It looks like we had a bad merge where the result caused some test
failures. This commit just updates the snapshots to the new reality. I
haven't found the root cause of the bad merge yet.
## Summary
It's hard for me to imagine a scenario in which a user passed
`--reinstall`, but wanted us to keep respecting cached data for a
package. For example, to actually "rebuild and reinstall" an editable
today, you have to pass both `--reinstall` and `--refresh`.
This PR makes `--reinstall` imply `--refresh`, so we always validate
that the cached data is fresh.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5424.
## Summary
This PR re-introduces caching for source trees. In short, we treat the
metadata as cached unless the `pyproject.toml`, `setup.py`, or
`setup.cfg` file changes. This is a heuristic and not a good one,
especially for extension modules, but without it, we have to rebuild
every project every time (unless you have static metadata, like a
`pyproject.toml` that we can read directly).
Now that we support persistent configuration, users should add:
```toml
[tool.uv]
reinstall = ["foo"]
```
If they want a package to always be refreshed (ignore cache) and
reinstalled (ignore environment).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5420.
Two changes split out from the instability work:
* Break `ResolutionGraph::from_state` into methods before adding new
logic to it.
* `ResolutionGraph`: Convert `NodeKey` type to `PackageRef` struct:
Another small refactoring to make subsequent changes easier.
No functional changes.
@BurntSushi I hope this doesn't interfere with your work too much, the
`PackageRef` should at least make debugging panics here easier.
In preparation for the preferences changes with forking, change the
method structure in `CandidateSelector`. Split out into its own PR to
avoid merge conflicts with main. No functional changes.
Consider these requirements from pylint 3.2.5:
```
Requires-Dist: dill >=0.3.6 ; python_version >= "3.11"
Requires-Dist: dill >=0.3.7 ; python_version >= "3.12"
```
We will split on the python version, but then we may pick a version of
`dill` that's `>=0.3.7` in both branches and also have an otherwise
identical resolution in both forks. In this case, we merge both forks
and store only their conjoined markers.
## Summary
Normalize the order of marker expressions on construction. This removes
the distinction between expressions like `os_name == 'Linux'` vs.
`'Linux' == os_name` throughout the codebase. One caveat here is that
the `in` operator does not have a direct inverse, so we introduce
`MarkerOperator::Contains` to handle that case.
I wanted to land this smaller change before some more intrusive changes
as it simplifies the existing code quite a bit.
## Summary
Prior to this change, the resolver would panic if we ran with
`--offline` and `--no-deps` and we had cached metadata for a _package_
(i.e., the versions) but no cached metadata for the _distribution_
(i.e., the specific wheel), since we weren't validating that the
returned metadata in the `--no-deps` case was actually successful. (We
need metadata, even for `--no-deps`, so that we can validate extras.)
## Test Plan
The added test panics on the previous branch.
## Summary
Users can now run `uv cache prune --ci` (open to feedback on the name of
that flag) to remove all pre-built wheels from the cache, leaving behind
zipped, built wheels (which tend to be the most expensive assets to
re-create). This should greatly increase cache performance in CI
environments, since uploading unzipped wheels can actually hurt
performance if you're persisting the uv cache.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5282.
The test asserts that 28 files were removed. But on my system, 27 files
are removed.
This PR is first about debugging what the difference is (since CI
presumably passes with the status quo snapshot). And then I'm thinking
the right way to fix the test failure is with a filter that replaces the
specific number of files removed (limited to what we know to be
correct) with a placeholder.
## Summary
This is surprisingly complex because we need to decide what happens if
you run `uv run` from within a hidden folder, etc. For now, I did the
simplest thing: we just ignore workspace members that are hidden
directories if they lack a `pyproject.toml`, so you can still include
hidden members, they're just ignored if they don't seem to be projects.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5403.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Implements #5340
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
This is a bit simpler than #5333, but seems to work in my testing on
macOS and Windows. It's based on implementations that I found in
[Pixi](36f1bb297d/src/cli/exec.rs (L99))
and
[Wasmer](49e60af8df/lib/wasix/src/state/builder.rs (L1058)).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5257.
## Test Plan
On both macOS and Windows:
- `cargo run -- tool run --from jupyterlab jupyter-lab` -- hit Ctrl-C;
verify that the process exits and the terminal is left in a good state.
- `cargo run -- run python` -- hit Ctrl-C; verify that the process does
_not_ exit, but does on Ctrl-D.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5359.
## Test Plan
Unfortunately, the only packages I know of that use this are Ruff and
uv, and both are too heavy to install in a recurring test, so:
`uv tool install hatch==1.12.0 --with uv==0.2.27 --force
--link-mode=symlink`
> DEBUG Found `cpython-3.12.1-macos-aarch64-none` at
`/Users/zb/Library/Application
Support/uv/python/cpython-3.12.1-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3`
(managed installations)
Instead of `<implementation> <version>`
> DEBUG Found cpython 3.12.1 at `/Users/zb/Library/Application
Support/uv/python/cpython-3.12.1-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3`
(managed installations)
