## Summary
Fixes#16912
Create a new type `DisplayMaybeParenthesizedType` that is now used in
Union and Intersection display
## Test Plan
Update callable annotations
## Summary
From #16861
This PR fixes the incorrect `ClassDef` handling of
`SemanticIndexBuilder::visit_stmt`, which fixes some of the incorrect
behavior of referencing the class itself in the class scope (a complete
fix requires a different fix, which will be done in the another PR).
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This is a cleanup PR. I am fixing various English language spelling
errors. This is mostly in docs and docstrings.
## Test Plan
The usual CI tests were run. I tried to build the docs (though I had
some troubles there). The testing needs here are, I trust, very low
impact. (Though I would happily test more.)
## Summary
Part of #15382, this PR adds support for calling a variable that's
annotated with `typing.Callable`.
## Test Plan
Add test cases in a new `call/annotation.md` file.
## Summary
Part of #15382
This PR adds support for checking the assignability of two general
callable types.
This is built on top of #16804 by including the gradual parameters check
and accepting a function that performs the check between the two types.
## Test Plan
Update `is_assignable_to.md` with callable types section.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
When callables are displayed in unions, like:
```py
from typing import Callable
def foo(x: Callable[[], int] | None):
# red-knot: Revealed type is `() -> int | None` [revealed-type]
reveal_type(x)
```
This leaves the type rather ambiguous, to fix this we can add
parenthesis to callable type in union
Fixes#16893
## Test Plan
Update callable annotations tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR removes false-positive diagnostics for `*` imports. Currently we
always emit a diagnostic for these statements unless the module we're
importing from has a symbol named `"*"` in its symbol table for the
global scope. (And if we were doing everything correctly, no module ever
would have a symbol named `"*"` in its global scope!)
The fix here is sort-of hacky and won't be what we'll want to do
long-term. However, I think it's useful to do this as a first step
since:
- It significantly reduces false positives when running on code that
uses `*` imports
- It "resets" the tests to a cleaner state with many fewer TODOs, making
it easier to see what the hard work is that's still to be done.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic`
## Summary
This PR adds a suite of tests for wildcard (`*`) imports. The tests
nearly all fail for now, and those that don't, ahem, pass for the wrong
reasons...
I've tried to add TODO comments in all instances for places where we are
currently inferring the incorrect thing, incorrectly emitting a
diagnostic, or emitting a diagnostic with a bad error message.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic`
This breaks up call binding into two phases:
- **_Matching parameters_** just looks at the names and kinds
(positional/keyword) of each formal and actual parameters, and matches
them up. Most of the current call binding errors happen during this
phase.
- Once we have matched up formal and actual parameters, we can **_infer
types_** of each actual parameter, and **_check_** that each one is
assignable to the corresponding formal parameter type.
As part of this, we add information to each formal parameter about
whether it is a type form or not. Once [PEP
747](https://peps.python.org/pep-0747/) is finalized, we can hook that
up to this internal type form representation. This replaces the
`ParameterExpectations` type, which did the same thing in a more ad hoc
way.
While we're here, we add a new fluent API for building `Parameter`s,
which makes our signature constructors a bit nicer to read. We also
eliminate a TODO where we were consuming types from the argument list
instead of the bound parameter list when evaluating our special-case
known functions.
Closes#15460
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Part of #15382
This PR adds support for checking the subtype relationship between the
two callable types.
The main source of reference used for implementation is
https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/callables.html#assignability-rules-for-callables.
The implementation is split into two phases:
1. Check all the positional parameters which includes positional-only,
standard (positional or keyword) and variadic kind
2. Collect all the keywords in a `HashMap` to do the keyword parameters
check via name lookup
For (1), there's a helper struct which is similar to `.zip_longest`
(from `itertools`) except that it allows control over one of the
iterator as that's required when processing a variadic parameter. This
is required because positional parameters needs to be checked as per
their position between the two callable types. The struct also keeps
track of the current iteration element because when the loop is exited
(to move on to the phase 2) the current iteration element would be
carried over to the phase 2 check.
This struct is internal to the `is_subtype_of` method as I don't think
it makes sense to expose it outside. It also allows me to use "self" and
"other" suffixed field names as that's only relevant in that context.
## Test Plan
Add extensive tests in markdown.
