Fix a typos in the error message of rule C400
With the latest version of Ruff (0.3.3) if I have a `scratch.py` script
like that:
```python
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
def generate_samples(test_cases: Dict) -> List[Tuple]:
return list(
(input, expected)
for input, expected in zip(test_cases["input_value"], test_cases["expected_value"])
)
```
and I run ruff
```shell
>>> ruff check scratch.py --select C400
>>> scratch.py:5:12: C400 Unnecessary generator (rewrite using `list()`
```
This PR fixes the error message from _"(rewrite using `list()`"_ to
_"(rewrite using `list()`)"_, and it fixes also the doc.
Related question: why I have this error message? The rule is not correct
in this case. Should I open an issue for that?
## Summary
This PR fixes a panic in the linter for `W605`.
Consider the following f-string:
```python
f"{{}}ab"
```
The `FStringMiddle` token would contain `{}ab`. Notice that the escaped
braces have _reduced_ the string. This means we cannot use the text
value from the token to determine the location of the escape sequence
but need to extract it from the source code.
fixes: #10434
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
## Summary
We're seeing failures in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10470
because `resolve_qualified_import_name` isn't guaranteed to return a
specific import if a symbol is accessible in two ways (e.g., you have
both `import logging` and `from logging import error` in scope, and you
want `logging.error`). This PR breaks up the failing tests such that the
imports aren't in the same scope.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10470.
## Test Plan
I added a `bindings.reverse()` to `resolve_qualified_import_name` to
ensure that the tests pass regardless of the binding order.
## Summary
I used `cargo-shear` (see
[tweet](https://twitter.com/boshen_c/status/1770106165923586395)) to
remove some unused dependencies that `cargo udeps` wasn't reporting.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This adds automatic fixes for the `PT007` rule.
I am currently reviewing and adding Ruff rules to Home Assistant. One
rule is PT007, which has multiple hundred occurrences in the codebase,
but no automatic fix, and this is not fun to do manually, especially
because using Regexes are not really possible with this.
My knowledge of the Ruff codebase and Rust in general is not good and
this is my first PR here, so I hope it is not too bad.
One thing where I need help is: How can I have the transformed code to
be formatted automatically, instead of it being minimized as it does it
now?
## Test Plan
Using the existing fixtures and updated snapshots.
## Summary
In issue https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6785 it is reported
that a docstring in the form of `''"assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''`
is autocorrected to `"""assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''` (note the
triple quotes one only one side), which breaks the python program due
`undetermined string lateral`.
* `Q002`: Not only would docstrings in the form of `''"assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` (single quotes) be autofixed wrongly, but also
e.g. `""'assert' ' SAM macro definitions '''` (double quotes). The bug
is present for docstrings in all scopes (e.g. module docstrings, class
docstrings, function docstrings)
* `Q000`: The autofix error is not only present for `Q002` (docstrings),
but also for inline strings (`Q000`). Therefore `s = ''"assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` will also be wrongly autofixed.
Note that situation in which the first string is non-empty can be fixed,
e.g. `'123'"assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''` -> `"123""assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` is valid.
## What
* Change FixAvailability of `Q000` `Q002` to `Sometimes`
* Changed both rules such that docstrings/inline strings that cannot be
fixed are still reported as bad quotes via diagnostics, but no fix is
provided
## Test Plan
* For `Q000`: Add docstrings in different scopes that (partially) would
have been autofixed wrongly
* For `Q002`: Add inline strings that (partially) would have been
autofixed wrongly
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6785
## Summary
The upstream category check here
fd26b29986/crates/ruff_linter/src/upstream_categories.rs (L54-L65)
was not working because the code is actually "E0001" not "PLE0001", I
changed it so it will detect the upstream category correctly.
I also sorted the upstream categories alphabetically, so that the
document generation will be deterministic.
## Test Plan
I compared the diff before and after the change.
Fixes#10426
## Summary
Fix rule B030 giving a false positive with Tuple operations like `+`.
[Playground](https://play.ruff.rs/17b086bc-cc43-40a7-b5bf-76d7d5fce78a)
```python
try:
...
except (ValueError,TypeError) + (EOFError,ArithmeticError):
...
```
## Reviewer notes
This is a little more convoluted than I was expecting -- because we can
have valid nested Tuples with operations done on them, the flattening
logic has become a bit more complex.
Shall I guard this behind --preview?
## Test Plan
Unit tested.
## Summary
Implement `singledispatchmethod-function` from pylint, part of #970.
This is essentially a copy paste of #8934 for `@singledispatchmethod`
decorator.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
## Summary
Short-circuit implementation mentioned in #10403.
