## Summary
The code later in this file that checks for slices relies on the stack
of brackets to determine the position. I'm not sure why format strings
were being excluded from this, but the tests still pass with these match
guards removed.
Closes#10278
## Test Plan
~Still needs a test.~ Test case added for this example.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10238 to
offer fixes for the f-string rule regardless of the line length of the
resulting fix. To quote Alex in the linked PR:
> Yes, from the user's perspective I'd rather have a fix that may lead
to line length issues than have to fix them myself :-) Cleaning up line
lengths is easier than changing from `"".format()` to `f""`
I agree with this position, which is that if we're going to offer a
diagnostic, we should really be offering the user the ability to fix it
-- otherwise, we're just inconveniencing them.
## Summary
Given a format string like `"{x} {x}".format(x=foo())`, we should avoid
converting to an f-string, since doing so would require repeating the
function call (`f"{foo()} {foo()}"`), which could introduce side
effects.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10258.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10235
This PR changes `UP032` to flag all `"".format` calls that can
technically be rewritten to an f-string, even if rewritting it to an
fstring, at least automatically, exceeds the line length (or increases
the amount by which it goes over the line length).
I looked at the Git history to understand whether the check prevents
some false positives (reported by an issue), but i haven't found a
compelling reason to limit the rule to only flag format calls that stay
in the line length limit:
* https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7818 Changed the heuristic to
determine if the fix fits to address
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/7810
* https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/1905 first version of the rule
I did take a look at pyupgrade and couldn't find a similar check, at
least not in the rule code (maybe it's checked somewhere else?)
https://github.com/asottile/pyupgrade/blob/main/pyupgrade/_plugins/fstrings.py
## Breaking Change?
This could be seen as a breaking change according to ruff's [versioning
policy](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/versioning/):
> The behavior of a stable rule is changed
* The scope of a stable rule is significantly increased
* The intent of the rule changes
* Does not include bug fixes that follow the original intent of the rule
It does increase the scope of the rule, but it is in the original intent
of the rule (so it's not).
## Test Plan
See changed test output
## Summary
When you try to remove an internal representation leaking into another
type and end up rewriting a simple version of `smallvec`.
The goal of this PR is to replace the `Box<[&'a str]>` with
`Box<QualifiedName>` to avoid that the internal `QualifiedName`
representation leaks (and it gives us a nicer API too). However, doing
this when `QualifiedName` uses `SmallVec` internally gives us all sort
of funny lifetime errors. I was lost but @BurntSushi came to rescue me.
He figured out that `smallvec` has a variance problem which is already
tracked in https://github.com/servo/rust-smallvec/issues/146
To fix the variants problem, I could use the smallvec-2-alpha-4 or
implement our own smallvec. I went with implementing our own small vec
for this specific problem. It obviously isn't as sophisticated as
smallvec (only uses safe code), e.g. it doesn't perform any size
optimizations, but it does its job.
Other changes:
* Removed `Imported::qualified_name` (the version that returns a
`String`). This can be replaced by calling `ToString` on the qualified
name.
* Renamed `Imported::call_path` to `qualified_name` and changed its
return type to `&QualifiedName`.
* Renamed `QualifiedName::imported` to `user_defined` which is the more
common term when talking about builtins vs the rest/user defined
functions.
## Test plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10039
The [recommendation for typing stub
files](https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source/stubs.html#blank-lines)
is to use **one** blank line to group related definitions and
otherwise omit blank lines.
The newly added blank line rules (`E3*`) didn't account for typing stub
files and enforced two empty lines at the top level and one empty line
otherwise, making it impossible to group related definitions.
This PR implements the `E3*` rules to:
* Not enforce blank lines. The use of blank lines in typing definitions
is entirely up to the user.
* Allow at most one empty line, including between top level statements.
## Test Plan
Added unit tests (It may look odd that many snapshots are empty but the
point is that the rule should no longer emit diagnostics)
## Summary
This PR changes the `E3*` rules to respect the `isort`
`lines-after-imports` and `lines-between-types` settings. Specifically,
the following rules required changing
* `TooManyBlannkLines` : Respects both settings.