Converted all of the code snippets from
https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/callables.html#assignability-rules-for-callables
to use `knot_extensions.is_subtype_of` and verified the result.
## Summary
This PR checks whether two callable types are equivalent or not.
This is required because for an equivalence relationship, the default
value does not necessarily need to be the same but if the parameter in
one of the callable has a default value then the corresponding parameter
in the other callable should also have a default value. This is the main
reason a manual implementation is required.
And, as per https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/callables.html#id4,
the default _type_ doesn't participate in a subtype relationship, only
the optionality (required or not) participates. This means that the
following two callable types are equivalent:
```py
def f1(a: int = 1) -> None: ...
def f2(a: int = 2) -> None: ...
```
Additionally, the name of positional-only, variadic and keyword-variadic
are not required to be the same for an equivalence relation.
A potential solution to avoid the manual implementation would be to only
store whether a parameter has a default value or not but the type is
currently required to check for assignability.
## Test plan
Add tests for callable types in `is_equivalent_to.md`
## Summary
Catch some Instances, but raise type error for the rest of them
Fixes#16851
## Test Plan
Extend invalid.md in annotations
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Currently for something like `X = typing.Tuple[str, str]`, we infer the
value of `X` as `object`. That's because `Tuple` (like many of the
symbols in the typing module) is annotated as a `_SpecialForm` instance
in typeshed's stubs:
23382f5f8c/crates/red_knot_vendored/vendor/typeshed/stdlib/typing.pyi (L215)
and we don't understand implicit type aliases yet, and the stub for
`_SpecialForm.__getitem__` says it always returns `object`:
23382f5f8c/crates/red_knot_vendored/vendor/typeshed/stdlib/typing.pyi (L198-L200)
We have existing false positives in our test suite due to this:
23382f5f8c/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/annotations/annotated.md (L76-L78)
and it's causing _many_ new false positives in #16872, which tries to
make our annotation-expression parsing stricter in some ways.
This PR therefore adds some small special casing for `KnownInstanceType`
variants that fallback to `_SpecialForm`, so that these false positives
can be avoided.
## Test Plan
Existing mdtest altered.
Cc. @MatthewMckee4
## Summary
From #16641
The previous PR attempted to fix the errors presented in this PR, but as
discussed in the conversation, it was concluded that the approach was
undesirable and that further work would be needed to fix the errors with
a correct general solution.
In this PR, I instead add the test cases from the previous PR as TODOs,
as a starting point for future work.
## Test Plan
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@oddbird.net>
## Summary
This PR reworks `TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_type_expression()` so that
we emit diagnostics when encountering a list literal in a type
expression. The only place where a list literal is allowed in a type
expression is if it appears as the first argument to `Callable[]`, and
`Callable` is already heavily special-cased in our type-expression
parsing.
In order to ensure that list literals are _always_ allowed as the
_first_ argument to `Callabler` (but never allowed as the second, third,
etc. argument), I had to do some refactoring of our type-expression
parsing for `Callable` annotations.
## Test Plan
New mdtests added, and existing ones updated
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
fixes#15048
We want to handle more types from Type::KnownInstance
## Test Plan
Add tests for each type added explicitly in the match
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Part of #15382
This PR infers the return type `lambda` expression as `Unknown`. In the
future, it would be more useful to infer the expression type considering
the surrounding context (#16696).
## Test Plan
Update existing test cases from `@todo` to the (verified) return type.
## Summary
Add error messages for invalid nodes in type expressions
Fixes#16816
## Test Plan
Extend annotations/invalid.md to handle these invalid AST nodes error
messages
These should all be minor cosmetic changes. To summarize:
* In many cases, `-` was replaced with `^` for primary annotations.
This is because, previously, whether `-` or `^` was used depended
on the severity. But in the new data model, it's based on whether
the annotation is "primary" or not. We could of course change this
in whatever way we want, but I think we should roll with this for now.
* The "secondary messages" in the old API are rendered as
sub-diagnostics. This in turn results in a small change in the output
format, since previously, the secondary messages were represented as
just another snippet. We use sub-diagnostics because that's the intended
way to enforce relative ordering between messages within a diagnostic.
* The "info:" prefix used in some annotation messages has been dropped.