I implemented this by extending C400:
- Made `UnnecessaryGeneratorList` have information of whether the the
short-circuiting occurred (to put diagnostic)
- Add additional check for whether in `unnecessary_generator_list`
function.
Please give me suggestions if you think this isn't the best way to
handle this :)
## Test Plan
Extended `C400.py` a little, and written the cases where:
- Code could be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(x for x in range(3))` -> `list(range(3))`
- Code couldn't be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(2 * x for x in range(3))` -> `[2 * x for x in range(3)]`
- `list` function is not built-in, and should not modify the code in any
way.
## Summary
Trailing ellipses in objects defined in `typing.TYPE_CHECKING` might be
meaningful (it might be declaring a stub). Thus, we should skip the
`unnecessary-placeholder` (`PIE970`) rule in such contexts.
Closes#10358.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Given `del X`, we'll typically add a `BindingKind::Deletion` to `X` to
shadow the current binding. However, if the deletion is inside of a
conditional operation, we _won't_, as in:
```python
def f():
global X
if X > 0:
del X
```
We will, however, track it as a reference to the binding. This PR adds
the expression context to those resolved references, so that we can
detect that the `X` in `global X` was "assigned to".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10397.
## Summary
The previous documentation sounded as if typing a mutable default as a
`ClassVar` were optional. However, it is not, as not doing so causes a
`ValueError`. The snippet below was tested in Python's interactive
shell:
```
>>> from dataclasses import dataclass
>>> @dataclass
... class A:
... mutable_default: list[int] = []
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 1230, in dataclass
return wrap(cls)
^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 1220, in wrap
return _process_class(cls, init, repr, eq, order, unsafe_hash,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 958, in _process_class
cls_fields.append(_get_field(cls, name, type, kw_only))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 815, in _get_field
raise ValueError(f'mutable default {type(f.default)} for field '
ValueError: mutable default <class 'list'> for field mutable_default is not allowed: use default_factory
>>>
```
This behavior is also documented in Python's docs, see
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#mutable-default-values):
> [...] the
[dataclass()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.dataclass)
decorator will raise a
[ValueError](https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#ValueError)
if it detects an unhashable default parameter. The assumption is that if
a value is unhashable, it is mutable. This is a partial solution, but it
does protect against many common errors.
And
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#class-variables)
it is documented why it works if it is typed as a `ClassVar`:
> One of the few places where
[dataclass()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.dataclass)
actually inspects the type of a field is to determine if a field is a
class variable as defined in [PEP
526](https://peps.python.org/pep-0526/). It does this by checking if the
type of the field is typing.ClassVar. If a field is a ClassVar, it is
excluded from consideration as a field and is ignored by the dataclass
mechanisms. Such ClassVar pseudo-fields are not returned by the
module-level
[fields()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.fields)
function.
In this PR I have changed the documentation to make it a little bit
clearer that not using `ClassVar` makes the code invalid.
## Summary
Ignoring all lines until the first logical line does not match the
behavior from pycodestyle. This PR therefore removes the `if
state.is_not_first_logical_line` skipping the line check before the
first logical line, and applies it only to `E302`.
For example, in the snippet below a rule violation should be detected on
the second comment and on the import.
```python
# first comment
# second comment
import foo
```
Fixes#10374
## Test Plan
Add test cases, update the snapshots and verify the ecosystem check output
## Summary
This PR updates the `StringLike::FString` variant to use `ExprFString`
instead of `FStringLiteralElement`.
For context, the reason it used `FStringLiteralElement` is that the node
is actually the string part of an f-string ("foo" in `f"foo{x}"`). But,
this is inconsistent with other variants where the captured value is the
_entire_ string.
This is also problematic w.r.t. implicitly concatenated strings. Any
rules which work with `StringLike::FString` doesn't account for the
string part in an implicitly concatenated f-strings. For example, we
don't flag confusable character in the first part of `"𝐁ad" f"𝐁ad
string"`, but only the second part
(https://play.ruff.rs/16071c4c-a1dd-4920-b56f-e2ce2f69c843).
### Update `PYI053`
_This is included in this PR because otherwise it requires a temporary
workaround to be compatible with the old logic._
This PR also updates the `PYI053` (`string-or-bytes-too-long`) rule for
f-string to consider _all_ the visible characters in a f-string,
including the ones which are implicitly concatenated. This is consistent
with implicitly concatenated strings and bytes.
For example,
```python
def foo(
# We count all the characters here
arg1: str = '51 character ' 'stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
# But not here because of the `{x}` replacement field which _breaks_ them up into two chunks
arg2: str = f'51 character {x} stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
) -> None: ...
