## Summary
Largely based on rustup's implementation (linked in the source).
Closes#5027.
## Test Plan
- Changed the executable directory to `uv/foo`.
- Ran script; verified that I could access executables in `foo`.
## Summary
I'll open follow-up tickets for Windows support.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4953.
## Test Plan
```
❯ cargo run tool install flask
Resolved 7 packages in 353ms
Prepared 7 packages in 392ms
Installed 7 packages in 17ms
+ blinker==1.8.2
+ click==8.1.7
+ flask==3.0.3
+ itsdangerous==2.2.0
+ jinja2==3.1.4
+ markupsafe==2.1.5
+ werkzeug==3.0.3
Installed 1 executable: flask
warning: /Users/crmarsh/.local/bin is not on your PATH. To use installed tools, run:
export PATH="/Users/crmarsh/.local/bin:$PATH"
```
Then:
```
❯ which flask
flask not found
```
Then:
```
❯ cargo run tool ensurepath
warning: `uv tool ensurepath` is experimental and may change without warning.
Updated configuration file: /Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/bar
Restart your shell for the changes to take effect.
```
Then:
```
❯ which flask
/Users/crmarsh/.local/bin/flask
```
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4671.
## Test Plan
```
❯ XDG_BIN_HOME="/Users/crmarsh/workspace/uv/foo bar" cargo run tool install black --force
Installed 2 executables: black, blackd
warning: `/Users/crmarsh/workspace/uv/foo bar` is not on your PATH. To use installed tools, run:
export PATH="/Users/crmarsh/workspace/uv/foo bar:$PATH"
```
## Summary
The basic strategy:
- When the user does `uv tool run`, we resolve the `from` and `with`
requirements (always).
- After resolving, we generate a hash of the requirements. For now, I'm
just converting to a lockfile and hashing _that_, but that's an
implementation detail.
- Once we have a hash, we _also_ hash the interpreter.
- We then store environments in
`${CACHE_DIR}/${INTERPRETER_HASH}/${RESOLUTION_HASH}`.
Some consequences:
- We cache based on the interpreter, so if you request a different
Python, we'll create a new environment (even if they're compatible).
This has the nice side-effect of ensuring that we don't use environments
for interpreters that were later deleted.
- We cache the `from` and `with` together. In practice, we may want to
cache them separately, then layer them? But this is also an
implementation detail that we could change later.
- Because we use the lockfile as the cache key, we will invalidate the
cache when the format changes. That seems ok, but we could improve it in
the future by generating a stable hash from a lockfile that's
independent of the schema.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4752.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Closes#4653
## Summary
Adds the tool version to the list command right beside the tool name
```
$ uv tool list
black v24.2.0
```
Following the proposed format discussed in #4653
## Test Plan
`cargo test tool_list`
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This doesn't cache the tool environment; rather, it just uses the `tool
install` environment if it satisfies the request.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4742.
Whew this is a lot.
The user-facing changes are:
- `uv toolchain` to `uv python` e.g. `uv python find`, `uv python
install`, ...
- `UV_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` to` UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_DIR`
- `<UV_STATE_DIR>/toolchains` to `<UV_STATE_DIR>/python` (with
[automatic
migration](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4735/files#r1663029330))
- User-facing messages no longer refer to toolchains, instead using
"Python", "Python versions" or "Python installations"
The internal changes are:
- `uv-toolchain` crate to `uv-python`
- `Toolchain` no longer referenced in type names
- Dropped unused `SystemPython` type (previously replaced)
- Clarified the type names for "managed Python installations"
- (more little things)
## Summary
For now the semantics are such that if the requested requirements from
the command line don't match the receipt (or if any `--reinstall` or
`--upgrade` is requested), we proceed with an install, passing the
`--reinstall` and `--upgrade` to the underlying Python environment.
This may lead to some unintuitive behaviors, but it's simplest for now.
For example:
- `uv tool install black<24` followed by `uv tool install black
--upgrade` will install the latest version of `black`, removing the
`<24` constraint.
- `uv tool install black --with black-plugin` followed by `uv tool
install black` will remove `black-plugin`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4659.
In #3514 and #2755, users had intermittent network errors, but it was
not always clear whether we had already retried these requests or not.
Building upon https://github.com/TrueLayer/reqwest-middleware/pull/159,
this PR adds the number of retries to the error message, so we can see
at first glance where we're missing retries and where we might need to
change retry settings.
Example error trace:
```
Could not connect, are you offline?
Caused by: Request failed after 3 retries
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/uv/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
```
This code is ugly since i'm missing a better pattern for attaching
context to reqwest middleware errors in
https://github.com/TrueLayer/reqwest-middleware/pull/159.
## Summary
Packages that provide scripts that _aren't_ Python entrypoints need to
respected in `uv tool install`. For example, Ruff ships a script in
`ruff-0.5.0.data/scripts`.
Unfortunately, the `.data` directory doesn't exist in the virtual
environment at all (it's removed, per the spec, after install). So this
PR changes the entry point detection to look at the `RECORD` file, which
is the only evidence that the scripts were installed.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4691.
## Test Plan
`cargo run uv tool install ruff` (snapshot tests to-come)
## Summary
This PR dodges some of the bigger issues raised by
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4554 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4555 by _not_ changing any of the
bigger semantics around syncing and instead merely changing virtual
workspace roots to sync all packages in the workspace (rather than
erroring due to being unable to find a project).
Closes#4541.
We need this to power uninstallations!
The latter two commits were reviewed in:
- #4637
- #4638
Note this is a breaking change for existing tool installations, but it's
in preview and very new. In the future, we'll need a clear upgrade path
for tool receipt changes.
Adds support for `--reinstall` and `--reinstall-package` to `uv tool
install`. These are already available via the installer settings, we
just respect them now.
`--reinstall` implies a recreation of the environment and reinstallation
of the entry points.
`--reinstall-package` will only update a subset of the environment. If
the target package is the one with the entry points, we'll reinstall the
entry points. Otherwise, the entry points are not changed.
This is the minimal "working" implementation. In summary, we:
- Resolve the requested requirements
- Create an environment at `$UV_STATE_DIR/tools/$name`
- Inspect the `dist-info` for the main requirement to determine its
entry points scripts
- Link the entry points from a user-executable directory
(`$XDG_BIN_HOME`) to the environment bin
- Create an entry at `$UV_STATE_DIR/tools/tools.toml` tracking the
user's request
The idea with `tools.toml` is that it allows us to perform upgrades and
syncs, retaining the original user request (similar to declarations in a
`pyproject.toml`). I imagine using a similar schema in the
`pyproject.toml` in the future if/when we add project-levle tools. I'm
also considering exposing `tools.toml` in the standard uv configuration
directory instead of the state directory, but it seems nice to tuck it
away for now while we iterate on it. Installing a tool won't perform a
sync of other tool environments, we'll probably have an explicit `uv
tool sync` command for that?
I've split out todos into follow-up pull requests:
- #4509 (failing on Windows)
- #4501
- #4504Closes#4485
## Summary
If the user puts their configuration in a `pyproject.toml` that _isn't_
a valid workspace root (e.g., it's a Poetry file), we won't discover it,
because we only look in `uv.toml` files in that case. I think this is
somewhat debatable... We could choose to _require_ `uv.toml` there, but
as a user I'd probably expect it to work?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4521.
