Commit graph

432 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Peter
820a31af5d
[red-knot] Attribute access and the descriptor protocol (#16416)
## Summary

* Attributes/method are now properly looked up on metaclasses, when
called on class objects
* We properly distinguish between data descriptors and non-data
descriptors (but we do not yet support them in store-context, i.e.
`obj.data_descr = …`)
* The descriptor protocol is now implemented in a single unified place
for instances, classes and dunder-calls. Unions and possibly-unbound
symbols are supported in all possible stages of the process by creating
union types as results.
* In general, the handling of "possibly-unbound" symbols has been
improved in a lot of places: meta-class attributes, attributes,
descriptors with possibly-unbound `__get__` methods, instance
attributes, …
* We keep track of type qualifiers in a lot more places. I anticipate
that this will be useful if we import e.g. `Final` symbols from other
modules (see relevant change to typing spec:
https://github.com/python/typing/pull/1937).
* Detection and special-casing of the `typing.Protocol` special form in
order to avoid lots of changes in the test suite due to new `@Todo`
types when looking up attributes on builtin types which have `Protocol`
in their MRO. We previously
looked up attributes in a wrong way, which is why this didn't come up
before.

closes #16367
closes #15966

## Context

The way attribute lookup in `Type::member` worked before was simply
wrong (mostly my own fault). The whole instance-attribute lookup should
probably never have been integrated into `Type::member`. And the
`Type::static_member` function that I introduced in my last descriptor
PR was the wrong abstraction. It's kind of fascinating how far this
approach took us, but I am pretty confident that the new approach
proposed here is what we need to model this correctly.

There are three key pieces that are required to implement attribute
lookups:

- **`Type::class_member`**/**`Type::find_in_mro`**: The
`Type::find_in_mro` method that can look up attributes on class bodies
(and corresponding bases). This is a partial function on types, as it
can not be called on instance types like`Type::Instance(…)` or
`Type::IntLiteral(…)`. For this reason, we usually call it through
`Type::class_member`, which is essentially just
`type.to_meta_type().find_in_mro(…)` plus union/intersection handling.
- **`Type::instance_member`**: This new function is basically the
type-level equivalent to `obj.__dict__[name]` when called on
`Type::Instance(…)`. We use this to discover instance attributes such as
those that we see as declarations on class bodies or as (annotated)
assignments to `self.attr` in methods of a class.
- The implementation of the descriptor protocol. It works slightly
different for instances and for class objects, but it can be described
by the general framework:
- Call `type.class_member("attribute")` to look up "attribute" in the
MRO of the meta type of `type`. Call the resulting `Symbol` `meta_attr`
(even if it's unbound).
- Use `meta_attr.class_member("__get__")` to look up `__get__` on the
*meta type* of `meta_attr`. Call it with `__get__(meta_attr, self,
self.to_meta_type())`. If this fails (either the lookup or the call),
just proceed with `meta_attr`. Otherwise, replace `meta_attr` in the
following with the return type of `__get__`. In this step, we also probe
if a `__set__` or `__delete__` method exists and store it in
`meta_attr_kind` (can be either "data descriptor" or "normal attribute
or non-data descriptor").
  - Compute a `fallback` type.
    - For instances, we use `self.instance_member("attribute")`
- For class objects, we use `class_attr =
self.find_in_mro("attribute")`, and then try to invoke the descriptor
protocol on `class_attr`, i.e. we look up `__get__` on the meta type of
`class_attr` and call it with `__get__(class_attr, None, self)`. This
additional invocation of the descriptor protocol on the fallback type is
one major asymmetry in the otherwise universal descriptor protocol
implementation.
- Finally, we look at `meta_attr`, `meta_attr_kind` and `fallback`, and
handle various cases of (possible) unboundness of these symbols.
- If `meta_attr` is bound and a data descriptor, just return `meta_attr`
- If `meta_attr` is not a data descriptor, and `fallback` is bound, just
return `fallback`
- If `meta_attr` is not a data descriptor, and `fallback` is unbound,
return `meta_attr`
- Return unions of these three possibilities for partially-bound
symbols.

This allows us to handle class objects and instances within the same
framework. There is a minor additional detail where for instances, we do
not allow the fallback type (the instance attribute) to completely
shadow the non-data descriptor. We do this because we (currently) don't
want to pretend that we can statically infer that an instance attribute
is always set.

