Otherwise, when testing `uv venv --preview` the default toolchain
directory will leak into the test.
I believe I've made a similar change for the standard `TestContext` in
another commit somewhere in my stack, if not I'll add it after.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
[ruff's `find_bin`
implementation](19cd9d7d8a/python/ruff/__main__.py (L31))
can find the binary in relative to the package root. It'd be nice to
have the same functionality for `uv`.
Adds a command to find a toolchain on the system. Right now, it displays
the path to the first matching toolchain. We'll probably have more rich
output in the future (after implementing `toolchain show`).
The eventual plan (separate from here) is to port all of the toolchain
discovery tests to use this command. I'll add a few tests for this
command here anyway.
## Summary
This would be a lightweight solution to
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4307 that doesn't fully engage
with all the possibilities in the design space (but would unblock
cross-platform for now).
## Summary
The fixtures here are pretty large, but it lets us test what we actually
care about (the resolved settings) rather than inferring the resolved
settings from behavior, which I think is a big improvement.
I also broke the tests down into more granular cases.
## Summary
Because the workspace member itself is part of the resolution, adding
the workspace name for the project leads to confusing errors, like:
```
❯ cargo run lock --preview
Compiling uv v0.2.11 (/Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/crates/uv)
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.79s
Running `/Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/target/debug/uv lock --preview`
× No solution found when resolving dependencies:
╰─▶ Because only albatross==0.1.0 is available and albatross==0.1.0 depends on anyio<=3, we can conclude that all versions of albatross depend on anyio<=3.
And because bird-feeder==1.0.0 depends on anyio>=4.3.0,<5 and only bird-feeder==1.0.0 is available, we can conclude that all versions of albatross and all versions of bird-feeder are incompatible.
And because albatross depends on albatross and bird-feeder, we can conclude that the requirements are unsatisfiable.
```
(Notice "albatross depends on albatross".)
## Summary
In a workspace, we now read configuration from the workspace root.
Previously, we read configuration from the first `pyproject.toml` or
`uv.toml` file in path -- but in a workspace, that would often be the
_project_ rather than the workspace configuration.
We need to read configuration from the workspace root, rather than its
members, because we lock the workspace globally, so all configuration
applies to the workspace globally.
As part of this change, the `uv-workspace` crate has been renamed to
`uv-settings` and its purpose has been narrowed significantly (it no
longer discovers a workspace; instead, it just reads the settings from a
directory).
If a user has a `uv.toml` in their directory or in a parent directory
but is _not_ in a workspace, we will still respect that use-case as
before.
Closes#4249.
## Summary
This PR introduces top-level configuration for uv, such that you can do:
```toml
[tool.uv]
index-url = "https://test.pypi.org/simple"
```
And `uv pip compile`, `uv run`, `uv tool run`, etc., will all respect
that configuration.
The settings that were escalated to the top-level remain on
`tool.uv.pip` too, but they're only respected in `uv pip` commands. If
they're specified in both places, then the `pip` settings win out.
While making this change, I also wired up some of the global options,
like `connectivity` and `native_tls`, through to all the relevant
places.
Closes#4250.
Make use of GitHub's markdown rendering
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Previously, we took the first executable on the `PATH` but if it was not
a usable interpreter we'd fail. Now, we'll continue searching in the
path until we find an interpreter as we do with the standard executable
names.
Previously, `b` in the test case would have been incorrectly locked to
the path of `a`. I've moved `relative_to` into uv-fs since it's now used
in two different places.
Previously failing lockfile when `a/pyproject.toml` and
`a/b/pyproject.toml` exist (not in a workspace) and `a` was depending on
`b`:
```toml
version = 1
requires-python = ">=3.11, <3.13"
[[distribution]]
name = "b"
version = "0.1.0"
source = "directory+/home/konsti/projects/uv/a"
sdist = { path = "/home/konsti/projects/uv/a" }
[[distribution]]
name = "black"
version = "0.1.0"
source = "editable+."
sdist = { path = "." }
[[distribution.dependencies]]
name = "b"
version = "0.1.0"
source = "directory+/home/konsti/projects/uv/a"
```
Includes system interpreters in `uv toolchain list`.
This includes a refactor of `find_toolchain` to support iterating over
all toolchains
that match a request rather than ending earlier.
## Summary
This i still a draft, but it gets some of the work started on issue
#4064 , which requests --no-binary functionality similar to `uv pip
install` to exist on `uv pip compile`.
