## Summary
This change introduces the `UV_NO_INSTALLER_METADATA` environment
variable
as a way to opt out of the extra installer metadata files that `uv` is
creating.
This is important to achieve reproducible builds in distribution
packaging, allowing to replace usage of
[installer](https://pypi.org/project/installer) with `uv pip install`.
At the time of writing these files are:
- `uv_cache.json`
Contains timestamps which are non-reproducible.
These hashes also leak in to the `RECORD` file.
- `direct_url.json`
Contains the path to the installed wheel.
While not non-reproducible it's not required for distribution packaging.
- `INSTALLER`
Again, not non-reproducible, but of no value in distribution packaging.
## Test Plan
Automated test added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Update the docs for the GitLab integration, to make it clear that an
entrypoint has to be specified, when a distroless image is being used.
## Test Plan
Without specifying an entrypoint when using a distroless image:
<img
src=https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/35499bd5-51d8-4016-b1d0-2d56956f82e6
width=500>
_It works if you either specify the entrypoint or if the image used in
not a distroless one._
Co-authored-by: Tsafaras <konstantinos@valuechecker.ai>
In preparation for a dedicated "Troubleshooting" section, revitalizes
the "Build failures" reference by adding more details, examples, and
structure. This will be used as a model for a "Install failures"
document.
This pull request is best viewed with [whitespace
hidden](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8650/files?diff=unified&w=1)
Adds a `--default` flag to `uv python install` in preview. This includes
a `python` and `python{major}` executable in addition to the
`python{major}.{minor}` executable. We will replace uv-managed
executables, but externally managed executables require the `--force`
flag to overwrite.
If you run `uv python install` (without arguments), we include the
`--default` flag implicitly to populate `python` and `python3` for the
"default" install version.
In the future, we should add a warning if the installed executable isn't
at the front of the PATH.
## Summary
Fixes#9027
Minor enhancement on top of #8531 that makes the CLI parameter
`--check-url` also available as the setting `check-url` in configuration
files.
## Test Plan
Updates existing tests to take the new setting into account.
Within publish command testing I didn't see existing tests covering
settings from toml files (instead of from CLI params), so I didn't add
anything of that sort.
Going through PEP 517 to build a package is slow, so when building a
package with the uv build backend, we can call into the uv build backend
directly. This is the basis for the `uv build --list`.
This does not enable the fast path for general source dependencies.
There is a possible difference in execution if the latest uv version is
newer than the one currently running: The PEP 517 path would use the
latest version, while the fast path uses the current version.
Please review commit-by-commit
### Benchmark
`built_with_uv`, using the fast path:
```
$ hyperfine "~/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv build"
Time (mean ± σ): 9.2 ms ± 1.1 ms [User: 4.6 ms, System: 4.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 6.4 ms … 12.7 ms 290 runs
```
`hatcling_editable`, with hatchling being optimized for fast startup
times:
```
$ hyperfine "~/projects/uv/target/profiling/uv build"
Time (mean ± σ): 270.5 ms ± 18.4 ms [User: 230.8 ms, System: 44.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 250.7 ms … 298.4 ms 10 runs
```
## Summary
This proposes adding the command line option `uv pip uninstall --dry-run
...`, complementing the existing `uv pip install --dry-run ...` added
for #1244 in #1436.
This option does not exist in PyPA's `pip uninstall`, if adopted it
would be unique to `uv pip`. The code should be considered PoC, it is
baby's first Rust.
The initial motivation was while investigating
https://github.com/moreati/ansible-uv/issues/2 - to allow Ansible module
`moreati.uv.pip` to work with`state: absent` in "check_mode" (Ansible's
equivalent of a dry run), without requiring `packaging` or `setuptools`.
## Test Plan
One new unit test has been added. I pedge to add more if the feature is
desired/accepted
Example usage
```console
➜ uv git:(pip-uninstall--dry-run) rm -rf .venv
➜ uv git:(pip-uninstall--dry-run) ./target/debug/uv venv
Using CPython 3.13.0
Creating virtual environment at: .venv
Activate with: source .venv/bin/activate
➜ uv git:(pip-uninstall--dry-run) ./target/debug/uv pip install httpx
Resolved 7 packages in 178ms
Prepared 5 packages in 60ms
Installed 7 packages in 15ms
+ anyio==4.6.2.post1
+ certifi==2024.8.30
+ h11==0.14.0
+ httpcore==1.0.7
+ httpx==0.28.0
+ idna==3.10
+ sniffio==1.3.1
➜ uv git:(pip-uninstall--dry-run) ./target/debug/uv pip uninstall --dry-run httpx
Would uninstall 1 package
- httpx==0.28.0
➜ uv git:(pip-uninstall--dry-run) ./target/debug/uv pip list
Package Version
-------- -----------
anyio 4.6.2.post1
certifi 2024.8.30
h11 0.14.0
httpcore 1.0.7
httpx 0.28.0
idna 3.10
sniffio 1.3.1
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR fixes name of `--refresh-package` flag in cache docs. It's
misspelled as `--refresh-dependency`.
## Test Plan
Deployed docs locally.
This is a first-pass at updating the "Managing dependencies" page after
moving some of the project concept documentation into it. I want to do
more things, like improve visibility into upgrading packages and
reordering some sections, but will tackle those separately for review.