Dunder method calls can also be embedded into this framework. The only
thing that changes is that *there is no fallback type*. If a dunder
method is called on an instance, we do not fall back to instance
variables. If a dunder method is called on a class object, we only look
it up on the meta class, never on the class itself.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests.
2025-03-07 22:03:28 +01:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
348c196cb3
[red-knot] avoid inferring types if unpacking fails (#16530)
## Summary

This PR closes #15199.

The change I just made is to set all variables to type `Unknown` if
unpacking fails, but in some cases this may be excessive.
For example:

```py
a, b, c = "ab"
reveal_type(a)  # Unknown, but it would be reasonable to think of it as LiteralString
reveal_type(c)  # Unknown
```

```py
# Failed to unpack before the starred expression
(a, b, *c, d, e) = (1,)
reveal_type(a)  # Unknown
reveal_type(b)  # Unknown
...
# Failed to unpack after the starred expression
(a, b, *c, d, e) = (1, 2, 3)
reveal_type(a)  # Unknown, but should it be Literal[1]?
reveal_type(b)  # Unknown, but should it be Literal[2]?
reveal_type(c)  # Todo
reveal_type(d)  # Unknown
reveal_type(e)  # Unknown
```

I will modify it if you think it would be better to make it a different
type than just `Unknown`.

## Test Plan

I have made appropriate modifications to the test cases affected by this
change, and also added some more test cases.
2025-03-07 11:04:44 -08:00
David Peter
0a627ef216
[red-knot] Never is callable and iterable. Arbitrary attributes can be accessed. (#16533)
## Summary

- `Never` is callable
- `Never` is iterable
- Arbitrary attributes can be accessed on `Never`

Split out from #16416 that is going to be required.

## Test Plan

Tests for all properties above.
2025-03-06 15:59:19 +00:00
Micha Reiser
ce0018c3cb
Add OsSystem support to mdtests (#16518)
## Summary

This PR introduces a new mdtest option `system` that can either be
`in-memory` or `os`
where `in-memory` is the default.

The motivation for supporting `os` is so that we can write OS/system
specific tests
with mdtests. Specifically, I want to write mdtests for the module
resolver,
testing that module resolution is case sensitive. 

## Test Plan

I tested that the case-sensitive module resolver test start failing when
setting `system = "os"`
2025-03-06 10:41:40 +01:00
Micha Reiser
48f906e06c
Add tests for case-sensitive module resolution (#16517)
## Summary

Python's module resolver is case sensitive. 

This PR adds mdtests that assert that our module resolution is case
sensitive.

The tests currently all pass because our in memory file system is case
sensitive.
I'll add support for using the real file system to the mdtest framework
in a separate PR.

This PR also adds support for specifying extra search paths to the
mdtest framework.

## Test Plan
The tests fail when running them using the real file system.
2025-03-06 10:19:23 +01:00
Douglas Creager
ebd172e732
[red-knot] Several failing tests for generics (#16509)
To kick off the work of supporting generics, this adds many new
(currently failing) tests, showing the behavior we plan to support.

This is still missing a lot!  Not included:

- typevar tuples
- param specs
- variance
- `Self`

But it's a good start! We can add more failing tests for those once we
tackle these.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-05 17:21:19 -05:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
bb44926ca5
[red-knot] Add rule invalid-type-checking-constant (#16501)
## Summary

This PR adds more features to #16468.

* Adds a new error rule `invalid-type-checking-constant`, which occurs
when we try to assign a value other than `False` to a user-defined
`TYPE_CHECKING` variable (it is possible to assign `...` in a stub
file).
* Allows annotated assignment to `TYPE_CHECKING`. Only types that
`False` can be assigned to are allowed. However, the type of
`TYPE_CHECKING` will be inferred to be `Literal[True]` regardless of
what the type is specified.

## Test plan

I ran the tests with `cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic` and
confirmed that all tests passed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-04 19:49:34 +00:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
1977dda079
[red-knot] respect TYPE_CHECKING even if not imported from typing (#16468)
## Summary

This PR closes #15722.

The change is that if the variable `TYPE_CHECKING` is defined/imported,
the type of the variable is interpreted as `Literal[True]` regardless of
what the value is.
This is compatible with the behavior of other type checkers (e.g. mypy,
pyright).

