## Summary
This PR fixes an issue where Ruff's `D403` rule
(`first-word-uncapitalized`) was not detecting some single-word edge
cases that are picked up by `pydocstyle`.
The change involves extracting the first word of the docstring by
identifying the first whitespace character. This is consistent with
`pydocstyle` which uses `.split()` - see
8d0cdfc93e/src/pydocstyle/checker.py (L581C13-L581C64)
## Example
Here is a playground example -
https://play.ruff.rs/eab9ea59-92cf-4e44-b1a9-b54b7f69b178
```py
def example1():
"""foo"""
def example2():
"""foo
Hello world!
"""
def example3():
"""foo bar
Hello world!
"""
def example4():
"""
foo
"""
def example5():
"""
foo bar
"""
```
`pydocstyle` detects all five cases:
```bash
$ pydocstyle test.py --select D403
dev/test.py:2 in public function `example1`:
D403: First word of the first line should be properly capitalized ('Foo', not 'foo')
dev/test.py:5 in public function `example2`:
D403: First word of the first line should be properly capitalized ('Foo', not 'foo')
dev/test.py:11 in public function `example3`:
D403: First word of the first line should be properly capitalized ('Foo', not 'foo')
dev/test.py:17 in public function `example4`:
D403: First word of the first line should be properly capitalized ('Foo', not 'foo')
dev/test.py:22 in public function `example5`:
D403: First word of the first line should be properly capitalized ('Foo', not 'foo')
```
Ruff (`0.8.4`) fails to catch example2 and example4.
## Test Plan
* Added two new test cases to cover the previously missed single-word
docstring cases.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix#11482. Applies
https://github.com/adamchainz/flake8-comprehensions/pull/205 to ruff.
`C416` should be skipped if comprehension contains unpacking. Here's an
example:
```python
list_of_lists = [[1, 2], [3, 4]]
# ruff suggests `list(list_of_lists)` here, but that would change the result.
# `list(list_of_lists)` is not `[(1, 2), (3, 4)]`
a = [(x, y) for x, y in list_of_lists]
# This is equivalent to `list(list_of_lists)`
b = [x for x in list_of_lists]
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Existing checks
---------
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
Airflow 3.0 removes various deprecated functions, members, modules, and
other values. They have been deprecated in 2.x, but the removal causes
incompatibilities that we want to detect. This PR deprecates the
following names and add a function for removed methods
* `airflow.datasets.manager.DatasetManager.register_dataset_change` →
`airflow.assets.manager.AssetManager.register_asset_change`
* `airflow.datasets.manager.DatasetManager.create_datasets` →
`airflow.assets.manager.AssetManager.create_assets`
* `airflow.datasets.manager.DatasetManager.notify_dataset_created` →
`airflow.assets.manager.AssetManager.notify_asset_created`
* `airflow.datasets.manager.DatasetManager.notify_dataset_changed` →
`airflow.assets.manager.AssetManager.notify_asset_changed`
* `airflow.datasets.manager.DatasetManager.notify_dataset_alias_created`
→ `airflow.assets.manager.AssetManager.notify_asset_alias_created`
*
`airflow.providers.amazon.auth_manager.aws_auth_manager.AwsAuthManager.is_authorized_dataset`
→
`airflow.providers.amazon.auth_manager.aws_auth_manager.AwsAuthManager.is_authorized_asset`
* `airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.create_dataset` →
`airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.create_asset`
* `airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.add_input_dataset` →
`airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.add_input_asset`
* `airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.add_output_dataset` →
`airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.dd_output_asset`
* `airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.collected_datasets` →
`airflow.lineage.hook.HookLineageCollector.collected_assets`
*
`airflow.providers_manager.ProvidersManager.initialize_providers_dataset_uri_resources`
→
`airflow.providers_manager.ProvidersManager.initialize_providers_asset_uri_resources`
## Test Plan
A test fixture is included in the PR.
## Summary
A follow up PR on https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14991
Ruff ignores hardcoded passwords for typed variables. Add a rule to
catch passwords in typed code bases
## Test Plan
Includes 2 more test typed variables
Closes#14000
## Summary
For typing context bindings we know that they won't be available at
runtime. We shouldn't recommend a fix, that will result in name errors
at runtime.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
Fixes#15012.
