## Summary
When we add a new optional group in `uv add`, we never to update the
`pyproject.toml` before locking. Otherwise, we use the stale
`pyproject.toml` and omit the optional group.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5687.
## Summary
Fixes a bug in #5494. The `RequirementSourceWire` representation was
ambiguous, and so the order of the fields meant that all variants were
mapped to `Registry` when deserializing. (So the snapshots were right,
but behaviors were wrong.)
## Summary
This could still be made more robust, but it's not critical, since you
can always `--force`. It's good to handle this case, though, since we
have an explicit error for it.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5490.
It transpires that detecting the directory a script was sourced from is
non-trivial across `bash`, `ksh` and `zsh`.
The previous version was a one-liner and supported `bash` and `zsh` but
not `ksh`.
It is possible to keep the one-liner and add `ksh` support, but that is
mutually-exclusive with `zsh`.
Therefore, the only way to square this circle is to add an `if` block. A
silver lining here is that although longer, the script is probably
easier to follow as there is less code-golfing going on.
## Summary
The current receipt doesn't capture quite enough information. For
example, it doesn't differentiate between editable and non-editable
requirements. This PR instead uses the full `Requirement` type. I think
we should use a custom representation like we do in the lockfile, but
I'm just using the default representation to demonstrate the idea.
## Summary
As-is, if you have a workspace with mixed `requires-python`
requirements, resolution will _never_ succeed, since we'll use the union
as the `requires-python` bound (i.e., take the lowest value), and fail
when we see the package that only supports some more narrow range.
This PR modifies the behavior to take the intersection (i.e., the
highest value), so if you have one package that supports Python 3.12 and
later, and another that supports Python 3.8 and later, we lock for
Python 3.12. If you try to sync or run with Python 3.8, we raise an
error, since the lockfile will be incompatible with that request.
Konsti has a write-up in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5594
that outlines what could be a longer-term strategy.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5578.
By resolving for each fork from the lockfile individually and by adding
using preferences for the current fork, we solve the instability #5180.
I've tested the locally and will add the packse test scenarios upstack.
Part of
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5180#issuecomment-2247696198
The comment in the code explains the bulk of this:
```rust
// We previously computed this heuristic freshness lifetime by
// looking at the difference between the last modified header and
// the response's date header. We then asserted that the cached
// response ought to be "fresh" for 10% of that interval.
//
// It turns out that this can result in very long freshness
// lifetimes[1] that lead to uv caching too aggressively.
//
// Since PyPI sets a max-age of 600 seconds and since we're
// principally just interacting with Python package indices here,
// we just assume a freshness lifetime equal to what PyPI has.
//
// Note though that a better solution here is for the index to
// support proper HTTP caching headers (ideally Cache-Control, but
// Expires also works too, as above).
```
We also remove the `heuristic_percent` field on `CacheConfig`. Since
that's actually part of the cache itself, we bump the simple cache
version.
Finally, we add some more `trace!` calls that should hopefully make
diagnosing issues related to the freshness lifetime a bit easier in the
future.
Fixes#5351
## Summary
Given a fork like:
```
pylint < 3 ; sys_platform == 'darwin'
pylint > 2 ; sys_platform != 'darwin'
```
Solving the top branch will typically yield a solution that also
satisfies the bottom branch, due to maximum version selection (while the
inverse isn't true).
To quote an example from the docs:
```rust
// If there's no difference, prioritize forks with upper bounds. We'd prefer to solve
// `numpy <= 2` before solving `numpy >= 1`, since the resolution produced by the former
// might work for the latter, but the inverse is unlikely to be true due to maximum
// version selection. (Selecting `numpy==2.0.0` would satisfy both forks, but selecting
// the latest `numpy` would not.)
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4926 for now.
## Summary
First part of: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4926. We should
solve forks that _don't_ expand the world of supported versions (e.g.,
`python_version >= '3.11'` enables us to select new packages, since we
narrow the supported version range).
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
`uv venv` should support adopting python version specified in
`requires-python` from `pyproject.toml`. This allows customization on
the venv setup when syncing from python project.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5552.