We could re-add this, but I think I like it better without this prefix.
I believe those 3 cover all of the snapshot changes here.
This cleans up how we handle calling unions of types. #16568 adding a
three-level structure for callable signatures (`Signatures`,
`CallableSignature`, and `Signature`) to handle unions and overloads.
This PR updates the bindings side to mimic that structure. What used to
be called `CallOutcome` is now `Bindings`, and represents the result of
binding actual arguments against a possible union of callables.
`CallableBinding` is the result of binding a single, possibly
overloaded, callable type. `Binding` is the result of binding a single
overload.
While we're here, this also cleans up `CallError` greatly. It was
previously extracting error information from the bindings and storing it
in the error result. It is now a simple enum, carrying no data, that's
used as a status code to talk about whether the overall binding was
successful or not. We are now more consistent about walking the binding
itself to get detailed information about _how_ the binding was
unsucessful.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug in the check for fully static callable type where we
would skip unannotated parameter type.
## Test Plan
Add tests using the new `CallableTypeFromFunction` special form.
## Summary
This is a re-creation of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16764 by
@mtshiba, which I closed meaning to immediately reopen (GitHub wasn't
updating the PR with the latest pushed changes), and which GitHub will
not allow me to reopen for some reason. Pasting the summary from that PR
below:
> From https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16641
>
> As stated in this comment
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16641#discussion_r1996153702),
the current ordering implementation for intersection types is incorrect.
So, I will introduce lexicographic ordering for intersection types.
## Test Plan
One property test stabilised (tested locally with
`QUICKCHECK_TESTS=2000000 cargo test --release -p
red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored
types::property_tests::stable::negation_reverses_subtype_order`), and
existing mdtests that previously failed now pass.
Primarily-authored-by:
[mtshiba](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/commits?author=mtshiba)
---------
Co-authored-by: Shunsuke Shibayama <sbym1346@gmail.com>
## Summary
Uses the `try_call_dunder` infrastructure for augmented assignment and
fixes the logic to work for types other than `Type::Instance(…)`. This
allows us to infer the correct type here:
```py
x = (1, 2)
x += (3, 4)
reveal_type(x) # revealed: tuple[Literal[1], Literal[2], Literal[3], Literal[4]]
```
Or in this (extremely weird) scenario:
```py
class Meta(type):
def __iadd__(cls, other: int) -> str:
return ""
class C(metaclass=Meta): ...
cls = C
cls += 1
reveal_type(cls) # revealed: str
```
Union and intersection handling could also be improved here, but I made
no attempt to do so in this PR.
## Test Plan
New MD tests
## Summary
A follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16705 which
documents various kinds of diagnostics that can appear when assigning to
an attribute.
## Test Plan
New snapshot tests.
## Summary
This PR implements the first part of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/16440. It ensures that Red
Knot's module resolver is case sensitive on all systems.
This PR combines a few approaches:
1. It uses `canonicalize` on non-case-sensitive systems to get the real
casing of a path. This works for as long as no symlinks or mapped
network drives (the windows `E:\` is mapped to `\\server\share` thingy).
This is the same as what Pyright does
2. If 1. fails, fall back to recursively list the parent directory and
test if the path's file name matches the casing exactly as listed in by
list dir. This is the same approach as CPython takes in its module
resolver. The main downside is that it requires more syscalls because,
unlike CPython, we Red Knot needs to invalidate its caches if a file
name gets renamed (CPython assumes that the folders are immutable).
It's worth noting that the file watching test that I added that renames
`lib.py` to `Lib.py` currently doesn't pass on case-insensitive systems.
Making it pass requires some more involved changes to `Files`. I plan to
work on this next. There's the argument that landing this PR on its own
isn't worth it without this issue being addressed. I think it's still a
good step in the right direction even when some of the details on how
and where the path case sensitive comparison is implemented.
## Test plan
I added multiple integration tests (including a failing one). I tested
that the `case-sensitivity` detection works as expected on Windows,
MacOS and Linux and that the fast-paths are taken accordingly.
## Summary
This PR includes minor improvements to binary operation inference,
specifically for tuple concatenation.