So far this has moved the command line shape from install and cloned it
over to compile. The actual functionality of respecting --no-binary
<package> and generating the resulting line in requirements.txt I could
use a hand with.
My understanding is we want to create a requirements.in file such as:
```
yt
```
Then when running `cargo run -- pip compile --no-binary yt
requirements.in`
we want the file to have this line in it:
```
yt==4.3.1 --no-binary yt
```
## Test Plan
Existing unit tests continue to pass.
No new unit tests have been created yet.
The new command line options do show up when testing with `cargo run --
pip compile -h`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4296.
## Test Plan
Ran `cargo run lock --verbose` from
`scripts/workspaces/albatross-virtual-workspace`:
```
DEBUG uv 0.2.11 (ef3bc1612 2024-06-12)
warning: `uv lock` is experimental and may change without warning.
DEBUG Found workspace root: `/Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/scripts/workspaces/albatross-virtual-workspace`
DEBUG Adding discovered workspace member: /Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/scripts/workspaces/albatross-virtual-workspace/packages/albatross
DEBUG Adding discovered workspace member: /Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/scripts/workspaces/albatross-virtual-workspace/packages/bird-feeder
DEBUG Adding discovered workspace member: /Users/crmarsh/workspace/puffin/scripts/workspaces/albatross-virtual-workspace/packages/seeds
DEBUG Searching for Python >=3.12 in search path or managed toolchains
DEBUG Searching for managed toolchains at `/Users/crmarsh/Library/Application Support/uv/toolchains`
DEBUG Found managed toolchain `cpython-3.12.3-macos-aarch64-none`
DEBUG Found CPython 3.12.3 at `/Users/crmarsh/Library/Application Support/uv/toolchains/cpython-3.12.3-macos-aarch64-none/install/bin/python3` (managed toolchains)
Using Python 3.12.3 interpreter at: /Users/crmarsh/Library/Application Support/uv/toolchains/cpython-3.12.3-macos-aarch64-none/install/bin/python3
```
Before 0.2.10 we would parse `--python=python` as an executable name.
After https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4214, we started treating
this as a Python version range request (with an empty version range).
This is not entirely unreasonable, but it was an unexpected regression
and I don't think `VersionRequest` should support empty ranges in its
`from_str` implementation without more consideration.
Updates `--no-binary <package>` to take precedence over `--only-binary
:all:` and `--only-binary <package>` to take precedence over
`--no-binary :all:`.
I'm not entirely sure about this behavior, e.g. maybe I provided
`--only-binary :all:` later on the command line and really want it to
override those earlier arguments of `--no-binary <package>` for safety.
Right now we just fail to solve though since we can't satisfy the
overlapping requests.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4063
## Summary
This is what I consider to be the "real" fix for #8072. We now treat
directory and path URLs as separate `ParsedUrl` types and
`RequirementSource` types. This removes a lot of `.is_dir()` forking
within the `ParsedUrl::Path` arms and makes some states impossible
(e.g., you can't have a `.whl` path that is editable). It _also_ fixes
the `direct_url.json` for direct URLs that refer to files. Previously,
we wrote out to these as if they were installed as directories, which is
just wrong.
We weren't using the common interface in `uv lock` because it didn't
support finding an interpreter without touching the virtual environment.
Here I refactor the project interface to support what we need and update
`uv lock` to use the shared implementation.
packse has the ability to specify a project wide Requires-Python
constraint, but our lock template wasn't forwarding this to the
corresponding pyproject.toml. This update makes that happen.
In the time before universal resolving, we would always pass a
`MarkerEnvironment`, and this environment would capture any relevant
`Requires-Python` specifier (including if `-p/--python` was provided on
the CLI).
But in universal resolution, we very specifically do not use a
`MarkerEnvironment` because we want to produce a resolution that is
compatible across potentially multiple environments. This in turn meant
that we lost `Requires-Python` filtering.
This PR adds it back. We do this by converting our `PythonRequirement`
into a `MarkerTree` that encodes the version specifiers in a
`Requires-Python` specifier. We then ask whether that `MarkerTree` is
disjoint with a dependency specification's `MarkerTree`. If it is, then
we know it's impossible for that dependency specification to every be
true, and we can completely ignore it.
## Summary
Right now, we're _always_ reinstalling local wheel archives, even if the
timestamp didn't change.
I want to fix the TODO properly but I will do so in a separate PR.
