We always ignore the `clippy::struct_excessive_bools` rule and formerly
annotated this at the function level. This PR specifies the allow in
`workspace.lints.clippy` in `Cargo.toml`.
This allows you to specify requires-python on individual dependency-groups,
with the intended usecase being "oh my dev-dependencies have a higher
requires-python than my actual project".
This includes a large driveby move of the RequiresPython type to
uv-distribution-types to allow us to generate the appropriate markers at
this point in the code. It also migrates RequiresPython from
pubgrub::Range to version_ranges::Ranges, and makes several pub(crate)
items pub, as it's no longer defined in uv_resolver.
Fixes#11606
## Summary
This PR extends `[[tool.uv.index]]` to support `--find-links`-style
"flat" indexes, so that users can point to such indexes without using
`--find-links` _and_ get access to the full functionality of
`[[tool.uv.index]]` (e.g., they can now pin packages to
`--find-links`-style indexes).
Note that, at present, `--find-links` indexes actually have some quirky
behavior, in that we combine them into a single entity and then merge
the discovered distributions into each Simple API-style index. The
motivation here, IIRC, was to match pip's behavior quite closely. I'm
interested in _removing_ that behavior, but it'd be breaking (and may
also be inconvenient for some use-cases). So, the behavior for indexes
passed in via `--find-links` remains completely unchanged. However,
`[[tool.uv.index]]` entries with `format = "flat"` are now treated
identically to those defined with `format = "simple"` (the default), in
that we stop after we find the first-matching index, etc.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11634.
## Summary
This PR fixes a subtle issue arising from our propagation of
preferences. When we resolve a fork, we take the solution from that fork
and mark all the chosen versions as "preferred" as we move on to the
next fork.
In this specific case, the resolver ended up solving a macOS-specific
fork first, which led us to pick `2.6.0` rather than `2.6.0+cpu`. This
in itself is correct; but when we moved on to the next fork, we
preferred `2.6.0` over `2.6.0+cpu`, despite the fact that `2.6.0` _only_
includes macOS wheel, and that branch was focused on Linux.
Now, in preferences, we prefer local variants (if they exist). If the
local variant ends up not working, we'll presumedly backtrack to the
base version anyway.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11406.
## Summary
If a user provides a constraint like `flask==3.0.0`, that gets expanded
to `[3.0.0, 3.0.0+[max])`. So it's not a _singleton_, but it should be
treated as such for the purposes of prioritization, since in practice it
will almost always map to a single version.
## Summary
The issue here is that we add `urllib3{python_full_version >= '3.8'}` as
a dependency, then `requests{python_full_version >= '3.8'}`, which adds
`urllib3`, but at that point, we haven't expanded
`urllib3{python_full_version >= '3.8'}`, so we "lose" the singleton
constraint. The solution is to ensure that we visit proxies eagerly, so
that we accumulate constraints as early as possible.
Closes
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10425#issuecomment-2580324578.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2777
I noticed we're seeing "Python ABI" _a lot_ in error messages which I
did not expect. This improves a common case by being a little more
specific.
Recently, rkyv 0.8 was released. Its API is a fair bit simpler now for
higher level uses (like for us in `uv`) and results in us being able to
delete a fair bit of code. This also removes our last dependency on `syn
1.0`, and thus drops that dependency.
Performance (via testing on the `transformers` example) seems to remain
about the same, which is what was expected:
```
$ hyperfine -w5 -r100 'uv lock' 'uv-ag-rkyv-update lock'
Benchmark 1: uv lock
Time (mean ± σ): 55.6 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 30.4 ms, System: 35.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 43.0 ms … 73.1 ms 100 runs
Benchmark 2: uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
Time (mean ± σ): 56.5 ms ± 7.2 ms [User: 30.5 ms, System: 36.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 39.1 ms … 71.5 ms 100 runs
Summary
uv lock ran
1.02 ± 0.18 times faster than uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
```
Closes#7415
## Summary
If we have a singleton `Range`, we don't need to iterate over the map of
available ranges; instead, we can just get the singleton directly.