### Before
```py
reveal_type((1, 2) + (3, 4)) # revealed: @Todo(return type of decorated function)
# If TODO is ignored, the revealed type would be `tuple[1|2|3|4, ...]`
```
The `builtins.tuple` type stub defines `__add__`, but it appears to only
work for homogeneous tuples. However, I think this limitation is not
ideal for many use cases.
### After
```py
reveal_type((1, 2) + (3, 4)) # revealed: tuple[Literal[1], Literal[2], Literal[3], Literal[4]]
```
## Test Plan
### Added
- `mdtest/binary/tuples.md`
### Affected
- `mdtest/slots.md` (a test have been moved out of the `False-Negative`
block.)
## Summary
This changeset adds proper support for assignments to attributes:
```py
obj.attr = value
```
In particular, the following new features are now available:
* We previously didn't raise any errors if you tried to assign to a
non-existing attribute `attr`. This is now fixed.
* If `type(obj).attr` is a data descriptor, we now call its `__set__`
method instead of trying to assign to the load-context type of
`obj.attr`, which can be different for data descriptors.
* An initial attempt was made to support unions and intersections, as
well as possibly-unbound situations. There are some remaining TODOs in
tests, but they only affect edge cases. Having nested diagnostics would
be one way that could help solve the remaining cases, I believe.
## Follow ups
The following things are planned as follow-ups:
- Write a test suite with snapshot diagnostics for various attribute
assignment errors
- Improve the diagnostics. An easy improvement would be to highlight the
right hand side of the assignment as a secondary span (with the rhs type
as additional information). Some other ideas are mentioned in TODO
comments in this PR.
- Improve the union/intersection/possible-unboundness handling
- Add support for calling custom `__setattr__` methods (see new false
positive in the ecosystem results)
## Ecosystem changes
Some changes are related to assignments on attributes with a custom
`__setattr__` method (see above). Since we didn't notice missing
attributes at all in store context previously, these are new.
The other changes are related to properties. We previously used their
read-context type to test the assignment. That results in weird error
messages, as we often see assignments to `self.property` and then we
think that those are instance attributes *and* descriptors, leading to
union types. Now we properly look them up on the meta type, see the
decorated function, and try to overwrite it with the new value (as we
don't understand decorators yet). Long story short: the errors are still
weird, we need to understand decorators to make them go away.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
There can be semi-cyclic inheritance patterns (e.g. recursive generics)
that are not technically inheritance cycles, but that can cause us to
hit Salsa query cycles in evaluating a type's MRO. Add fixed-point
handling to these MRO-related queries so we don't panic on these cycles.
The details of what queries we hit in what order in this case will
change as we implement support for generics, but ultimately we will
probably need cycle handling for all queries that can re-enter type
inference, otherwise we are susceptible to small changes in query
execution order causing panics.
Fixes#14333
Further reduces the panicking set of seeds in #14737
## Summary
This PR adds a new `CallableTypeFromFunction` special form to allow
extracting the abstract signature of a function literal i.e., convert a
`Type::Function` into a `Type::Callable` (`CallableType::General`).
This is done to support testing the `is_gradual_equivalent_to` type
relation specifically the case we want to make sure that a function that
has parameters with no annotations and does not have a return type
annotation is gradual equivalent to `Callable[[Any, Any, ...], Any]`
where the number of parameters should match between the function literal
and callable type.
Refer
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16634#discussion_r1989976692
### Bikeshedding
The name `CallableTypeFromFunction` is a bit too verbose. A possibly
alternative from Carl is `CallableTypeOf` but that would be similar to
`TypeOf` albeit with a limitation that the former only accepts function
literal types and errors on other types.
Some other alternatives:
* `FunctionSignature`
* `SignatureOf` (similar issues as `TypeOf`?)
* ...
## Test Plan
Update `type_api.md` with a new section that tests this special form,
both invalid and valid forms.
## Summary
Add support for calling custom `__getattr__` methods in case an
attribute is not otherwise found. This allows us to get rid of many
ecosystem false positives where we previously emitted errors when
accessing attributes on `argparse.Namespace`.
closes#16614
## Test Plan
* New Markdown tests
* Observed expected ecosystem changes (the changes for `arrow` also look
fine, since the `Arrow` class has a custom [`__getattr__`
here](1d70d00919/arrow/arrow.py (L802-L815)))
Pulls in the latest Salsa main branch, which supports fixpoint
iteration, and uses it to handle all query cycles.
