This is a fallback mode that we supported when we decided to use PEP 517
builds by default. I can't find a single reference to it on GitHub or in
our issue tracker, so I want to drop support for it as part of v0.3.0.
These are global and non-specific to the `pip` API, so I think they
should be elevated.
- Ran `UV_CONCURRENT_DOWNLOADS=1 cargo run pip list`; verified that
`downloads` resolved to 1.
- Added `concurrent-downloads = 5` under `[tool.uv]` in
`pyproject.toml`; ran `cargo run pip list`; verified that `downloads`
resolved to 5.
- Ran `UV_CONCURRENT_DOWNLOADS=1 cargo run pip list`; verified that
`downloads` resolved to 1.
This PR migrates uv's use of `chrono` to `jiff`.
I did most of this work a while back as one of my tests to ensure Jiff
could actually be used in a real world project. I decided to revive
this because I noticed that `reqwest-retry` dropped its Chrono
dependency,
which is I believe the only other thing requiring Chrono in uv.
(Although, we use a fork of `reqwest-middleware` at present, and that
hasn't been updated to latest upstream yet. I wasn't quite sure of the
process we have for that.)
In course of doing this, I actually made two changes to uv:
First is that the lock file now writes an RFC 3339 timestamp for
`exclude-newer`. Previously, we were using Chrono's `Display`
implementation for this which is a non-standard but "human readable"
format. I think the right thing to do here is an RFC 3339 timestamp.
Second is that, in addition to an RFC 3339 timestamp, `--exclude-newer`
used to accept a "UTC date." But this PR changes it to a "local date."
That is, a date in the user's system configured time zone. I think
this makes more sense than a UTC date, but one alternative is to drop
support for a date and just rely on an RFC 3339 timestamp. The main
motivation here is that automatically assuming UTC is often somewhat
confusing, since just writing an unqualified date like `2024-08-19` is
often assumed to be interpreted relative to the writer's "local" time.
## Summary
The strategy here is: if the user provides supported environments, we
use those as the initial forks when resolving. As a result, we never add
or explore branches that are disjoint with the supported environments.
(If the supported environments change, we ignore the lockfile entirely,
so we don't have to worry about any interactions between supported
environments and the preference forks.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6184.
## Summary
Added the actual error message to the warning when uv fails to parse
`pyproject.toml`.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5934
## Test Plan
Took the case from the issue:
- have `pyproject.toml` which contains
```
[tool.uv]
foobar = false
```
-
```
$ uv venv --preview -v
```
- Expect the message that contains the actual problem in the
`pyproject.toml` like:
```
warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings discovery: unknown field `foobar`; skipping...
```
## Summary
We now persist the `ResolverInstallerOptions` when writing out a tool
receipt. When upgrading, we grab the saved options, and merge with the
command-line arguments and user-level filesystem settings (CLI > receipt
> filesystem).
The loose consensus is that "fetch" doesn't have much meaning and that a
boolean flag makes more sense from the command line.
1. Adds `--allow-python-downloads` (hidden, default) and
`--no-python-downloads` to the CLI to quickly enable or disable
downloads
2. Deprecates `--python-fetch` in favor of the options from (1)
3. Removes `python-fetch` in favor of a `python-downloads` setting
5. Adds a `never` variant to the enum, allowing even explicit installs
to be disabled via the configuration file
## Test plan
I tested this with various `pyproject.toml`-level settings and `uv venv
--preview --python 3.12.2` and `uv python install 3.12.2` with and
without the new CLI flags.
## Summary
Previously, we wouldn't respect configuration files in directories
_above_ a workspace root. But this is somewhat problematic, because any
`pyproject.toml` will define a workspace root...
Instead, I think we should _start_ the search at the workspace root, but
go above it if necessary.
Closes: #5929.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4295.
This already rejects `pyproject.toml`... but because the schema
validation is relaxed (we allow unknown fields, and all fields are
optional), a `pyproject.toml` doesn't get properly rejected here.
This PR makes the schema stricter, but in a safe way (by adding the
other `tool.uv` fields, like `workspace`, as any).
Closes#5832.
## Summary
After referring to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5637 and doing
additional testing.
The default value in a stable state seems more reasonable to be
``only-system``. ``managed`` in preview.
```
cpython-3.11.9-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python311\python.exe
cpython-3.10.14-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\python\cpython-3.10.14-windows-x86_64-none\install\python.exe
cpython-3.10.11-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310\python.exe
cpython-3.9.19-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\python\cpython-3.9.19-windows-x86_64-none\python.exe
```
test on uv 0.2.33 (build from
257007ccaf)
### Stable version
``uv venv -p 3.10`` is ``3.10.11`` (System Python)
``uv venv -p 3.9`` is ``No interpreter found``(3.9.19 for managed
Python)
``uv venv -p 3.9 --python-preference only-system`` is ``No interpreter
found``(fail)
``uv venv -p 3.9 --python-preference only-managed`` is
``3.9.19``(success)
Do not use managed Python, only use the system Python, so it can be
determined as ``only-system``.