Closes#6131.
## Summary
Right now, we have slightly different `requires-python` semantics for
`-p 3.11` vs. `-p 3.11 --universal`, and slightly different (wrong)
semantics for how we compare against the _installed_ Python version
(which doesn't ignore upper bounds, but should).
This PR rips it all out and replaces it with consistent semantics across
`uv lock`, `uv pip compile -p 3.11`, and `uv pip compile -p 3.11
--universal`. We now always ignore upper bounds.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6859.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5045.
## Summary
This PR adds a `DistExtension` field to some of our distribution types,
which requires that we validate that the file type is known and
supported when parsing (rather than when attempting to unzip). It
removes a bunch of extension parsing from the code too, in favor of
doing it once upfront.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5858.
## Summary
`dearpygui==1.9.1 has no wheels are available with a matching Python
ABI` is way better than `he requested Python version (>=3.12.3) does not
satisfy Python>=3.12.3`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5284.
## Summary
Given `Requires-Python: ">=3.12.3"`, we were rejecting wheels like
`dearpygui-1.11.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl`, since `3.12.0` is not
included in `>=3.12.3`. We instead need to test against the major-minor
version of `Requires-Python`.
The easiest way to do this, I think, is the use the `RequiresPython`
struct, which has a single bound that we can truncate the major-minor.
This also means that we now allow
`dearpygui-1.11.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl` for specifiers like
`Requires-Python: "==3.10.*"`. This is incorrect on the surface, but it
does match our semantics for `Requires-Python` elsewhere: we treat it as
a lower bound.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5287.
## Summary
The example in the linked issue doesn't quite work, but I think it has
to do with the existing filtering logic. Will follow-up separately.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5012.
## Summary
This is required to solve https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4669,
because the `Requires-Python` version can now vary across a resolution.
For example, within certain forks, we might have a more narrow range,
which would allow us to use distributions that would not be allowed for
the global resolution.
This should be fine because `requires-python` is part of the package
metadata, so it should be consistent between files within a package
version. As such, there shouldn't be any risk that we incorrectly
prioritize distributions by omitting this information.
(To be more specific, the risk is something like: we prioritize some
wheel over a source distribution within a package-version, so we don't
track the source distribution at all. Then, later, when we choose a
candidate, we see that the wheel doesn't meet the `Requires-Python`
requirement, even though the source distribution _would've_ met it. If
files within a distribution could have varied support, this would be a
real risk.)
Updates `--no-binary <package>` to take precedence over `--only-binary
:all:` and `--only-binary <package>` to take precedence over
`--no-binary :all:`.
I'm not entirely sure about this behavior, e.g. maybe I provided
`--only-binary :all:` later on the command line and really want it to
override those earlier arguments of `--no-binary <package>` for safety.
Right now we just fail to solve though since we can't satisfy the
overlapping requests.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4063
## Summary
If a package lacks a source distribution, and we can't find a compatible
wheel for the current platform, we need to just _assume_ that the
package will have a valid wheel on all platforms on which it's
requested; if not, we raise an error at install time.
It's possible that we can be smarter about this over time. For example,
if the package was requested _only_ for macOS, we could verify that
there's at least one macOS-compatible wheel. See the linked issue for
more details.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4139.
## Summary
This PR modifies our `Requires-Python` handling to treat
`Requires-Python` as a lower bound. There's extensive discussion around
this in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4022 and the references
linked therein. I think it's an experiment worth trying. Even in my own
small projects, I'm running into issues whereby I'm being "forced" to
add a `<4` upper bound to my `Requires-Python` due to these caps.
Separately, we should explore adding a mechanism that's distinct from
`Requires-Python` to enable users to declare a supported range for
locking.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4022.
## Summary
Instead of checking if the target and installed version are the same, we
model the data such that the target version is only present if it was
specified by the user. This also means that we correctly say "requested
version" even if the two happen to be the same.
