Specifically, these are emitted when requirements fail to satisfy
`Requires-Python` or the markers associated with the current fork in the
resolver.
Closes#4373
I found this while testing the tracking of marker expressions across
resolver forks. Namely, given
sys_platform == 'darwin' and implementation_name == 'pypy'
And:
sys_platform == 'bar' or implementation_name == 'foo'
These should be disjoint, but the disjointness checker was reporting
them as overlapping. I fixed this by giving handling of disjunctions
higher precedence than conjunctions, although I am not 100% confident
that this is correct for all cases.
This commit adds marker expressions to our `Fork` type, which are in
turn passed down into `PubGrubDependencies::from_requirements` to filter
our any dependencies with markers that are disjoint from the fork's
marker expression.
This is necessary to avoid visiting packages in the dependency graph
that can never actually be installed. This is because when a fork is
created in the resolver, it always happens when there are two sibling
dependency specifications on a package with the same name, but with
non-overlapping marker expressions. Each fork corresponds to each
such conflicting dependency specification, and each fork assumes the
the corresponding marker expression as a pre-condition for any future
dependencies considered by it. That is, since the fork represents an
installation path that can only be taken when the corresponding
dependency specification (and its marker expression) is actually used,
it also therefore follows that the marker expression is true. Therefore,
any dependency visited in that fork with a marker expression that cannot
possibly be true when the markers of the fork are true can and ought to
be completely ignored.
There are some key invariants that I had to re-learn by reading the
code. This hopefully makes those invariants easier to discover by future
me (and others).
## Summary
This would be a lightweight solution to
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4307 that doesn't fully engage
with all the possibilities in the design space (but would unblock
cross-platform for now).
Updates `--no-binary <package>` to take precedence over `--only-binary
:all:` and `--only-binary <package>` to take precedence over
`--no-binary :all:`.
I'm not entirely sure about this behavior, e.g. maybe I provided
`--only-binary :all:` later on the command line and really want it to
override those earlier arguments of `--no-binary <package>` for safety.
Right now we just fail to solve though since we can't satisfy the
overlapping requests.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4063
## Summary
This is what I consider to be the "real" fix for #8072. We now treat
directory and path URLs as separate `ParsedUrl` types and
`RequirementSource` types. This removes a lot of `.is_dir()` forking
within the `ParsedUrl::Path` arms and makes some states impossible
(e.g., you can't have a `.whl` path that is editable). It _also_ fixes
the `direct_url.json` for direct URLs that refer to files. Previously,
we wrote out to these as if they were installed as directories, which is
just wrong.
In the time before universal resolving, we would always pass a
`MarkerEnvironment`, and this environment would capture any relevant
`Requires-Python` specifier (including if `-p/--python` was provided on
the CLI).
But in universal resolution, we very specifically do not use a
`MarkerEnvironment` because we want to produce a resolution that is
compatible across potentially multiple environments. This in turn meant
that we lost `Requires-Python` filtering.
This PR adds it back. We do this by converting our `PythonRequirement`
into a `MarkerTree` that encodes the version specifiers in a
`Requires-Python` specifier. We then ask whether that `MarkerTree` is
disjoint with a dependency specification's `MarkerTree`. If it is, then
we know it's impossible for that dependency specification to every be
true, and we can completely ignore it.
## Summary
`normalize` now takes an owned value and returns `Option<MarkerTree>`,
such that if any sub-expression evaluates to `true`, we can normalize
out the entire marker.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4267.
By splitting `path` into a lockable, relative (or absolute) and an
absolute installable path and by splitting between urls and paths by
dist type, we can store relative paths in the lockfile.
## Summary
Should be no behavior changes, but one piece of technical debt I noticed
left over in the URL resolver. We already have structured paths, so we
shouldn't need to compare verbatim URLs.
## Summary
If the user requests a package as both editable and non-editable, the
editable now "wins".
Previously, `pip install -e . .` would install as editable. However,
`pip install -e . -r requirements.txt` would _not_ if `requirements.txt`
contained `.`, because we ignored `editable` when deduplicating and the
order of iteration was just dependent on internals.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4053.
## Summary
Similar to how we abstracted the dependencies into
`ResolutionDependencyNames`, I think it makes sense to abstract the base
packages into a `ResolutionPackage`. This also avoids leaking details
about the various `PubGrubPackage` enum variants to `ResolutionGraph`.
Remove the panic when there is an invalid wheel source, instead surface
the error. This error can only occur when manually editing the lock
file, but since it's an external file, we should error and not panic.
This change is helpful since the method needs to be able to error for
relative path support.
## Summary
If a package lacks a source distribution, and we can't find a compatible
wheel for the current platform, we need to just _assume_ that the
package will have a valid wheel on all platforms on which it's
requested; if not, we raise an error at install time.