### Preview mode
**Note:** ``3.10.14`` is managed python, ``3.10.11`` is system python.
``uv venv -p 3.11 --preview`` is ``3.11.9`` (System Python)
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview`` is ``3.10.14``
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference only-managed`` is
``3.10.14``
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference managed`` is ``3.10.14``
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference system`` is ``3.10.11``
``venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference only-system`` is
``3.10.11``
Prioritize the managed Python and then select the system Python, so it
can be determined as ``managed``.
-----
fixed#5754
## Test Plan
Run website in local.
## Summary
It's hard for me to imagine a scenario in which a user passed
`--reinstall`, but wanted us to keep respecting cached data for a
package. For example, to actually "rebuild and reinstall" an editable
today, you have to pass both `--reinstall` and `--refresh`.
This PR makes `--reinstall` imply `--refresh`, so we always validate
that the cached data is fresh.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5424.
Resolves#4467.
## Summary
This PR implements the following
1. Add `tool.uv.constraint-dependencies` to pyproject.toml
1. Support to refer `tool.uv.constraint-dependencies` in `uv lock`
1. Support to refer `tool.uv.constraint-dependencies` in `uv pip
compile/install`
These are analogues of the override features implemented in #3839 and
#4369.
## Test Plan
Add test.
## Summary
Spotted some issues in the settings documentation, and room for small
improvements by linking to PEPs/RFCs.
Also updating contribution documentation to mention that it's necessary
to enable the virtual environment before running `mkdocs serve`.
## Test Plan
Running documentation locally.
## Summary
This is an alternative to `--require-hashes` which will validate a hash
if it's present, but ignore requirements that omit hashes or are absent
from the lockfile entirely.
So, e.g., transitive dependencies that are missing will _not_ error; nor
will dependencies that are included but lack a hash.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3305.
## Summary
First part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5093.
Remaining:
- Global settings
- `pip`-specific settings (some will be copied-over from here)
- Auto-generating the "Possible values" for enums
Whew this is a lot.
The user-facing changes are:
- `uv toolchain` to `uv python` e.g. `uv python find`, `uv python
install`, ...
- `UV_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` to` UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_DIR`
- `<UV_STATE_DIR>/toolchains` to `<UV_STATE_DIR>/python` (with
[automatic
migration](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4735/files#r1663029330))
- User-facing messages no longer refer to toolchains, instead using
"Python", "Python versions" or "Python installations"
The internal changes are:
- `uv-toolchain` crate to `uv-python`
- `Toolchain` no longer referenced in type names
- Dropped unused `SystemPython` type (previously replaced)
- Clarified the type names for "managed Python installations"
- (more little things)
Adds a `toolchain-fetch` option alongside `toolchain-preference` with
`automatic` (default) and `manual` values allowing automatic toolchain
fetches to be disabled (replaces
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4425). When `manual`, toolchains
must be installed with `uv toolchain install`.
Note this was previously implemented with `if-necessary`, `always`,
`never` variants but the interaction between this and
`toolchain-preference` was too confusing. By reducing to a binary
option, things should be clearer. The `if-necessary` behavior moved to
`toolchain-preference=installed`. See
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4601#discussion_r1657839633 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4601#discussion_r1658658755
## Summary
This is an intermediary change in enabling universal resolution for
`requirements.txt` files. To start, we need to be able to preserve
markers in the `requirements.txt` output _and_ propagate those markers,
such that if you have a dependency that's only included with a given
marker, the transitive dependencies respect that marker too.
Closes#1429.
## Summary
If the user puts their configuration in a `pyproject.toml` that _isn't_
a valid workspace root (e.g., it's a Poetry file), we won't discover it,
because we only look in `uv.toml` files in that case. I think this is
somewhat debatable... We could choose to _require_ `uv.toml` there, but
as a user I'd probably expect it to work?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4521.
Exposes the option added in #4416. Adds `--toolchain-preference` and
`tool.uv.toolchain-preference` to configure if system or managed
toolchains are preferred. Users can opt-out of managed toolchains or
system toolchains entirely as well.
## Summary
In a workspace, we now read configuration from the workspace root.
Previously, we read configuration from the first `pyproject.toml` or
`uv.toml` file in path -- but in a workspace, that would often be the
_project_ rather than the workspace configuration.
We need to read configuration from the workspace root, rather than its
members, because we lock the workspace globally, so all configuration
applies to the workspace globally.
As part of this change, the `uv-workspace` crate has been renamed to
`uv-settings` and its purpose has been narrowed significantly (it no
longer discovers a workspace; instead, it just reads the settings from a
directory).
If a user has a `uv.toml` in their directory or in a parent directory
but is _not_ in a workspace, we will still respect that use-case as
before.
Closes#4249.
