## Summary
This PR modifies the documentation to use `ruff check` instead of `ruff
check .`, and `ruff format` instead of `ruff format .`, as discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10168#discussion_r1509976904)
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This PR adds methods on `FString` to iterate over the two different kind
of elements it can have - literals and expressions. This is similar to
the methods we have on `ExprFString`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Fix "TRIO115 false positive with with sleep(var) where var starts as 0"
#9935 based on the discussion in the issue.
## Test Plan
Issue code added to fixture
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
## Summary
We had a report of a test failure on a specific architecture, and
looking into it, I think the test assumes that the hash keys are
iterated in a specific order. This PR thus adds a variant to our
settings display macro specifically for maps and sets. Like `CacheKey`,
it sorts the keys when printing.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10359.
## Summary
Fixes#10351
It seems the bug was caused by this section of code
b669306c87/crates/ruff_python_index/src/indexer.rs (L55-L58)
It's true that newline tokens cannot be immediately followed by line
continuations, but only outside parentheses. e.g. the exception
```
(
1
\
+ 2)
```
But why was this check put there in the first place? Is it guarding
against something else?
## Test Plan
New test was added to indexer
## Summary
When negating an expression like `a or b`, we need to wrap it in
parentheses, e.g., `not (a or b)` instead of `not a or b`, due to
operator precedence.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10335.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
This PR fixes the following false positive in a `.pyi` stub file:
```py
x: int
y = x # F821 currently emitted here, but shouldn't be in a stub file
```
In a `.py` file, this is invalid regardless of whether `from __future__ import annotations` is enabled or not. In a `.pyi` stub file, however, it's always valid, as an annotation counts as a binding in a stub file even if no value is assigned to the variable.
I also added more test coverage for `.pyi` stub files in various edge cases where ruff's behaviour is currently correct, but where `.pyi` stub files do slightly different things to `.py` files.
## Summary
Fixes#10295.
`E225` (`Missing whitespace around operator`) and `E275` (`Missing
whitespace after keyword`) try to add a white space even when the next
character is a `)` (which is a syntax error in most cases, the
exceptions already being handled). This causes `E202` (`Whitespace
before close bracket`) to try to remove the added whitespace, resulting
in an infinite loop when `E225`/`E275` re-add it.
This PR adds an exception in `E225` and `E275` to not trigger in case
the next token is a `)`. It is a bit simplistic, but it solves the
example given in the issue without introducing a change in behavior
(according to the fixtures).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and the `ruff-ecosystem` check were used to check that the
PR's changes do not have side-effects.
A new fixture was added to check that running the 3 rules on the example
given in the issue does not cause ruff to fail to converge.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR introduces the `ruff_server` crate and a new `ruff server`
command. `ruff_server` is a re-implementation of
[`ruff-lsp`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp), written entirely in
Rust. It brings significant performance improvements, much tighter
integration with Ruff, a foundation for supporting entirely new language
server features, and more!
This PR is an early version of `ruff_lsp` that we're calling the
**pre-release** version. Anyone is more than welcome to use it and
submit bug reports for any issues they encounter - we'll have some
documentation on how to set it up with a few common editors, and we'll
also provide a pre-release VSCode extension for those interested.
This pre-release version supports:
- **Diagnostics for `.py` files**
- **Quick fixes**
- **Full-file formatting**
- **Range formatting**
- **Multiple workspace folders**
- **Automatic linter/formatter configuration** - taken from any
`pyproject.toml` files in the workspace.
Many thanks to @MichaReiser for his [proof-of-concept
work](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7262), which was important
groundwork for making this PR possible.
## Architectural Decisions
I've made an executive choice to go with `lsp-server` as a base
framework for the LSP, in favor of `tower-lsp`. There were several
reasons for this:
1. I would like to avoid `async` in our implementation. LSPs are mostly
computationally bound rather than I/O bound, and `async` adds a lot of
complexity to the API, while also making harder to reason about
execution order. This leads into the second reason, which is...
