## Summary
Adds support for `--system-site-packages`. Unlike `pip`, we won't take
the system site packages into account in subsequent commands. I think
this is ok.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1483.
Update #1918 to handle https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/12536, where pip
removed their python minor entrypoint. The pip test is semi-functional
since it builds pip from source instead of using a wheel with the wrong
entrypoint, we have to update it when this pip version has a release.
Closes#1593.
## Summary
This is based on Pradyun's installer branch
(d01624e5f2/src/installer/scripts.py (L54)),
which is itself based on pip
(0ad4c94be7/src/pip/_vendor/distlib/scripts.py (L136)).
The gist of it is: on Posix platforms, if a path contains a space (or is
too long), we wrap the shebang in a `/bin/sh` invocation.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2076.
## Test Plan
```
❯ cargo run venv "foo"
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.14s
Running `target/debug/uv venv foo`
Using Python 3.12.0 interpreter at: /Users/crmarsh/.local/share/rtx/installs/python/3.12.0/bin/python3
Creating virtualenv at: foo
Activate with: source foo/bin/activate
❯ source "foo bar/bin/activate"
❯ which black
black not found
❯ cargo run pip install black
Resolved 6 packages in 177ms
Installed 6 packages in 17ms
+ black==24.2.0
+ click==8.1.7
+ mypy-extensions==1.0.0
+ packaging==23.2
+ pathspec==0.12.1
+ platformdirs==4.2.0
❯ which black
/Users/crmarsh/workspace/uv/foo bar/bin/black
❯ black
Usage: black [OPTIONS] SRC ...
One of 'SRC' or 'code' is required.
❯ cat "foo bar/bin/black"
#!/bin/sh
'''exec' '/Users/crmarsh/workspace/uv/foo bar/bin/python' "$0" "$@"
' '''
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import re
import sys
from black import patched_main
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.argv[0] = re.sub(r"(-script\.pyw|\.exe)?$", "", sys.argv[0])
sys.exit(patched_main())
```
I'm not at all sure whether this is a correct fix or not, but it does
seem to make `pypy` work in at least some cases with `uv`. Previously,
I couldn't get it to work at all. Namely the virtualenv was created
with a `lib/python3.10/site-packages`, but whenever I did a `uv
pip install` in that virtualenv, it was looking for a non-existent
`lib/pypy3.10/site-packages` directory.
With this PR, the workflow reported as not working in #1488 now works
for me:
```
$ pypy3 --version
Python 3.10.13 (fc59e61cfbff, Jan 17 2024, 05:35:45)
[PyPy 7.3.15 with GCC 13.2.1 20230801]
$ uv venv --python $(which pypy3) --seed
Using Python 3.10.13 interpreter at: /usr/bin/pypy3
Creating virtualenv at: .venv
+ pip==24.0
+ setuptools==69.1.1
+ wheel==0.42.0
Activate with: source .venv/bin/activate
$ uv pip install 'alembic==1.0.11'
Resolved 9 packages in 8ms
Installed 9 packages in 14ms
+ alembic==1.0.11
+ greenlet==3.0.3
+ mako==1.3.2
+ markupsafe==2.1.5
+ python-dateutil==2.8.2
+ python-editor==1.0.4
+ six==1.16.0
+ sqlalchemy==2.0.27
+ typing-extensions==4.10.0
```
Where as previously (current `main`), I was hitting this error:
```
$ uv venv --python $(which pypy3) --seed
Using Python 3.10.13 interpreter at: /usr/bin/pypy3
Creating virtualenv at: .venv
+ pip==24.0
+ setuptools==69.1.1
+ wheel==0.42.0
Activate with: source .venv/bin/activate
$ uv pip install 'alembic==1.0.11'
error: Failed to list installed packages
Caused by: failed to read directory `/home/andrew/astral/issues/uv/i1488/.venv/lib/pypy3.10/site-packages`
Caused by: No such file or directory (os error 2)
```
Notice though that neither outcome above matches the error reported in #1488,
so this is likely not a complete fix. There are perhaps other lurking
issues.
Ref #1488
## Summary
This was a missed find-and-replace. We shouldn't assume `layout.platlib`
here, since `RECORD` will be written to `site_packages` (which could be
`layout.purelib`).
