## Summary
Similar to how we abstracted the dependencies into
`ResolutionDependencyNames`, I think it makes sense to abstract the base
packages into a `ResolutionPackage`. This also avoids leaking details
about the various `PubGrubPackage` enum variants to `ResolutionGraph`.
Remove the panic when there is an invalid wheel source, instead surface
the error. This error can only occur when manually editing the lock
file, but since it's an external file, we should error and not panic.
This change is helpful since the method needs to be able to error for
relative path support.
## Summary
If a package lacks a source distribution, and we can't find a compatible
wheel for the current platform, we need to just _assume_ that the
package will have a valid wheel on all platforms on which it's
requested; if not, we raise an error at install time.
It's possible that we can be smarter about this over time. For example,
if the package was requested _only_ for macOS, we could verify that
there's at least one macOS-compatible wheel. See the linked issue for
more details.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4139.
## Summary
See the long comment inline. I think this is debatable but probably
right for now. The other options have their own problems, but there are
a few alternate ideas in the comment.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4132.
The basic idea here is to make it so forking can only ever result in a
resolution that, for a particular marker environment, will only install
at most one version of a package. We can guarantee this by ensuring we
only fork on conflicting dependency specifications only when their
corresponding markers are completely disjoint. If they aren't, then
resolution _must_ find a single version of the package in the
intersection of the two dependency specifications.
A test for this case has been added to packse here:
https://github.com/astral-sh/packse/pull/182. Previously, that test
would result in a resolution with two different unconditional versions
of the same package. With this change, resolution fails (as it should).
A commit-by-commit review should be helpful here, since the first commit
is a refactor to make the second commit a bit more digestible.
## Summary
I think we should be able to model PubGrub such that this isn't
necessary (at least for the case described in the issue), but for now,
let's just avoid attempting to build very old distributions in
prefetching.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4136.
## Summary
Simplify and normalize marker expressions in the lockfile. Right now
this does a simple analysis by only looking at related operators at the
same level of precedence. I think anything more complex would be out of
scope.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4002.
## Summary
This PR adds a lowering similar to that seen in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/3100, but this time, for markers.
Like `PubGrubPackageInner::Extra`, we now have
`PubGrubPackageInner::Marker`. The dependencies of the `Marker` are
`PubGrubPackageInner::Package` with and without the marker.
As an example of why this is useful: assume we have `urllib3>=1.22.0` as
a direct dependency. Later, we see `urllib3 ; python_version > '3.7'` as
a transitive dependency. As-is, we might (for some reason) pick a very
old version of `urllib3` to satisfy `urllib3 ; python_version > '3.7'`,
then attempt to fetch its dependencies, which could even involve
building a very old version of `urllib3 ; python_version > '3.7'`. Once
we fetch the dependencies, we would see that `urllib3` at the same
version is _also_ a dependency (because we tack it on). In the new
scheme though, as soon as we "choose" the very old version of `urllib3 ;
python_version > '3.7'`, we'd then see that `urllib3` (the base package)
is also a dependency; so we see a conflict before we even fetch the
dependencies of the old variant.
With this, I can successfully resolve the case in #4099.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4099.
Follow-up to #4016.
This exposes `Range` and `PubGrubSpecifier` from outside the resolver to
use pubgrub's union creating a dependency edge we don't really want.
When creating a lockfile, lock the combined dependencies for all
packages in a workspace. This make the lockfile independent of where you
are in the workspace.
Fixes#3983
## Summary
This PR modifies our `Requires-Python` handling to treat
`Requires-Python` as a lower bound. There's extensive discussion around
this in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4022 and the references
linked therein. I think it's an experiment worth trying. Even in my own
small projects, I'm running into issues whereby I'm being "forced" to
add a `<4` upper bound to my `Requires-Python` due to these caps.
Separately, we should explore adding a mechanism that's distinct from
`Requires-Python` to enable users to declare a supported range for
locking.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4022.