The primary goals here were to consolidate redundant information on
dependency tables and improve the consistency of examples.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us review effectively, please
ensure that:
- The pull request includes a summary of the change.
- The title is descriptive and concise.
- Relevant issues are referenced where applicable.
-->
## Summary
Resolves#9333
This pull request introduces support for the `--no-extra` command-line
flag and the corresponding `no-extra` UV setting.
### Behavior
- When `--all-extras` is supplied, the specified extras in `--no-extra`
will be excluded from the installation.
- If `--all-extras` is not supplied, `--no-extra` has no effect and is
safely ignored.
## Test Plan
Since `ExtrasSpecification::from_args` and
`ExtrasSpecification::extra_names` are the most important parts in the
implementation, I added the following tests in the
`uv-configuration/src/extras.rs` module:
- **`test_no_extra_full`**: Verifies behavior when `no_extra` includes
the entire list of extras.
- **`test_no_extra_partial`**: Tests partial exclusion, ensuring only
specified extras are excluded.
- **`test_no_extra_empty`**: Confirms that no extras are excluded if
`no_extra` is empty.
- **`test_no_extra_excessive`**: Ensures the implementation ignores
`no_extra` values that don't match any available extras.
- **`test_no_extra_without_all_extras`**: Validates that `no_extra` has
no effect when `--all-extras` is not supplied.
- **`test_no_extra_without_package_extras`**: Confirms correct behavior
when no extras are available in the package.
- **`test_no_extra_duplicates`**: Verifies that duplicate entries in
`pkg_extras` or `no_extra` do not cause errors.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This adds a `--prune` flag to the `export` command to correspond with
the `--prune` flag of the `tree` command.
The purpose is for generating a `requirements.txt` that omits a package
and all of that package's unique dependencies. This is useful for cases
where the project has a dependency on a common core package, but where
that package does not need to be installed in the target environment.
For example, a pyspark job needs spark for development, but when
installing into a cluster that already has pyspark installed, it is
desirable to omit pyspark's whole dependency tree so that only the
unique dependencies that your job needs get installed, and do not risk
breaking the pyspark dependencies with something incompatible.
Dev groups cannot always cover this case because there are other
projects where this common dependency occurs as a transitive. One
example is Airflow providers, which include Airflow itself as a
dependency, but it is unnecessary and undesirable to include Airflow's
dependency tree in the `requirements.txt` for your DAGs.
Partly related to #7214, though I'm not sure it covers the ask in that
one of having this functionality extend to the project's actual
published metadata.
## Test Plan
An integration test was added, and some manual testing. Let me know if
more would be better.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Aligns the description of `UV_NO_PROGRESS` with other env vars that also
have a related flag.
`--no-progress` is a "global option" and exists in every command.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
`--upgrade` isn't useful, since it's the default. So it's now hidden,
but continues to warn if you enable it.
`--no-upgrade` isn't useful, since it panics. So it's now removed
entirely. This isn't breaking, since it already didn't work.
`--upgrade-package` actually _is_ useful, because it turns out it allows
things like: `uv tool upgrade babel --upgrade-package "babel<0.2.14"` to
constrain the upgrade.
I left this in place but hid it... I think we should provide a better
workflow for this, like `uv tool upgrade "babel<0.2.14"`? It's strange
to specify the package twice, and that `uv tool upgrade` has an
`--upgrade-package` flag.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9317.
The snippet out of context looks like a valid minimal pyproject.toml
which it is not without name and version. The line worked in layout.md
before when it was just under the minimal config.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
I find myself messing this up with `--build-constraint` vs.
`--build-constraints`, and it turns out our own CLI isn't fully
consistent here either.
On large screens, we require scrolling below the fold for the next page
/ prev page navigation footer. This dramatically improves visibility of
the left nav when looking at small pages like section overviews.
Critically, this stops the height of the navigation from jumping around
depending on the page you're on. On small screens, the positioning is
unchanged since the nav is in a hamburger menu and it'd be annoying to
scroll.
Eventually, we could move the next / prev nav out of the footer and into
the content, e.g., as in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9121#issuecomment-2479282706.
These images don't quite do the change in experience justice. It's the
consistency when changing pages that feels the most different.
Before
<img width="1484" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-15 at 10 16 30 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0729691-31ea-46cc-9679-636fb144eab7">
After
<img width="1474" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-15 at 10 15 26 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d01ae5cd-1347-45de-a294-fbd56b2d6fb5">
- Adds a collapsible section for the project concept
- Splits the project concept document into several child documents.
- Moves the workspace and dependencies documents to under the project
section
- Adds a mkdocs plugin for redirects, so links to the moved documents
still work
I attempted to make the minimum required changes to the contents of the
documents here. There is a lot of room for improvement on the content of
each new child document. For review purposes, I want to do that work
separately. I'd prefer if the review focused on this structure and idea
rather than the content of the files.
I expect to do this to other documentation pages that would otherwise be
very nested.
The project concept landing page and nav (collapsed by default) looks
like this now:
<img width="1507" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-14 at 11 28 45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/88288b09-8463-49d4-84ba-ee27144b62a5">