## Summary
It turns out that in the
[spec](https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/binary-distribution-format/#file-name-convention),
if a wheel filename includes a build tag, then we need to use it to
break ties. This PR implements that behavior. (Previously, we dropped
the build tag entirely.)
Closes#3779.
## Test Plan
Run: `cargo run pip install -i https://pypi.anaconda.org/intel/simple
mkl_fft==1.3.8 --python-platform linux --python-version 3.10`. This now
resolves without error. Previously, we selected build tag 63 of
`mkl_fft==1.3.8`, which led to an incompatibility with NumPy. Now, we
select build tag 70.
## Summary
Uncertain about this, but we don't actually need the full
`SourceDistFilename`, only the name and version -- and we often have
that information already (as in the lockfile routines). So by flattening
the fields onto `RegistrySourceDist`, we can avoid re-parsing for
information we already have.
Following from #3595, we'd like wheels to make their way into the lock
file even if the current environment selects an sdist. With #3595, this
didn't happen:
$ cargo run -p uv -- pip compile -p3.10 <(echo psycopg2)
--unstable-uv-lock-file
$ cat uv.lock
version = 1
[[distribution]]
name = "psycopg2"
version = "2.9.9"
source = "registry+https://pypi.org/simple"
[distribution.sdist]
url =
"dc6acaf46d/psycopg2-2.9.9.tar.gz"
hash =
"sha256:d1454bde93fb1e224166811694d600e746430c006fbb031ea06ecc2ea41bf156"
The above example uses `psycopg2`, which has an sdist and wheels only on
Windows. Since I ran the above on Linux, an sdist was selected. But no
wheels appeared in the lock file.
With this PR, wheels are now correctly plumbed through:
$ cargo run -p uv -- pip compile -p3.10 <(echo psycopg2)
--unstable-uv-lock-file
$ cat uv.lock
version = 1
[[distribution]]
name = "psycopg2"
version = "2.9.9"
source = "registry+https://pypi.org/simple"
[distribution.sdist]
url =
"dc6acaf46d/psycopg2-2.9.9.tar.gz"
hash =
"sha256:d1454bde93fb1e224166811694d600e746430c006fbb031ea06ecc2ea41bf156"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"2767d96391/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp310-cp310-win32.whl"
hash =
"sha256:38a8dcc6856f569068b47de286b472b7c473ac7977243593a288ebce0dc89516"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"6572dec683/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp310-cp310-win_amd64.whl"
hash =
"sha256:426f9f29bde126913a20a96ff8ce7d73fd8a216cfb323b1f04da402d452853c3"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"1fc5b9d33c/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp311-cp311-win32.whl"
hash =
"sha256:ade01303ccf7ae12c356a5e10911c9e1c51136003a9a1d92f7aa9d010fb98372"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"5133dd3183/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl"
hash =
"sha256:121081ea2e76729acfb0673ff33755e8703d45e926e416cb59bae3a86c6a4981"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"f74ffe6b6f/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp312-cp312-win32.whl"
hash =
"sha256:d735786acc7dd25815e89cc4ad529a43af779db2e25aa7c626de864127e5a024"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"c4a26e1918/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl"
hash =
"sha256:a7653d00b732afb6fc597e29c50ad28087dcb4fbfb28e86092277a559ae4e693"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"ffeb9ac356/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp37-cp37m-win32.whl"
hash =
"sha256:5e0d98cade4f0e0304d7d6f25bbfbc5bd186e07b38eac65379309c4ca3193efa"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"0a39176d36/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp37-cp37m-win_amd64.whl"
hash =
"sha256:7e2dacf8b009a1c1e843b5213a87f7c544b2b042476ed7755be813eaf4e8347a"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"86b90d30c4/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp38-cp38-win32.whl"
hash =
"sha256:ff432630e510709564c01dafdbe996cb552e0b9f3f065eb89bdce5bd31fabf4c"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"c439b378ef/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp38-cp38-win_amd64.whl"
hash =
"sha256:bac58c024c9922c23550af2a581998624d6e02350f4ae9c5f0bc642c633a2d5e"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"5080c0e61a/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp39-cp39-win32.whl"
hash =
"sha256:c92811b2d4c9b6ea0285942b2e7cac98a59e166d59c588fe5cfe1eda58e72d59"
[[distribution.wheel]]
url =
"ec73fe66d4/psycopg2-2.9.9-cp39-cp39-win_amd64.whl"
hash =
"sha256:de80739447af31525feddeb8effd640782cf5998e1a4e9192ebdf829717e3913"
Ref #3351
Our current flow of data from "simple registry package" to "final
resolved distribution" goes through a number of types:
* `SimpleMetadata` is the API response from a registry that includes all
published versions for a package. Each version has an assortment of
metadata
associated with it.