## Test Plan

I ran the tests with `cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic` and
confirmed that all tests passed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-04 07:58:29 -08:00
Mike Perlov
fdf0915283
[red-knot] treat annotated assignments without RHS in stubs as bindings (#16409) 2025-02-28 16:45:21 +00:00
Alex Waygood
09d0b227fb
[red-knot] Disallow more invalid type expressions (#16427) 2025-02-28 10:04:30 +00:00
Carl Meyer
87d011e1bd
[red-knot] fix non-callable reporting for unions (#16387)
Minor follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16161

This `not_callable` flag wasn't functional, because it could never be
`false`. It was initialized to `true` and then only ever updated with
`|=`, which can never make it `false`.

Add a test that exercises the case where it _should_ be `false` (all of
the union elements are callable) but `bindings` is also empty (all union
elements have binding errors). Before this PR, the added test wrongly
emits a diagnostic that the union `Literal[f1] | Literal[f2]` is not
callable.

And add a test where a union call results in one binding error and one
not-callable error, where we currently give the wrong result (we show
only the binding error), with a TODO.

Also add TODO comments in a couple other tests where ideally we'd report
more than just one error out of a union call.

Also update the flag name to `all_errors_not_callable` to more clearly
indicate the semantics of the flag.
2025-02-26 07:06:04 -08:00
David Peter
86b01d2d3c
[red-knot] Correct modeling of dunder calls (#16368)
## Summary

Model dunder-calls correctly (and in one single place), by implementing
this behavior (using `__getitem__` as an example).

```py
def getitem_desugared(obj: object, key: object) -> object:
    getitem_callable = find_in_mro(type(obj), "__getitem__")
    if hasattr(getitem_callable, "__get__"):
        getitem_callable = getitem_callable.__get__(obj, type(obj))

    return getitem_callable(key)
```

See the new `calls/dunder.md` test suite for more information. The new
behavior also needs much fewer lines of code (the diff is positive due
to new tests).

## Test Plan

New tests; fix TODOs in existing tests.
2025-02-25 20:38:15 +01:00
David Peter
f88328eedd
[red-knot] Handle possibly-unbound instance members (#16363)
## Summary

Adds support for possibly-unbound/undeclared instance members.

## Test Plan

New MD tests.
2025-02-25 20:00:38 +01:00
Alex Waygood
5c007db7e2
[red-knot] Rewrite Type::try_iterate() to improve type inference and diagnostic messages (#16321) 2025-02-25 14:02:03 +00:00
David Peter
aac79e453a
[red-knot] Better diagnostics for method calls (#16362)
## Summary

Add better error messages and additional spans for method calls. Can be
reviewed commit-by-commit.

before:

```
error: lint:invalid-argument-type
 --> /home/shark/playground/test.py:6:10
  |
5 | c = C()
6 | c.square("hello")  # error: [invalid-argument-type]
  |          ^^^^^^^ Object of type `Literal["hello"]` cannot be assigned to parameter 2 (`x`); expected type `int`
7 |
8 | # import inspect
  |
```

after:

```
error: lint:invalid-argument-type
 --> /home/shark/playground/test.py:6:10
  |
5 | c = C()
6 | c.square("hello")  # error: [invalid-argument-type]
  |          ^^^^^^^ Object of type `Literal["hello"]` cannot be assigned to parameter 2 (`x`) of bound method `square`; expected type `int`
7 |
8 | # import inspect
  |
 ::: /home/shark/playground/test.py:2:22
  |
1 | class C:
2 |     def square(self, x: int) -> int:
  |                      ------ info: parameter declared in function definition here
3 |         return x * x
  |
```

## Test Plan

New snapshot test
2025-02-25 09:58:08 +01:00
Mike Perlov
68991d09a8
[red-knot] Add diagnostic for class-object access to pure instance variables (#16036)
## Summary

Add a diagnostic if a pure instance variable is accessed on a class object. For example

```py
class C:
    instance_only: str

    def __init__(self):
        self.instance_only = "a"

# error: Attribute `instance_only` can only be accessed on instances, not on the class object `Literal[C]` itself.
C.instance_only
```


---------

Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
2025-02-24 15:17:16 +01:00
David Peter
141ba253da
[red-knot] Add support for @classmethods (#16305)
## Summary