It also serves as a workaround to close
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5258.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
1. Run `uv venv` in folder with `pyroject.toml` specifying
`requries-python = "<3.10"`. Python 3.9 is selected for venv.
2. Change to `requries-python = "<3.11"` and run `uv venv` again. Python
3.10 is selected now.
3. Switch to a folder without `pyproject.toml` then run `uv venv`.
Python 3.12 is selected now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Collapses the previous default into "managed" and makes the "managed"
behavior match "installed". People should use "only-managed" if they
want that behavior, it seems overly complicated otherwise.
## Summary
This PR deprecates the `--isolated` flag. The treatment varies across
the APIs:
- For non-preview APIs, we warn but treat it as equivalent to
`--no-config`.
- For preview APIs, we warn and ignore it, with two exceptions...
- For `tool run` and `run` specifically, we don't even warn, because we
can't differentiate the command-specific `--isolated` from the global
`--isolated`.
## Summary
The culmination of #4730. We now have `uv run --isolated` which always
uses a fresh environment (but includes the workspace dependencies as
needed). This enables you to test with strict isolation (e.g., `uv run
--isolated -p foo` will ensure that `foo` is unable to import anything
that isn't an actual dependency).
Closes#5430.
## Summary
This PR gets rid of the global `--isolated` flag (which serves a bunch
of independent responsibilities right now) on `uv tool run` in favor of
a dedicated `--isolated` flag, which tells uv to avoid re-using an
existing tool environment for this invocation. We'll add the same thing
to `uv run`, to avoid using the base project environment.
This will become a bit clearer in #5466, when we deprecate the
`--isolated` flag on the preview APIs.
## Summary
The idea here is that we hide all resolver output (the grayed out
resolver messages, plus the list of environment modifications) by
default in `uv run` and `uv tool run`. You can pass `--show-resolution`
to re-enable them.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5458.
## Summary
Right now, `--isolated` is read from `uv run` and `uv init` to avoid
discovering the current workspace (or project). This PR moves that
behavior to a dedicated `--no-workspace` flag for `uv init`, and
`--no-project` for `uv run`. They could use the same flag, but
`--no-project` feels confusing for `uv init`, and `--no-workspace` seems
confusing for `uv run` (especially so once you read the documentation,
where we refer to the thing you're omitting as the project).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5429.
This PR represents a different approach to marker propagation in an
attempt to unblock #4640. In particular, instead of propagating markers
when forks are created, we wait until resolution is complete to
propagate all markers to all dependencies in each fork. This ends up
being both more robust (we should never miss anything) and simpler to
implement because it doesn't require mutating a `PubGrubPackage` (which
was pretty annoying). I think the main downside here is that this can
sometimes add markers where they aren't needed.
This actually winds up making quite a few snapshot changes. I went
through each of them. Some of them look like legitimate bug fixes. Some
of them look like superfluous additions. And some of them look like they
would be removed if we had perfect marker normalization. But I don't
think any of the changes are _wrong_.
## Summary
If we just created an entrypoint script, we can of course set the
permissions (we just created it). However, if we're copying from the
cache, we might _not_ own the file. In that case, if we need to change
the permissions (we shouldn't, since the script is likely already
executable -- we set the permissions when we unzip, but I guess they
could _not_ be properly set in the zip itself), we have to copy it.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5581.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
use windows-sys bindings maintained by microsoft devs. winapi didn't has
any updates for more than 3 years
## Test Plan
cargo test. it failed locally because I don't have Python 3.12 installed
## Summary
uv run --directory <path> means that one doesn't have to change to a
project's directory to run programs from it. It makes it possible to use
projects as if they are tool installations.
To support this, first the code reading .python-version was updated so
that
it can read such markers outside the current directory. Note the minor
change this causes (if I'm right), described in the commit.
## Test Plan
One test has been added.
## --directory
Not sure what the name of the argument should be, but it's following uv
sync's directory for now.
Other alternatives could be "--project". Uv run and uv tool run should
probably find common agreement on this (relevant for project-locked
tools).
I've implemented this same change in Rye, some time ago, and then we
went
with --pyproject `<`path to pyproject.toml file`>`. I think using
pyproject.toml file path and not directory was probably a mistake, an
overgeneralization one doesn't need.