This is hard to reproduce. You need a _fresh_ environment where
`purelib` and `platlib` differ (which isn't the case for virtualenvs, at
least typically), and you need to be installing a new package that is a
purelib. I tested it by manually changing `platlib` to point to a
different path.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2064.
Previously, `uv` would always prioritize the index given by
`--index-url`. It would then try any indexes after that given by zero
or more `--extra-index-url` flags. This differed from `pip` in that any
priority was given at all, where `pip` doesn't guarantee any priority
ordering of indexes.
We could go in the direction of mimicing `pip`'s behavior here, but it
at present has issues with dependency confusion attacks where packages
may get installed from indexes you don't control. More specifically,
there is an issue of different trust levels. See discussion in #171 and
[PEP-0708] for more on the security impact.
In contrast, `uv` will only select versions for a package from a single
index. That is, even if `foo` is in indexes `a` and `b`, it will
only consider the versions from the index that it checks first. This
probably helps with respect to dependency confusion attacks, but also
means that `uv` doesn't quite cover all of the same use cases as `pip`.
In this PR, we retain the notion of prioritizing indexes, but
tweak it so that PyPI is preferred last as opposed to first. Or
more precisely, the `--index-url` flag specifies a fallback index,
not the primary index, and is deprioritized beneath every index
specified by `--extra-index-url`. The ordering among indexes given by
`--extra-index-url` remains the same: earlier indexes are prioritized
over later indexes.
While this tweak likely won't hit all use cases, I believe it will
resolve some of the most common pain points without exacerbating
dependency confusion problems.
Ref #171, Fixes#1377, Fixes#1451, Fixes#1600
[PEP-0708]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0708/
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Expose the uv_normalize types from pep508, so that these can be used
with a crates.io version.
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
`uv --system` is failing in GitHub Actions, because `py --list-paths`
returns all the pre-cached Pythons:
```
-V:3.12 * C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.12.2\x64\python.exe
-V:3.12-32 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.12.2\x86\python.exe
-V:3.11 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.11.8\x64\python.exe
-V:3.11-32 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.11.8\x86\python.exe
-V:3.10 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.10.11\x64\python.exe
-V:3.10-32 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.10.11\x86\python.exe
-V:3.9 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.9.13\x64\python.exe
-V:3.9-32 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.9.13\x86\python.exe
-V:3.8 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.8.10\x64\python.exe
-V:3.8-32 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.8.10\x86\python.exe
-V:3.7 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.7.9\x64\python.exe
-V:3.7-32 C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.7.9\x86\python.exe
```
So, our default selector returns the first entry here. But none of these
are actually in `PATH` except the one that the user installed via
`actions/setup-python@v5` -- that's the point of the action, that it
puts the correct versions in `PATH`.
It seems to me like we should prioritize `PATH` over `py --list-paths`.
Is there a good reason not to do this?
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2056
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
With this PR I've added the option environment variables to the wheel
building process, through the `BuildDispatch`. When integrating uv with
our project pixi (https://github.com/prefix-dev/pixi/pull/863). We ran
into this missing requirement, I've made a rough version here, could
maybe use some refinement.
### Why do we need this?
Because pixi allow the user to use a conda activated prefix for wheel
building, this comes with a number of environment variables, like `PATH`
but also `CONDA_PREFIX` amongst others. This allows the user to use
system dependencies from conda-forge to use during an sdist build.
Because we use `uv` as a library we need to pass in the options
programatically. Additionally, in general there is nothing holding a
python sdist back from actually depending on an environment variable,
see
e.g the test package: https://pypi.org/project/env-test-package/
### What about `ConfigSettings`
I think `ConfigSettings` does not suffice because e.g. CMake could
function differently when the `CONDA_PREFIX` is set. Also, we do not
know if the user supplied backend actually support these settings.
### Path handling
Because the user can now also supply a PATH in the environment map, the
logic I had was the following, I format the path so that it has the
following precedence
1. venv scripts dir.
2. user supplied path.
3. system path.
### Improvements
There is some path modification and copying happening everytime we use
the `run_python_script` function, I think we could improve this but
would like some pointers where to best put the maybe split and cached
version, we might also want to use some types to split these things up.
### Finally
I did not add any of these options to the uv executables, I first would
like to know if this is a direction we would want to go in. I'm happy to
do this or make any changes that you feel would benefit this project.