Add support for `@classmethod`s.

```py
class C:
    @classmethod
    def f(cls, x: int) -> str:
        return "a"

reveal_type(C.f(1))  # revealed: str
```

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-02-24 09:55:34 +01:00
Alex Waygood
64effa4aea
[red-knot] Add a regression test for recent improvement to TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_name_load() (#16310) 2025-02-21 22:28:42 +00:00
Alex Waygood
224a36f5f3
Teach red-knot that type(x) is the same as x.__class__ (#16301) 2025-02-21 21:05:48 +00:00
Alex Waygood
5347abc766
[red-knot] Generalise special-casing for KnownClasses in Type::bool (#16300) 2025-02-21 20:46:36 +00:00
Micha Reiser
5fab97f1ef
[red-knot] Diagnostics for incorrect bool usages (#16238) 2025-02-21 19:26:05 +01:00
David Peter
3aa7ba31b1
[red-knot] Fix descriptor __get__ call on class objects (#16304)
## Summary

I spotted a minor mistake in my descriptor protocol implementation where
`C.descriptor` would pass the meta type (`type`) of the type of `C`
(`Literal[C]`) as the owner argument to `__get__`, instead of passing
`Literal[C]` directly.

## Test Plan

New test.
2025-02-21 15:35:41 +01:00
David Peter
d2e034adcd
[red-knot] Method calls and the descriptor protocol (#16121)
## Summary

This PR achieves the following:

* Add support for checking method calls, and inferring return types from
method calls. For example:
  ```py
  reveal_type("abcde".find("abc"))  # revealed: int
  reveal_type("foo".encode(encoding="utf-8"))  # revealed: bytes
  
  "abcde".find(123)  # error: [invalid-argument-type]
  
  class C:
      def f(self) -> int:
          pass
  
  reveal_type(C.f)  # revealed: <function `f`>
  reveal_type(C().f)  # revealed: <bound method: `f` of `C`>
  
  C.f()  # error: [missing-argument]
  reveal_type(C().f())  # revealed: int
  ```
* Implement the descriptor protocol, i.e. properly call the `__get__`
method when a descriptor object is accessed through a class object or an
instance of a class. For example:
  ```py
  from typing import Literal
  
  class Ten:
def __get__(self, instance: object, owner: type | None = None) ->
Literal[10]:
          return 10
  
  class C:
      ten: Ten = Ten()
  
  reveal_type(C.ten)  # revealed: Literal[10]
  reveal_type(C().ten)  # revealed: Literal[10]
  ```
* Add support for member lookup on intersection types.
* Support type inference for `inspect.getattr_static(obj, attr)` calls.
This was mostly used as a debugging tool during development, but seems
more generally useful. It can be used to bypass the descriptor protocol.
For the example above:
  ```py
  from inspect import getattr_static
  
  reveal_type(getattr_static(C, "ten"))  # revealed: Ten
  ```
* Add a new `Type::Callable(…)` variant with the following sub-variants:
* `Type::Callable(CallableType::BoundMethod(…))` — represents bound
method objects, e.g. `C().f` above
* `Type::Callable(CallableType::MethodWrapperDunderGet(…))` — represents
`f.__get__` where `f` is a function
* `Type::Callable(WrapperDescriptorDunderGet)` — represents
`FunctionType.__get__`
* Add new known classes:
  * `types.MethodType`
  * `types.MethodWrapperType`
  * `types.WrapperDescriptorType`
  * `builtins.range`

## Performance analysis

On this branch, we do more work. We need to do more call checking, since
we now check all method calls. We also need to do ~twice as many member
lookups, because we need to check if a `__get__` attribute exists on
accessed members.

A brief analysis on `tomllib` shows that we now call `Type::call` 1780
times, compared to 612 calls before.

## Limitations

* Data descriptors are not yet supported, i.e. we do not infer correct
types for descriptor attribute accesses in `Store` context and do not
check writes to descriptor attributes. I felt like this was something
that could be split out as a follow-up without risking a major
architectural change.
* We currently distinguish between `Type::member` (with descriptor
protocol) and `Type::static_member` (without descriptor protocol). The
former corresponds to `obj.attr`, the latter corresponds to
`getattr_static(obj, "attr")`. However, to model some details correctly,
we would also need to distinguish between a static member lookup *with*
and *without* instance variables. The lookup without instance variables
corresponds to `find_name_in_mro`
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/howto/descriptor.html#invocation-from-an-instance).
We currently approximate both using `member_static`, which leads to two
open TODOs. Changing this would be a larger refactoring of
`Type::own_instance_member`, so I chose to leave it out of this PR.

