## Summary
This PR updates the parser to remove building the `CommentRanges` and
instead it'll be built by the linter and the formatter when it's
required.
For the linter, it'll be built and owned by the `Indexer` while for the
formatter it'll be built from the `Tokens` struct and passed as an
argument.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
The fix for E203 now produces the same result as ruff format in cases
where a slice ends on a colon and the closing square bracket is on the
following line.
Refers to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10973
## Test Plan
The minimal reproduction case in the ticket was added as test case
producing no error. Additional cases with multiple spaces or a tab
before the colon where added to make sure that the rule still finds
these.
## Summary
As-is, we're using the URL path for all files, leading us to use paths
like:
```
/c%3A/Users/crmar/workspace/fastapi/tests/main.py
```
This doesn't match against per-file ignores and other patterns in Ruff
configuration.
This PR modifies the LSP to use the real file path if available, and the
virtual file path if not.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11751.
## Test Plan
Ran the LSP on Windows. In the FastAPI repo, added:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
"tests/**/*.py" = ["F401"]
```
And verified that an unused import was ignored in `tests` after this
change, but not before.
## Summary
This PR removes the `result-like` dependency and instead implement the
required functionality. The motivation being that `noqa.is_enabled()` is
easier to read than `noqa.into()`.
For context, I was just trying to understand the syntax error workflow
and I saw these flags which were being converted via `into`. I always
find `into` confusing because you never know what's it being converted
into unless you know the type. Later realized that it's just a boolean
flag. After removing the usages from these two flags, it turns out that
the dependency is only being used in one rule so I thought to remove
that as well.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR implements the [consider dict
items](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/convention/consider-using-dict-items.html)
rule from Pylint. Enabling this rule flags:
```python
ORCHESTRA = {
"violin": "strings",
"oboe": "woodwind",
"tuba": "brass",
"gong": "percussion",
}
for instrument in ORCHESTRA:
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in ORCHESTRA.keys():
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in (inline_dict := {"foo": "bar"}):
print(f"{instrument}: {inline_dict[instrument]}")
```
For not using `items()` to extract the value out of the dict. We ignore
the case of an assignment, as you can't modify the underlying
representation with the value in the list of tuples returned.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Definitions are used in symbol table and in flow graph, and aren't
inherently owned by one or the other; move them into their own
submodule.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
Add support for inferring int literal types from basic arithmetic on int
literals. Just to begin showing examples of resolving more complex
expression types, and because this will be useful in testing walrus
expressions.
## Test Plan
Added test.
## Summary
After looking at this a bit, I think it does make sense to have
`Unbound` as part of the `Definition` enum; if we are modeling `Unbound`
as a type (which currently we are), then every symbol implicitly starts
each scope with a "definition" as unbound, and the cleanest way to model
that is as a real `Definition`. We should be able to handle a definition
of "unbound" anywhere we handle definitions.
But the name `None` wasn't clear enough; changing the name to `Unbound`
and adding a doc comment.
Also change `[first].into_iter()` to `std::iter::once(first)`, from
post-land code review on a prior PR.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
This PR is a follow-up to #11740 to restrict access to the `Parsed`
output by replacing the `parsed` API function with a more specific one.
Currently, that is `comment_ranges` but the linked PR exposes a `tokens`
method.
The main motivation is so that there's no way to get an incorrect
information from the checker. And, it also encapsulates the source of
the comment ranges and the tokens itself. This way it would become
easier to just update the checker if the source for these information
changes in the future.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug where the checker would require the tokens for an
invalid offset w.r.t. the source code.
Taking the source code from the linked issue as an example:
```py
relese_version :"0.0is 64"
```
Now, this isn't really a valid type annotation but that's what this PR
is fixing. Regardless of whether it's valid or not, Ruff shouldn't
panic.
The checker would visit the parsed type annotation (`0.0is 64`) and try
to detect any violations. Certain rule logic requests the tokens for the
same but it would fail because the lexer would only have the `String`
token considering original source code. This worked before because the
lexer was invoked again for each rule logic.
The solution is to store the parsed type annotation on the checker if
it's in a typing context and use the tokens from that instead if it's
available. This is enforced by creating a new API on the checker to get
the tokens.
But, this means that there are two ways to get the tokens via the
checker API. I want to restrict this in a follow-up PR (#11741) to only
expose `tokens` and `comment_ranges` as methods and restrict access to
the parsed source code.
fixes: #11736
## Test Plan
- [x] Add a test case for `F632` rule and update the snapshot
- [x] Check all affected rules
- [x] No ecosystem changes
## Summary
This PR updates the return type of `parse_type_annotation` from `Expr`
to `Parsed<ModExpression>`. This is to allow accessing the tokens for
the parsed sub-expression in the follow-up PR.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/482.
I've made adjustments to `format` and `format_range` that handle parsing
errors before they become server errors. We'll still log this as a
problem, but there will no longer be a visible popup.
## Test Plan
Instead of seeing a visible error when formatting a document with syntax
issues, you should see this warning in the LSP logs:
<img width="991" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 3 38 23 PM"
src="9d68947d-6462-4ca6-ab5a-65e573c91db6">
Similarly, if you try to format a range with syntax issues, you should
see this warning in the LSP logs instead of a visible error popup:
<img width="1010" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 3 39 10 PM"
src="99fff098-798d-406a-976e-81ead0da0352">
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This change adds a GitHub Actions CI job to check that the project
builds and test pass under the declared minimum supported rust compiler.
I have bumped the msrv to 1.74 as that is the lowest version I could get
this project to build on.
## Test Plan
The CI job has run on this PR, and will also run on the main branch.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug where the lexer didn't consider the BOM into the
start offset.
fixes: #11731
## Test Plan
Add multiple test cases which involves BOM character in the source for
the lexer and verify the snapshot.
