We currently have two marker keys that a list, `extras` and
`dependency_groups`, both from PEP 751. With the variants PEP, we will
add three more. This change is broken out of the wheel variants PR to
introduce generic marker list support, plus a change to use
`ContainerOperator` in more places.
## Summary
We don't yet support writing these, but we can at least read them
(which, e.g., allows you to install PDM-exported `pylock.toml` files
with uv, since PDM _always_ writes a default group).
Closes#14740.
If a user specifies `-e /path/to/dir` and `/path/to/dir` in a `uv pip
install` command, we want the editable to "win" (rather than erroring
due to conflicting URLs). Unfortunately, this behavior meant that when
you requested a package as editable and non-editable in conflicting
groups, the editable version was _always_ used. This PR modifies the
requisite types to use `Option<bool>` rather than `bool` for the
`editable` field, so we can determine whether a requirement was
explicitly requested as editable, explicitly requested as non-editable,
or not specified (as in the case of `/path/to/dir` in a
`requirements.txt` file). In the latter case, we allow editables to
override the "unspecified" requirement.
If a project includes a path dependency twice, once with `editable =
true` and once without any `editable` annotation, those are now
considered conflicting URLs, and lead to an error, so I've marked this
change as breaking.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14139.
Reverts:
- #14349
- #14346
- #14245
Retains the test cases. Includes a `find-links` test case.
Supersedes
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14387
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14503
We originally got a report at
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13707 that inclusion of a
trailing slash on an index URL was causing lockfile churn despite having
no semantic meaning and resolved the issue by adding normalization that
stripped trailing slashes at parse time.
We then discovered that, while there are not semantic differences for
trailing slashes on Simple API index URLs, there are differences for
some flat (or find links) indexes. As reported in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14367, the change in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14245 caused a regression for at
least one user.
We attempted to fix the regression via a few approaches.
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14387 attempted to differentiate
between Simple API and flat index URL parsing, but failed to account for
the `Deserialize` implementation, which always assumed Simple API-style
index URLs and incorrectly trimmed trailing slashes in various cases
where we deserialized the `IndexUrl` type from a file. I attempted to
resolve this by performing a larger refactor, but it ended up being
quite painful. In particular, the `Index` type was a blocker — we don't
know the `IndexUrl` variant until we've parsed the `IndexFormat` and
having a multi-stage deserializer is not appealing but adding a new
intermediate type (i.e., `RawIndex`) is painful due to the pervasiveness
of `Index`. Given that we've regressed behavior here and there's not a
straight-forward fix, we're reverting the normalization entirely.
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14503 attempted to perform
normalization at compare-time, but that means we'd fail to invalidate
the lockfile when the a trailing slash was added or removed and given
that a trailing slash has semantic meaning for a find-links URL... we'd
have another correctness problem.
After this revert, we'll retain all index URLs verbatim. The downside to
this approach is that we'll be adding a bunch of trailing slashes back
to lockfiles that we previously normalized out, and we'll be reverting
our fix for users with inconsistent trailing slashes on their index
URLs. Users affected by the original motivating issue should use
consistent trailing slashes on their URLs, as they do frequently have
semantic meaning. We may want to revisit normalization and type aware
index URL parsing as part of a larger change.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14367
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
In pixi we overlay the PyPI packages over the conda packages and we
sometimes need to figure out what PyPI packages are involved in the
no-solution error. We could parse the error message, but this is pretty
error-prone, so it would be good to get access to more information. A
lot of information in this module is private and should probably stay
this way, but package names are easy enough to expose. This would help
us a lot!
I collect into a HashSet to remove duplication, and did not want to
expose a rustc_hash datastructure directly, thats's why I've chosen to
expose as an iterator :)
Let me know if any changes need to be done, and thanks!
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Hey, are you okay with exposing the `ErrorTree` for library consumers?
We have a use case that needs more information on conflicts. We need the
tree-structure of the conflict and be able to traverse it in particular.
Signed-off-by: Simon Sure <ssure@palantir.com>
## Summary
There's a good example of the downside of using verbatim URLs here:
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14197#discussion_r2163599625 (we
show two relative paths that point to the same directory, but it's not
clear from the error message).