* `BlankLinesTopLevel`: Respects `lines-after-imports`. Doesn't need to
respect `lines-between-types` because it only applies to classes and
functions
The downside of this approach is that `isort` and the blank line rules
emit a diagnostic when there are too many blank lines. The fixes aren't
identical, the blank line is less opinionated, but blank lines accepts
the fix of `isort`.
<details>
<summary>Outdated approach</summary>
Fixes
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10077#issuecomment-1961266981
This PR changes the blank line rules to not enforce the number of blank
lines after imports (top-level) if isort is enabled and leave it to
isort to enforce the right number of lines (depends on the
`isort.lines-after-imports` and `isort.lines-between-types` settings).
The reason to give `isort` precedence over the blank line rules is that
they are configurable. Users that always want to blank lines after
imports can use `isort.lines-after-imports=2` to enforce that
(specifically for imports).
This PR does not fix the incompatibility with the formatter in pyi files
that only uses 0 to 1 blank lines. I'll address this separately.
</details>
## Review
The first commit is a small refactor that simplified implementing the
fix (and makes it easier to reason about what's mutable and what's not).
## Test Plan
I added a new test and verified that it fails with an error that the fix
never converges. I verified the snapshot output after implementing the
fix.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hoël Bagard <34478245+hoel-bagard@users.noreply.github.com>
The expression types in our AST are called `ExprYield`, `ExprAwait`,
`ExprStringLiteral` etc, except `ExprNamedExpr`, `ExprIfExpr` and
`ExprGenratorExpr`. This seems to align with [Python AST's
naming](https://docs.python.org/3/library/ast.html) but feels
inconsistent and excessive.
This PR removes the `Expr` postfix from `ExprNamedExpr`, `ExprIfExpr`,
and `ExprGeneratorExpr`.
## Summary
Charlie can probably explain this better than I but it turns out,
`CallPath` is used for two different things:
* To represent unqualified names like `version` where `version` can be a
local variable or imported (e.g. `from sys import version` where the
full qualified name is `sys.version`)
* To represent resolved, full qualified names
This PR splits `CallPath` into two types to make this destinction clear.
> Note: I haven't renamed all `call_path` variables to `qualified_name`
or `unqualified_name`. I can do that if that's welcomed but I first want
to get feedback on the approach and naming overall.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR fixes for `invalid-first-argument` rules.
The fixes rename the first argument of methods and class methods to the
valid one. References to this argument are also renamed.
Fixes are skipped when another argument is named as the valid first
argument.
The fix is marked as unsafe due
The functions for the `N804` and `N805` rules are now merged, as they
only differ by the name of the valid first argument.
The rules were moved from the AST iteration to the deferred scopes to be
in the function scope while creating the fix.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Allows `required-version` to be set with a version specifier, like
`>=0.3.1`.
If a single version is provided, falls back to assuming `==0.3.1`, for
backwards compatibility.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10192.
## Summary
This PR removes the unneeded lifetime `'b` from many of our `Visitor`
implementations.
The lifetime is unneeded because it is only constraint by `'a`, so we
can use `'a` directly.
## Test Plan
`cargo build`
## Summary
This PR changes the `CallPath` type alias to a newtype wrapper.
A newtype wrapper allows us to limit the API and to experiment with
alternative ways to implement matching on `CallPath`s.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Removes the unnecessary `exc` variable in `TRY300`'s docs example.
## Test Plan
```
python scripts/generate_mkdocs.py; mkdocs serve -f mkdocs.public.yml
```
## Summary
Fixes#10174 by allowing match cases to be enclosing nodes for
suppression comments. `else/elif` clauses are now also allowed to be
enclosing nodes.
## Test Plan
I've added the offending code from the original issue to the `RUF028`
snapshot test, and I've also expanded it to test the allowed `else/elif`
clause.
## Summary
This fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7868.
Support isort's `default-section` feature which allows any imports that
match sections that are not in `section-order` to be mapped to a
specifically named section.
https://pycqa.github.io/isort/docs/configuration/options.html#default-section
This has a few implications:
- It is no longer required that all known sections are defined in
`section-order`.
- This is technically a bw-incompat change because currently if folks
define custom groups, and do not define a `section-order`, the code used
to add all known sections to `section-order` while emitting warnings.
**However, when this happened, users would be seeing warnings so I do
not think it should count as a bw-incompat change.**
## Test Plan
- Added a new test.