* `VersionFiles` is the aforementioned metadata. It is split in two: a
group of files for source distributions and a group of files for wheels.
* `PrioritizedDist` collects a subset of the files from `VersionFiles`
to form a selection of the "best" sdist and the "best" wheel for the
current environment.
* `CompatibleDist` is created from a borrowed `PrioritizedDist` that,
perhaps among other things, encapsulates the decision of whether to pick
an sdist or a wheel. (This decision depends both on compatibility and
the action being performed. e.g., When doing installation, a
`CompatibleDist` will sometimes select an sdist over a wheel.)
* `ResolvedDistRef` is like a `ResolvedDist`, but borrows a `Dist`.
* `ResolvedDist` is the almost-final-form of a distribution in a
resolution and is created from a `ResolvedDistRef`.
* `AnnotatedResolvedDist` is a new data type that is the actual final
form of a distribution that a universal lock file cares about. It
bundles a `ResolvedDist` with some metadata needed to generate a lock
file.
One of the requirements of a universal lock file is that we include all
wheels (and maybe all source distributions? but at least one if it's
present) associated with a distribution. But the above flow of data (in
the step from `VersionFiles` to `PrioritizedDist`) drops all wheels
except for the best one.
To remedy this, in this PR, we rejigger `PrioritizedDist`,
`CompatibleDist` and `ResolvedDistRef` so that all wheel data is
preserved. And when a `ResolvedDistRef` is finally turned into a
`ResolvedDist`, we copy all of the wheel data. And finally, we adjust
the `Lock` constructor to read this new data and include it in the lock
file. To make this work, we also modify `RegistryBuiltDist` so that it
can contain one or more wheels instead of just one.
One shortcoming here (called out in the code as a FIXME) is that if a
source distribution is selected as the "best" thing to use (perhaps
there are no compatible wheels), then the wheels won't end up in the
lock file. I plan to fix this in a follow-up PR.
We also aren't totally consistent on source distribution naming.
Sometimes we use `sdist`. Sometimes `source`. Sometimes `source_dist`.
I think it'd be nice to just use `sdist` everywhere, but I do prefer
the type names to be `SourceDist`. And sometimes you want function
names to match the type names (i.e., `from_source_dist`), which in turn
leads to an appearance of inconsistency. I'm open to ideas.
Closes#3351
## Summary
This makes it easier to add (e.g.) JSON Schema derivations to the type.
If we have support for other dates in the future, we can generalize it
to a `UserDate` or similar.
## Summary
This PR enables `--require-hashes` with unnamed requirements. The key
change is that `PackageId` becomes `VersionId` (since it refers to a
package at a specific version), and the new `PackageId` consists of
_either_ a package name _or_ a URL. The hashes are keyed by `PackageId`,
so we can generate the `RequiredHashes` before we have names for all
packages, and enforce them throughout.
Closes#2979.
## Summary
This PR enables hash generation for URL requirements when the user
provides `--generate-hashes` to `pip compile`. While we include the
hashes from the registry already, today, we omit hashes for URLs.
To power hash generation, we introduce a `HashPolicy` abstraction:
```rust
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub enum HashPolicy<'a> {
/// No hash policy is specified.
