ruff/crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/attributes.md

Attributes

Tests for attribute access on various kinds of types.

Class and instance variables

Pure instance variables

Variable only declared/bound in __init__

Variables only declared and/or bound in __init__ are pure instance variables. They cannot be accessed on the class itself.

class C:
    def __init__(self, param: int | None, flag: bool = False) -> None:
        value = 1 if flag else "a"
        self.inferred_from_value = value
        self.inferred_from_other_attribute = self.inferred_from_value
        self.inferred_from_param = param
        self.declared_only: bytes
        self.declared_and_bound: bool = True
        if flag:
            self.possibly_undeclared_unbound: str = "possibly set in __init__"

c_instance = C(1)

reveal_type(c_instance.inferred_from_value)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, "a"]

# TODO: Same here. This should be `Unknown | Literal[1, "a"]`
reveal_type(c_instance.inferred_from_other_attribute)  # revealed: Unknown

# There is no special handling of attributes that are (directly) assigned to a declared parameter,
# which means we union with `Unknown` here, since the attribute itself is not declared. This is
# something that we might want to change in the future.
#
# See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15960 for a related discussion.
reveal_type(c_instance.inferred_from_param)  # revealed: Unknown | int | None

reveal_type(c_instance.declared_only)  # revealed: bytes

reveal_type(c_instance.declared_and_bound)  # revealed: bool

# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(c_instance.possibly_undeclared_unbound)  # revealed: str

# This assignment is fine, as we infer `Unknown | Literal[1, "a"]` for `inferred_from_value`.
c_instance.inferred_from_value = "value set on instance"

# This assignment is also fine:
c_instance.declared_and_bound = False

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal["incompatible"]` is not assignable to attribute `declared_and_bound` of type `bool`"
c_instance.declared_and_bound = "incompatible"

# mypy shows no error here, but pyright raises "reportAttributeAccessIssue"
# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Attribute `inferred_from_value` can only be accessed on instances, not on the class object `<class 'C'>` itself."
reveal_type(C.inferred_from_value)  # revealed: Unknown

# mypy shows no error here, but pyright raises "reportAttributeAccessIssue"
# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Cannot assign to instance attribute `inferred_from_value` from the class object `<class 'C'>`"
C.inferred_from_value = "overwritten on class"

# This assignment is fine:
c_instance.declared_and_bound = False

# TODO: After this assignment to the attribute within this scope, we may eventually want to narrow
# the `bool` type (see above) for this instance variable to `Literal[False]` here. This is unsound
# in general (we don't know what else happened to `c_instance` between the assignment and the use
# here), but mypy and pyright support this. In conclusion, this could be `bool` but should probably
# be `Literal[False]`.
reveal_type(c_instance.declared_and_bound)  # revealed: bool

Variable declared in class body and possibly bound in __init__

The same rule applies even if the variable is declared (not bound!) in the class body: it is still a pure instance variable.

class C:
    declared_and_bound: str | None

    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.declared_and_bound = "value set in __init__"

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.declared_and_bound)  # revealed: str | None

# Note that both mypy and pyright show no error in this case! So we may reconsider this in
# the future, if it turns out to produce too many false positives. We currently emit:
# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Attribute `declared_and_bound` can only be accessed on instances, not on the class object `<class 'C'>` itself."
reveal_type(C.declared_and_bound)  # revealed: Unknown

# Same as above. Mypy and pyright do not show an error here.
# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Cannot assign to instance attribute `declared_and_bound` from the class object `<class 'C'>`"
C.declared_and_bound = "overwritten on class"

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `declared_and_bound` of type `str | None`"
c_instance.declared_and_bound = 1

Variable declared in class body and not bound anywhere

If a variable is declared in the class body but not bound anywhere, we still consider it a pure instance variable and allow access to it via instances.

class C:
    only_declared: str

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.only_declared)  # revealed: str

# Mypy and pyright do not show an error here. We treat this as a pure instance variable.
# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Attribute `only_declared` can only be accessed on instances, not on the class object `<class 'C'>` itself."
reveal_type(C.only_declared)  # revealed: Unknown

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Cannot assign to instance attribute `only_declared` from the class object `<class 'C'>`"
C.only_declared = "overwritten on class"

Mixed declarations/bindings in class body and __init__

class C:
    only_declared_in_body: str | None
    declared_in_body_and_init: str | None

    declared_in_body_defined_in_init: str | None

    bound_in_body_declared_in_init = "a"

    bound_in_body_and_init = None

    def __init__(self, flag) -> None:
        self.only_declared_in_init: str | None
        self.declared_in_body_and_init: str | None = None

        self.declared_in_body_defined_in_init = "a"

        self.bound_in_body_declared_in_init: str | None

        if flag:
            self.bound_in_body_and_init = "a"

c_instance = C(True)

reveal_type(c_instance.only_declared_in_body)  # revealed: str | None
reveal_type(c_instance.only_declared_in_init)  # revealed: str | None
reveal_type(c_instance.declared_in_body_and_init)  # revealed: str | None

reveal_type(c_instance.declared_in_body_defined_in_init)  # revealed: str | None

# TODO: This should be `str | None`. Fixing this requires an overhaul of the `Symbol` API,
# which is planned in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14297
reveal_type(c_instance.bound_in_body_declared_in_init)  # revealed: Unknown | str | None

reveal_type(c_instance.bound_in_body_and_init)  # revealed: Unknown | None | Literal["a"]

Variable defined in non-__init__ method

We also recognize pure instance variables if they are defined in a method that is not __init__.

class C:
    def __init__(self, param: int | None, flag: bool = False) -> None:
        self.initialize(param, flag)

    def initialize(self, param: int | None, flag: bool) -> None:
        value = 1 if flag else "a"
        self.inferred_from_value = value
        self.inferred_from_other_attribute = self.inferred_from_value
        self.inferred_from_param = param
        self.declared_only: bytes
        self.declared_and_bound: bool = True

c_instance = C(1)

reveal_type(c_instance.inferred_from_value)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, "a"]

