## Summary
I don't know if I actually want to commit this, but I did it on the
plane last time and just polished it off (got it to compile) while
waiting to board.
## Summary
This PR modifies the requirement source entities to store a (new)
container struct that wraps `IndexUrl`. This will allow us to store
user-defined metadata alongside `IndexUrl`, and propagate that metadata
throughout resolution.
Specifically, I need to store the "kind" of the index (Simple API vs.
`--find-links`), but I also ran into this problem when I tried to add
support for overriding `Cache-Control` headers on a per-index basis: at
present, we have no way to passing around metadata alongside an
`IndexUrl`.
## Summary
This crate is for standards-compliant types, but this is explicitly a
type that's custom to uv. It's also strange because we kind of want to
reference `IndexUrl` on the registry type, but that's in a crate that
_depends_ on `uv-pypi-types`, which to me is a sign that this is off.
Reject lockfiles where the package version and the wheel versions are
incoherent. This implicitly checks that all wheel files have the same
version.
It does not check for the source dist version, since a source dist may
not contain a version in the filename and attempting to deserialize
source dist filenames we may not need is a performance overhead for
something that's already slow in `uv run`.
Fixes#12164
In #10669, a pyproject.toml with requires-python but no environment had
a lockfile covering only a subset of the requires-python space:
```toml
resolution-markers = [
"python_full_version >= '3.10' and platform_python_implementation == 'CPython'",
"python_full_version == '3.9.*'",
"python_full_version < '3.9'",
]
```
This marker set is invalid, we have to reject the lockfile. (We can
still use the versions though, to avoid churn).
Part 1/2 of #10669
## Summary
This is the pattern I see in a variety of crates, and I believe this is
preferred if you don't _need_ an owned `String`, since you can avoid the
allocation. This could be pretty impactful for us?
Initially, we were limiting Git schemes to HTTPS and SSH as only
supported schemes. We lost this validation in #3429. This incidentally
allowed file schemes, which apparently work with Git out of the box.
A caveat for this is that in tool.uv.sources, we parse the git field
always as URL. This caused a problem with #11425: repo = { git =
'c:\path\to\repo', rev = "xxxxx" } was parsed as a URL where c: is the
scheme, causing a bad error message down the line.
This PR:
* Puts Git URL validation back in place. It bans everything but HTTPS,
SSH, and file URLs. This could be a breaking change, if users were using
a git transport protocol were not aware of, even though never
intentionally supported.
* Allows file: URL in Git: This seems to be supported by Git and we were
supporting it albeit unintentionally, so it's reasonable to continue to
support it.
* It does not allow relative paths in the git field in tool.uv.sources.
Absolute file URLs are supported, whether we want relative file URLs for
Git too should be discussed separately.
Closes#3429: We reject the input with a proper error message, while
hinting the user towards file:. If there's still desire for relative
path support, we can keep it open.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
We want to build `uv-build` without depending on the network crates. In
preparation for that, we split uv-git into uv-git and uv-git-types,
where only uv-git depends on reqwest, so that uv-build can use
uv-git-types.
## Summary
This PR revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/10017, which might
be viable now that we _don't_ enforce any platforms by default.
The basic idea here is that users can mark certain platforms as required
(empty, by default). When resolving, we ensure that the specified
platforms have wheel coverage, backtracking if not.
For example, to require that we include a version of PyTorch that
supports Intel macOS:
```toml
[project]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = ">=3.11"
dependencies = ["torch>1.13"]
[tool.uv]
required-platforms = [
"sys_platform == 'darwin' and platform_machine == 'x86_64'"
]
```
Other than that, the forking is identical to past iterations of this PR.
This would give users a way to resolve the tail of issues in #9711, but
with manual opt-in to supporting specific platforms.
## Summary
This is an alternative to the approach we took in #11063 whereby we
always included `provides-extra` and `requires-dist`, since we needed
some way to differentiate between "no extras" and "lockfile was
generated by a uv version that didn't include extras".
Instead, this PR adds a minor version (called a "revision") to the
lockfile that we can use to indicate support for this feature. While
lockfile version bumps are backwards-incompatible, older uv versions
_can_ read lockfiles with a later revision -- they just won't understand
all the data.
In a future major version bump, we could simplify things and change the
schema to use a (major, minor) format instead of these two separate
fields. But this is the only way to do it that's backwards-compatible
with existing uv versions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Closes#10597.