## Summary
The condition enforced here isn't quite right. The same dependency can
appear multiple times, as long as the extra is different.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4101.
## Summary
The "only include if relevant for the extra" filtering should _not_ be
applied to constraints. Otherwise, we'd only constrain when the extra
was included in the constraints file itself, which is incorrect.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4091.
## Summary
I don't think it's worth maintaining this separate test harness for ~18
tests, when they can all be tested in the `uv` package itself. Let's
drop the maintenance burden.
## Summary
Externally, development dependencies are currently structured as a flat
list of PEP 580-compatible requirements:
```toml
[tool.uv]
dev-dependencies = ["werkzeug"]
```
When locking, we lock all development dependencies; when syncing, users
can provide `--dev`.
Internally, though, we model them as dependency groups, similar to
Poetry, PDM, and [PEP 735](https://peps.python.org/pep-0735). This
enables us to change out the user-facing frontend without changing the
internal implementation, once we've decided how these should be exposed
to users.
A few important decisions encoded in the implementation (which we can
change later):
1. Groups are enabled globally, for all dependencies. This differs from
extras, which are enabled on a per-requirement basis. Note, however,
that we'll only discover groups for uv-enabled packages anyway.
2. Installing a group requires installing the base package. We rely on
this in PubGrub to ensure that we resolve to the same version (even
though we only expect groups to come from workspace dependencies anyway,
which are unique). But anyway, that's encoded in the resolver right now,
just as it is for extras.
## Summary
This PR adds the `Requires-Python` range to the user's lockfile. This
will enable us to validate it when installing.
For now, we repeat the `Requires-Python` back to the user;
alternatively, though, we could detect the supported Python range
automatically.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4052
We had previously changed the signature of
`DependencyProvider::get_dependencies` to return an iterator instead of
a hashmap to avoid the conversion cost from our dependencies `Vec` to
the pubgrub's hashmap. These changes are difficult to make in pubgrub
since they complicate the public api. But we don't actually use
`DependencyProvider::get_dependencies`, so we rolled those
customizations back in https://github.com/pubgrub-rs/pubgrub/pull/226
and instead opted to change only the internal
`add_incompatibility_from_dependencies` method that we exposed in our
fork. This aligns us closer with upstream, removes the design questions
about `DependencyProvider` from our concerns and reduces our diff (not
counting the github action) to +36 -12.
## Summary
Thankfully this is pretty rare since `pip sync` is usually run on `pip
compile` output, and `pip compile` never outputs markers.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4044
This is a quick fix for some flaky tests where the output in the lock
file isn't stable because marker expressions can be combined in a
non-deterministic order.
I believe there is ongoing work to simplify marker expressions which
will help here, but I think some kind of normalization is still
ultimately needed to guarantee consistent output.
I first noticed the flaky test in:
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4015
## Summary
Instead of checking if the target and installed version are the same, we
model the data such that the target version is only present if it was
specified by the user. This also means that we correctly say "requested
version" even if the two happen to be the same.
## Summary
I believe this is no longer necessary. Part of the problem here is that
we can't _know_ the full set of available Python versions, especially
once we start resolving against a `Requires-Python` rather than a fixed
set of two versions.
## Summary
Previously, when we locked something like `flask[dotenv]`, we created
two separate distributions in the lockfile: one for `flask`, which
included the base dependencies, and one for `flask[dotenv]`, which
included the base dependencies _and_ the `dotenv` dependencies. This was
easy to implement, but it meant that we were duplicating all of the
distribution files for every extra, and duplicating all of the base
dependencies for every extra.