# TODO: Should be `Unknown | Literal[1, "a"]`
reveal_type(c_instance.inferred_from_other_attribute)  # revealed: Unknown

reveal_type(c_instance.inferred_from_param)  # revealed: Unknown | int | None

reveal_type(c_instance.declared_only)  # revealed: bytes

reveal_type(c_instance.declared_and_bound)  # revealed: bool

# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Attribute `inferred_from_value` can only be accessed on instances, not on the class object `<class 'C'>` itself."
reveal_type(C.inferred_from_value)  # revealed: Unknown

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Cannot assign to instance attribute `inferred_from_value` from the class object `<class 'C'>`"
C.inferred_from_value = "overwritten on class"

Variable defined in multiple methods

If we see multiple un-annotated assignments to a single attribute (self.x below), we build the union of all inferred types (and Unknown). If we see multiple conflicting declarations of the same attribute, that should be an error.

def get_int() -> int:
    return 0

def get_str() -> str:
    return "a"

class C:
    z: int

    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.x = get_int()
        self.y: int = 1

    def other_method(self):
        self.x = get_str()

        # TODO: this redeclaration should be an error
        self.y: str = "a"

        # TODO: this redeclaration should be an error
        self.z: str = "a"

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.x)  # revealed: Unknown | int | str
reveal_type(c_instance.y)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(c_instance.z)  # revealed: int

Attributes defined in multi-target assignments

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.a = self.b = 1

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.a)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
reveal_type(c_instance.b)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

Augmented assignments

class Weird:
    def __iadd__(self, other: None) -> str:
        return "a"

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.w = Weird()
        self.w += None

# TODO: Mypy and pyright do not support this, but it would be great if we could
# infer `Unknown | str` or at least `Unknown | Weird | str` here.
reveal_type(C().w)  # revealed: Unknown | Weird

Attributes defined in tuple unpackings

def returns_tuple() -> tuple[int, str]:
    return (1, "a")

class C:
    a1, b1 = (1, "a")
    c1, d1 = returns_tuple()

    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.a2, self.b2 = (1, "a")
        self.c2, self.d2 = returns_tuple()

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.a1)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
reveal_type(c_instance.b1)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["a"]
reveal_type(c_instance.c1)  # revealed: Unknown | int
reveal_type(c_instance.d1)  # revealed: Unknown | str

reveal_type(c_instance.a2)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

reveal_type(c_instance.b2)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["a"]

reveal_type(c_instance.c2)  # revealed: Unknown | int
reveal_type(c_instance.d2)  # revealed: Unknown | str

Starred assignments

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.a, *self.b = (1, 2, 3)

c_instance = C()
reveal_type(c_instance.a)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
reveal_type(c_instance.b)  # revealed: Unknown

Attributes defined in for-loop (unpacking)

class IntIterator:
    def __next__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class IntIterable:
    def __iter__(self) -> IntIterator:
        return IntIterator()

class TupleIterator:
    def __next__(self) -> tuple[int, str]:
        return (1, "a")

class TupleIterable:
    def __iter__(self) -> TupleIterator:
        return TupleIterator()

class NonIterable: ...

class C:
    def __init__(self):
        for self.x in IntIterable():
            pass

        for _, self.y in TupleIterable():
            pass

        # TODO: We should emit a diagnostic here
        for self.z in NonIterable():
            pass

# Iterable might be empty
# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | int
# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(C().y)  # revealed: Unknown | str

Attributes defined in with statements

class ContextManager:
    def __enter__(self) -> int | None:
        return 1

    def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        with ContextManager() as self.x:
            pass

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.x)  # revealed: Unknown | int | None

Attributes defined in with statements, but with unpacking

class ContextManager:
    def __enter__(self) -> tuple[int | None, int]:
        return 1, 2

    def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback) -> None:
        pass

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        with ContextManager() as (self.x, self.y):
            pass

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.x)  # revealed: Unknown | int | None
reveal_type(c_instance.y)  # revealed: Unknown | int

Attributes defined in comprehensions

class IntIterator:
    def __next__(self) -> int:
        return 1

class IntIterable:
    def __iter__(self) -> IntIterator:
        return IntIterator()

class TupleIterator:
    def __next__(self) -> tuple[int, str]:
        return (1, "a")

class TupleIterable:
    def __iter__(self) -> TupleIterator:
        return TupleIterator()

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        [... for self.a in IntIterable()]
        [... for (self.b, self.c) in TupleIterable()]
        [... for self.d in IntIterable() for self.e in IntIterable()]

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.a)  # revealed: Unknown | int
reveal_type(c_instance.b)  # revealed: Unknown | int
reveal_type(c_instance.c)  # revealed: Unknown | str
reveal_type(c_instance.d)  # revealed: Unknown | int
reveal_type(c_instance.e)  # revealed: Unknown | int

Conditionally declared / bound attributes

Attributes are possibly unbound if they, or the method to which they are added are conditionally declared / bound.

def flag() -> bool:
    return True

class C:
    def f(self) -> None:
        if flag():
            self.a1: str | None = "a"
            self.b1 = 1
    if flag():
        def f(self) -> None:
            self.a2: str | None = "a"
            self.b2 = 1

c_instance = C()

# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(c_instance.a1)  # revealed: str | None
# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(c_instance.a2)  # revealed: str | None
# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(c_instance.b1)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
# error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
reveal_type(c_instance.b2)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