The diff:
```
2 2 │ ----- stdout -----
3 3 │
4 4 │ ----- stderr -----
5 5 │ error: Requirements contain conflicting URLs for package `library` in all marker environments:
6 │-- ../../library
7 │-- ./library
6 │+- file://[TEMP_DIR]/library
7 │+- file://[TEMP_DIR]/library (editable)
```
## Summary
When the user provides a requirement like `==2.4.*`, we desugar that to
`>=2.4.dev0,<2.5.dev0`. These bounds then appear in error messages, and
worse, they also trick the error message reporter into thinking that the
user asked for a pre-release.
This PR adds logic to convert to the more-concise `==2.4.*`
representation when possible. We could probably do a similar thing for
the compatible release operator (`~=`).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14177.
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
This PR updates `IndexUrl` parsing to normalize non-file URLs by
removing trailing slashes. It also normalizes registry source URLs when
using them to validate the lockfile.
Prior to this change, when writing an index URL to the lockfile, uv
would use a trailing slash if present in the provided URL and no
trailing slash otherwise. This can cause surprising behavior. For
example, `uv lock --locked` will fail when a package is added with an
`--index` value without a trailing slash and then `uv lock --locked` is
run with a `pyproject.toml` version of the index URL that contains a
trailing slash. This PR fixes this and adds a test for the scenario.
It might be safe to normalize file URLs in the same way, but since
slashes have a well-defined meaning in the context of files and
directories, I chose not to normalize them here.
Closes#13707.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Update [schemars
0.9.0](https://github.com/GREsau/schemars/releases/tag/v0.9.0)
There are differences in the generated JSON Schema and I will [contact
the author](https://github.com/GREsau/schemars/issues/407).
## Test Plan
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
Allows `--torch-backend=auto` to detect AMD GPUs. The approach is fairly
well-documented inline, but I opted for `rocm_agent_enumerator` over
(e.g.) `rocminfo` since it seems to be the recommended approach for
scripting:
https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/rocminfo/en/latest/how-to/use-rocm-agent-enumerator.html.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14086.
## Test Plan
```
root@rocm-jupyter-gpu-mi300x1-192gb-devcloud-atl1:~# ./uv-linux-libc-11fb582c5c046bae09766ceddd276dcc5bb41218/uv pip install torch --torch-backend=auto
Resolved 11 packages in 251ms
Prepared 2 packages in 6ms
Installed 11 packages in 257ms
+ filelock==3.18.0
+ fsspec==2025.5.1
+ jinja2==3.1.6
+ markupsafe==3.0.2
+ mpmath==1.3.0
+ networkx==3.5
+ pytorch-triton-rocm==3.3.1
+ setuptools==80.9.0
+ sympy==1.14.0
+ torch==2.7.1+rocm6.3
+ typing-extensions==4.14.0
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
When using `uv lock --upgrade-package=python` after changing
`requires-python`, it was possible to get into a state where the fork
markers produced corresponded to the empty set. This in turn resulted in
an empty lock file.
There was already some infrastructure in place that I think was perhaps
intended to handle this. In particular, `Lock::check_marker_coverage`
checks whether the fork markers have some overlap with the supported
environments (including the `requires-python`). But there were two
problems with this.
First is that in lock validation, this marker coverage check came
_after_ a path that returned `Preferable` (meaning that the fork markers
should be kept) when `--upgrade-package` was used. Second is that the
marker coverage check used the `requires-python` in the lock file and
_not_ the `requires-python` in the now updated `pyproject.toml`.
We attempt to solve this conundrum by slightly re-arranging lock file
validation and by explicitly checking whether the *new*
`requires-python` is disjoint from the fork markers in the lock file. If
it is, then we return `Versions` from lock file validation (indicating
that the fork markers should be dropped).
Fixes#13951
We always ignore the `clippy::struct_excessive_bools` rule and formerly
annotated this at the function level. This PR specifies the allow in
`workspace.lints.clippy` in `Cargo.toml`.
This allows you to specify requires-python on individual dependency-groups,
with the intended usecase being "oh my dev-dependencies have a higher
requires-python than my actual project".
This includes a large driveby move of the RequiresPython type to
uv-distribution-types to allow us to generate the appropriate markers at
this point in the code. It also migrates RequiresPython from
pubgrub::Range to version_ranges::Ranges, and makes several pub(crate)
items pub, as it's no longer defined in uv_resolver.