None,
/// Hashes should be generated (specifically, a SHA-256 hash), but not validated.
Generate,
/// Hashes should be validated against a pre-defined list of hashes. If necessary, hashes should
/// be generated so as to ensure that the archive is valid.
Validate(&'a [HashDigest]),
}
```
All of the methods on the distribution database now accept this policy,
instead of accepting `&'a [HashDigest]`.
Closes#2378.
## Summary
This represents a change to `--require-hashes` in the event that we
don't find a matching hash from the registry. The behavior in this PR is
closer to pip's.
Prior to this PR, if a distribution had no reported hash, or only
mismatched hashes, we would mark it as incompatible. Now, we mark it as
compatible, but we use the hash-agreement as part of the ordering, such
that we prefer any distribution with a matching hash, then any
distribution with no hash, then any distribution with a mismatched hash.
As a result, if an index reports incorrect hashes, but the user provides
the correct one, resolution now succeeds, where it would've failed.
Similarly, if an index omits hashes altogether, but the user provides
the correct one, resolution now succeeds, where it would've failed.
If we end up picking a distribution whose hash ultimately doesn't match,
we'll reject it later, after resolution.
## Summary
This PR adds support for hash-checking mode in `pip install` and `pip
sync`. It's a large change, both in terms of the size of the diff and
the modifications in behavior, but it's also one that's hard to merge in
pieces (at least, with any test coverage) since it needs to work
end-to-end to be useful and testable.
Here are some of the most important highlights:
- We store hashes in the cache. Where we previously stored pointers to
unzipped wheels in the `archives` directory, we now store pointers with
a set of known hashes. So every pointer to an unzipped wheel also
includes its known hashes.
- By default, we don't compute any hashes. If the user runs with
`--require-hashes`, and the cache doesn't contain those hashes, we
invalidate the cache, redownload the wheel, and compute the hashes as we
go. For users that don't run with `--require-hashes`, there will be no
change in performance. For users that _do_, the only change will be if
they don't run with `--generate-hashes` -- then they may see some
repeated work between resolution and installation, if they use `pip
compile` then `pip sync`.
- Many of the distribution types now include a `hashes` field, like
`CachedDist` and `LocalWheel`.
- Our behavior is similar to pip, in that we enforce hashes when pulling
any remote distributions, and when pulling from our own cache. Like pip,
though, we _don't_ enforce hashes if a distribution is _already_
installed.
- Hash validity is enforced in a few different places:
1. During resolution, we enforce hash validity based on the hashes
reported by the registry. If we need to access a source distribution,
though, we then enforce hash validity at that point too, prior to
running any untrusted code. (This is enforced in the distribution
database.)
2. In the install plan, we _only_ add cached distributions that have
matching hashes. If a cached distribution is missing any hashes, or the
hashes don't match, we don't return them from the install plan.
3. In the downloader, we _only_ return distributions with matching
hashes.
4. The final combination of "things we install" are: (1) the wheels from
the cache, and (2) the downloaded wheels. So this ensures that we never
install any mismatching distributions.
- Like pip, if `--require-hashes` is provided, we require that _all_
distributions are pinned with either `==` or a direct URL. We also
require that _all_ distributions have hashes.
There are a few notable TODOs:
- We don't support hash-checking mode for unnamed requirements. These
should be _somewhat_ rare, though? Since `pip compile` never outputs
unnamed requirements. I can fix this, it's just some additional work.
- We don't automatically enable `--require-hashes` with a hash exists in
the requirements file. We require `--require-hashes`.
Closes#474.
## Test Plan
I'd like to add some tests for registries that report incorrect hashes,
but otherwise: `cargo test`
## Summary
This lets us remove circular dependencies (in the future, e.g., #2945)
that arise from `FlatIndex` needing a bunch of resolver-specific
abstractions (like incompatibilities, required hashes, etc.) that aren't
necessary to _fetch_ the flat index entries.