Methods that does not use self as a first parameter

class C:
    # This might trigger a stylistic lint like `invalid-first-argument-name-for-method`, but
    # it should be supported in general:
    def __init__(this) -> None:
        this.declared_and_bound: str | None = "a"

reveal_type(C().declared_and_bound)  # revealed: str | None

Aliased self parameter

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        this = self
        this.declared_and_bound: str | None = "a"

# This would ideally be `str | None`, but mypy/pyright don't support this either,
# so `Unknown` + a diagnostic is also fine.
# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C().declared_and_bound)  # revealed: Unknown

Static methods do not influence implicitly defined attributes

class Other:
    x: int

class C:
    @staticmethod
    def f(other: Other) -> None:
        other.x = 1

# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Unknown

# TODO: this should raise `unresolved-attribute` as well, and the type should be `Unknown`
reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

# This also works if `staticmethod` is aliased:

my_staticmethod = staticmethod

class D:
    @my_staticmethod
    def f(other: Other) -> None:
        other.x = 1

# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(D.x)  # revealed: Unknown

# TODO: this should raise `unresolved-attribute` as well, and the type should be `Unknown`
reveal_type(D().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

If staticmethod is something else, that should not influence the behavior:

def staticmethod(f):
    return f

class C:
    @staticmethod
    def f(self) -> None:
        self.x = 1

reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

And if staticmethod is fully qualified, that should also be recognized:

import builtins

class Other:
    x: int

class C:
    @builtins.staticmethod
    def f(other: Other) -> None:
        other.x = 1

# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Unknown

# TODO: this should raise `unresolved-attribute` as well, and the type should be `Unknown`
reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

Attributes defined in statically-known-to-be-false branches

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        # We use a "significantly complex" condition here (instead of just `False`)
        # for a proper comparison with mypy and pyright, which distinguish between
        # conditions that can be resolved from a simple pattern matching and those
        # that need proper type inference.
        if (2 + 3) < 4:
            self.x: str = "a"

# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown

class C:
    def __init__(self, cond: bool) -> None:
        if True:
            self.a = 1
        else:
            self.a = "a"

        if False:
            self.b = 2

        if cond:
            return

        self.c = 3

        self.d = 4
        self.d = 5

    def set_c(self, c: str) -> None:
        self.c = c
    if False:
        def set_e(self, e: str) -> None:
            self.e = e

reveal_type(C(True).a)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C(True).b)  # revealed: Unknown
reveal_type(C(True).c)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[3] | str
# TODO: this attribute is possibly unbound
reveal_type(C(True).d)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[5]
# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C(True).e)  # revealed: Unknown

Attributes considered always bound

class C:
    def __init__(self, cond: bool):
        self.x = 1
        if cond:
            raise ValueError("Something went wrong")

        # We consider this attribute is always bound.
        # This is because, it is not possible to access a partially-initialized object by normal means.
        self.y = 2

reveal_type(C(False).x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
reveal_type(C(False).y)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[2]

class C:
    def __init__(self, b: bytes) -> None:
        self.b = b

        try:
            s = b.decode()
        except UnicodeDecodeError:
            raise ValueError("Invalid UTF-8 sequence")

        self.s = s

reveal_type(C(b"abc").b)  # revealed: Unknown | bytes
reveal_type(C(b"abc").s)  # revealed: Unknown | str

class C:
    def __init__(self, iter) -> None:
        self.x = 1

        for _ in iter:
            pass

        # The for-loop may not stop,
        # but we consider the subsequent attributes to be definitely-bound.
        self.y = 2

reveal_type(C([]).x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
reveal_type(C([]).y)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[2]

Diagnostics are reported for the right-hand side of attribute assignments

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        # error: [too-many-positional-arguments]
        # error: [invalid-argument-type]
        self.x: int = len(1, 2, 3)

Pure class variables (ClassVar)

Annotated with ClassVar type qualifier

Class variables annotated with the typing.ClassVar type qualifier are pure class variables. They cannot be overwritten on instances, but they can be accessed on instances.

For more details, see the typing spec on ClassVar.

from typing import ClassVar

class C:
    pure_class_variable1: ClassVar[str] = "value in class body"
    pure_class_variable2: ClassVar = 1

    def method(self):
        # TODO: this should be an error
        self.pure_class_variable1 = "value set through instance"

reveal_type(C.pure_class_variable1)  # revealed: str

# TODO: Should be `Unknown | Literal[1]`.
reveal_type(C.pure_class_variable2)  # revealed: Unknown

c_instance = C()

# It is okay to access a pure class variable on an instance.
reveal_type(c_instance.pure_class_variable1)  # revealed: str

# TODO: Should be `Unknown | Literal[1]`.
reveal_type(c_instance.pure_class_variable2)  # revealed: Unknown

# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Cannot assign to ClassVar `pure_class_variable1` from an instance of type `C`"
c_instance.pure_class_variable1 = "value set on instance"

C.pure_class_variable1 = "overwritten on class"

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `pure_class_variable1` of type `str`"
C.pure_class_variable1 = 1

class Subclass(C):
    pure_class_variable1: ClassVar[str] = "overwritten on subclass"

reveal_type(Subclass.pure_class_variable1)  # revealed: str

Variable only mentioned in a class method

We also consider a class variable to be a pure class variable if it is only mentioned in a class method.

class C:
    @classmethod
    def class_method(cls):
        cls.pure_class_variable = "value set in class method"

# for a more realistic example, let's actually call the method
C.class_method()

# TODO: We currently plan to support this and show no error here.
# mypy shows an error here, pyright does not.
# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C.pure_class_variable)  # revealed: Unknown

# TODO: should be no error when descriptor protocol is supported
# and the assignment is properly attributed to the class method.
# error: [invalid-attribute-access] "Cannot assign to instance attribute `pure_class_variable` from the class object `<class 'C'>`"
C.pure_class_variable = "overwritten on class"

# TODO: should be  `Unknown | Literal["value set in class method"]` or
# Literal["overwritten on class"]`, once/if we support local narrowing.
# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C.pure_class_variable)  # revealed: Unknown

c_instance = C()
reveal_type(c_instance.pure_class_variable)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["value set in class method"]

# TODO: should raise an error.
c_instance.pure_class_variable = "value set on instance"

Instance variables with class-level default values

These are instance attributes, but the fact that we can see that they have a binding (not a declaration) in the class body means that reading the value from the class directly is also permitted. This is the only difference for these attributes as opposed to "pure" instance attributes.