```
This PR fixes it to consider all _visible_ characters inside an f-string
which includes expressions as well.
fixes: #10310fixes: #10307
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
## Review
To facilitate the review process, the change have been split into two
commits: one which has the code change while the other has the test
cases and updated snapshots.
Re-implementation of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5845 but
instead of deprecating the option I toggle the default. Now users can
_opt-in_ via the setting which will give them an unsafe fix to remove
the import. Otherwise, we raise violations but do not offer a fix. The
setting is a bit of a misnomer in either case, maybe we'll want to
remove it still someday.
As discussed there, I think the safe fix should be to import it as an
alias. I'm not sure. We need support for offering multiple fixes for
ideal behavior though? I think we should remove the fix entirely and
consider it separately.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5697
Supersedes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5845
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds methods on `FString` to iterate over the two different kind
of elements it can have - literals and expressions. This is similar to
the methods we have on `ExprFString`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Fix "TRIO115 false positive with with sleep(var) where var starts as 0"
#9935 based on the discussion in the issue.
## Test Plan
Issue code added to fixture
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
## Summary
We had a report of a test failure on a specific architecture, and
looking into it, I think the test assumes that the hash keys are
iterated in a specific order. This PR thus adds a variant to our
settings display macro specifically for maps and sets. Like `CacheKey`,
it sorts the keys when printing.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10359.
## Summary
When negating an expression like `a or b`, we need to wrap it in
parentheses, e.g., `not (a or b)` instead of `not a or b`, due to
operator precedence.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10335.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
This PR fixes the following false positive in a `.pyi` stub file:
```py
x: int
y = x # F821 currently emitted here, but shouldn't be in a stub file
```
In a `.py` file, this is invalid regardless of whether `from __future__ import annotations` is enabled or not. In a `.pyi` stub file, however, it's always valid, as an annotation counts as a binding in a stub file even if no value is assigned to the variable.
I also added more test coverage for `.pyi` stub files in various edge cases where ruff's behaviour is currently correct, but where `.pyi` stub files do slightly different things to `.py` files.
## Summary
Fixes#10295.
`E225` (`Missing whitespace around operator`) and `E275` (`Missing
whitespace after keyword`) try to add a white space even when the next
character is a `)` (which is a syntax error in most cases, the
exceptions already being handled). This causes `E202` (`Whitespace
before close bracket`) to try to remove the added whitespace, resulting
in an infinite loop when `E225`/`E275` re-add it.
This PR adds an exception in `E225` and `E275` to not trigger in case
the next token is a `)`. It is a bit simplistic, but it solves the
example given in the issue without introducing a change in behavior
(according to the fixtures).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and the `ruff-ecosystem` check were used to check that the
PR's changes do not have side-effects.
A new fixture was added to check that running the 3 rules on the example
given in the issue does not cause ruff to fail to converge.
## Summary
Fix#10282
This PR updates the Python grammar to include the `*` character in
`*args` `**kwargs` in the range of the `Parameter`
```
def f(*args, **kwargs): pass
# ~~~~ ~~~~~~ <-- range before the PR
# ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ <-- range after
```
The invalid syntax `def f(*, **kwargs): ...` is also now correctly
reported.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to `function.rs`.
This PR modifies our AST so that nodes for string literals, bytes literals and f-strings all retain the following information:
- The quoting style used (double or single quotes)
- Whether the string is triple-quoted or not
- Whether the string is raw or not
This PR is a followup to #10256. Like with that PR, this PR does not, in itself, fix any bugs. However, it means that we will have the necessary information to preserve quoting style and rawness of strings in the `ExprGenerator` in a followup PR, which will allow us to provide a fix for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7799.
The information is recorded on the AST nodes using a bitflag field on each node, similarly to how we recorded the information on `Tok::String`, `Tok::FStringStart` and `Tok::FStringMiddle` tokens in #10298. Rather than reusing the bitflag I used for the tokens, however, I decided to create a custom bitflag for each AST node.
Using different bitflags for each node allows us to make invalid states unrepresentable: it is valid to set a `u` prefix on a string literal, but not on a bytes literal or an f-string. It also allows us to have better debug representations for each AST node modified in this PR.
## Summary
Changes the generic recommendation to replace
```python
if foo == True: ...
```
with `if cond:` to `if foo:`.
Still uses a generic message for compound comparisons as a specific
message starts to become confusing. For example,
```python
if foo == True != False: ...
```
produces two recommendations, one of which would recommend `if True:`,
which is confusing.
Resolves [recommendation in a previous
PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8613/files#r1514915070).
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