2. Any handlers that mutate state should be blocking and run in the
event loop, and the state should be lock-free. This is the approach that
`rust-analyzer` uses (also with the `lsp-server`/`lsp-types` crates as a
framework), and it gives us assurances about data mutation and execution
order. `tower-lsp` doesn't support this, which has caused some
[issues](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284) around data
races and out-of-order handler execution.
3. In general, I think it makes sense to have tight control over
scheduling and the specifics of our implementation, in exchange for a
slightly higher up-front cost of writing it ourselves. We'll be able to
fine-tune it to our needs and support future LSP features without
depending on an upstream maintainer.
## Test Plan
The pre-release of `ruff_server` will have snapshot tests for common
document editing scenarios. An expanded test suite is on the roadmap for
future version of `ruff_server`.
## Summary
Fix#10282
This PR updates the Python grammar to include the `*` character in
`*args` `**kwargs` in the range of the `Parameter`
```
def f(*args, **kwargs): pass
# ~~~~ ~~~~~~ <-- range before the PR
# ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ <-- range after
```
The invalid syntax `def f(*, **kwargs): ...` is also now correctly
reported.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to `function.rs`.
## Summary
This PR changes how we format `with` statements with a single with item
for Python 3.8 or older. This change is not compatible with Black.
This is how we format a single-item with statement today
```python
def run(data_path, model_uri):
with pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.config(
key="spark.python.worker.reuse", value=True
).config(key="spark.ui.enabled", value=False).master(
"local-cluster[2, 1, 1024]"
).getOrCreate():
# ignore spark log output
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("OFF")
print(score_model(spark, data_path, model_uri))
```
This is different than how we would format the same expression if it is
inside any other clause header (`while`, `if`, ...):
```python
def run(data_path, model_uri):
while (
pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.config(
key="spark.python.worker.reuse", value=True
)
.config(key="spark.ui.enabled", value=False)
.master("local-cluster[2, 1, 1024]")
.getOrCreate()
):
# ignore spark log output
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("OFF")
print(score_model(spark, data_path, model_uri))
```
Which seems inconsistent to me.
This PR changes the formatting of the single-item with Python 3.8 or
older to match that of other clause headers.
```python
def run(data_path, model_uri):
with (
pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.config(
key="spark.python.worker.reuse", value=True
)
.config(key="spark.ui.enabled", value=False)
.master("local-cluster[2, 1, 1024]")
.getOrCreate()
):
# ignore spark log output
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("OFF")
print(score_model(spark, data_path, model_uri))
```
According to our versioning policy, this style change is gated behind a
preview flag.
## Test Plan
See added tests.
Added
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10267
The issue with the current formatting is that the formatter flips
between the `SingleParenthesizedContextManager` and
`ParenthesizeIfExpands` or `SingleWithTarget` because the layouts use
incompatible formatting ( `SingleParenthesizedContextManager`:
`maybe_parenthesize_expression(context)` vs `ParenthesizeIfExpands`:
`parenthesize_if_expands(item)`, `SingleWithTarget`:
`optional_parentheses(item)`.
The fix is to ensure that the layouts between which the formatter flips
when adding or removing parentheses are the same. I do this by
introducing a new `SingleWithoutTarget` layout that uses the same
formatting as `SingleParenthesizedContextManager` if it has no target
and prefer `SingleWithoutTarget` over using `ParenthesizeIfExpands` or
`SingleWithTarget`.
## Formatting change
The downside is that we now use `maybe_parenthesize_expression` over
`parenthesize_if_expands` for expressions where
`can_omit_optional_parentheses` returns `false`. This can lead to stable
formatting changes. I only found one formatting change in our ecosystem
check and, unfortunately, this is necessary to fix the instability (and
instability fixes are okay to have as part of minor changes according to
our versioning policy)
The benefit of the change is that `with` items with a single context
manager and without a target are now formatted identically to how the
same expression would be formatted in other clause headers.
## Test Plan
I ran the ecosystem check locally
## Summary
This PR refactors the with item formatting to use more explicit layouts
to make it easier to understand the different formatting cases.