Basic

class C:
    variable_with_class_default1: str = "value in class body"
    variable_with_class_default2 = 1

    def instance_method(self):
        self.variable_with_class_default1 = "value set in instance method"

reveal_type(C.variable_with_class_default1)  # revealed: str

reveal_type(C.variable_with_class_default2)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

c_instance = C()

reveal_type(c_instance.variable_with_class_default1)  # revealed: str
reveal_type(c_instance.variable_with_class_default2)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

c_instance.variable_with_class_default1 = "value set on instance"

reveal_type(C.variable_with_class_default1)  # revealed: str

# TODO: Could be Literal["value set on instance"], or still `str` if we choose not to
# narrow the type.
reveal_type(c_instance.variable_with_class_default1)  # revealed: str

C.variable_with_class_default1 = "overwritten on class"

# TODO: Could be `Literal["overwritten on class"]`, or still `str` if we choose not to
# narrow the type.
reveal_type(C.variable_with_class_default1)  # revealed: str

# TODO: should still be `Literal["value set on instance"]`, or `str`.
reveal_type(c_instance.variable_with_class_default1)  # revealed: str

Descriptor attributes as class variables

Whether they are explicitly qualified as ClassVar, or just have a class level default, we treat descriptor attributes as class variables. This test mainly makes sure that we do not treat them as instance variables. This would lead to a different outcome, since the __get__ method would not be called (the descriptor protocol is not invoked for instance variables).

from typing import ClassVar

class Descriptor:
    def __get__(self, instance, owner) -> int:
        return 42

class C:
    a: ClassVar[Descriptor]
    b: Descriptor = Descriptor()
    c: ClassVar[Descriptor] = Descriptor()

reveal_type(C().a)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(C().b)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(C().c)  # revealed: int

Inheritance of class/instance attributes

Instance variable defined in a base class

class Base:
    declared_in_body: int | None = 1

    base_class_attribute_1: str | None
    base_class_attribute_2: str | None
    base_class_attribute_3: str | None

    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.defined_in_init: str | None = "value in base"

class Intermediate(Base):
    # Redeclaring base class attributes with the *same *type is fine:
    base_class_attribute_1: str | None = None

    # Redeclaring them with a *narrower type* is unsound, because modifications
    # through a `Base` reference could violate that constraint.
    #
    # Mypy does not report an error here, but pyright does: "… overrides symbol
    # of same name in class "Base". Variable is mutable so its type is invariant"
    #
    # We should introduce a diagnostic for this. Whether or not that should be
    # enabled by default can still be discussed.
    #
    # TODO: This should be an error
    base_class_attribute_2: str

    # Redeclaring attributes with a *wider type* directly violates LSP.
    #
    # In this case, both mypy and pyright report an error.
    #
    # TODO: This should be an error
    base_class_attribute_3: str | int | None

class Derived(Intermediate): ...

reveal_type(Derived.declared_in_body)  # revealed: int | None

reveal_type(Derived().declared_in_body)  # revealed: int | None

reveal_type(Derived().defined_in_init)  # revealed: str | None

Accessing attributes on class objects

When accessing attributes on class objects, they are always looked up on the type of the class object first, i.e. on the metaclass:

from typing import Literal

class Meta1:
    attr: Literal["metaclass value"] = "metaclass value"

class C1(metaclass=Meta1): ...

reveal_type(C1.attr)  # revealed: Literal["metaclass value"]

However, the metaclass attribute only takes precedence over a class-level attribute if it is a data descriptor. If it is a non-data descriptor or a normal attribute, the class-level attribute is used instead (see the descriptor protocol tests for data/non-data descriptor attributes):

class Meta2:
    attr: str = "metaclass value"

class C2(metaclass=Meta2):
    attr: Literal["class value"] = "class value"

reveal_type(C2.attr)  # revealed: Literal["class value"]

If the class-level attribute is only partially defined, we union the metaclass attribute with the class-level attribute:

def _(flag: bool):
    class Meta3:
        attr1 = "metaclass value"
        attr2: Literal["metaclass value"] = "metaclass value"

    class C3(metaclass=Meta3):
        if flag:
            attr1 = "class value"
            # TODO: Neither mypy nor pyright show an error here, but we could consider emitting a conflicting-declaration diagnostic here.
            attr2: Literal["class value"] = "class value"

    reveal_type(C3.attr1)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["metaclass value", "class value"]
    reveal_type(C3.attr2)  # revealed: Literal["metaclass value", "class value"]

If the metaclass attribute is only partially defined, we emit a possibly-unbound-attribute diagnostic:

def _(flag: bool):
    class Meta4:
        if flag:
            attr1: str = "metaclass value"

    class C4(metaclass=Meta4): ...
    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    reveal_type(C4.attr1)  # revealed: str

Finally, if both the metaclass attribute and the class-level attribute are only partially defined, we union them and emit a possibly-unbound-attribute diagnostic:

def _(flag1: bool, flag2: bool):
    class Meta5:
        if flag1:
            attr1 = "metaclass value"

    class C5(metaclass=Meta5):
        if flag2:
            attr1 = "class value"

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    reveal_type(C5.attr1)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["metaclass value", "class value"]