## Test Plan

* New `call/methods.md` test suite for method calls
* New tests in `descriptor_protocol.md`
* New `call/getattr_static.md` test suite for `inspect.getattr_static`
* Various updated tests
2025-02-20 23:22:26 +01:00
David Peter
8198668fc3
[red-knot] MDTest: Use custom class names instead of builtins (#16269)
## Summary

Follow up on the discussion
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16121#discussion_r1962973298).
Replace builtin classes with custom placeholder names, which should
hopefully make the tests a bit easier to understand.

I carefully renamed things one after the other, to make sure that there
is no functional change in the tests.
2025-02-20 12:25:55 +00:00
Douglas Creager
cfc6941d5c
[red-knot] Resolve references in eager nested scopes eagerly (#16079)
We now resolve references in "eager" scopes correctly — using the
bindings and declarations that are visible at the point where the eager
scope is created, not the "public" type of the symbol (typically the
bindings visible at the end of the scope).

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
2025-02-19 10:22:30 -05:00
Andrew Gallant
3ea32e2cdd red_knot_python_semantic: improve diagnostic message for "invalid argument type"
This uses the refactoring and support for secondary diagnostic messages
to improve the diagnostic for "invalid argument type." The main
improvement here is that we show where the function being called is
defined, and annotate the span corresponding to the invalid parameter.
2025-02-19 08:24:19 -05:00
David Peter
877c1066d3
[red-knot] Update tests for attributes inferred from parameters (#16208)
## Summary

Update description and remove TODOs from out `attributes.md` test suite
to reflect our current intentions.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15960
2025-02-18 22:43:11 +01:00
Carl Meyer
00b022d472
[red-knot] update TODO comment in mdtest (#16242)
This comment gave wrong/misleading info about the reason for the wrong
output, just updating it to be correct to avoid confusing our future
selves.
2025-02-18 20:52:17 +00:00
Micha Reiser
4ed5db0d42
Refactor CallOutcome to Result (#16161) 2025-02-18 13:34:39 +01:00
Alex Waygood
4941975e74
[red-knot] Recognize ... as a singleton (#16184) 2025-02-16 22:01:02 +00:00
Alex Waygood
93aff36147
[red-knot] Improve handling of inherited class attributes (#16160) 2025-02-15 18:22:35 +00:00
Carl Meyer
dcabb948f3
[red-knot] add special case for float/complex (#16166)
When adjusting the existing tests, I aimed to avoid dealing with the
special case in other tests if it's not necessary to do so (that is,
avoid using `float` and `complex` as examples where we just need "some
type"), and keep the tests for the special case mostly collected in the
mdtest dedicated to that purpose.

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14932
2025-02-14 12:24:10 -08:00
Dhruv Manilawala
60b3ef2c98
[red-knot] Support re-export conventions for stub files (#16073)
This is an alternative implementation to #15848.

## Summary

This PR adds support for re-export conventions for imports for stub
files.

**How does this work?**
* Add a new flag on the `Import` and `ImportFrom` definitions to
indicate whether they're being exported or not
* Add a new enum to indicate whether the symbol lookup is happening
within the same file or is being queried from another file (e.g., an
import statement)
* When a `Symbol` is being queried, we'll skip the definitions that are
(a) coming from a stub file (b) external lookup and (c) check the
re-export flag on the definition

This implementation does not yet support `__all__` and `*` imports as
both are features that needs to be implemented independently.

closes: #14099
closes: #15476 

## Test Plan

Add test cases, update existing ones if required.
2025-02-14 15:17:51 +05:30
David Peter
366ae1feaa
[red-knot] Document 'public type of undeclared symbols' behavior (#16096)
## Summary

After I was asked twice within the same day, I thought it would be a
good idea to write some *user facing* documentation that explains our
reasoning behind inferring `Unknown | T_inferred` for public uses of
undeclared symbols. This is a major deviation from the behavior of other
type checkers and it seems like a good practice to defend our choice
like this.
2025-02-12 08:52:11 +01:00
David Peter
0019d39f6e
[red-knot] T | object == object (#16088)
## Summary

