More refinements to the panic messages for failing mdtests to mimic the
output of the default panic hook more closely:
- We now print out `Box<dyn Any>` if the panic payload is not a string
(which is typically the case for salsa panics).
- We now include the panic's backtrace if you set the `RUST_BACKTRACE`
environment variable.
## Summary
- Add a workflow to run property tests on a daily basis (based on
`daily_fuzz.yaml`)
- Mark `assignable_to_is_reflexive` as flaky (related to #14899)
- Add new (failing) `intersection_assignable_to_both` test (also related
to #14899)
## Test Plan
Ran:
```bash
export QUICKCHECK_TESTS=100000
while cargo test --release -p red_knot_python_semantic -- \
--ignored types::property_tests::stable; do :; done
```
Observed successful property_tests CI run
## Summary
This changeset migrates all existing `is_assignable_to` tests to a
Markdown-based test. It also increases our test coverage in a hopefully
meaningful way (not claiming to be complete in any sense). But at least
I found and fixed one bug while doing so.
## Test Plan
Ran property tests to make sure the new test succeeds after fixing it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
This fixes#15317. Our `catch_unwind` wrapper installs a panic hook that
captures (the rendered contents of) the panic info when a panic occurs.
Since the intent is that the caller will render the panic info in some
custom way, the hook silences the default stderr panic output.
However, the panic hook is a global resource, so if any one thread was
in the middle of a `catch_unwind` call, we would silence the default
panic output for _all_ threads.
The solution is to also keep a thread local that indicates whether the
current thread is in the middle of our `catch_unwind`, and to fall back
on the default panic hook if not.
## Test Plan
Artificially added an mdtest parse error, ran tests via `cargo test -p
red_knot_python_semantic` to run a large number of tests in parallel.
Before this patch, the panic message was swallowed as reported in
#15317. After, the panic message was shown.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fix infinite loop issue reported here #15248.
The issue was caused by the break inside the if block, which caused the
flow to exit in an unforeseen way. This caused other issues, eventually
leading to an infinite loop.
Resolves#15248. Resolves#15336.
## Test Plan
Added failing code to fixture.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: dylwil3 <dylwil3@gmail.com>
## Summary
Refer to the VS Code PR
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/659) for details on the
change.
This PR changes the following:
1. Add tracing span for both request (request id and method name) and
notification (method name) handler
2. Remove the `RUFF_TRACE` environment variable. This was being used to
turn on / off logging for the server
3. Similarly, remove reading the `trace` value from the initialization
options
4. Remove handling the `$/setTrace` notification
5. Remove the specialized `TraceLogWriter` used for Zed and VS Code
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12564)
Regarding the (5) for the Zed editor, the reason that was implemented
was because there was no way of looking at the stderr messages in the
editor which has been changed. Now, it captures the stderr as part of
the "Server Logs".