With this, we no longer need to skip any corpus files to avoid panics.
Latest perf results show a 6% incremental and 1% cold-check regression.
This is not a "no cycles" regression, as tomllib and typeshed do trigger
some definition cycles (previously handled by our old
`infer_definition_types` fallback to `Unknown`). We don't currently have
a benchmark we can use to measure the pure no-cycles regression, though
I expect there would still be some regression; the fixpoint iteration
feature in Salsa does add some overhead even for non-cyclic queries.
I think this regression is within the reasonable range for this feature.
We can do further optimization work later, but I don't think it's the
top priority right now. So going ahead and acknowledging the regression
on CodSpeed.
Mypy primer is happy, so this doesn't regress anything on our
currently-checked projects. I expect it probably unlocks adding a number
of new projects to our ecosystem check that previously would have
panicked.
Fixes#13792Fixes#14672
## Summary
Implements attribute access on intersection types, which didn't
previously work. For example:
```py
from typing import Any
class P: ...
class Q: ...
class A:
x: P = P()
class B:
x: Any = Q()
def _(obj: A):
if isinstance(obj, B):
reveal_type(obj.x) # revealed: P & Any
```
Refers to [this comment].
[this comment]:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16416#discussion_r1985040363
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Background - as a follow up to #16611 I noticed that there's a lot of
code duplicated between the `is_assignable_to` and `is_subtype_of`
functions and considered trying to merge them.
[A subtype and an assignable type are pretty much the
same](https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/concepts.html#the-assignable-to-or-consistent-subtyping-relation),
except that subtypes are by definition fully static, so I think we can
replace the whole of `is_subtype_of` with:
```
if !self.is_fully_static(db) || !target.is_fully_static(db) {
return false;
}
return self.is_assignable_to(target)
```
if we move all of the logic to is_assignable_to and delete duplicate
code. Then we can discuss if it even makes sense to have a separate
is_subtype_of function (I think the answer is yes since it's used by a
bunch of other places, but we may be able to basically rip out the
concept).
Anyways while playing with combining the functions I noticed is that the
handling of Intersections in `is_subtype_of` has a special case for two
intersections, which I didn't include in the last PR - rather I first
handled right hand intersections before left hand, which should properly
handle double intersections (hand-wavy explanation I can justify if
needed - (A & B & C) is assignable to (A & B) because the left is
assignable to both A and B, but none of A, B, or C is assignable to (A &
B)).
I took a look at what breaks if I remove the handling for double
intersections, and the reason it is needed is because is_disjoint does
not properly handle intersections with negative conditions (so instead
`is_subtype_of` basically implements the check correctly).
This PR adds support to is_disjoint for properly checking negative
branches, which also lets us simplify `is_subtype_of`, bringing it in
line with `is_assignable_to`
## Test Plan
Added a bunch of tests, most of which failed before this fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This is a pure restructuring of the `attributes.md` and
`descriptor_protocol.md` test suites. They have grown organically and I
didn't want to make major structural changes in my recent PR to keep the
diff clean.
## Summary
Properly handle binary operator inference for union types.
This fixes a bug I noticed while looking at ecosystem results. The MRE
version of it is this:
```py
def sub(x: float, y: float):
# Red Knot: Operator `-` is unsupported between objects of type `int | float` and `int | float`
return x - y
```
## Test Plan
- New Markdown tests.
- Expected diff in the ecosystem checks
## Summary
Part of #15382
This PR adds the check for whether a callable type is fully static or
not.
A callable type is fully static if all of the parameter types are fully
static _and_ the return type is fully static _and_ if it does not use
the gradual form (`...`) for its parameters.
## Test Plan
Update `is_fully_static.md` with callable types.
It seems that currently this test is grouped into either fully static or
not, I think it would be useful to split them up in groups like
callable, etc. I intentionally avoided that in this PR but I'll put up a
PR for an appropriate split.
Note: I've an explicit goal of updating the property tests with the new
callable types once all relations are implemented.
## Summary
This PR closes#16248.
If the return type of the function isn't assignable to the one
specified, an `invalid-return-type` error occurs.
I thought it would be better to report this as a different kind of error
than the `invalid-assignment` error, so I defined this as a new error.
