We now use the getters and setters everywhere.
There were some places where we wanted to build a `MarkerEnvironment`
out of whole cloth, usually in tests. To facilitate those use cases, we
add a `MarkerEnvironmentBuilder` that provides a convenient constructor.
It's basically like a `MarkerEnvironment::new`, but with named
parameters. That's useful here because there are so many fields (and
they many have the same type).
## Summary
This is universal environment variable used to determine the mac OS
deployment target. We now respect it in `--python-platform` -- so we
default to 12.0, but users can override it as needed.
## Summary
This PR follows Cargo's strategy for merging configuration, albeit in a
more limited way (we don't support as many configuration locations).
Specifically, we merge the user configuration with the workspace
configuration if both are present. The workspace configuration has
priority, such that we take values from the workspace configuration and
ignore those in the user configuration if both are specified for a given
setting -- with the exception of arrays and maps, which are
concatenated.
For now, if a user provides a configuration file with `--config-file`,
we _don't_ merge in the user settings.
See:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/config.html#hierarchical-structure.
Closes#3420.
## Introduction
PEP 621 is limited. Specifically, it lacks
* Relative path support
* Editable support
* Workspace support
* Index pinning or any sort of index specification
The semantics of urls are a custom extension, PEP 440 does not specify
how to use git references or subdirectories, instead pip has a custom
stringly format. We need to somehow support these while still stying
compatible with PEP 621.
## `tool.uv.source`
Drawing inspiration from cargo, poetry and rye, we add `tool.uv.sources`
or (for now stub only) `tool.uv.workspace`:
```toml
[project]
name = "albatross"
version = "0.1.0"
dependencies = [
"tqdm >=4.66.2,<5",
"torch ==2.2.2",
"transformers[torch] >=4.39.3,<5",
"importlib_metadata >=7.1.0,<8; python_version < '3.10'",
"mollymawk ==0.1.0"
]
[tool.uv.sources]
tqdm = { git = "https://github.com/tqdm/tqdm", rev = "cc372d09dcd5a5eabdc6ed4cf365bdb0be004d44" }
importlib_metadata = { url = "https://github.com/python/importlib_metadata/archive/refs/tags/v7.1.0.zip" }
torch = { index = "torch-cu118" }
mollymawk = { workspace = true }
[tool.uv.workspace]
include = [
"packages/mollymawk"
]
[tool.uv.indexes]
torch-cu118 = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu118"
```
See `docs/specifying_dependencies.md` for a detailed explanation of the
format. The basic gist is that `project.dependencies` is what ends up on
pypi, while `tool.uv.sources` are your non-published additions. We do
support the full range or PEP 508, we just hide it in the docs and
prefer the exploded table for easier readability and less confusing with
actual url parts.
This format should eventually be able to subsume requirements.txt's
current use cases. While we will continue to support the legacy `uv pip`
interface, this is a piece of the uv's own top level interface. Together
with `uv run` and a lockfile format, you should only need to write
`pyproject.toml` and do `uv run`, which generates/uses/updates your
lockfile behind the scenes, no more pip-style requirements involved. It
also lays the groundwork for implementing index pinning.
## Changes
This PR implements:
* Reading and lowering `project.dependencies`,
`project.optional-dependencies` and `tool.uv.sources` into a new
requirements format, including:
* Git dependencies
* Url dependencies
* Path dependencies, including relative and editable
* `pip install` integration
* Error reporting for invalid `tool.uv.sources`
* Json schema integration (works in pycharm, see below)
* Draft user-level docs (see `docs/specifying_dependencies.md`)
It does not implement:
* No `pip compile` testing, deprioritizing towards our own lockfile
* Index pinning (stub definitions only)
* Development dependencies
* Workspace support (stub definitions only)
* Overrides in pyproject.toml
* Patching/replacing dependencies
One technically breaking change is that we now require user provided
pyproject.toml to be valid wrt to PEP 621. Included files still fall
back to PEP 517. That means `pip install -r requirements.txt` requires
it to be valid while `pip install -r requirements.txt` with `-e .` as
content falls back to PEP 517 as before.
## Implementation
The `pep508` requirement is replaced by a new `UvRequirement` (name up
for bikeshedding, not particularly attached to the uv prefix). The still
existing `pep508_rs::Requirement` type is a url format copied from pip's
requirements.txt and doesn't appropriately capture all features we
want/need to support. The bulk of the diff is changing the requirement
type throughout the codebase.
We still use `VerbatimUrl` in many places, where we would expect a
parsed/decomposed url type, specifically:
* Reading core metadata except top level pyproject.toml files, we fail a
step later instead if the url isn't supported.
* Allowed `Urls`.
* `PackageId` with a custom `CanonicalUrl` comparison, instead of
canonicalizing urls eagerly.
* `PubGrubPackage`: We eventually convert the `VerbatimUrl` back to a
`Dist` (`Dist::from_url`), instead of remembering the url.
* Source dist types: We use verbatim url even though we know and require
that these are supported urls we can and have parsed.
I tried to make improve the situation be replacing `VerbatimUrl`, but
these changes would require massive invasive changes (see e.g.
