<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Docs at https://docs.astral.sh/uv/pip/compatibility/ still say:
> the future, uv will also support persistent configuration in its own
configuration file format (e.g., pyproject.toml or uv.toml or similar).
For more, see [#651](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/651).
I think that's done now (?), so updated these to link to
https://docs.astral.sh/uv/configuration/files/
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5915, not entirely sure
if `manylinux_compatible` should be a separate field in the JSON
returned by the interpreter or there's some way to use the existing
`platform` for it.
## Test Plan
ran the below
```
rm -rf .venv
target/debug/uv venv
# commenting out the line below triggers the change..
# target/debug/uv pip install no-manylinux
target/debug/uv pip install cryptography --no-cache
```
is there an easy way to add this into the existing snapshot-based test
suite? looking around to see if there's a way that doesn't involve
something implementation-dependent like mocks.
~update: i think the output does differ between these two, so probably
we can use that.~ i lied - that "building..." output seems to be
discarded.
## Summary
`mkdocs` supports [validation rules for
links](https://www.mkdocs.org/user-guide/configuration/#validation),
which can be tightened to report more issues than the default
configuration. I used the recommended "maximal strictness" configuration
from the documentation.
Adding the `anchors` rule helped spot 4 errors:
```console
WARNING - Doc file 'guides/install-python.md' contains a link '../concepts/python-versions.md#python-distributions', but the doc 'concepts/python-versions.md' does not contain an anchor '#python-distributions'.
WARNING - Doc file 'guides/install-python.md' contains a link '../concepts/python-versions.md#discovery-order', but the doc 'concepts/python-versions.md' does not contain an anchor '#discovery-order'.
WARNING - Doc file 'guides/projects.md' contains a link '../concepts/projects.md#lock-file', but the doc 'concepts/projects.md' does not contain an anchor '#lock-file'.
WARNING - Doc file 'pip/environments.md' contains a link '../concepts/python-versions.md#discovery-order', but the doc 'concepts/python-versions.md' does not contain an anchor '#discovery-order'.
```
## Test Plan
Local run of the documentation + `mkdocs build --strict`.
To enforce the 100 character line limit in markdown files introduced in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5635, and to automate the
formatting of markdown files, i've added prettier and formatted our
markdown files with it.
I've excluded the changelog and the generated references documentation
from this for having too many changes, but we can also include them.
I'm not particular on which style we use. My main motivations are
(major) not having to reflow markdown files myself anymore and (minor)
consistence between all markdown files. I've chosen prettier for similar
reason as we chose black, it's a single good style that's automated and
shared in the community. I do prefer prettier's style of not breaking
inside of a link name though.
This PR is in two parts, the first adds prettier to CI and documents
using it, while the second actually formats the docs. When merge
conflicts arise, we can drop the last commit and regenerate it with `npx
prettier --prose-wrap always --write BENCHMARKS.md CONTRIBUTING.md
README.md STYLE.md docs/*.md docs/concepts/**/*.md docs/guides/**/*.md
docs/pip/**/*.md`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
We want to have consistency between the Ruff and uv documentation for
the upcoming release. We don't love the Ruff docs, but we'd rather have
consistency and then work towards improving them both, rather than have
two very-different documentation sites that both have weaknesses.
The setup here is simpler than in Ruff as: (1) we don't yet generate any
docs from Rust and (2) we don't try to reuse the README in the uv
documentation (which adds a lot of complexity in Ruff). So the change
here is mostly a 1-to-1 port to MkDocs.
## Test Plan
Moving the preview features to top-level concepts and pushing the
pip-compatible interface down.
e.g.
<img width="291" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 7 03 48 AM"
src="500ad97d-899d-4051-b59d-e74786b3a45f">
