As per
https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html
Before that, there were 91 separate integration tests binary.
(As discussed on Discord — I've done the `uv` crate, there's still a few
more commits coming before this is mergeable, and I want to see how it
performs in CI and locally).
## Summary
This PR adds a more flexible cache invalidation abstraction for uv, and
uses that new abstraction to improve support for dynamic metadata.
Specifically, instead of relying solely on a timestamp, we now pass
around a `CacheInfo` struct which (as of now) contains
`Option<Timestamp>` and `Option<Commit>`. The `CacheInfo` is saved in
`dist-info` as `uv_cache.json`, so we can test already-installed
distributions for cache validity (along with testing _cached_
distributions for cache validity).
Beyond the defaults (`pyproject.toml`, `setup.py`, and `setup.cfg`
changes), users can also specify additional cache keys, and it's easy
for us to extend support in the future. Right now, cache keys can either
be instructions to include the current commit (for `setuptools_scm` and
similar) or file paths (for `hatch-requirements-txt` and similar):
```toml
[tool.uv]
cache-keys = [{ file = "requirements.txt" }, { git = true }]
```
This change should be fully backwards compatible.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6964.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6255.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6860.
## Summary
We now persist the `ResolverInstallerOptions` when writing out a tool
receipt. When upgrading, we grab the saved options, and merge with the
command-line arguments and user-level filesystem settings (CLI > receipt
> filesystem).
## Summary
This PR follows Cargo's strategy for merging configuration, albeit in a
more limited way (we don't support as many configuration locations).
Specifically, we merge the user configuration with the workspace
configuration if both are present. The workspace configuration has
priority, such that we take values from the workspace configuration and
ignore those in the user configuration if both are specified for a given
setting -- with the exception of arrays and maps, which are
concatenated.
For now, if a user provides a configuration file with `--config-file`,
we _don't_ merge in the user settings.
See:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/config.html#hierarchical-structure.
Closes#3420.
In *some* places in our crates, `serde` (and `rkyv`) are optional
dependencies. I believe this was done out of reasons of "good sense,"
that is, it follows a Rust ecosystem pattern where serde integration
tends to be an opt-in crate feature. (And similarly for `rkyv`.)
However, ultimately, `uv` itself requires `serde` and `rkyv` to
function. Since our crates are strictly internal, there are limited
consumers for our crates without `serde` (and `rkyv`) enabled. I think
one possibility is that optional `serde` (and `rkyv`) integration means
that someone can do this:
cargo test -p pep440_rs
And this will run tests _without_ `serde` or `rkyv` enabled. That in
turn could lead to faster iteration time by reducing compile times. But,
I'm not sure this is worth supporting. The iterative compilation times
of
individual crates are probably fast enough in debug mode, even with
`serde` and `rkyv` enabled. Namely, `serde` and `rkyv` themselves
shouldn't need to be re-compiled in most cases. On `main`:
```
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.685
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.278s
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 3.948s
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 0.321s
```
So while a from-scratch build does take significantly longer, an
incremental build is about the same.
The benefit of doing this change is two-fold:
1. It brings out crates into alignment with "reality." In particular,
some crates were _implicitly_ relying on `serde` being enabled
without explicitly declaring it. This technically means that our
`Cargo.toml`s were wrong in some cases, but it is hard to observe it
because of feature unification in a Cargo workspace.
2. We no longer need to deal with the cognitive burden of writing
`#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", ...)]` everywhere.
## Summary
This PR adds basic struct definitions along with a "workspace" concept
for discovering settings. (The "workspace" terminology is used to match
Ruff; I did not invent it.)
A few notes:
- We discover any `pyproject.toml` or `uv.toml` file in any parent
directory of the current working directory. (We could adjust this to
look at the directories of the input files.)
- We don't actually do anything with the configuration yet; but those
PRs are large and I want this to be reviewed in isolation.
When running the `uv-client` tests, i would previously get:
```
warning: field `0` is never read
--> crates/uv-configuration/src/config_settings.rs:43:27
|
43 | pub struct ConfigSettings(BTreeMap<String, ConfigSettingValue>);
| -------------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| field in this struct
|
= note: `ConfigSettings` has derived impls for the traits `Clone` and `Debug`, but these are intentionally ignored during dead code analysis
= note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default
help: consider changing the field to be of unit type to suppress this warning while preserving the field numbering, or remove the field
|
43 | pub struct ConfigSettings(());
| ~~
warning: `uv-configuration` (lib) generated 1 warning
```
Needed to prevent circular dependencies in my toolchain work (#2931). I
think this is probably a reasonable change as we move towards persistent
configuration too?
Unfortunately `BuildIsolation` needs to be in `uv-types` to avoid
circular dependencies still. We might be able to resolve that in the
future.
2024-04-09 11:35:53 -05:00
Renamed from crates/uv-types/src/config_settings.rs (Browse further)