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/3253). A main problem is the ref
`VersionOrUrl` and applying overrides, which assume the same
requirement/url type everywhere. In its current form, this PR increases
this tech debt.
I've tried to split off PRs and commits, but the main refactoring is
still a single monolith commit to make it compile and the tests pass.
## Demo
Adding
d1ae3b85d5/pyproject.json
as json schema (v7) to pycharm for `pyproject.toml`, you can try the IDE
support already:
[dove.webm](c293c272-c80b-459d-8c95-8c46a8d198a1)
In *some* places in our crates, `serde` (and `rkyv`) are optional
dependencies. I believe this was done out of reasons of "good sense,"
that is, it follows a Rust ecosystem pattern where serde integration
tends to be an opt-in crate feature. (And similarly for `rkyv`.)
However, ultimately, `uv` itself requires `serde` and `rkyv` to
function. Since our crates are strictly internal, there are limited
consumers for our crates without `serde` (and `rkyv`) enabled. I think
one possibility is that optional `serde` (and `rkyv`) integration means
that someone can do this:
cargo test -p pep440_rs
And this will run tests _without_ `serde` or `rkyv` enabled. That in
turn could lead to faster iteration time by reducing compile times. But,
I'm not sure this is worth supporting. The iterative compilation times
of
individual crates are probably fast enough in debug mode, even with
`serde` and `rkyv` enabled. Namely, `serde` and `rkyv` themselves
shouldn't need to be re-compiled in most cases. On `main`:
```
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.685
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.278s
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 3.948s
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 0.321s
```
So while a from-scratch build does take significantly longer, an
incremental build is about the same.
The benefit of doing this change is two-fold:
1. It brings out crates into alignment with "reality." In particular,
some crates were _implicitly_ relying on `serde` being enabled
without explicitly declaring it. This technically means that our
`Cargo.toml`s were wrong in some cases, but it is hard to observe it
because of feature unification in a Cargo workspace.
2. We no longer need to deal with the cognitive burden of writing
`#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", ...)]` everywhere.
## Summary
This index strategy resolves every package to the latest possible
version across indexes. If a version is in multiple indexes, the first
available index is selected.
Implements #3137
This closely matches pip.
## Test Plan
Good question. I'm hesitant to use my certifi example here, since that
would inevitably break when torch removes this package. Please comment!
## Summary
based on PEP 508 the `platform_machine` should be same as
`platform.machine()` output:
https://peps.python.org/pep-0508/#environment-markers
From my macOS M2
```python
In [1]: import platform
In [2]: platform.machine()
Out[2]: 'arm64'
```
I napari we also use `arm64` in requirements and it works as expected:
9fcf63e69a/pyproject.toml (L120)
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
I initially implemented this by allowing arbitrary
`x86_64-manylinux_x_y`, but it makes the Clap, Serde, and Schemars
definitions more complicated, _and_ makes it harder for the user.
Ultimately, manylinux itself only provides images for 2_17 and 2_28, so
this seems like it should be sufficient.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3222.
## Summary
macOS 11 has been EOL for 7 months, and it seems like it's common to
publish ARM-only wheels at 12.0+. I think this is a better default for
ARM macs.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3227.
## Test Plan
`cargo run pip install scikit-learn==1.3.2 --python-platform macos
--no-build`
Adds hidden `--preview` / `--no-preview` flags with `UV_PREVIEW`
environment variable support. Copies the `PreviewMode` type from Ruff.
Does a little bit of extra work to port `uv run` to the new settings
model.
Note we allow `uv run` invocations without preview and only use its
presence to toggle an experimental warning.
## Test plan
```
❯ cargo run -q -- run --no-workspace -- python --version
warning: `uv run` is experimental and may change without warning.
Python 3.12.2
❯ cargo run -q -- run --no-workspace --preview -- python --version
Python 3.12.2
❯ UV_PREVIEW=1 cargo run -q -- run --no-workspace -- python --version
Python 3.12.2
```
## Summary
This PR adds basic struct definitions along with a "workspace" concept
for discovering settings. (The "workspace" terminology is used to match
Ruff; I did not invent it.)
A few notes:
- We discover any `pyproject.toml` or `uv.toml` file in any parent
directory of the current working directory. (We could adjust this to
look at the directories of the input files.)
- We don't actually do anything with the configuration yet; but those
PRs are large and I want this to be reviewed in isolation.
When running the `uv-client` tests, i would previously get:
```
warning: field `0` is never read
--> crates/uv-configuration/src/config_settings.rs:43:27
|
43 | pub struct ConfigSettings(BTreeMap<String, ConfigSettingValue>);
| -------------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| field in this struct
|
= note: `ConfigSettings` has derived impls for the traits `Clone` and `Debug`, but these are intentionally ignored during dead code analysis
= note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default
help: consider changing the field to be of unit type to suppress this warning while preserving the field numbering, or remove the field
|
43 | pub struct ConfigSettings(());
| ~~
warning: `uv-configuration` (lib) generated 1 warning
```
Needed to prevent circular dependencies in my toolchain work (#2931). I
think this is probably a reasonable change as we move towards persistent
configuration too?
Unfortunately `BuildIsolation` needs to be in `uv-types` to avoid
circular dependencies still. We might be able to resolve that in the
future.
