## Summary
This commit adds some additional error checking to the parser such that
assignments that are invalid syntax are rejected. This covers the
obvious cases like `5 = 3` and some not so obvious cases like `x + y =
42`.
This does add an additional recursive call to the parser for the cases
handling assignments. I had initially been concerned about doing this,
but `set_context` is already doing recursion during assignments, so I
didn't feel as though this was changing any fundamental performance
characteristics of the parser. (Also, in practice, I would expect any
such recursion here to be quite shallow since the recursion is done on
the target of an assignment. Such things are rarely nested much in
practice.)
Fixes#6895
## Test Plan
I've added unit tests covering every case that is detected as invalid on
an `Expr`.
## Summary
Fixes bug in `TRIO115` where it would not `return` for values that were
not a `NumberLiteral` so
```python
x = "bla"
trio.sleep(x)
```
would set off a false positive
## Test Plan
Added test case to fixture
## Summary
Given `key in obj.keys()`, `obj` _could_ be a dictionary, or it could be
another type that defines
a `.keys()` method. In the latter case, removing the `.keys()` attribute
could lead to a runtime error.
Previously, we marked all `SIM118` fixes as unsafe for this reason;
however, in preview, we now mark them as safe if we can
infer that the expression is a dictionary.
## Test Plan
Added a preview fixture.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
For example, https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8512 doesn't need
ecosystem check
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
We have this pattern in a bunch of places, where we find the _only_
binding to a name (and return `None`) if it's bound multiple times. This
PR DRYs it up into a method on `SemanticModel`.
## Summary
If you want to create an edit with dynamic applicability, you have to
branch and repeat the edit entirely between the two branches. If you
further need the edit itself to be dynamic (e.g., perhaps you have a
single edit in one case, vs. multiple in another), you suddenly have
four branches. This PR just adds an alternate constructor that takes
applicability as an argument, as an escape hatch.
## Summary
Implement
[`no-is-type-none`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/builtin/no_is_type_none.py)
as `type-none-comparison` (`FURB169`).
Auto-fixes comparisons that use `type` to compare the type of an object
to `type(None)` to a `None` identity check. For example,
```python
type(foo) is type(None)
```
becomes
```python
foo is None
```
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Black and Ruff's preview styles now collapse statements like:
```python
from contextlib import nullcontext
ctx = nullcontext()
with ctx: ...
```
Historically, we made an exception here for classes
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/2837). This PR extends it to
other statement kinds for consistency with the formatter.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8496.
## Summary
Adds `TRIO105` from the [flake8-trio
plugin](https://github.com/Zac-HD/flake8-trio). The `MethodName` logic
mirrors that of `TRIO100` to stay consistent within the plugin.
It is at 95% parity with the exception of upstream also checking for a
slightly more complex scenario where a call to `start()` on a
`trio.Nursery` context should also be immediately awaited. Upstream
plugin appears to just check for anything named `nursery` judging from
[the relevant issue](https://github.com/Zac-HD/flake8-trio/issues/56).
Unsure if we want to do so something similar or, alternatively, if there
is some capability in ruff to check for calls made on this context some
other way
## Test Plan
Added a new fixture, based on [the one from upstream
plugin](https://github.com/Zac-HD/flake8-trio/blob/main/tests/eval_files/trio105.py)
## Issue link
Refers: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8451
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug in our formatter where a multiline lambda expression
statement was formatted over multiple lines without adding parentheses.
The PR "fixes" the problem by not splitting the lambda parameters if it
is not parenthesized
## Test Plan
Added test
## Summary
Adds `memoryview` to the list of typeclasses that `fn is_type()` uses
for type comparison checks so that it raises a violation if `is`, `is
not` or `isinstance()` are not used.
## Test Plan
Added examples to existing fixture
## Issue Link
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8483
This is the one refactor in the NumPy 2.0 upgrade rule that isn't
compatible with earlier versions of NumPy, so I'm marking it as unsafe
and adding a dedicated message.
## Summary
Currently, `UP032` applied to raw strings results in format strings with
the prefix 'fr'. This gets changed to 'rf' by Ruff format (or Black). In
order to avoid that, this PR uses the prefix 'rf' to begin with.
## Test Plan
Updated the expectation on an existing test.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Hi! Currently NumPy Python API is undergoing a cleanup process that will
be delivered in NumPy 2.0 (release is planned for the end of the year).
Most changes are rather simple (renaming, removing or moving a member of
the main namespace to a new place), and they could be flagged/fixed by
an additional ruff rule for numpy (e.g. changing occurrences of
`np.float_` to `np.float64`).
Would you accept such rule?
I named it `NPY201` in the existing group, so people will receive a
heads-up for changes arriving in 2.0 before actually migrating to it.
~~This is still a draft PR.~~ I'm not an expert in rust so if any part
of code can be done better please share!
NumPy 2.0 migration guide:
https://numpy.org/devdocs/numpy_2_0_migration_guide.html
NEP 52: https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0052-python-api-cleanup.html
NumPy cleanup tracking issue:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/23999
## Test Plan
A unit test is provided that checks all rule's fix cases.
