uv/crates/uv-workspace
Zanie Blue 989b103171
Add support for respecting VIRTUAL_ENV in project commands via --active (#11189)
I think `UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` is too complicated for use-cases where
the user wants to sync to the active environment. I don't see a
compelling reason not to make opt-in easier. I see a lot of questions
about how to deal with this warning in the issue tracker, but it seems
painful to collect them here for posterity.

A notable behavior here — we'll treat this as equivalent to
`UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` so... if you point us to a valid virtual
environment that needs to be recreated for some reason (e.g., new Python
version request), we'll happily delete it and start over.
2025-02-05 10:12:19 -06:00
..
src Add support for respecting VIRTUAL_ENV in project commands via --active (#11189) 2025-02-05 10:12:19 -06:00
Cargo.toml Enable --all-packages --frozen in uv sync and uv export (#8760) 2024-11-02 02:48:55 +00:00