between files within a package
version. As such, there shouldn't be any risk that we incorrectly
prioritize distributions by omitting this information.
(To be more specific, the risk is something like: we prioritize some
wheel over a source distribution within a package-version, so we don't
track the source distribution at all. Then, later, when we choose a
candidate, we see that the wheel doesn't meet the `Requires-Python`
requirement, even though the source distribution _would've_ met it. If
files within a distribution could have varied support, this would be a
real risk.)
I think `--toolchain-preference system` is sufficiently clear and
`--toolchain-preference prefer-system` is excessively verbose. This was
discussed in the original pull request at
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4424 but because we had a case for
preferring "installed managed" toolchains I was hesitant to change it.
Now that I've dropped that in #4601, I think we can drop the prefix.
Adds a `toolchain-fetch` option alongside `toolchain-preference` with
`automatic` (default) and `manual` values allowing automatic toolchain
fetches to be disabled (replaces
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4425). When `manual`, toolchains
must be installed with `uv toolchain install`.
Note this was previously implemented with `if-necessary`, `always`,
`never` variants but the interaction between this and
`toolchain-preference` was too confusing. By reducing to a binary
option, things should be clearer. The `if-necessary` behavior moved to
`toolchain-preference=installed`. See
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4601#discussion_r1657839633 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4601#discussion_r1658658755
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4476
Originally, this used the changes in #4642 to invoke `main()` from a
`uvx` binary. This had the benefit of `uvx` being entirely standalone at
the cost of doubling our artifact size. We think that's the incorrect
trade-off.
Instead, we assume `uvx` is always next to `uv` and create a tiny binary
(<1MB) that invokes `uv` in a child process. This seems preferable to a
`cargo-dist` alias because we have more control over it. This binary
should "just work" for all of our cargo-dist distributions and
installers, but we'll need to add a new entry point for our PyPI
distribution. I'll probably tackle support there separately?
```
❯ ls -lah target/release/uv target/release/uvx
-rwxr-xr-x 1 zb staff 31M Jun 28 23:23 target/release/uv
-rwxr-xr-x 1 zb staff 452K Jun 28 23:22 target/release/uvx
```
This includes some small overhead:
```
❯ hyperfine --shell=none --warmup=100 './target/release/uv tool run --help' './target/release/uvx --help' --min-runs 2000
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/uv tool run --help
Time (mean ± σ): 2.2 ms ± 0.1 ms [User: 1.3 ms, System: 0.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 2.0 ms … 4.0 ms 2000 runs
Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet system without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/uvx --help
Time (mean ± σ): 2.9 ms ± 0.1 ms [User: 1.7 ms, System: 0.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 2.8 ms … 4.2 ms 2000 runs
Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet system without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.
Summary
./target/release/uv tool run --help ran
1.35 ± 0.09 times faster than ./target/release/uvx --help
```
I presume there may be some other downsides to a child process? The
wrapper is a little awkward. We could consider `execv` but this is
complicated across platforms. An example implementation of that over in
[monotrail](433af5aed9/crates/monotrail/src/monotrail.rs (L764-L799)).
## Summary
I ended up needing this for https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4664
but I think it's a good change more broadly. We should be able to share
this cached information across operations within a given invocation.
## Summary
These are changing in one of my branches but I can't tell _what's_
changing. Some tests include the lock, but others don't. This PR adds it
for all successful resolves in the suite.
## Summary
You can now add `managed = false` under `[tool.uv]` in a
`pyproject.toml` to explicitly opt out of the project and workspace
APIs.
If a project sets `managed = false`, we will (1) _not_ discover it as a
workspace root, and (2) _not_ discover it as a workspace member (similar
to using `exclude` in the workspace parent).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4551.
## Summary
This doesn't actually change any behaviors, but it does make it a bit
easier to solve #4669, because we don't have to support "version
narrowing" for the non-`RequiresPython` variants in here. Right now, the
semantics are kind of muddied, because the `target` variant is
_sometimes_ interpreted as an exact version and sometimes as a lower
bound.
## Summary
`GitDatabase::contains` previously only parsed the commit to see if it
was a valid hash and didn't verify if the commit existed in the object
database. This led to the database never being updated.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4378.
## Test Plan
Added a test that fails without this change.
It's hard to talk about solve state and resolver state, so i'm renaming
them to fork state and resolver state, indicating the hierarchy between
more directly.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4688.
## Test Plan
```
❯ cargo run tool install ruff
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.14s
Running `target/debug/uv tool install ruff`
warning: `uv tool install` is experimental and may change without warning.
Resolved 1 package in 136ms
Installed 1 package in 3ms
+ ruff==0.5.0
No entrypoints to install for tool `ruff`
```
## Summary
Packages that provide scripts that _aren't_ Python entrypoints need to
respected in `uv tool install`. For example, Ruff ships a script in
`ruff-0.5.0.data/scripts`.
Unfortunately, the `.data` directory doesn't exist in the virtual
environment at all (it's removed, per the spec, after install). So this
PR changes the entry point detection to look at the `RECORD` file, which
is the only evidence that the scripts were installed.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4691.
## Test Plan
`cargo run uv tool install ruff` (snapshot tests to-come)
## Summary
Resolves#4483Resolves#4484
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
```sh
❯ cargo run -- toolchain dir
warning: `uv toolchain dir` is experimental and may change without warning.
/Users/ahmedilyas/Library/Application Support/uv/toolchains
❯ cargo run -- tool dir
warning: `uv tool dir` is experimental and may change without warning.
/Users/ahmedilyas/Library/Application Support/uv/tools
```
## Summary
I think this may have just been a typo.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4692.
## Test Plan
Run `cargo run tool install flask --force --reinstall` repeatedly.