Recreated https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/10925 that got closed as
the base branch got merged.
Snapshot tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
## Summary
Now that `version` is an optional field, we shouldn't error if an
unambiguous package is lacking a version. We can still enforce the same
guarantees via `source`, since we always set version and source
together, if the package is unambiguous. I also retained the same error
for non-local packages that lack a version like this.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11384.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I got a bit confused when testing `[dependency-groups]` because uv's
error message had the same typo I did in my `pyproject.toml`.
I tried to fix it, as well as a few comment I found along the way.
This collects ALL activated extras while traversing the lock file to
produce a `Resolution` for installation. If any two extras are activated
that are conflicting, then an error is produced.
We add a couple of tests to demonstrate the behavior. One case is
desirable (where we conditionally depend on `package[extra]`) and the
other case is undesirable (where we create an uninstallable lock file).
Fixes#9942, Fixes#10590
## Summary
We should only be ignoring changes in `version` for dynamic projects;
for static projects, it should still be enforced. We should also be
invalidating the lockfile if a project goes from static to dynamic or
vice versa.
Closes#10852.
## Summary
The linked issue actually isn't a bug on main anymore, but it does
require us to take the "slow" path, since setuptools seems to reorder
the extras. This PR adds another normalization step which lets us take
the fast path: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10855.
When support for conflicting extras/groups was initially added, I
stopped short of including the conflict markers in uv's "fork markers"
in the lock file. That is, the fork markers are markers that indicate
the different splits uv took during resolution, which we record, I
believe, to avoid spurious updates to the lock file as a result of
using them as preferences.
One interesting result of omitting the conflict markers from the fork
markers is that sometimes this would result in duplicate markers. In
response, I wrote a function that stripped off the conflict markers and
deduplicated the remainder. My thinking at the time was that it wasn't
clear whether we needed to keep conflict markers around.
It looks like #10783 demonstrates a case where we do, seemingly, need
them. Namely, it's a case where after stripping conflict markers, you
don't end up with duplicate markers, but you do end up with overlapping
markers. Overlapping fork markers are bad juju for the same reason that
overlapping resolver forks are bad juju: you can end up with multiple
versions of the same package in the same environment.
I don't know how to fix overlapping markers without just including the
conflict markers. So that's what this PR does. Because of this, there
will be some churn in lock files, but this only applies to projects that
define conflicting extras.
This PR includes a regression test from #10783. I also manually tried
the original reproduction in #10772 (where adding `numpy<2` caused `uv
sync` to fail), and things worked.
Fixes#10772, Fixes#10783
## Summary
This is a smaller alternative to #10794. If the `Requires-Dist` that we
extract statically doesn't match the lockfile metadata, we now go back
to the distribution database to double-check. Checking the
`Requires-Dist` is itself very cheap, so in the worst case, we're just
paying the same cost as prior to this optimization.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10776.
## Summary
These are very similar to (and computed in the same way as) the hints we
should during a failed resolution, but for install-time.
Closes#10635.
## Test Plan
As an example, when installing PyTorch on macOS with Python 3.13 (wheels
exist for Linux):
```
error: Distribution `torch==2.5.1 @ registry+https://pypi.org/simple` can't be installed because it doesn't have a source distribution or wheel for the current platform
hint: You're on macOS (`macosx_14_0_arm64`), but `torch` (v2.5.1) only has wheels for the following platform: `manylinux1_x86_64`
```
## Summary
This PR modifies the lockfile to omit versions for source trees that use
`dynamic` versioning, thereby enabling projects to use dynamic
versioning with `uv.lock`.
Prior to this change, dynamic versioning was largely incompatible with
locking, especially for popular tools like `setuptools_scm` -- in that
case, every commit bumps the version, so every commit invalidates the
committed lockfile.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7533.
## Summary
After we resolve, we filter out any wheels that aren't applicable for
the target platforms. So, e.g., we remove macOS wheels if we find that
the user only asked to solve for Windows.
This PR extends the same logic to architectures, so that we filter out
ARM-only wheels when the user is only solving for x86, etc.
Closes#10571.
## Summary
This PR extends the thinking in #10525 to platform tags, and then uses
the structured tag enums everywhere, rather than passing around strings.
I think this is a big improvement! It means we're no longer doing ad hoc
tag parsing all over the place.