(82492d74a8/crates/language_tools/src/lsp_log.rs (L548-L552))
### Question
Regarding (1), I think having just a simple trace level message should
be good for now as the spans are not hierarchical. This could be tackled
with #12744. The difference between the two:
<details><summary>Using <code>tracing::trace</code></summary>
<p>
```
0.019243416s DEBUG ThreadId(08) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.026398750s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.026802125s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didOpen"
0.026930666s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didOpen"
0.026962333s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/diagnostic" (1)
0.027042875s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/diagnostic" (2)
0.027097500s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/codeAction" (3)
0.027107458s DEBUG ruff:worker:0 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.027123541s DEBUG ruff:worker:3 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/organize_imports.py
0.027514875s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
0.285689833s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/codeAction" (4)
45.741101666s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didClose"
47.108745500s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didOpen"
47.109802041s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/diagnostic" (5)
47.109926958s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/codeAction" (6)
47.110027791s DEBUG ruff:worker:6 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
51.863679125s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/hover" (7)
```
</p>
</details>
<details><summary>Using <code>tracing::trace_span</code></summary>
<p>
Only logging the enter event:
```
0.018638750s DEBUG ThreadId(11) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.025895791s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.026378791s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026531208s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026567583s TRACE ruff:main request{id=1 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026652541s TRACE ruff:main request{id=2 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026711041s DEBUG ruff:worker:2 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/organize_imports.py
0.026729166s DEBUG ruff:worker:1 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.027023083s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
5.197554750s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didClose"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
6.534458000s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
6.535027958s TRACE ruff:main request{id=3 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
6.535271166s DEBUG ruff:worker:3 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/organize_imports.py
6.544240583s TRACE ruff:main request{id=4 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.049692458s TRACE ruff:main request{id=5 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.508142541s TRACE ruff:main request{id=6 method="textDocument/hover"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.872421958s TRACE ruff:main request{id=7 method="textDocument/hover"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
8.024498583s TRACE ruff:main request{id=8 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
13.895063666s TRACE ruff:main request{id=9 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
14.774706083s TRACE ruff:main request{id=10 method="textDocument/hover"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
16.058918958s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
16.060562208s TRACE ruff:main request{id=11 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
16.061109083s DEBUG ruff:worker:8 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
21.561742875s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
21.563573791s TRACE ruff:main request{id=12 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
21.564206750s DEBUG ruff:worker:4 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
21.826691375s TRACE ruff:main request{id=13 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
22.091080125s TRACE ruff:main request{id=14 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
```
</p>
</details>
**Todo**
- [x] Update documentation (I'll be adding a troubleshooting section
under "Editors" as a follow-up which is for all editors)
- [x] Check for backwards compatibility. I don't think this should break
backwards compatibility as it's mainly targeted towards improving the
debugging experience.
~**Before I go on to updating the documentation, I'd appreciate initial
review on the chosen approach.**~
resolves: #14959
## Test Plan
Refer to the test plan in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/659.
Example logs at `debug` level:
```
0.010770083s DEBUG ThreadId(15) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.018101916s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.018559916s DEBUG ruff:worker:4 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.018992375s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
23.408802375s DEBUG ruff:worker:11 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
24.329127416s DEBUG ruff:worker:6 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
```
Example logs at `trace` level:
```
0.010296375s DEBUG ThreadId(13) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.017422583s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.018034458s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.018199708s TRACE ruff:worker:0 request{id=1 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.018251167s DEBUG ruff:worker:0 request{id=1 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.018528708s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
1.611798417s TRACE ruff:worker:1 request{id=2 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
1.861757542s TRACE ruff:worker:4 request{id=3 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.027361792s TRACE ruff:worker:2 request{id=4 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.851361500s TRACE ruff:worker:5 request{id=5 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.901690875s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.903063167s TRACE ruff:worker:10 request{id=6 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.903183500s DEBUG ruff:worker:10 request{id=6 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
8.702385292s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
8.704106625s TRACE ruff:worker:3 request{id=7 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
8.704304875s DEBUG ruff:worker:3 request{id=7 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
8.966853458s TRACE ruff:worker:9 request{id=8 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
9.229622792s TRACE ruff:worker:6 request{id=9 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
10.513111583s TRACE ruff:worker:7 request{id=10 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
```
## Summary
Adds a type-check-time Python API that allows us to create and
manipulate types and to test various of their properties. For example,
this can be used to write a Markdown test to make sure that `A & B` is a
subtype of `A` and `B`, but not of an unrelated class `C` (something
that requires quite a bit more code to do in Rust):
```py
from knot_extensions import Intersection, is_subtype_of, static_assert
class A: ...
class B: ...
type AB = Intersection[A, B]
static_assert(is_subtype_of(AB, A))
static_assert(is_subtype_of(AB, B))
class C: ...
static_assert(not is_subtype_of(AB, C))
```
I think this functionality is also helpful for interactive debugging
sessions, in order to query various properties of Red Knot's type
system. Which is something that otherwise requires a custom Rust unit
test, some boilerplate code and constant re-compilation.