- Did not break any existing tests.
Finally, I ran the following config against Pyramid's complex codebase
that was previously using isort and this change worked there.
### pyramid's previous isort config
5f7e286b06/pyproject.toml (L22-L37)
```toml
[tool.isort]
profile = "black"
multi_line_output = 3
src_paths = ["src", "tests"]
skip_glob = ["docs/*"]
include_trailing_comma = true
force_grid_wrap = false
combine_as_imports = true
line_length = 79
force_sort_within_sections = true
no_lines_before = "THIRDPARTY"
sections = "FUTURE,THIRDPARTY,FIRSTPARTY,LOCALFOLDER"
default_section = "THIRDPARTY"
known_first_party = "pyramid"
```
### tested with ruff isort config
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.isort]
case-sensitive = true
combine-as-imports = true
force-sort-within-sections = true
section-order = [
"future",
"third-party",
"first-party",
"local-folder",
]
default-section = "third-party"
known-first-party = [
"pyramid",
]
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Fixes#6611
## Summary
This lint rule spots comments that are _intended_ to suppress or enable
the formatter, but will be ignored by the Ruff formatter.
We borrow some functions the formatter uses for determining comment
placement / putting them in context within an AST.
The analysis function uses an AST visitor to visit each comment and
attach it to the AST. It then uses that context to check:
1. Is this comment in an expression?
2. Does this comment have bad placement? (e.g. a `# fmt: skip` above a
function instead of at the end of a line)
3. Is this comment redundant?
4. Does this comment actually suppress any code?
5. Does this comment have ambiguous placement? (e.g. a `# fmt: off`
above an `else:` block)
If any of these are true, a violation is thrown. The reported reason
depends on the order of the above check-list: in other words, a `# fmt:
skip` comment on its own line within a list expression will be reported
as being in an expression, since that reason takes priority.
The lint suggests removing the comment as an unsafe fix, regardless of
the reason.
## Test Plan
A snapshot test has been created.
## Summary
Adapts the fix for rule B006 to no longer modify the body of function
stubs, while retaining the change in method signature.
## Test Plan
The existing tests for B006 were adapted to reflect this change in
behavior.
## Relevant issue
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10083
## Summary
The `lxml` library has been modified to address known vulnerabilities
and unsafe defaults. As such, the `defusedxml`
library is no longer necessary, `defusedxml` has deprecated its `lxml`
module.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10030.
## Summary
Currently, rule `RUF015` is not able to detect the usage of
`list(iterable).pop(0)` falling under the category of an _unnecessary
iterable allocation for accessing the first element_. This PR wants to
change that. See the underlying issue for more details.
* Provide extension to detect `list(iterable).pop(0)`, but not
`list(iterable).pop(i)` where i > 1
* Update corresponding doc
## Test Plan
* `RUF015.py` and the corresponding snap file were extended such that
their correspond to the new behaviour
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9190
---
PS: I've only been working on this ticket as I haven't seen any activity
from issue assignee @rmad17, neither in this repo nor in a fork. I hope
I interpreted his inactivity correctly. Didn't mean to steal his chance.
Since I stumbled across the underlying problem myself, I wanted to offer
a solution as soon as possible.
## Summary
It is a convention to use the `_()` alias for `gettext()`. We want to
avoid
statement expressions and assignments related to aliases of the gettext
API.
See https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html for details. When one
uses `_() to mark a string for translation, the tools look for these
markers
and replace the original string with its translated counterpart. If the
string contains variable placeholders or formatting, it can complicate
the
translation process, lead to errors or incorrect translations.
## Test Plan
* Test file `RUF027_1.py` was extended such that the test reproduces the
false-positive
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10023.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The original implementation of this applied the runtime-required context
to definitions _within_ the function, but not the signature itself. (We
had test coverage; the snapshot was just correctly showing the wrong
outcome.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10089.
## Summary
Update PLR1714 to ignore `sys.platform` and `sys.version` checks.
I'm not sure if these checks or if we need to add more. Please advise.
Fixes#10017
## Test Plan
Added a new test case and ran `cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Allows, e.g.:
```python
import os
os.environ["WORLD_SIZE"] = "1"
os.putenv("CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES", "4")
import torch
```
For now, this is only allowed in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10059
