## Summary
Check for unused private `TypeVar`. See [original
implementation](2a86db8271/pyi.py (L1958)).
```
$ flake8 --select Y018 crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:4:1: Y018 TypeVar "_T" is not used
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:5:1: Y018 TypeVar "_P" is not used
```
```
$ ./target/debug/ruff --select PYI018 crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi --no-cache
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:4:1: PYI018 TypeVar `_T` is never used
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pyi/PYI018.pyi:5:1: PYI018 TypeVar `_P` is never used
Found 2 errors.
```
In the file `unused_private_type_declaration.rs`, I'm planning to add
other rules that are similar to `PYI018` like the `PYI046`, `PYI047` and
`PYI049`.
ref #848
## Test Plan
Snapshots and manual runs of flake8.
## Summary
In Ruff only a subset of rules are enabled by default. This change
change aims to clarify that when adding a new rule, you must explicitly
use the `--select name_of_rule` command to ensure the rule gets
executed.
This was talked about on Discord a while back.
## Test Plan
Checked docs via mkdocs
## Summary
This is a rewrite of the main comment placement logic. `place_comment`
now has three parts:
- place own line comments
- between branches
- after a branch
- place end-of-line comments
- after colon
- after a branch
- place comments for specific nodes (that include module level comments)
The rewrite fixed three bugs: `class A: # trailing comment` comments now
stay end-of-line, `try: # comment` remains end-of-line and deeply
indented try-else-finally comments remain with the right nested
statement.
It will be much easier to give more alternative branches nodes since
this is abstracted away by `is_node_with_body` and the first/last child
helpers. Adding new node types can now be done by adding an entry to the
`place_comment` match. The code went from 1526 lines before #6033 to
1213 lines now.
It thinks it easier to just read the new `placement.rs` rather than
reviewing the diff.
## Test Plan
The existing fixtures staying the same or improving plus new ones for
the bug fixes.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The `SIM102` auto-fix fails if `elif` is indented like this:
## Example
```python
def f():
# SIM102
if a:
pass
elif b:
if c:
d
```
```
> cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check --select SIM102 --fix a.py
...
error: Failed to fix nested if: Failed to extract statement from source
a.py:5:5: SIM102 Use a single `if` statement instead of nested `if` statements
Found 1 error.
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test
## Summary
This PR adds the implementation for the new Jupyter AST nodes i.e.,
`ExprLineMagic` and `StmtLineMagic`.
## Test Plan
Add test cases for `unparse` containing magic commands
resolves: #6087
## Summary
Updated `pyproject.toml` classifiers from `"Development Status :: 4 -
Beta"` to `"Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable"` to reflect the
transition from Beta to Full Release.
Updated the `README.md` to use `.com/astral-sh/ruff/...` instead of
`.com/charliermarsh/ruff/...` in Shields.io badges to reflect the
transition to a company.
## Test Plan
Utilized the official PyPA classifiers list (located at:
https://pypi.org/classifiers/)
Previewed the markdown file in different browsers on Github to ensure
all badges and logos still render properly.
## Summary
Updated doc comment for `tab_indentation.rs`. Online docs also benefit
from this update.
## Test Plan
Checked docs via
[mkdocs](389fe13c93/CONTRIBUTING.md (L267-L296))
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Part of #5062
Requires https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/32
Adds visitation of type alias statements and type parameters in class
and function definitions.
Duplicates tests for `PreorderVisitor` into `Visitor` with new
snapshots. Testing required node implementations for the `TypeParam`
enum, which is a chunk of the diff and the reason we need `Ranged`
implementations in
https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/32.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Adds unit tests with snapshots.
Reimplements https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/3104
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5726
Note that we will generate the hash for a cache key twice in normal
operation. Once to check for the cached item and again to update the
cache. We could optimize this by generating the hash once in
`diagnostics::lint_file` and passing the `u64` into `get` and `update`.
We'd probably want to wrap it in a `CacheKeyHash` enum for type safety.
## Test plan
Unit tests for Windows and Unix.
Manual test with case from issue
```
❯ touch fake.py
❯ chmod +x fake.py
❯ ./target/debug/ruff --select EXE fake.py
fake.py:1:1: EXE002 The file is executable but no shebang is present
Found 1 error.
❯ chmod -x fake.py
❯ ./target/debug/ruff --select EXE fake.py
```
## Summary
If a method is annotated with `@typing_extensions.override`, we should
avoid flagging A003 on it. This isn't part of the standard library yet,
but it's used to explicitly mark methods as overrides.