## Test Plan
- New Markdown tests
- Tested the modified typeshed_sync workflow locally
## Summary
`Type[Any]` should be assignable to `object`. All types should be
assignable to `object`.
We specifically didn't understand the former; this PR adds a test for
it, and a case to ensure that `Type[Any]` is assignable to anything that
`type` is assignable to (which includes `object`).
This PR also adds a property test that all types are assignable to
object. In order to make it pass, I added a special case to check early
if we are assigning to `object` and just return `true`. In principle,
once we get all the more general cases correct, this special case might
be removable. But having the special case for now allows the property
test to pass.
And we add a property test that all types are subtypes of object. This
failed for the case of an intersection with no positive elements (that
is, a negation type). This really does need to be a special case for
`object`, because there is no other type we can know that a negation
type is a subtype of.
## Test Plan
Added unit test and property test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
When removing `int` in calls like `int(expr)` we may need to keep
parentheses around `expr` even when it is a function call or subscript,
since there may be newlines in between the function/value name and the
opening parentheses/bracket of the argument.
This PR implements that logic.
Closes#15263
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
We now support class patterns in a match statement, adding a narrowing
constraint that within the body of that match arm, we can assume that
the subject is an instance of that class.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This implements checking of calls.
I ended up following Micha's original suggestion from back when the
signature representation was first introduced, and flattening it to a
single array of parameters. This turned out to be easier to manage,
because we can represent parameters using indices into that array, and
represent the bound argument types as an array of the same length.
Starred and double-starred arguments are still TODO; these won't be very
useful until we have generics.
The handling of diagnostics is just hacked into `return_ty_result`,
which was already inconsistent about whether it emitted diagnostics or
not; now it's even more inconsistent. This needs to be addressed, but
could be a follow-up.
The new benchmark errors here surface the need for intersection support
in `is_assignable_to`.
Fixes#14161.
## Test Plan
Added mdtests.
Note: `PLW0101` remains in testing rather than preview, so this PR does
not modify any public behavior (hence the title beginning with
`internal` rather than `pylint`, for the sake of the changelog.)
Fixes an error in the processing of `try` statements in the control flow
graph builder.
When processing a try statement, the block following a `return` was
forced to point to the `finally` block. However, if the return was _in_
the `finally` block, this caused the block to point to itself. In the
case where the whole `try-finally` statement was also included inside of
a loop, this caused an infinite loop in the builder for the control flow
graph as it attempted to resolve edges.
Closes#15248
## Test function
### Source
```python
def l():
while T:
try:
while ():
if 3:
break
finally:
return
```
### Control Flow Graph
```mermaid
flowchart TD
start(("Start"))
return(("End"))
block0[["`*(empty)*`"]]
block1[["Loop continue"]]
block2["return\n"]
block3[["Loop continue"]]
block4["break\n"]
block5["if 3:
break\n"]
block6["while ():
if 3:
break\n"]
block7[["Exception raised"]]
block8["try:
while ():
if 3:
break
finally:
return\n"]
block9["while T:
try:
while ():
if 3:
break
finally:
return\n"]
start --> block9
block9 -- "T" --> block8
block9 -- "else" --> block0
block8 -- "Exception raised" --> block7
block8 -- "else" --> block6
block7 --> block2
block6 -- "()" --> block5
block6 -- "else" --> block2
block5 -- "3" --> block4
block5 -- "else" --> block3
block4 --> block2
block3 --> block6
block2 --> return
block1 --> block9
block0 --> return
```
## Summary
When debugging, I frequently want to know which symbols are being looked
up. `symbol_by_id` adds tracing information, but it only shows the
`ScopedSymbolId`. Since `symbol_by_id` is only called from `symbol`, it
seems reasonable to move the tracing call one level up from
`symbol_by_id` to `symbol`, where we can also show the name of the
symbol.