```python
def f():
# panics when the code can't find the loop variable
values = [1, 2, 3]
result = []
for i in values:
result.append(i + 1)
del i
```
I'm not sure exactly why this test case panics, but I suspect the `del
i` removes the binding from the semantic model's symbols.
I changed the code to search for the correct binding by directly
iterating through the bindings. Since we know exactly which binding we
want, this should find the loop variable without any complications.
This PR introduces three changes to `D403`, which has to do with
capitalizing the first word in a docstring.
1. The diagnostic and fix now skip leading whitespace when determining
what counts as "the first word".
2. The name has been changed to `first-word-uncapitalized` from
`first-line-capitalized`, for both clarity and compliance with our rule
naming policy.
3. The diagnostic message and documentation has been modified slightly
to reflect this.
Closes#14890
Fixes#14969.
The issue was that this line:
```rust
let from_assign_to_loop = TextRange::new(binding_stmt.end(), for_stmt.start());
```
was not safe if the binding was after the target. The only way (at least
that I can think of) this can happen is if they are in different scopes,
so it now checks for that before checking if there are usages between
the two.
## Summary
Many core Airflow features have been deprecated and moved to Airflow
Providers since users might need to install an additional package (e.g.,
`apache-airflow-provider-fab==1.0.0`); a separate rule (AIR303) is
created for this.
As some of the changes only relate to the module/package moved, instead
of listing out all the functions, variables, and classes in a module or
a package, it warns the user to import from the new path instead of the
specific name.
The following is the ones that has been moved to
`apache-airflow-provider-fab==1.0.0`
* module moved
* `airflow.api.auth.backend.basic_auth` →
`airflow.providers.fab.auth_manager.api.auth.backend.basic_auth`
* `airflow.api.auth.backend.kerberos_auth` →
`airflow.providers.fab.auth_manager.api.auth.backend.kerberos_auth`
* `airflow.auth.managers.fab.api.auth.backend.kerberos_auth` →
`airflow.providers.fab.auth_manager.api.auth.backend.kerberos_auth`
* `airflow.auth.managers.fab.security_manager.override` →
`airflow.providers.fab.auth_manager.security_manager.override`
* classes (e.g., functions, classes) moved
* `airflow.www.security.FabAirflowSecurityManagerOverride` →
`airflow.providers.fab.auth_manager.security_manager.override.FabAirflowSecurityManagerOverride`
* `airflow.auth.managers.fab.fab_auth_manager.FabAuthManager` →
`airflow.providers.fab.auth_manager.security_manager.FabAuthManager`
## Test Plan
A test fixture has been included for the rule.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14892, by adding
`sqlmodel.SQLModel` to the list of classes with default copy semantics.
## Test Plan
Added a test into `RUF012.py` containing the example from the original
issue.
## Summary
`PTH210` renamed to `invalid-pathlib-with-suffix` and extended to check for `.with_suffix(".")`. This caused the fix availability to be downgraded to "Sometimes", since there is no fix offered in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Dylan <53534755+dylwil3@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Part 1 of the big change introduced in #14828. This temporarily causes
all fixes for `round(...)` to be considered unsafe, but they will
eventually be enhanced.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
## Summary
Close#11243. Fix `pytest-parametrize-names-wrong-type (PT006)` to edit
both `argnames` and `argvalues` if both of them are single-element
tuples/lists.
```python
# Before fix
@pytest.mark.parametrize(("x",), [(1,), (2,)])
def test_foo(x):
...
# After fix:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("x", [1, 2])
def test_foo(x):
...
```
## Test Plan
New test cases
This PR introduces three changes to the diagnostic and fix behavior
(still under preview) for [boolean-chained-comparison
(PLR1716)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/boolean-chained-comparison/#boolean-chained-comparison-plr1716).
1. We now offer a _fix_ in the case of parenthesized expressions like
`(a < b) and b < c`. The fix will merge the chains of comparisons and
then balance parentheses by _adding_ parentheses to one side of the
expression.
2. We now trigger a diagnostic (and fix) in the case where some
comparisons have multiple comparators like `a < b < c and c < d`.
3. When adjacent comparators are parenthesized, we prefer the left
parenthesization and apply the replacement to the whole parenthesized
range. So, for example, `a < (b) and ((b)) < c` becomes `a < (b) < c`.