## Summary
If a user subclasses `threading.Event`, e.g. with:
```python
from threading import Event
class CustomEvent(Event):
def set(self) -> None:
...
```
They no control over the method name (`set`). This PR allows
`threading.Event#set` and `logging.Filter#filter` overrides, and avoids
flagging A003 in such cases. Ideally, we'd avoid flagging all overridden
methods, but... that's a lot more difficult, and this is at least
_better_ than what we do now.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6057.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5956.
## Summary
This PR modifies the order of operations in our AST checker. Previously,
we ran our analysis rules first, then bound names and traversed over the
subtrees. Now, after a series of refactors, we can invert the order: do
the subtree traversal and model-building _first_, then run rules.
The nice thing about this change is that when we go to analyze, e.g., a
function call node, we'll already have traversed any of the constituent
`Expr::Name` nodes... So if we store the resolution of all names when do
the traversal, we can avoid having to do any expensive work in
`resolve_call_path`.
## Test Plan
Clean run of the snapshot tests, and hopefully the ecosystem checks too!
## Summary
This PR is a refactoring of placement.rs. The code got more consistent,
some comments were updated and some dead code was removed or replaced
with debug assertions. It also contains a bugfix for the placement of
end-of-branch comments with nested bodies inside try statements that
occurred when refactoring the nested body loop.
## Test Plan
The existing test cases don't change. I added a couple of cases that i
think should be tested but weren't, and a regression test for the bugfix
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
As of right now, the instructions don't specify where to run ruff from
after cloning the repository this is to address that. Super trivial
change, but helpful for real newbies I think.
## Summary
This PR ensures that we can retain the current behavior even after we
reorder the visitor a bit, by looking for annotated lambdas rather than
"is the name bound to anything?", since if we visit the name before we
run this rule, it'll _always_ be bound. (This check is already a bit
flawed -- in truth, we should probably run this rule deferred so that we
can reliably detect shadowing.)
## Summary
This PR attempts to draw some basic separation between the `Checker`'s
traversal responsibilities (traversing the AST, building the semantic
model) and its calling-out-to-lint-rule responsibilities. It doesn't try
to introduce any sophisticated API. Instead, it just moves all of the
lint rule calls out of `checkers/ast/mod.rs` and into methods in a new
`analyze` module. (There are four remaining lint rules in `Checker`, but
I'll remove those in future PRs.)
I'm not trying to "solve" our lint rule API here. Instead, I'm trying to
make two improvements:
1. `checkers/ast/mod.rs` has just gotten way too large, and people work
in it all the time. Prior to this PR, it was 5.5k lines, which led to
significant lags in my editor and made it really hard to reason about
the parts that are _actually_ important. (I like big files, but this one
crossed the line for me.) Now, it's < 2,000 lines, and the code is much
more focused.
2. I want to avoid accidentally adding lint rules in the "wrong" parts
of the traversal. By confining lint rule invocations to these "analyze"
calls, we'll avoid (e.g.) putting them in the binding phase.
## Summary
These only need the token stream, and we always prefer token-based to
physical line-based rules.
There are a few other changes snuck in here:
- Renaming the rule files to match the diagnostic names (likely an
error).
- The "leading whitespace before shebang" rule now works regardless of
where the comment occurs (i.e., if the shebang is on the second line,
and the first line is blank, we flag and remove that leading
whitespace).
**Summary** Fix an instability in with statement formatter when there is
an own line comment as the `as`
```python
with (
a as
# bad comment
b):
```
**Test Plan** Added the comment to the test cases.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6025 (which contains a
more thorough description of the issue). Previously, the `# noqa` here
was being marked as unused, but removing it raised `SIM114`:
```python
def foo():
a = True
b = False
if a > b: # noqa: SIM114
return 3
elif a == b:
return 3
```
**Summary** Add a formatter progress testing script to CI. This script
will 1) print the black compability on each run 2) catch regressions wrt
to formatter stability, emitting invalid syntax and other kinds of bugs
(e.g. #5917) before they land on main 3) have an additional layer of
real world tests when implementing new nodes or other new formatter
code.
This is currently a bash script, i'm not sure if we want to keep it that
way, or switch to e.g. the regular ecosystem scripts. The output
separation of `format_dev` could also use some polishing. We should also
consider pinning commits so we don't get spurious regression when they
change their code.
**Test Plan** The script extends CI.
## Summary
My intuition is that it's faster to do these checks as-needed rather
than allocation new hash maps and vectors for the arguments. (We
typically only query once anyway.)