**Before**:
```
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::infer::infer_expression_types{expression=Id(60de), file=/home/shark/tomllib_modified/_parser.py}
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(33)}
6 ┌─┘
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(123)}
6 ┌─┘
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(54)}
6 ┌─┘
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(122)}
6 ┌─┘
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(165)}
6 ┌─┘
6 ┌─┘
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(32)}
6 ┌─┘
6 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol_by_id{symbol=ScopedSymbolId(232)}
6 ┌─┘
6 ┌─┘
6 ┌─┘
6┌─┘
```
**After**:
```
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::infer::infer_expression_types{expression=Id(60de), file=/home/shark/tomllib_modified/_parser.py}
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="dict"}
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="dict"}
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="list"}
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="list"}
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="isinstance"}
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="isinstance"}
5 ┌─┘
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="ValueError"}
5 ┌─┘
5 └─┐red_knot_python_semantic::types::symbol{name="ValueError"}
5 ┌─┘
5 ┌─┘
5 ┌─┘
5┌─┘
```
## Test Plan
```
cargo run --bin red_knot -- --current-directory path/to/tomllib -vvv
```
## Summary
While looking at #14899, I looked at seeing if I could get shrinking on
the examples. It turned out to be straightforward, with a couple of
caveats.
I'm calling `clone` a lot during shrinking. Since by the shrink step
we're already looking at a test failure this feels fine? Unless I
misunderstood `quickcheck`'s core loop
When shrinking `Intersection`s, in order to just rely on `quickcheck`'s
`Vec` shrinking without thinking about it too much, the shrinking
strategy is:
- try to shrink the negative side (keeping the positive side the same)
- try to shrink the positive side (keeping the negative side the same)
This means that you can't shrink from `(A & B & ~C & ~D)` directly to
`(A & ~C)`! You would first need an intermediate failure at `(A & B &
~C)` or `(A & ~C & ~D)`. This feels good enough. Shrinking the negative
side first also has the benefit of trying to strip down negative
elements in these intersections.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic -- --ignored
types::property_tests::stable` still fails as it current does on `main`,
but now the errors seem more minimal.
## Summary
Adds `class-as-data-structure` rule (`B903`). Also compare pylint's `too-few-public-methods` (`PLR0903`).
Took some creative liberty with this by allowing the class to have any
decorators or base classes. There are years-old issues on pylint that
don't approve of the strictness when it comes to these things.
Especially considering that dataclass is a decorator and namedtuple _can
be_ a base class. I feel ignoring those explicitly is redundant all
things considered, but it's not a hill I'm willing to die on!
See: #970
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: dylwil3 <dylwil3@gmail.com>
Just like in #15045 for unary expressions: In binary expressions, we
were only looking for dunder expressions for `Type::Instance` types. We
had some special cases for coercing the various `Literal` types into
their corresponding `Instance` types before doing the lookup. But we can
side-step all of that by using the existing `Type::to_meta_type` and
`Type::to_instance` methods.
## Summary
This PR upgrades zizmor to the latest release in our CI. zizmor is a
static analyzer checking for security issues in GitHub workflows. The
new release finds some new issues in our workflows; this PR fixes some
of the issues, and adds ignores for some other issues.
The issues fixed in this PR are new cases of zizmor's
[`template-injection`](https://woodruffw.github.io/zizmor/audits/#template-injection)
rule being emitted. The issues I'm ignoring for now are all to do with
the
[`cache-poisoning`](https://woodruffw.github.io/zizmor/audits/#cache-poisoning)
rule. The main reason I'm fixing some but ignoring others is that I'm
confident fixing the template-injection diagnostics won't have any
impact on how our workflows operate in CI, but I'm worried that fixing
the cache-poisoning diagnostics could slow down our CI a fair bit. I
don't mind if somebody else is motivated to try to fix these
diagnostics, but for now I think I'd prefer to just ignore them; it
doesn't seem high-priority enough to try to fix them right now :-)
## Test Plan
- `uvx pre-commit run -a --hook-stage=manual` passes locally
- Let's see if CI passes on this PR...
