## Summary
This is a not-unpopular directory name, and it's led to tons of issues
and user confusion (most recently:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit/issues/69). I've wanted to
remove it for a long time, but we need to do so as part of a minor
release.
## Summary
Currently, rule `RUF015` is not able to detect the usage of
`list(iterable).pop(0)` falling under the category of an _unnecessary
iterable allocation for accessing the first element_. This PR wants to
change that. See the underlying issue for more details.
* Provide extension to detect `list(iterable).pop(0)`, but not
`list(iterable).pop(i)` where i > 1
* Update corresponding doc
## Test Plan
* `RUF015.py` and the corresponding snap file were extended such that
their correspond to the new behaviour
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9190
---
PS: I've only been working on this ticket as I haven't seen any activity
from issue assignee @rmad17, neither in this repo nor in a fork. I hope
I interpreted his inactivity correctly. Didn't mean to steal his chance.
Since I stumbled across the underlying problem myself, I wanted to offer
a solution as soon as possible.
## Summary
It is a convention to use the `_()` alias for `gettext()`. We want to
avoid
statement expressions and assignments related to aliases of the gettext
API.
See https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html for details. When one
uses `_() to mark a string for translation, the tools look for these
markers
and replace the original string with its translated counterpart. If the
string contains variable placeholders or formatting, it can complicate
the
translation process, lead to errors or incorrect translations.
## Test Plan
* Test file `RUF027_1.py` was extended such that the test reproduces the
false-positive
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10023.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The original implementation of this applied the runtime-required context
to definitions _within_ the function, but not the signature itself. (We
had test coverage; the snapshot was just correctly showing the wrong
outcome.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10089.
## Summary
Update PLR1714 to ignore `sys.platform` and `sys.version` checks.
I'm not sure if these checks or if we need to add more. Please advise.
Fixes#10017
## Test Plan
Added a new test case and ran `cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Allows, e.g.:
```python
import os
os.environ["WORLD_SIZE"] = "1"
os.putenv("CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES", "4")
import torch
```
For now, this is only allowed in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10059
## Summary
Closes#10031
- Detect commented out `case` statements. Playground repro:
https://play.ruff.rs/5a305aa9-6e5c-4fa4-999a-8fc427ab9a23
- Add more support for one-line commented out code.
## Test Plan
Unit tested and tested with
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/eradicate/ERA001.py --no-cache --preview --select ERA001
```
TODO:
- [x] `cargo insta test`
## Summary
Part of #7595
This PR moves the `RUF001` and `RUF002` rules to the AST checker. This
removes the use of docstring detection from these rules.
## Test Plan
As this is just a refactor, make sure existing test cases pass.
## Summary
Fixes#9895
The cause for this panic came from an offset error in the code. When
analyzing a hypothetical f-string, we attempt to re-parse it as an
f-string, and use the AST data to determine, among other things, whether
the format specifiers are correct. To determine the 'correctness' of a
format specifier, we actually have to re-parse the format specifier, and
this is where the issue lies. To get the source text for the specifier,
we were taking a slice from the original file source text... even though
the AST data for the specifier belongs to the standalone parsed f-string
expression, meaning that the ranges are going to be way off. In a file
with Unicode, this can cause panics if the slice is inside a char
boundary.
To fix this, we now slice from the temporary source we created earlier
to parse the literal as an f-string.
## Test Plan
The RUF027 snapshot test was amended to include a string with format
specifiers which we _should_ be calling out. This is to ensure we do
slice format specifiers from the source text correctly.
## Summary
_This is preview only feature and is available using the `--preview`
command-line flag._
With the implementation of [PEP 701] in Python 3.12, f-strings can now
be broken into multiple lines, can contain comments, and can re-use the
same quote character. Currently, no other Python formatter formats the
f-strings so there's some discussion which needs to happen in defining
the style used for f-string formatting. Relevant discussion:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/9785
The goal for this PR is to add minimal support for f-string formatting.
This would be to format expression within the replacement field without
introducing any major style changes.
### Newlines
The heuristics for adding newline is similar to that of
[Prettier](https://prettier.io/docs/en/next/rationale.html#template-literals)
where the formatter would only split an expression in the replacement
field across multiple lines if there was already a line break within the
replacement field.
In other words, the formatter would not add any newlines unless they
were already present i.e., they were added by the user. This makes
breaking any expression inside an f-string optional and in control of
the user. For example,
```python
# We wouldn't break this
aaaaaaaaaaa = f"asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa { aaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb + ccccccccccccccc } cccccccccc"
# But, we would break the following as there's already a newline
aaaaaaaaaaa = f"asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
aaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb + ccccccccccccccc } cccccccccc"
```
If there are comments in any of the replacement field of the f-string,
then it will always be a multi-line f-string in which case the formatter
would prefer to break expressions i.e., introduce newlines. For example,
```python
x = f"{ # comment
a }"
```
### Quotes
The logic for formatting quotes remains unchanged. The existing logic is
used to determine the necessary quote char and is used accordingly.
Now, if the expression inside an f-string is itself a string like, then
we need to make sure to preserve the existing quote and not change it to
the preferred quote unless it's 3.12. For example,
```python
f"outer {'inner'} outer"
# For pre 3.12, preserve the single quote
f"outer {'inner'} outer"
# While for 3.12 and later, the quotes can be changed
f"outer {"inner"} outer"
```
But, for triple-quoted strings, we can re-use the same quote char unless
the inner string is itself a triple-quoted string.
```python
f"""outer {"inner"} outer""" # valid
f"""outer {'''inner'''} outer""" # preserve the single quote char for the inner string
```
### Debug expressions
If debug expressions are present in the replacement field of a f-string,
then the whitespace needs to be preserved as they will be rendered as it
is (for example, `f"{ x = }"`. If there are any nested f-strings, then
the whitespace in them needs to be preserved as well which means that
we'll stop formatting the f-string as soon as we encounter a debug
expression.
```python
f"outer { x = !s :.3f}"
# ^^
# We can remove these whitespaces
```
Now, the whitespace doesn't need to be preserved around conversion spec
and format specifiers, so we'll format them as usual but we won't be
formatting any nested f-string within the format specifier.
### Miscellaneous
- The
[`hug_parens_with_braces_and_square_brackets`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8279)
preview style isn't implemented w.r.t. the f-string curly braces.
- The
[indentation](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/9785#discussioncomment-8470590)
is always relative to the f-string containing statement
## Test Plan
* Add new test cases
* Review existing snapshot changes
* Review the ecosystem changes
[PEP 701]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0701/
