## Summary
This implements the iOS part of
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8029
FYI: @freakboy3742
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Create a venv with uv and run `cargo run pip install --python-platform
arm64-apple-ios pillow`. Then the iOS binary of pillow should be
installed inside the venv.
## Summary
This implements the Android part of
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8029
FYI: @freakboy3742 @mhsmith
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Create a venv with uv and run `cargo run pip install --python-platform
aarch64-linux-android pybase64`. Then the Android binary of pybase64
should be installed inside the venv.
## Summary
`uv publish --dry-run` will perform the `--check-url` validation, and
hit the `/validate` endpoint if the registry is known to support
fast-path validation (like pyx). The `/validate` endpoint lets us
validate an upload without uploading the file _contents_, which lets you
skip the expensive step for common mistakes.
In the future, my hope is that the `/validate` step will deprecated in
favor of Upload API 2.0.
We're not sure what the best way to expose the native store to users is
yet and it's a bit weird that you can use this in the `uv auth` commands
but can't use any of the other keyring provider options. The simplest
path forward is to just not expose it to users as a keyring provider,
and instead frame it as a preview alternative to the plaintext uv
credentials store. We can revisit the best way to expose configuration
before stabilization.
Note this pull request retains the _internal_ keyring provider
implementation — we can refactor it out later but I wanted to avoid a
bunch of churn here.
Picks up the work from
- #14559
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14896
There are some high-level changes from those pull requests
1. We do not stash seen credentials in the keyring automatically
2. We use `auth login` and `auth logout` (for future consistency)
3. We add a `token` command for showing the credential that will be used
As well as many smaller changes to API, messaging, testing, etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: John Mumm <jtfmumm@gmail.com>
## Summary
We (and I'm sure many others) are currently doing a lot of RISC-V work
in QEMU. It is possible to significantly improve the speed of
Python-related builds by taking care of the environment setup using an
AMD64 `uv` binary (bypassing binfmt/qemu-system emulation).
Some approx numbers from local testing in riscv64 Ubuntu in QEMU:
| Resolver arch | Command | Time |
| --- | --- | --- |
| riscv64 | `pip install --upgrade --break-system-packages
--index-url=https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/riseproject%2Fpython%2Fwheel_builder/packages/pypi/simple
openai-harmony` | 15s |
| riscv64 | `uv pip install --upgrade --system --break-system-packages
--index-url=https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/riseproject%2Fpython%2Fwheel_builder/packages/pypi/simple
openai-harmony` | 5s |
| amd64 | `uv pip install --python-platform=riscv64-unknown-linux
--upgrade --system --break-system-packages
--index-url=https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/riseproject%2Fpython%2Fwheel_builder/packages/pypi/simple
openai-harmony` | 4s |
The numbers from some larger internal packages with deeper dependency
trees are much more pronounced - 3m6 vs 43s vs 8s, in one example.
Manylinux 2.39 is specified, as it's the first (only?) RISC-V manylinux
## Test Plan
Locally, in QEMU.
`$ docker run --platform linux/riscv64 -it ubuntu:latest`, get amd64
libc into LD_LIBRARY_PATH, tests as above
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Adds the enhancement proposed in #15470. Each package in the dependency
tree now shows its compressed wheel file size, reading the wheel sizes
directly from the lockfile (uv.lock). Doesn't break existing tree
formatting or options. If no wheel size is available, nothing is added.
Now, developers can identify large packages in their dependency tree.
The tree still shows extras exactly as before, and then appends a size
for the package.
## Test Plan
Manually tested :
```
harsh@fcr-node:~/uv/test-uv-tree-sizes$ ../target/debug/uv tree
Using CPython 3.13.7
warning: No `requires-python` value found in the workspace. Defaulting to `>=3.13`.
Resolved 4 packages in 6ms
pure-python v0.1.0
├── click v8.2.1
└── six v1.17.0
harsh@fcr-node:~/uv/test-uv-tree-sizes$ ../target/debug/uv tree --show-sizes
Using CPython 3.13.7
warning: No `requires-python` value found in the workspace. Defaulting to `>=3.13`.
Resolved 4 packages in 6ms
pure-python v0.1.0
├── click v8.2.1 (99.8KiB)
└── six v1.17.0 (10.8KiB)
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Closes#14866. Adds a `no-install-local` flag to the sync and export
commands that excludes locally defined packages from being installed.
This helps with if you're caching your virtual environment. You can
exclude local packages since they're more likely to change between
builds.