Unions of attributes

If the (meta)class is a union type or if the attribute on the (meta) class has a union type, we infer those union types accordingly:

def _(flag: bool):
    if flag:
        class C1:
            x = 1
            y: int = 1

    else:
        class C1:
            x = 2
            y: int | str = "b"

    reveal_type(C1.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, 2]
    reveal_type(C1.y)  # revealed: int | str

    C1.y = 100
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal["problematic"]` is not assignable to attribute `y` on type `<class 'C1'> | <class 'C1'>`"
    C1.y = "problematic"

    class C2:
        if flag:
            x = 3
            y: int = 3
        else:
            x = 4
            y: int | str = "d"

    reveal_type(C2.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[3, 4]
    reveal_type(C2.y)  # revealed: int | str

    C2.y = 100
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `None` is not assignable to attribute `y` of type `int | str`"
    C2.y = None
    # TODO: should be an error, needs more sophisticated union handling in `validate_attribute_assignment`
    C2.y = "problematic"

    if flag:
        class Meta3(type):
            x = 5
            y: int = 5

    else:
        class Meta3(type):
            x = 6
            y: int | str = "f"

    class C3(metaclass=Meta3): ...
    reveal_type(C3.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[5, 6]
    reveal_type(C3.y)  # revealed: int | str

    C3.y = 100
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `None` is not assignable to attribute `y` of type `int | str`"
    C3.y = None
    # TODO: should be an error, needs more sophisticated union handling in `validate_attribute_assignment`
    C3.y = "problematic"

    class Meta4(type):
        if flag:
            x = 7
            y: int = 7
        else:
            x = 8
            y: int | str = "h"

    class C4(metaclass=Meta4): ...
    reveal_type(C4.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[7, 8]
    reveal_type(C4.y)  # revealed: int | str

    C4.y = 100
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `None` is not assignable to attribute `y` of type `int | str`"
    C4.y = None
    # TODO: should be an error, needs more sophisticated union handling in `validate_attribute_assignment`
    C4.y = "problematic"

Unions with possibly unbound paths

Definite boundness within a class

In this example, the x attribute is not defined in the C2 element of the union:

def _(flag1: bool, flag2: bool):
    class C1:
        x = 1

    class C2: ...

    class C3:
        x = 3

    C = C1 if flag1 else C2 if flag2 else C3

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute] "Attribute `x` on type `<class 'C1'> | <class 'C2'> | <class 'C3'>` is possibly unbound"
    reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, 3]

    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[100]` is not assignable to attribute `x` on type `<class 'C1'> | <class 'C2'> | <class 'C3'>`"
    C.x = 100

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute] "Attribute `x` on type `C1 | C2 | C3` is possibly unbound"
    reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, 3]

    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[100]` is not assignable to attribute `x` on type `C1 | C2 | C3`"
    C().x = 100

Possibly-unbound within a class

We raise the same diagnostic if the attribute is possibly-unbound in at least one element of the union:

def _(flag: bool, flag1: bool, flag2: bool):
    class C1:
        x = 1

    class C2:
        if flag:
            x = 2

    class C3:
        x = 3

    C = C1 if flag1 else C2 if flag2 else C3

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute] "Attribute `x` on type `<class 'C1'> | <class 'C2'> | <class 'C3'>` is possibly unbound"
    reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, 2, 3]

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    C.x = 100

    # Note: we might want to consider ignoring possibly-unbound diagnostics for instance attributes eventually,
    # see the "Possibly unbound/undeclared instance attribute" section below.
    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute] "Attribute `x` on type `C1 | C2 | C3` is possibly unbound"
    reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1, 2, 3]

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    C().x = 100

Possibly-unbound within gradual types

from typing import Any

def _(flag: bool):
    class Base:
        x: Any

    class Derived(Base):
        if flag:
            # Redeclaring `x` with a more static type is okay in terms of LSP.
            x: int

    reveal_type(Derived().x)  # revealed: int | Any

    Derived().x = 1
    Derived().x = "a"

Attribute possibly unbound on a subclass but not on a superclass

def _(flag: bool):
    class Foo:
        x = 1

    class Bar(Foo):
        if flag:
            x = 2

    reveal_type(Bar.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[2, 1]
    Bar.x = 3

    reveal_type(Bar().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[2, 1]
    Bar().x = 3

Attribute possibly unbound on a subclass and on a superclass

def _(flag: bool):
    class Foo:
        if flag:
            x = 1

    class Bar(Foo):
        if flag:
            x = 2

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    reveal_type(Bar.x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[2, 1]

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    Bar.x = 3

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    reveal_type(Bar().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[2, 1]

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    Bar().x = 3

Possibly unbound/undeclared instance attribute

Possibly unbound and undeclared

def _(flag: bool):
    class Foo:
        if flag:
            x: int

        def __init(self):
            if flag:
                self.x = 1

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    reveal_type(Foo().x)  # revealed: int | Unknown

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    Foo().x = 1

Possibly unbound

def _(flag: bool):
    class Foo:
        def __init(self):
            if flag:
                self.x = 1
                self.y = "a"
            else:
                self.y = "b"

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    reveal_type(Foo().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

    # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
    Foo().x = 2

    reveal_type(Foo().y)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["a", "b"]
    Foo().y = "c"

Unions with all paths unbound

If the symbol is unbound in all elements of the union, we detect that:

def _(flag: bool):
    class C1: ...
    class C2: ...
    C = C1 if flag else C2

    # error: [unresolved-attribute] "Type `<class 'C1'> | <class 'C2'>` has no attribute `x`"
    reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Unknown

    # TODO: This should ideally be a `unresolved-attribute` error. We need better union
    # handling in `validate_attribute_assignment` for this.
    # error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `x` on type `<class 'C1'> | <class 'C2'>`"
    C.x = 1

Inherited class attributes

Basic

class A:
    X = "foo"

class B(A): ...
class C(B): ...

reveal_type(C.X)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal["foo"]

C.X = "bar"

Multiple inheritance

class O: ...

class F(O):
    X = 56

class E(O):
    X = 42

class D(O): ...
class C(D, F): ...
class B(E, D): ...
class A(B, C): ...