The benefit of the explicit layout is that it makes it easier to reasons
about layout transition between format runs. For example, today it's
possible that `SingleWithTarget` or `ParenthesizeIfExpands` add
parentheses around the with items for `with aaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb:
pass`, resulting in `with (aaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb): pass`. The
problem with this is that the next formatting pass uses the
`SingleParenthesizedContextExpression` layout that uses
`maybe_parenthesize_expression` which is different from
`parenthesize_if_expands(&expr)` or `optional_parentheses(&expr)`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
I ran the ecosystem checks locally and there are no changes.
This PR modifies our AST so that nodes for string literals, bytes literals and f-strings all retain the following information:
- The quoting style used (double or single quotes)
- Whether the string is triple-quoted or not
- Whether the string is raw or not
This PR is a followup to #10256. Like with that PR, this PR does not, in itself, fix any bugs. However, it means that we will have the necessary information to preserve quoting style and rawness of strings in the `ExprGenerator` in a followup PR, which will allow us to provide a fix for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7799.
The information is recorded on the AST nodes using a bitflag field on each node, similarly to how we recorded the information on `Tok::String`, `Tok::FStringStart` and `Tok::FStringMiddle` tokens in #10298. Rather than reusing the bitflag I used for the tokens, however, I decided to create a custom bitflag for each AST node.
Using different bitflags for each node allows us to make invalid states unrepresentable: it is valid to set a `u` prefix on a string literal, but not on a bytes literal or an f-string. It also allows us to have better debug representations for each AST node modified in this PR.
## Summary
Fixes the handling end of line comments that belong to `**kwargs` when
the `**kwargs` come after a slash.
The issue was that we missed to include the `**kwargs` start position
when determining the start of the next node coming after the `/`.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10281
## Test Plan
Added test
## Summary
Changes the generic recommendation to replace
```python
if foo == True: ...
```
with `if cond:` to `if foo:`.
Still uses a generic message for compound comparisons as a specific
message starts to become confusing. For example,
```python
if foo == True != False: ...
```
produces two recommendations, one of which would recommend `if True:`,
which is confusing.
Resolves [recommendation in a previous
PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8613/files#r1514915070).
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
The code later in this file that checks for slices relies on the stack
of brackets to determine the position. I'm not sure why format strings
were being excluded from this, but the tests still pass with these match
guards removed.
Closes#10278
## Test Plan
~Still needs a test.~ Test case added for this example.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10238 to
offer fixes for the f-string rule regardless of the line length of the
resulting fix. To quote Alex in the linked PR:
> Yes, from the user's perspective I'd rather have a fix that may lead
to line length issues than have to fix them myself :-) Cleaning up line
lengths is easier than changing from `"".format()` to `f""`
I agree with this position, which is that if we're going to offer a
diagnostic, we should really be offering the user the ability to fix it
-- otherwise, we're just inconveniencing them.
## Summary
Given a format string like `"{x} {x}".format(x=foo())`, we should avoid
converting to an f-string, since doing so would require repeating the
function call (`f"{foo()} {foo()}"`), which could introduce side
effects.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10258.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10235
This PR changes `UP032` to flag all `"".format` calls that can
technically be rewritten to an f-string, even if rewritting it to an
fstring, at least automatically, exceeds the line length (or increases
the amount by which it goes over the line length).
I looked at the Git history to understand whether the check prevents
some false positives (reported by an issue), but i haven't found a
compelling reason to limit the rule to only flag format calls that stay
in the line length limit:
* https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7818 Changed the heuristic to
determine if the fix fits to address
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/7810
* https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/1905 first version of the rule
I did take a look at pyupgrade and couldn't find a similar check, at
least not in the rule code (maybe it's checked somewhere else?)
https://github.com/asottile/pyupgrade/blob/main/pyupgrade/_plugins/fstrings.py
## Breaking Change?
This could be seen as a breaking change according to ruff's [versioning
policy](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/versioning/):
> The behavior of a stable rule is changed
* The scope of a stable rule is significantly increased
* The intent of the rule changes
* Does not include bug fixes that follow the original intent of the rule
It does increase the scope of the rule, but it is in the original intent
of the rule (so it's not).
## Test Plan
See changed test output