It's possible that we can be smarter about this over time. For example,
if the package was requested _only_ for macOS, we could verify that
there's at least one macOS-compatible wheel. See the linked issue for
more details.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4139.
## Summary
See the long comment inline. I think this is debatable but probably
right for now. The other options have their own problems, but there are
a few alternate ideas in the comment.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4132.
The basic idea here is to make it so forking can only ever result in a
resolution that, for a particular marker environment, will only install
at most one version of a package. We can guarantee this by ensuring we
only fork on conflicting dependency specifications only when their
corresponding markers are completely disjoint. If they aren't, then
resolution _must_ find a single version of the package in the
intersection of the two dependency specifications.
A test for this case has been added to packse here:
https://github.com/astral-sh/packse/pull/182. Previously, that test
would result in a resolution with two different unconditional versions
of the same package. With this change, resolution fails (as it should).
A commit-by-commit review should be helpful here, since the first commit
is a refactor to make the second commit a bit more digestible.
## Summary
I think we should be able to model PubGrub such that this isn't
necessary (at least for the case described in the issue), but for now,
let's just avoid attempting to build very old distributions in
prefetching.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4136.
## Summary
Simplify and normalize marker expressions in the lockfile. Right now
this does a simple analysis by only looking at related operators at the
same level of precedence. I think anything more complex would be out of
scope.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4002.
## Summary
This PR adds a lowering similar to that seen in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/3100, but this time, for markers.
Like `PubGrubPackageInner::Extra`, we now have
`PubGrubPackageInner::Marker`. The dependencies of the `Marker` are
`PubGrubPackageInner::Package` with and without the marker.
As an example of why this is useful: assume we have `urllib3>=1.22.0` as
a direct dependency. Later, we see `urllib3 ; python_version > '3.7'` as
a transitive dependency. As-is, we might (for some reason) pick a very
old version of `urllib3` to satisfy `urllib3 ; python_version > '3.7'`,
then attempt to fetch its dependencies, which could even involve
building a very old version of `urllib3 ; python_version > '3.7'`. Once
we fetch the dependencies, we would see that `urllib3` at the same
version is _also_ a dependency (because we tack it on). In the new
scheme though, as soon as we "choose" the very old version of `urllib3 ;
python_version > '3.7'`, we'd then see that `urllib3` (the base package)
is also a dependency; so we see a conflict before we even fetch the
dependencies of the old variant.
With this, I can successfully resolve the case in #4099.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4099.
Follow-up to #4016.
This exposes `Range` and `PubGrubSpecifier` from outside the resolver to
use pubgrub's union creating a dependency edge we don't really want.
When creating a lockfile, lock the combined dependencies for all
packages in a workspace. This make the lockfile independent of where you
are in the workspace.
Fixes#3983
## Summary
This PR modifies our `Requires-Python` handling to treat
`Requires-Python` as a lower bound. There's extensive discussion around
this in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4022 and the references
linked therein. I think it's an experiment worth trying. Even in my own
small projects, I'm running into issues whereby I'm being "forced" to
add a `<4` upper bound to my `Requires-Python` due to these caps.
Separately, we should explore adding a mechanism that's distinct from
`Requires-Python` to enable users to declare a supported range for
locking.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4022.
## Summary
The condition enforced here isn't quite right. The same dependency can
appear multiple times, as long as the extra is different.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4101.
## Summary
The "only include if relevant for the extra" filtering should _not_ be
applied to constraints. Otherwise, we'd only constrain when the extra
was included in the constraints file itself, which is incorrect.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4091.
## Summary
I don't think it's worth maintaining this separate test harness for ~18
tests, when they can all be tested in the `uv` package itself. Let's
drop the maintenance burden.
## Summary
Externally, development dependencies are currently structured as a flat
list of PEP 580-compatible requirements:
```toml
[tool.uv]
dev-dependencies = ["werkzeug"]
```
When locking, we lock all development dependencies; when syncing, users
can provide `--dev`.
Internally, though, we model them as dependency groups, similar to
Poetry, PDM, and [PEP 735](https://peps.python.org/pep-0735). This
enables us to change out the user-facing frontend without changing the
internal implementation, once we've decided how these should be exposed
to users.
A few important decisions encoded in the implementation (which we can
change later):
1. Groups are enabled globally, for all dependencies. This differs from
extras, which are enabled on a per-requirement basis. Note, however,
that we'll only discover groups for uv-enabled packages anyway.
2. Installing a group requires installing the base package. We rely on
this in PubGrub to ensure that we resolve to the same version (even
though we only expect groups to come from workspace dependencies anyway,
which are unique). But anyway, that's encoded in the resolver right now,
just as it is for extras.