## Test Plan
snapshot test: `sync::no_install_local`
CI
## Notes
I made an `InstallOptions` struct to avoid a crate isolation issue I was
running into while implementing.
Thanks for maintaining this project!
## Summary
Add torch cuda 12.9 backend
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: youkaichao <youkaichao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
As a frontend to Ruff's formatter.
There are some interesting choices here, some of which may just be
temporary:
1. We pin a default version of Ruff, so `uv format` is stable for a
given uv version
2. We install Ruff from GitHub instead of PyPI, which means we don't
need a Python interpreter or environment
3. We do not read the Ruff version from the dependency tree
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19665 for a prototype of the
LSP integration.
Correct typo. "uv cache clear" is not a command.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
As described in #15179, there are cases where it can be useful to
reinstall the latest patch on upgrade if it is already installed. Using
this flag, you don't need to know ahead of time if you have the latest
patch already.
Closes#15179.
Specifically, support `UV_NO_EDITABLE=1 uv export`. It's now also
supported in `uv add`, though it's default there anyway and the env var
exists only for completeness.
Fixes#15103
Close#6314
## Summary
Continuing from #7592. Created a new PR to rebase the old branch with
`main`, cleaned up test errors, and improved readability.
## Test Plan
Same test cases as in #7592.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Adds `exclude-newer-package = { package = timestamp, ... } ` and
`--exclude-newer-package package=timestamp`. These take precedence over
`exclude-newer` for a given package.
This does need to be serialized to the lockfile, so the revision is
bumped to 3. I tested a previous version and we can read a lockfile with
this information just fine.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14394
## Summary
We don't yet support writing these, but we can at least read them
(which, e.g., allows you to install PDM-exported `pylock.toml` files
with uv, since PDM _always_ writes a default group).
Closes#14740.
By default, `uv venv <venv-name>` currently removes the `<venv-name`>
directory if it exists. This can be surprising behavior: not everyone
expects an existing environment to be overwritten. This PR updates the
default to fail if a non-empty `<venv-name>` directory already exists
and neither `--allow-existing` nor the new `-c/--clear` option is
provided (if a TTY is detected, it prompts first). If it's not a TTY,
then uv will only warn and not fail for now — we'll make this an error
in the future. I've also added a corresponding `UV_VENV_CLEAR` env var.
I've chosen to use `--clear` instead of `--force` for this option
because it is used by the `venv` module and `virtualenv` and will be
familiar to users. I also think its meaning is clearer in this context
than `--force` (which could plausibly mean force overwrite just the
virtual environment files, which is what our current `--allow-existing`
option does).
Closes#1472.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
If `--workspace` is provided, we add all paths as workspace members.
If `--no-workspace` is provided, we add all paths as direct path
dependencies.
If neither is provided, then we add any paths that are under the
workspace root as workspace members, and the rest as direct path
dependencies.
Closes#14524.
Adds environment variables for
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14612 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14614
We can't use the Clap `BoolishValueParser` here, and the reasoning is a
little hard to explain. If we used `UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_NO_BIN`, as is our
typical pattern, it'd work, but here we allow opt-in to hard errors with
`UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_BIN=1` and I don't think we should have both
`UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_BIN` and `UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_NO_BIN`.
Consequently, this pull request introduces a new `EnvironmentOptions`
abstraction which allows us to express semantics that Clap cannot —
which we probably want anyway because we have an increasing number of
environment variables we're parsing downstream, e.g., #14544 and #14369.
Part of #14296
This is the same as `uv tool update-shell` but handles the case where
the Python bin directory is configured to a different path.
```
❯ UV_PYTHON_BIN_DIR=/tmp/foo cargo run -q -- python install --preview 3.13.3
Installed Python 3.13.3 in 1.75s
+ cpython-3.13.3-macos-aarch64-none
warning: `/tmp/foo` is not on your PATH. To use installed Python executables, run `export PATH="/tmp/foo:$PATH"` or `uv python update-shell`.
❯ UV_PYTHON_BIN_DIR=/tmp/foo cargo run -q -- python update-shell
Created configuration file: /Users/zb/.zshenv
Restart your shell to apply changes
❯ cat /Users/zb/.zshenv
# uv
export PATH="/tmp/foo:$PATH"
❯ UV_TOOL_BIN_DIR=/tmp/bar cargo run -q -- tool update-shell
Updated configuration file: /Users/zb/.zshenv
Restart your shell to apply changes
❯ cat /Users/zb/.zshenv
# uv
export PATH="/tmp/foo:$PATH"
# uv
export PATH="/tmp/bar:$PATH"
```
Previously, if installation of executables into the bin directory failed
we'd with a non-zero code. However, if we make this behavior the default
we don't want it to be fatal. There's a `--bin` opt-in to _require_
successful executable installation and a `--no-bin` opt-out to silence
the warning / opt-out of installation entirely.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14296 — we need this
before we can stabilize the behavior.