# revealed: tuple[<class 'A'>, <class 'B'>, <class 'E'>, <class 'C'>, <class 'D'>, <class 'F'>, <class 'O'>, <class 'object'>]
reveal_type(A.__mro__)

# `E` is earlier in the MRO than `F`, so we should use the type of `E.X`
reveal_type(A.X)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[42]

A.X = 100

Intersections of attributes

Attribute only available on one element

from ty_extensions import Intersection

class A:
    x: int = 1

class B: ...

def _(a_and_b: Intersection[A, B]):
    reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: int

    a_and_b.x = 2

# Same for class objects
def _(a_and_b: Intersection[type[A], type[B]]):
    reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: int

    a_and_b.x = 2

Attribute available on both elements

from ty_extensions import Intersection

class P: ...
class Q: ...
class R(P, Q): ...

class A:
    x: P = P()

class B:
    x: Q = Q()

def _(a_and_b: Intersection[A, B]):
    reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q
    a_and_b.x = R()

# Same for class objects
def _(a_and_b: Intersection[type[A], type[B]]):
    reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q
    a_and_b.x = R()

Possible unboundness

from ty_extensions import Intersection

class P: ...
class Q: ...
class R(P, Q): ...

def _(flag: bool):
    class A1:
        if flag:
            x: P = P()

    class B1: ...

    def inner1(a_and_b: Intersection[A1, B1]):
        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P

        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        a_and_b.x = R()
    # Same for class objects
    def inner1_class(a_and_b: Intersection[type[A1], type[B1]]):
        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P

        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        a_and_b.x = R()

    class A2:
        if flag:
            x: P = P()

    class B1:
        x: Q = Q()

    def inner2(a_and_b: Intersection[A2, B1]):
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q

        # TODO: this should not be an error, we need better intersection
        # handling in `validate_attribute_assignment` for this
        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        a_and_b.x = R()
    # Same for class objects
    def inner2_class(a_and_b: Intersection[type[A2], type[B1]]):
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q

    class A3:
        if flag:
            x: P = P()

    class B3:
        if flag:
            x: Q = Q()

    def inner3(a_and_b: Intersection[A3, B3]):
        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q

        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        a_and_b.x = R()
    # Same for class objects
    def inner3_class(a_and_b: Intersection[type[A3], type[B3]]):
        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q

        # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
        a_and_b.x = R()

    class A4: ...
    class B4: ...

    def inner4(a_and_b: Intersection[A4, B4]):
        # error: [unresolved-attribute]
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: Unknown

        # error: [invalid-assignment]
        a_and_b.x = R()
    # Same for class objects
    def inner4_class(a_and_b: Intersection[type[A4], type[B4]]):
        # error: [unresolved-attribute]
        reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: Unknown

        # error: [invalid-assignment]
        a_and_b.x = R()

Intersection of implicit instance attributes

from ty_extensions import Intersection

class P: ...
class Q: ...

class A:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x: P = P()

class B:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x: Q = Q()

def _(a_and_b: Intersection[A, B]):
    reveal_type(a_and_b.x)  # revealed: P & Q

Attribute access on Any

The union of the set of types that Any could materialise to is equivalent to object. It follows from this that attribute access on Any resolves to Any if the attribute does not exist on object -- but if the attribute does exist on object, the type of the attribute is <type as it exists on object> & Any.

from typing import Any

class Foo(Any): ...

reveal_type(Foo.bar)  # revealed: Any
reveal_type(Foo.__repr__)  # revealed: (def __repr__(self) -> str) & Any

Similar principles apply if Any appears in the middle of an inheritance hierarchy:

from typing import ClassVar, Literal

class A:
    x: ClassVar[Literal[1]] = 1

class B(Any): ...
class C(B, A): ...

reveal_type(C.__mro__)  # revealed: tuple[<class 'C'>, <class 'B'>, Any, <class 'A'>, <class 'object'>]
reveal_type(C.x)  # revealed: Literal[1] & Any

Classes with custom __getattr__ methods

Basic

If a type provides a custom __getattr__ method, we use the return type of that method as the type for unknown attributes. Consider the following CustomGetAttr class:

from typing import Literal

def flag() -> bool:
    return True

class GetAttrReturnType: ...

class CustomGetAttr:
    class_attr: int = 1

    if flag():
        possibly_unbound: bytes = b"a"

    def __init__(self) -> None:
        self.instance_attr: str = "a"

    def __getattr__(self, name: str) -> GetAttrReturnType:
        return GetAttrReturnType()

We can access arbitrary attributes on instances of this class, and the type of the attribute will be GetAttrReturnType:

c = CustomGetAttr()

reveal_type(c.whatever)  # revealed: GetAttrReturnType

If an attribute is defined on the class, it takes precedence over the __getattr__ method:

reveal_type(c.class_attr)  # revealed: int

If the class attribute is possibly unbound, we union the type of the attribute with the fallback type of the __getattr__ method:

reveal_type(c.possibly_unbound)  # revealed: bytes | GetAttrReturnType

Instance attributes also take precedence over the __getattr__ method:

# Note: we could attempt to union with the fallback type of `__getattr__` here, as we currently do not
# attempt to determine if instance attributes are always bound or not. Neither mypy nor pyright do this,
# so it's not a priority.
reveal_type(c.instance_attr)  # revealed: str

Importantly, __getattr__ is only called if attributes are accessed on instances, not if they are accessed on the class itself:

# error: [unresolved-attribute]
CustomGetAttr.whatever

Type of the name parameter

If the name parameter of the __getattr__ method is annotated with a (union of) literal type(s), we only consider the attribute access to be valid if the accessed attribute is one of them:

from typing import Literal

class Date:
    def __getattr__(self, name: Literal["day", "month", "year"]) -> int:
        return 0

date = Date()

reveal_type(date.day)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(date.month)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(date.year)  # revealed: int

# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Type `Date` has no attribute `century`"
reveal_type(date.century)  # revealed: Unknown

argparse.Namespace

A standard library example of a class with a custom __getattr__ method is argparse.Namespace:

import argparse

def _(ns: argparse.Namespace):
    reveal_type(ns.whatever)  # revealed: Any

Classes with custom __setattr__ methods

Basic

If a type provides a custom __setattr__ method, we use the parameter type of that method as the type to validate attribute assignments. Consider the following CustomSetAttr class:

class CustomSetAttr:
    def __setattr__(self, name: str, value: int) -> None:
        pass

We can set arbitrary attributes on instances of this class:

c = CustomSetAttr()

c.whatever = 42

Type of the name parameter

If the name parameter of the __setattr__ method is annotated with a (union of) literal type(s), we only consider the attribute assignment to be valid if the assigned attribute is one of them:

from typing import Literal

class Date:
    def __setattr__(self, name: Literal["day", "month", "year"], value: int) -> None:
        pass

date = Date()
date.day = 8
date.month = 4
date.year = 2025

# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Can not assign object of `Literal["UTC"]` to attribute `tz` on type `Date` with custom `__setattr__` method."
date.tz = "UTC"

argparse.Namespace

A standard library example of a class with a custom __setattr__ method is argparse.Namespace:

import argparse

def _(ns: argparse.Namespace):
    ns.whatever = 42

Objects of all types have a __class__ method

The type of x.__class__ is the same as x's meta-type. x.__class__ is always the same value as type(x).

import typing_extensions

reveal_type(typing_extensions.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'ModuleType'>
reveal_type(type(typing_extensions))  # revealed: <class 'ModuleType'>

a = 42
reveal_type(a.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'int'>
reveal_type(type(a))  # revealed: <class 'int'>

b = "42"
reveal_type(b.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'str'>

c = b"42"
reveal_type(c.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'bytes'>

d = True
reveal_type(d.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'bool'>

e = (42, 42)
reveal_type(e.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'tuple'>

def f(a: int, b: typing_extensions.LiteralString, c: int | str, d: type[str]):
    reveal_type(a.__class__)  # revealed: type[int]
    reveal_type(type(a))  # revealed: type[int]

    reveal_type(b.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'str'>
    reveal_type(type(b))  # revealed: <class 'str'>

    reveal_type(c.__class__)  # revealed: type[int] | type[str]
    reveal_type(type(c))  # revealed: type[int] | type[str]

    # `type[type]`, a.k.a., either the class `type` or some subclass of `type`.
    # It would be incorrect to infer `Literal[type]` here,
    # as `c` could be some subclass of `str` with a custom metaclass.
    # All we know is that the metaclass must be a (non-strict) subclass of `type`.
    reveal_type(d.__class__)  # revealed: type[type]

reveal_type(f.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'FunctionType'>

class Foo: ...

reveal_type(Foo.__class__)  # revealed: <class 'type'>

Module attributes

Basic

mod.py:

global_symbol: str = "a"

import mod

reveal_type(mod.global_symbol)  # revealed: str
mod.global_symbol = "b"

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `global_symbol` of type `str`"
mod.global_symbol = 1

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal[1]` is not assignable to attribute `global_symbol` of type `str`"
(_, mod.global_symbol) = (..., 1)

# TODO: this should be an error, but we do not understand list unpackings yet.
[_, mod.global_symbol] = [1, 2]

class IntIterator:
    def __next__(self) -> int:
        return 42

class IntIterable:
    def __iter__(self) -> IntIterator:
        return IntIterator()

# error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `int` is not assignable to attribute `global_symbol` of type `str`"
for mod.global_symbol in IntIterable():
    pass

Nested module attributes

outer/__init__.py:

outer/nested/__init__.py:

outer/nested/inner.py:

class Outer:
    class Nested:
        class Inner:
            attr: int = 1

import outer.nested.inner

reveal_type(outer.nested.inner.Outer.Nested.Inner.attr)  # revealed: int

# error: [invalid-assignment]
outer.nested.inner.Outer.Nested.Inner.attr = "a"

Literal types

Function-literal attributes

Most attribute accesses on function-literal types are delegated to types.FunctionType, since all functions are instances of that class:

def f(): ...

reveal_type(f.__defaults__)  # revealed: tuple[Any, ...] | None
reveal_type(f.__kwdefaults__)  # revealed: dict[str, Any] | None

Some attributes are special-cased, however:

reveal_type(f.__get__)  # revealed: <method-wrapper `__get__` of `f`>
reveal_type(f.__call__)  # revealed: <method-wrapper `__call__` of `f`>

Int-literal attributes

Most attribute accesses on int-literal types are delegated to builtins.int, since all literal integers are instances of that class:

reveal_type((2).bit_length)  # revealed: bound method Literal[2].bit_length() -> int
reveal_type((2).denominator)  # revealed: Literal[1]

Some attributes are special-cased, however:

reveal_type((2).numerator)  # revealed: Literal[2]
reveal_type((2).real)  # revealed: Literal[2]

Bool-literal attributes

Most attribute accesses on bool-literal types are delegated to builtins.bool, since all literal bools are instances of that class:

# revealed: Overload[(value: bool, /) -> bool, (value: int, /) -> int]
reveal_type(True.__and__)
# revealed: Overload[(value: bool, /) -> bool, (value: int, /) -> int]
reveal_type(False.__or__)

Some attributes are special-cased, however:

reveal_type(True.numerator)  # revealed: Literal[1]
reveal_type(False.real)  # revealed: Literal[0]