- Simplify unions with `object` to `object`.
- Add a new `Type::object(db)` constructor to abbreviate
`KnownClass::Object.to_instance(db)` in some places.
- Add a `Type::is_object` and `Class::is_object` function to make some
tests for a bit easier to read.

closes #16084

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests.
2025-02-10 23:07:06 +01:00
David Peter
97e6fc3793
[red-knot] Unpacking and for loop assignments to attributes (#16004)
## Summary

* Support assignments to attributes in more cases:
    - assignments in `for` loops
    - in unpacking assignments
* Add test for multi-target assignments
* Add tests for all other possible assignments to attributes that could
   possibly occur (in decreasing order of likeliness):
    - augmented attribute assignments
    - attribute assignments in `with` statements
    - attribute assignments in comprehensions
- Note: assignments to attributes in named expressions are not
   syntactically allowed

closes #15962

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-02-07 11:30:51 +01:00
Micha Reiser
38351e00ee
[red-knot] Partial revert of relative import handling for files in the root of a search path (#16001)
## Summary

This PR reverts the behavior changes from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15990

But it isn't just a revert, it also:

* Adds a test covering this specific behavior
* Preserves the improvement to use `saturating_sub` in the package case
to avoid overflows in the case of invalid syntax
* Use `ancestors` instead of a `for` loop

## Test Plan

Added test
2025-02-07 11:04:09 +01:00
David Peter
e345307260
[red-knot] Fix diagnostic range for non-iterable unpacking assignments (#15994)
## Summary

I noticed that the diagnostic range in specific unpacking assignments is
wrong. For this example

```py
a, b = 1
```

we previously got (see first commit):

```
error: lint:not-iterable
 --> /src/mdtest_snippet.py:1:1
  |
1 | a, b = 1
  | ^^^^ Object of type `Literal[1]` is not iterable
  |
```

and with this change, we get:

```
error: lint:not-iterable
 --> /src/mdtest_snippet.py:1:8
  |
1 | a, b = 1
  |        ^ Object of type `Literal[1]` is not iterable
  |
```

## Test Plan

New snapshot tests.
2025-02-06 15:36:22 +01:00
Micha Reiser
5588c75d65
[red-knot] Fix relative imports in src.root (#15990)
## Summary

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15989

Red Knot failed to resolve relative imports if the importing module is
located at a search path root.

The issue was that the module resolver returned an `Err(TooManyDots)` as
soon as the parent of the current module is `None` (which is the case
for a module at the search path root).
However, this is incorrect if a `tail` (a module name) exists.
2025-02-06 14:08:20 +00:00
David Peter
d0555f7b5c
[red-knot] Litate tests: minor follow-up (#15987)
## Summary

- Minor wording update
- Code improvement (thanks Alex)
- Removed all unnecessary filenames throughout our Markdown tests (two
new ones were added in the meantime)
- Minor rewording of the statically-known-branches introduction
2025-02-06 07:15:26 +00:00
Douglas Creager
0906554357
[red-knot] Combine terminal statement support with statically known branches (#15817)
This example from @sharkdp shows how terminal statements can appear in
statically known branches:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15676#issuecomment-2618809716

```py
def _(cond: bool):
    x = "a"
    if cond:
        x = "b"
        if True:
            return

    reveal_type(x)  # revealed: "a", "b"; should be "a"
```

We now use visibility constraints to track reachability, which allows us
to model this correctly. There are two related changes as a result:

- New bindings are not assumed to be visible; they inherit the current
"scope start" visibility, which effectively means that new bindings are
visible if/when the current flow is reachable

- When simplifying visibility constraints after branching control flow,
we only simplify if none of the intervening branches included a terminal
statement. That is, earlier unaffected bindings are only _actually_
unaffected if all branches make it to the merge point.
2025-02-05 17:47:49 -05:00
David Peter
d296f602e7
[red-knot] Merge Markdown code blocks inside a single section (#15950)
## Summary

Allow for literate style in Markdown tests and merge multiple (unnamed)
code blocks into a single embedded file.

closes #15941

## Test Plan

- Interactively made sure that error-lines were reported correctly in
  multi-snippet sections.
2025-02-05 22:26:15 +01:00
Andrew Gallant
d47088c8f8
[red-knot] fix unresolvable import range (#15976)
This causes the diagnostic to highlight the actual unresovable import
instead of the entire `from ... import ...` statement.