In #14614 we do the same for writing entries to the Windows registry.
This is a continuation of the work in
* #12405
I have:
* moved to an architecture where the human output is derived from the
json structs to centralize more of the printing state/logic
* cleaned up some of the names/types
* added tests
* removed the restriction that this output is --dry-run only
I have not yet added package info, which was TBD in their design.
---------
Co-authored-by: x0rw <mahdi.svt5@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Co-authored-by: John Mumm <jtfmumm@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This is a small quality of life feature that adds a shorthand (`-w`) to
the `--with` flag for minimizing keystrokes.
Pretty minor, but I didn't see any conflicts with `-w` and thought this
could be a nice place for it.
```bash
# proposed addition (short)
uvx -w numpy ipython
# original (long)
uvx --with numpy ipython
```
## Test Plan
Added testing already in the P.R. - just copied over tests from the
`--with` flag
<!-- How was it tested? -->
This adds `alpha`, `beta`, `rc`, `stable`, `post`, and `dev` modes to
`uv version --bump`.
The components that `--bump` accepts are ordered as follows:
major > minor > patch > stable > alpha > beta > rc > post > dev
Bumping a component "clears" all lesser component (`alpha`, `beta`, and
`rc` all overwrite each other):
* `--bump minor` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.3.0`
* `--bump alpha` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3a5`
* `--bump dev ` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3a4.post5.dev7`
In addition, `--bump` can now be repeated. The primary motivation of
this is "bump stable version and also enter a prerelease", but it
technically lets you express other things if you want them:
* `--bump patch --bump alpha` on `1.2.3` => `1.2.4a1` ("bump patch
version and go to alpha 1")
* `--bump minor --bump patch` on `1.2.3` => `1.3.1` ("bump minor version
and got to patch 1")
* `--bump minor --bump minor` on `1.2.3` => `1.4.0` ("bump minor version
twice")
The `--bump` flags are sorted by their priority, so that you don't need
to remember the priority yourself. This ordering is the only "useful"
one that preserves every `--bump` you passed, so there's no concern
about loss of expressiveness. For instance `--bump minor --bump major`
would just be `--bump major` if we didn't sort, as the major bump clears
the minor version. The ordering of `beta` after `alpha` means `--bump
alpha --bump beta` will just result in beta 1; this is the one case
where a bump request will effectively get overwritten.
The `stable` mode "bumps to the next stable release", clearing the pre
(`alpha`, `beta`, `rc`), `dev`, and `post` components from a version
(`1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3`). The choice to clear `post` here is a
bit odd, in that `1.2.3.post4` => `1.2.3` is actually a version
decrease, but I think this gives a more intuitive model (as preserving
`post5` in the previous example is definitely wrong), and also
post-releases are extremely obscure so probably no one will notice. In
the cases where this behaviour isn't useful, you probably wanted to pass
`--bump patch` or something anyway which *should* definitely clear the
`post5` (putting it another way: the only cases where `--bump stable`
has dubious behaviour is when you wanted it to do a noop, which, is a
command you could have just not written at all).
In all cases we preserve the "epoch" and "local" components of a
version, so the `7!` and `+local` in `7!1.2.3+local` will never be
modified by `--bump` (you can use the raw version set mode if you want
to touch those). The preservation of `local` is another slightly odd
choice, but it's a really obscure feature (so again it mostly won't come
up) and when it's used it seems to mostly be used for referring to
variant releases, in which case preserving it tends to be correct.
Fixes#13223
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
We do not currently support passing index names to `--index` for
installing packages. However, we do accept relative paths that can look
like index names. This PR adds the requirement that `--index` values
must be disambiguated with a prefix (`./` or `../` on Unix and Windows
or `.\\` or `..\\` on Windows). For now, if an ambiguous value is
provided, uv will warn that this will not be supported in the future.
Currently, if you provide an index name like `--index test` when there
is no `test` directory, uv will error with a `Directory not found...`
error. That's not very informative if you thought index names were
supported. The new warning makes the context clearer.
Closes#13921