While these seem like somewhat disconnected changes, they are actually
related. If we only offered (1), then we would see the following fix
behavior:
```diff
- (a < b) and b < c and ((c < d))
+ (a < b < c) and ((c < d))
```
This is because the fix which add parentheses to the first pair of
comparisons overlaps with the fix that removes the `and` between the
second two comparisons. So the latter fix is deferred. However, the
latter fix does not get a second chance because, upon the next lint
iteration, there is no violation of `PLR1716`.
Upon adopting (2), however, both fixes occur by the time ruff completes
several iterations and we get:
```diff
- (a < b) and b < c and ((c < d))
+ ((a < b < c < d))
```
Finally, (3) fixes a previously unobserved bug wherein the autofix for
`a < (b) and b < c` used to result in `a<(b<c` which gives a syntax
error. It could in theory have been fixed in a separate PR, but seems to
be on theme here.
----------
- Closes#13524
- (1), (2), and (3) are implemented in separate commits for ease of
review and modification.
- Technically a user can trigger an error in ruff (by reaching max
iterations) if they have a humongous boolean chained comparison with
differing parentheses levels.
Improves error message for [except*](https://peps.python.org/pep-0654/)
(Rules: B025, B029, B030, B904)
Example python snippet:
```python
try:
a = 1
except* ValueError:
a = 2
except* ValueError:
a = 2
try:
pass
except* ():
pass
try:
pass
except* 1: # error
pass
try:
raise ValueError
except* ValueError:
raise UserWarning
```
Error messages
Before:
```
$ ruff check --select=B foo.py
foo.py:6:9: B025 try-except block with duplicate exception `ValueError`
foo.py:11:1: B029 Using `except ():` with an empty tuple does not catch anything; add exceptions to handle
foo.py:16:9: B030 `except` handlers should only be exception classes or tuples of exception classes
foo.py:22:5: B904 Within an `except` clause, raise exceptions with `raise ... from err` or `raise ... from None` to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
Found 4 errors.
```
After:
```
$ ruff check --select=B foo.py
foo.py:6:9: B025 try-except* block with duplicate exception `ValueError`
foo.py:11:1: B029 Using `except* ():` with an empty tuple does not catch anything; add exceptions to handle
foo.py:16:9: B030 `except*` handlers should only be exception classes or tuples of exception classes
foo.py:22:5: B904 Within an `except*` clause, raise exceptions with `raise ... from err` or `raise ... from None` to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
Found 4 errors.
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14791
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Airflow 3.0 removes various deprecated functions, members, modules, and
other values. They have been deprecated in 2.x, but the removal causes
incompatibilities that we want to detect. This PR deprecates the
following names.
* in `DAG`
* `sla_miss_callback` was removed
* in `airflow.operators.trigger_dagrun.TriggerDagRunOperator`
* `execution_date` was removed
* in `airflow.operators.weekday.DayOfWeekSensor`,
`airflow.operators.datetime.BranchDateTimeOperator` and
`airflow.operators.weekday.BranchDayOfWeekOperator`
* `use_task_execution_day` was removed in favor of
`use_task_logical_date`
The full list of rules we will extend
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/44556
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
A test fixture is included in the PR.
When fixing an invalid escape sequence in an f-string, each f-string
element is analyzed for valid escape characters prior to creating the
diagnostic and fix. This allows us to safely prefix with `r` to create a
raw string if no valid escape characters were found anywhere in the
f-string, and otherwise insert backslashes.
This fixes a bug in the original implementation: each "f-string part"
was treated separately, so it was not possible to tell whether a valid
escape character was or would be used elsewhere in the f-string.
Progress towards #11491 but format specifiers are not handled in this
PR.
## Summary
This PR makes changes to the `AIR001` rule as per
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14627#discussion_r1860212307.
Additionally,
* Avoid returning the `Diagnostic` and update the checker in the rule
logic for consistency
* Remove test case for different keyword position (I don't think it's
required here)
## Test Plan
Add test cases for multiple operators from various modules.
## Summary
Just some minor followups to the recently merged RUF052 rule, that was
added in bf0fd04:
- Some small tweaks to the docs
- A minor code-style nit
- Some more tests for my peace of mind, just to check that the new
methods on the semantic model are working correctly
I'm adding the "internal" label as this doesn't deserve a changelog
entry. RUF052 is a new rule that hasn't been released yet.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter`