Fixes#11606
For the case where there was no matching wheel on sync, we previously
added a note about which wheels are available vs. on which platform you
are on. We extend this error message to link directly towards
`tool.uv.required-environments`, which otherwise has a discovery
problem.
On Linux (Setting `tool.uv.required-environments` doesn't help here
either, but it's a clear example):
```
[project]
name = "debug"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = "==3.10.*"
dependencies = ["tensorflow-macos>=2.13.1"]
```
```
Resolved 41 packages in 24ms
error: Distribution `tensorflow-macos==2.16.2 @ registry+https://pypi.org/simple` can't be installed because it doesn't have a source distribution or wheel for the current platform
hint: You're on Linux (`manylinux_2_39_x86_64`), but there are no wheels for the current platform, consider configuring `tool.uv.required-environments`.
hint: `tensorflow-macos` (v2.16.2) only has wheels for the following platform: `macosx_12_0_arm64`.
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Users are not (yet) properly familiar with the concept of universal
resolution and its implication that we need to resolve for all possible
platforms and Python versions. Some projects only target a specific
platform or Python version, and users experience resolution errors due
to failures for other platforms. Indicated by the number of questions we
get about it, `tool.uv.environments` for restricting environments is not
well discoverable.
We add a special hint when resolution failed on a fork disjoint with the
current environment, hinting the user to constrain `requires-python` and
`tool.uv.environments` respectively.
The hint has false positives for cases where the resolution failed on a
different platform, but equally fails on the current platform, in cases
where the non-current fork was tried earlier. Given that conflicts can
be based on `requires-python`, afaik we can't parse whether the current
platform would also be affected from the derivation tree.
Two cases not covered by this are build errors as well as install errors
that need `tool.uv.required-environments`.
## Summary
When trying out `uv export --no-editable --format pylock.toml` the
exported contents would still retain `editable = true` regardless.
## Test Plan
Added additional test. Tested locally on few projects where I was
previously using `uv export --no-editable --format requirements.txt` to
ensure the output aligns.
## Summary
Right now, if a workspace member is first created by way of being a dev
dependency on another member, we end up duplicating it in the graph.
Instead, we should create all the roots upfront; all subsequent node
creations are robust to existing nodes.
Closes
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13673#issuecomment-2912196406.
Prior to this PR, there were numerous places where uv would leak
credentials in logs. We had a way to mask credentials by calling methods
or a recently-added `redact_url` function, but this was not secure by
default. There were a number of other types (like `GitUrl`) that would
leak credentials on display.
This PR adds a `DisplaySafeUrl` newtype to prevent leaking credentials
when logging by default. It takes a maximalist approach, replacing the
use of `Url` almost everywhere. This includes when first parsing config
files, when storing URLs in types like `GitUrl`, and also when storing
URLs in types that in practice will never contain credentials (like
`DirectorySourceUrl`). The idea is to make it easy for developers to do
the right thing and for the compiler to support this (and to minimize
ever having to manually convert back and forth). Displaying credentials
now requires an active step. Note that despite this maximalist approach,
the use of the newtype should be zero cost.
One conspicuous place this PR does not use `DisplaySafeUrl` is in the
`uv-auth` crate. That would require new clones since there are calls to
`request.url()` that return a `&Url`. One option would have been to make
`DisplaySafeUrl` wrap a `Cow`, but this would lead to lifetime
annotations all over the codebase. I've created a separate PR based on
this one (#13576) that updates `uv-auth` to use `DisplaySafeUrl` with
one new clone. We can discuss the tradeoffs there.
Most of this PR just replaces `Url` with `DisplaySafeUrl`. The core is
`uv_redacted/lib.rs`, where the newtype is implemented. To make it
easier to review the rest, here are some points of note:
* `DisplaySafeUrl` has a `Display` implementation that masks
credentials. Currently, it will still display the username when there is
both a username and password. If we think is the wrong choice, it can
now be changed in one place.
* `DisplaySafeUrl` has a `remove_credentials()` method and also a
`.to_string_with_credentials()` method. This allows us to use it in a
variety of scenarios.
* `IndexUrl::redacted()` was renamed to
`IndexUrl::removed_credentials()` to make it clearer that we are not
masking.