Bytes-literal attributes

All attribute access on literal bytes types is currently delegated to builtins.bytes:

# revealed: bound method Literal[b"foo"].join(iterable_of_bytes: Iterable[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`)], /) -> bytes
reveal_type(b"foo".join)
# revealed: bound method Literal[b"foo"].endswith(suffix: @Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`) | tuple[@Todo(Support for `typing.TypeAlias`), ...], start: SupportsIndex | None = ellipsis, end: SupportsIndex | None = ellipsis, /) -> bool
reveal_type(b"foo".endswith)

Instance attribute edge cases

Assignment to attribute that does not correspond to the instance

class Other:
    x: int = 1

class C:
    def __init__(self, other: Other) -> None:
        other.x = 1

def f(c: C):
    # error: [unresolved-attribute]
    reveal_type(c.x)  # revealed: Unknown

Nested classes

class Outer:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x: int = 1

    class Middle:
        # has no 'x' attribute

        class Inner:
            def __init__(self):
                self.x: str = "a"

reveal_type(Outer().x)  # revealed: int

# error: [unresolved-attribute]
Outer.Middle().x

reveal_type(Outer.Middle.Inner().x)  # revealed: str

Shadowing of self

class Other:
    x: int = 1

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        # Redeclaration of self. `self` does not refer to the instance anymore.
        self: Other = Other()
        self.x: int = 1

# TODO: this should be an error
C().x

Assignment to self after nested function

class Other:
    x: str = "a"

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        def nested_function(self: Other):
            self.x = "b"
        self.x: int = 1

reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: int

Assignment to self from nested function

class C:
    def __init__(self) -> None:
        def set_attribute(value: str):
            self.x: str = value
        set_attribute("a")

# TODO: ideally, this would be `str`. Mypy supports this, pyright does not.
# error: [unresolved-attribute]
reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown

Accessing attributes on Never

Arbitrary attributes can be accessed on Never without emitting any errors:

from typing_extensions import Never

def f(never: Never):
    reveal_type(never.arbitrary_attribute)  # revealed: Never

    # Assigning `Never` to an attribute on `Never` is also allowed:
    never.another_attribute = never

Cyclic implicit attributes

Inferring types for undeclared implicit attributes can be cyclic:

class C:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x = 1

    def copy(self, other: "C"):
        self.x = other.x

reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

If the only assignment to a name is cyclic, we just infer Unknown for that attribute:

class D:
    def copy(self, other: "D"):
        self.x = other.x

reveal_type(D().x)  # revealed: Unknown

If there is an annotation for a name, we don't try to infer any type from the RHS of assignments to that name, so these cases don't trigger any cycle:

class E:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x: int = 1

    def copy(self, other: "E"):
        self.x = other.x

reveal_type(E().x)  # revealed: int

class F:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x = 1

    def copy(self, other: "F"):
        self.x: int = other.x

reveal_type(F().x)  # revealed: int

class G:
    def copy(self, other: "G"):
        self.x: int = other.x

reveal_type(G().x)  # revealed: int

We can even handle cycles involving multiple classes:

class A:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x = 1

    def copy(self, other: "B"):
        self.x = other.x

class B:
    def copy(self, other: "A"):
        self.x = other.x

reveal_type(B().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
reveal_type(A().x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]

This case additionally tests our union/intersection simplification logic:

class H:
    def __init__(self):
        self.x = 1

    def copy(self, other: "H"):
        self.x = other.x or self.x

Builtin types attributes

This test can probably be removed eventually, but we currently include it because we do not yet understand generic bases and protocols, and we want to make sure that we can still use builtin types in our tests in the meantime. See the corresponding TODO in Type::static_member for more information.

class C:
    a_int: int = 1
    a_str: str = "a"
    a_bytes: bytes = b"a"
    a_bool: bool = True
    a_float: float = 1.0
    a_complex: complex = 1 + 1j
    a_tuple: tuple[int] = (1,)
    a_range: range = range(1)
    a_slice: slice = slice(1)
    a_type: type = int
    a_none: None = None

reveal_type(C.a_int)  # revealed: int
reveal_type(C.a_str)  # revealed: str
reveal_type(C.a_bytes)  # revealed: bytes
reveal_type(C.a_bool)  # revealed: bool
reveal_type(C.a_float)  # revealed: int | float
reveal_type(C.a_complex)  # revealed: int | float | complex
reveal_type(C.a_tuple)  # revealed: tuple[int]
reveal_type(C.a_range)  # revealed: range
# TODO: revealed: slice[Any, Literal[1], Any]
reveal_type(C.a_slice)  # revealed: slice[Any, Any, Any]
reveal_type(C.a_type)  # revealed: type
reveal_type(C.a_none)  # revealed: None

Generic methods

We also detect implicit instance attributes on methods that are themselves generic. We have an extra test for this because generic functions have an extra type-params scope in between the function body scope and the outer scope, so we need to make sure that our implementation can still recognize f as a method of C here:

[environment]
python-version = "3.12"

class C:
    def f[T](self, t: T) -> T:
        self.x: int = 1
        return t

reveal_type(C().x)  # revealed: int

Enum classes

Enums are not supported yet; attribute access on an enum class is inferred as Todo.

import enum

reveal_type(enum.Enum.__members__)  # revealed: @Todo(Attribute access on enum classes)

class Foo(enum.Enum):
    BAR = 1

reveal_type(Foo.BAR)  # revealed: @Todo(Attribute access on enum classes)
reveal_type(Foo.BAR.value)  # revealed: @Todo(Attribute access on enum classes)
reveal_type(Foo.__members__)  # revealed: @Todo(Attribute access on enum classes)

References

Some of the tests in the Class and instance variables section draw inspiration from pyright's documentation on this topic.