While we're here, we expand the test coverage to cover all of the
possible ways that an `import` or a `from ... import` can fail.

Some considerations:

* The first commit in this PR adds a regression test for the current
behavior.
* This creates a new `mdtest/diagnostics` directory. Are folks cool
with this? I guess the idea is to put tests more devoted to diagnostics
than semantics in this directory. (Although I'm guessing there will
be some overlap.)

Fixes #15866
2025-02-05 14:01:58 -05:00
David Peter
1f0ad675d3
[red-knot] Initial set of descriptor protocol tests (#15972)
## Summary

This is a first step towards creating a test suite for
[descriptors](https://docs.python.org/3/howto/descriptor.html). It does
not (yet) aim to be exhaustive.

relevant ticket: #15966 

## Test Plan

Compared desired behavior with the runtime behavior and the behavior of
existing type checkers.

---------

Co-authored-by: Mike Perlov <mishamsk@gmail.com>
2025-02-05 19:47:43 +01:00
Andrew Gallant
a84b27e679 red_knot_test: add support for diagnostic snapshotting
This ties together everything from the previous commits.
Some interesting bits here are how the snapshot is generated
(where we include relevant info to make it easier to review
the snapshots) and also a tweak to how inline assertions are
processed.

This commit also includes some example snapshots just to get
a sense of what they look like. Follow-up work should add
more of these I think.
2025-02-05 13:02:54 -05:00
Alex Waygood
c816542704
[red-knot] Fix some instance-attribute TODOs around ModuleType (#15974) 2025-02-05 15:33:37 +00:00
Alex Waygood
2ebb5e8d4b
[red-knot] Make Symbol::or_fall_back_to() lazy (#15943) 2025-02-05 14:51:02 +00:00
David Peter
eb08345fd5
[red-knot] Extend instance/class attribute tests (#15959)
## Summary

In preparation for creating some (sub) issues for
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14164, I'm trying to document
the current behavior (and a bug) a bit better.
2025-02-05 12:45:00 +01:00
Mike Perlov
e15419396c
[red-knot] Fix Stack overflow in Type::bool (#15843)
## Summary

This PR adds `Type::call_bound` method for calls that should follow
descriptor protocol calling convention. The PR is intentionally shallow
in scope and only fixes #15672

Couple of obvious things that weren't done:

* Switch to `call_bound` everywhere it should be used
* Address the fact, that red_knot resolves `__bool__ = bool` as a Union,
which includes `Type::Dynamic` and hence fails to infer that the
truthiness is always false for such a class (I've added a todo comment
in mdtests)
* Doesn't try to invent a new type for descriptors, although I have a
gut feeling it may be more convenient in the end, instead of doing
method lookup each time like I did in `call_bound`

## Test Plan

* extended mdtests with 2 examples from the issue
* cargo neatest run
2025-02-04 12:40:07 -08:00
Douglas Creager
444b055cec
[red-knot] Use ternary decision diagrams (TDDs) for visibility constraints (#15861)
We now use ternary decision diagrams (TDDs) to represent visibility
constraints. A TDD is just like a BDD ([_binary_ decision
diagram](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_decision_diagram)), but
with "ambiguous" as an additional allowed value. Unlike the previous
representation, TDDs are strongly normalizing, so equivalent ternary
formulas are represented by exactly the same graph node, and can be
compared for equality in constant time.

We currently have a slight 1-3% performance regression with this in
place, according to local testing. However, we also have a _5× increase_
in performance for pathological cases, since we can now remove the
recursion limit when we evaluate visibility constraints.

As follow-on work, we are now closer to being able to remove the
`simplify_visibility_constraint` calls in the semantic index builder. In
the vast majority of cases, we now see (for instance) that the
visibility constraint after an `if` statement, for bindings of symbols
that weren't rebound in any branch, simplifies back to `true`. But there
are still some cases we generate constraints that are cyclic. With
fixed-point cycle support in salsa, or with some careful analysis of the
still-failing cases, we might be able to remove those.
2025-02-04 14:32:11 -05:00