* We convert from a `DisplaySafeUrl` to a `Url` when calling `reqwest`
methods like `.get()` and `.head()`.
* We convert from a `DisplaySafeUrl` to a `Url` when creating a
`uv_auth::Index`. That is because, as mentioned above, I will be
updating the `uv_auth` crate to use this newtype in a separate PR.
* A number of tests (e.g., in `pip_install.rs`) that formerly used
filters to mask tokens in the test output no longer need those filters
since tokens in URLs are now masked automatically.
* The one place we are still knowingly writing credentials to
`pyproject.toml` is when a URL with credentials is passed to `uv add`
with `--raw`. Since displaying credentials is no longer automatic, I
have added a `to_string_with_credentials()` method to the `Pep508Url`
trait. This is used when `--raw` is passed. Adding it to that trait is a
bit weird, but it's the simplest way to achieve the goal. I'm open to
suggestions on how to improve this, but note that because of the way
we're using generic bounds, it's not as simple as just creating a
separate trait for that method.
PackageMetadata, for whatever reason, does not have a mirrored Wire type
so it was easy to not realize that it contains markers that need to be
complexified.
Fixes#13614
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Rustfmt introduces a lot of formatting changes in the 2024 edition. To
not break everything all at once, we split out the set of formatting
changes compatible with both the 2021 and 2024 edition by first
formatting with the 2024 style, and then again with the currently used
2021 style.
Notable changes are the formatting of derive macro attributes and lines
with overly long strings and adding trailing semicolons after statements
consistently.
This PR redacts credentials in displayed URLs.
It mostly relies on a `redacted_url` function (and where possible
`IndexUrl::redacted`). This is a quick way to prevent leaked credentials
but it's prone to programmer error when adding new trace statements. A
better follow-on would use a `RedactedUrl` type with the appropriate
`Display` implementation. This would allow us to still extract
credentials from the URL while displaying it securely. On the plus side,
the sites where the `redacted_url` function are used serve as easy
signposts for where to use the new type in a future PR.
Closes#1714.
## Summary
If a script has some requirements, and you provide `--with`, we
currently ignore any constraints from those requirements. We might want
to treat them as hard constraints in the future. For now, though, we
just treat them as preferences -- so we _prefer_ those versions, but
don't require them to match and still run the `--with` resolution in
isolation.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13173.
uv’s default index strategy was designed with dependency confusion
attacks in mind. [According to the
docs](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/configuration/indexes/#searching-across-multiple-indexes),
“if a package exists on an internal index, it should always be installed
from the internal index, and never from PyPI”. Unfortunately, this is
not true in the case where authentication fails on that internal index.
In that case, uv will simply try the next index (even on the
`first-index` strategy). This means that uv is not secure by default in
this common scenario.
This PR causes uv to stop searching for a package if it encounters an
authentication failure at an index. It is possible to opt out of this
behavior for an index with a new `pyproject.toml` option
`ignore-error-codes`. For example:
```
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "my-index"
url = "<index-url>"
ignore-error-codes = [401, 403]
```
This will also enable users to handle idiosyncratic registries in a more
fine-grained way. For example, PyTorch registries return a 403 when a
package is not found. In this PR, we special-case PyTorch registries to
ignore 403s, but users can use `ignore-error-codes` to handle similar
behaviors if they encounter them on internal registries.
Depends on #12651Closes#9429Closes#12362
## Summary
If you use `--torch-backend=auto`, we want to avoid selecting (e.g.) a
`+cu124` build of `torch` alongside a `+cu126` build of `torchvision`.
## Summary
Part of #8607. This is a pure refactor aimed at paving the way for
supporting the `default-extras` configuration in the `pyproject.toml`
file.
The `ExtraSpecification` struct has been refactored to align more
closely with the
[`DependencyGroups`](256b100a9e/crates/uv-configuration/src/dependency_groups.rs (L9))
struct.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12968, we added support for
upload time to `uv.lock`, but stylized as `upload_time`. The other keys
in `uv.lock` use kebab casing, as in common in Python formats, so this
really should've been `upload-time`. I want to change it ASAP to
minimize churn for users. Any users that already upgraded will of course
experience churn in their files a second time. But if we don't change it
now, we'll only increase the surface area of affected users.
So, this PR uses `upload-time` instead, but continues reading
`upload_time` to make it non-breaking.