## Test Plan
All type inconsistencies in the test cases have been replaced with
appropriate ones.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
This updates the `Signature` and `CallBinding` machinery to support
multiple overloads for a callable. This is currently only used for
`KnownFunction`s that we special-case in our type inference code. It
does **_not_** yet update the semantic index builder to handle
`@overload` decorators and construct a multi-signature `Overloads`
instance for real Python functions.
While I was here, I updated many of the `try_call` special cases to use
signatures (possibly overloaded ones now) and `bind_call` to check
parameter lists. We still need some of the mutator methods on
`OverloadBinding` for the special cases where we need to update return
types based on some Rust code.
## Summary
This mostly fixes#14899
My motivation was similar to the last comment by @sharkdp there. I ran
red_knot on a codebase and the most common error was patterns like this
failing:
```
def foo(x: str): ...
x: Any = ...
if isinstance(x, str):
foo(x) # Object of type `Any & str` cannot be assigned to parameter 1 (`x`) of function `foo`; expected type `str`
```
The desired behavior is pretty much to ignore Any/Unknown when resolving
intersection assignability - `Any & str` should be assignable to `str`,
and `str` should be assignable to `str & Any`
The fix is actually very similar to the existing code in
`is_subtype_of`, we need to correctly handle intersections on either
side, while being careful to handle dynamic types as desired.
This does not fix the second test case from that issue:
```
static_assert(is_assignable_to(Intersection[Unrelated, Any], Not[tuple[Unrelated, Any]]))
```
but that's misleading because the root cause there has nothing to do
with gradual types. I added a simpler test case that also fails:
```
static_assert(is_assignable_to(Unrelated, Not[tuple[Unrelated]]))
```
This is because we don't determine that Unrelated does not subclass from
tuple so we can't rule out this relation. If that logic is improved then
this fix should also handle the case of the intersection
## Test Plan
Added a bunch of is_assignable_to tests, most of which failed before
this fix.
## Summary
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15382
This PR adds support for inferring the `lambda` expression and return
the `CallableType`.
Currently, this is only limited to inferring the parameters and a todo
type for the return type.
For posterity, I tried using the `file_expression_type` to infer the
return type of lambda but it would always lead to cycle. The main reason
is that in `infer_parameter_definition`, the default expression is being
inferred using `file_expression_type`, which is correct, but it then
Take the following source code as an example:
```py
lambda x=1: x
```
Here's how the code will flow:
* `infer_scope_types` for the global scope
* `infer_lambda_expression`
* `infer_expression` for the default value `1`
* `file_expression_type` for the return type using the body expression.
This is because the body creates it's own scope
* `infer_scope_types` (lambda body scope)
* `infer_name_load` for the symbol `x` whose visible binding is the
lambda parameter `x`
* `infer_parameter_definition` for parameter `x`
* `file_expression_type` for the default value `1`
* `infer_scope_types` for the global scope because of the default
expression
This will then reach to `infer_definition` for the parameter `x` again
which then creates the cycle.
## Test Plan
Add tests around `lambda` expression inference.
## Summary
Fixes a small nit of mine -- we are currently inconsistent in our
spelling between "metaclass" and "meta class", and between "meta type"
and "meta-type". This PR means that we consistently use "metaclass" and
"meta-type".
## Test Plan
`uvx pre-commit run -a`
## Summary
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15382
This PR implements a general callable type that wraps around a
`Signature` and it uses that new type to represent `typing.Callable`.
It also implements `Display` support for `Callable`. The format is as:
```
([<arg name>][: <arg type>][ = <default type>], ...) -> <return type>
```
The `/` and `*` separators are added at the correct boundary for
positional-only and keyword-only parameters. Now, as `typing.Callable`
only has positional-only parameters, the rendered signature would be:
```py
Callable[[int, str], None]
# (int, str, /) -> None
```
The `/` separator represents that all the arguments are positional-only.
The relationship methods that check assignability, subtype relationship,
etc. are not yet implemented and will be done so as a follow-up.
## Test Plan
Add test cases for display support for `Signature` and various mdtest
for `typing.Callable`.
## Summary
Resolves#16365
Add support for unpacking `with` statement targets.
## Test Plan
Added some test cases, alike the ones added by #15058.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