This PR normalizes the data such that we now have one entry per
distribution (i.e., `ExtraName` was removed from `DistributionId`), with
an optional dependencies table with an entry per extra, like:
```toml
[[distribution]]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
source = "editable+file://[TEMP_DIR]/"
sdist = { url = "file://[TEMP_DIR]/" }
[[distribution.dependencies]]
name = "anyio"
version = "3.7.0"
source = "registry+https://pypi.org/simple"
[distribution.optional-dependencies]
[[distribution.optional-dependencies.test]]
name = "iniconfig"
version = "2.0.0"
source = "registry+https://pypi.org/simple"
```
This requires a bit more work upfront, because we now need to merge
multiple packages from the `PetGraph` representation when creating the
lockfile.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3916.
## Summary
Once we use a _range_ rather than a precise version, it won't actually
make sense to return a version here. It's no longer required, so I'm
removing it.
## Summary
Running a resolution that required forking was failing due to breaking
an invariant in PubGrub. It looks like we were adding the same
incompatibility multiple times, or something like that. The issue
appears to be that when forking, we modify the current state, then clone
it as the "next state", then push to the "forked states" -- but that
means we're cloning the _modified_ state.
This PR changes the order of operations such that we clone, then modify.
It shouldn't introduce any additional clones though.
## Summary
This PR ensures that if a lockfile already contains a resolved reference
(e.g., you locked with `main` previously, and it locked to a specific
commit), and you run `uv lock`, we use the same SHA, even if it's not
the latest SHA for that tag. This avoids upgrading Git dependencies
without `--upgrade`.
Closes#3920.
## Summary
This PR removes the static resolver map:
```rust
static RESOLVED_GIT_REFS: Lazy<Mutex<FxHashMap<RepositoryReference, GitSha>>> =
Lazy::new(Mutex::default);
```
With a `GitResolver` struct that we now pass around on the
`BuildContext`. There should be no behavior changes here; it's purely an
internal refactor with an eye towards making it cleaner for us to
"pre-populate" the list of resolved SHAs.
With the change, we remove the special casing of workspace dependencies
and resolve `tool.uv` for all git and directory distributions. This
gives us support for non-editable workspace dependencies and path
dependencies in other workspaces. It removes a lot of special casing
around workspaces. These changes are the groundwork for supporting
`tool.uv` with dynamic metadata.
The basis for this change is moving `Requirement` from
`distribution-types` to `pypi-types` and the lowering logic from
`uv-requirements` to `uv-distribution`. This changes should be split out
in separate PRs.
I've included an example workspace `albatross-root-workspace2` where
`bird-feeder` depends on `a` from another workspace `ab`. There's a
bunch of failing tests and regressed error messages that still need
fixing. It does fix the audited package count for the workspace tests.
## Summary
This PR changes the lock-file format to use inline tables for wheels and
source distributions, which currently use separate tables that make the
file harder to follow.
```diff
[[distribution]]
name = "typing-extensions"
version = "4.10.0"
source = "registry+https://pypi.org/simple"
- [distribution.sdist]
- url = "0d26ce356c/typing_extensions-4.10.0.tar.gz"
- hash = "sha256:b0abd7c89e8fb96f98db18d86106ff1d90ab692004eb746cf6eda2682f91b3cb"
- size = 77558
-
- [[distribution.wheel]]
- url = "dc04a3ea60/typing_extensions-4.10.0-py3-none-any.whl"
- hash = "sha256:69b1a937c3a517342112fb4c6df7e72fc39a38e7891a5730ed4985b5214b5475"
- size = 33926
+ sdist = { url = "0d26ce356c/typing_extensions-4.10.0.tar.gz", hash = "sha256:b0abd7c89e8fb96f98db18d86106ff1d90ab692004eb746cf6eda2682f91b3cb", size = 77558 }
+ wheel = [{ url = "dc04a3ea60/typing_extensions-4.10.0-py3-none-any.whl", hash = "sha256:69b1a937c3a517342112fb4c6df7e72fc39a38e7891a5730ed4985b5214b5475", size = 33926 }]
```
The downside is that the inline-tables end up quite long and TOML
doesn't support line breaks in inline tables, yet.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3611.
