ruff/crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/dataclasses/fields.md
Leandro Braga 39ee71c2a5
[ty] correctly ignore field specifiers when not specified (#20002)
This commit corrects the type checker's behavior when handling
`dataclass_transform` decorators that don't explicitly specify
`field_specifiers`. According to [PEP 681 (Data Class
Transforms)](https://peps.python.org/pep-0681/#dataclass-transform-parameters),
when `field_specifiers` is not provided, it defaults to an empty tuple,
meaning no field specifiers are supported and
`dataclasses.field`/`dataclasses.Field` calls should be ignored.

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/980
2025-08-20 11:33:23 -07:00

3.2 KiB

Dataclass fields

Basic

from dataclasses import dataclass, field

@dataclass
class Member:
    name: str
    role: str = field(default="user")
    tag: str | None = field(default=None, init=False)

# revealed: (self: Member, name: str, role: str = Literal["user"]) -> None
reveal_type(Member.__init__)

alice = Member(name="Alice", role="admin")
reveal_type(alice.role)  # revealed: str
alice.role = "moderator"

# `tag` is marked as `init=False`, so this is an
# error: [unknown-argument] "Argument `tag` does not match any known parameter"
bob = Member(name="Bob", tag="VIP")

default_factory

The default_factory argument can be used to specify a callable that provides a default value for a field:

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime

@dataclass
class Data:
    content: list[int] = field(default_factory=list)
    timestamp: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.now, init=False)

# revealed: (self: Data, content: list[int] = list[Unknown]) -> None
reveal_type(Data.__init__)

data = Data([1, 2, 3])
reveal_type(data.content)  # revealed: list[int]
reveal_type(data.timestamp)  # revealed: datetime

kw_only

[environment]
python-version = "3.12"

If kw_only is set to True, the field can only be set using keyword arguments:

from dataclasses import dataclass, field

@dataclass
class Person:
    name: str
    age: int | None = field(default=None, kw_only=True)
    role: str = field(default="user", kw_only=True)

# revealed: (self: Person, name: str, *, age: int | None = None, role: str = Literal["user"]) -> None
reveal_type(Person.__init__)

alice = Person(role="admin", name="Alice")

# error: [too-many-positional-arguments] "Too many positional arguments: expected 1, got 2"
bob = Person("Bob", 30)

The field function

from dataclasses import field

def get_default() -> str:
    return "default"

reveal_type(field(default=1))  # revealed: dataclasses.Field[Literal[1]]
reveal_type(field(default=None))  # revealed: dataclasses.Field[None]
reveal_type(field(default_factory=get_default))  # revealed: dataclasses.Field[str]

dataclass_transform field_specifiers

If field_specifiers is not specified, it defaults to an empty tuple, meaning no field specifiers are supported and dataclasses.field and dataclasses.Field should not be accepted by default.

from typing_extensions import dataclass_transform
from dataclasses import field, dataclass
from typing import TypeVar

T = TypeVar("T")

@dataclass_transform()
def create_model(*, init: bool = True):
    def deco(cls: type[T]) -> type[T]:
        return cls
    return deco

@create_model()
class A:
    name: str = field(init=False)

# field(init=False) should be ignored for dataclass_transform without explicit field_specifiers
reveal_type(A.__init__)  # revealed: (self: A, name: str = Unknown) -> None

@dataclass
class B:
    name: str = field(init=False)

# Regular @dataclass should respect field(init=False)
reveal_type(B.__init__)  # revealed: (self: B) -> None

Test constructor calls:

# This should NOT error because field(init=False) is ignored for A
A(name="foo")

# This should error because field(init=False) is respected for B
# error: [unknown-argument]
B(name="foo")