Also tagging @wolfv to keep track of this as well.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
This is still imperfect, since the INI parser seems to strip empty
lines, but at least the content is preserved.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2061.
## Test Plan
## Summary
We shouldn't be resolving symlinks on the provided interpreter;
otherwise we break `pyenv`, since running `cargo run pip install mypy
--python .venv/bin/python` will immediately resolve to (e.g.)
`/Users/crmarsh/.pyenv/versions/3.10.2/bin/python3.10`, and pyenv relies
on the path to do its lookups.
Instead, the canonicalizing happens when we query the interpreter
metadata.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2068.
## Test Plan
Ran `cargo run pip install mypy --python .venv/bin/python -v -n` with a
virtualenv created using a pyenv Python; verified that Mypy was
installed into the virtual environment, rather than into the global
environment.
## Summary
If a pre-release marker is present on a requirement in a constraint
file, we should allow pre-releases for that package.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2063.
## Summary
Temporarily disabling `install_git_private_https_pat_and_username` since
running this test can break your local Git authentication for other
projects. I experienced this today and keep finding myself needing to
ignore it locally.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1980.
## Summary
Internal refactor to `PrioritizedDistribution` that I think should
reduce the size? Although the motivation here is simplicity, not perf.
Instead of storing:
```rust
/// The highest-priority, installable wheel for the package version.
compatible_wheel: Option<(DistMetadata, TagPriority)>,
/// The most-relevant, incompatible wheel for the package version.
incompatible_wheel: Option<(DistMetadata, IncompatibleWheel)>,
```
We now store:
```rust
wheel: Option<(DistMetadata, WheelCompatibility)>,
```
Where `WheelCompatibility` is an enum of `TagPriority` or
`IncompatibleWheel`.
## Summary
This is essentially a wrapper around something like `--python $(which
python3)`, but gives users a portable and streamlined way to solve the
common pain point of using `uv` in GitHub Actions or a Docker container.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1526.
## Summary
This also preserves the environment variables in the output file, e.g.:
```
Resolved 1 package in 216ms
# This file was autogenerated by uv via the following command:
# uv pip compile requirements.in --emit-index-url
--index-url https://test.pypi.org/${SUFFIX}
requests==2.5.4.1
```
I'm torn on whether that's correct or undesirable here.
Closes#2035.
## Summary
`PythonPlatform` only exists to format paths to directories within
virtual environments based on a root and an OS, so it's now
`VirtualenvLayout`.
`Virtualenv` is now used for non-virtual environment Pythons, so it's
now `PythonEnvironment`.
## Summary
Now that we have the ability to introspect the installed packages for
arbitrary Pythons, we can allow `pip freeze` and `pip list` to fall back
to the "default" Python, if no virtualenv is present.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2005.
## Summary
This PR aligns the `uv pip install --python` flag with the `uv venv
--python` flag, such that the former now accepts binary names and Python
versions by way of using the same `find_requested_python` method under
the hood.
## Summary
This PR adds a `--python` flag that allows users to provide a specific
Python interpreter into which `uv` should install packages. This would
replace the `VIRTUAL_ENV=` workaround that folks have been using to
install into arbitrary, system environments, while _also_ actually being
correct for installing into non-virtual environments, where the bin and
site-packages paths can differ.
The approach taken here is to use `sysconfig.get_paths()` to get the
correct paths from the interpreter, and then use those for determining
the `bin` and `site-packages` directories, rather than constructing them
based on hard-coded expectations for each platform.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1396.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1779.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1988.
## Test Plan
- Verified that, on my Windows machine, I was able to install `requests`
into a global environment with: `cargo run pip install requests --python
'C:\\Users\\crmarsh\\AppData\\Local\\Programs\\Python\\Python3.12\\python.exe`,
then `python` and `import requests`.
- Verified that, on macOS, I was able to install `requests` into a
global environment installed via Homebrew with: `cargo run pip install
requests --python $(which python3.8)`.
In this context, we already know (as the comment says) that `self` does
not have a local segment, so we don't need to strip it.
This change isn't motivated by anything other than making the code and
comment in sync. For example, when I first looked at it, I wondered
whether the extra stripping was somehow necessary. But it isn't.
* Document good first issues
* Document `scripts` directory, as far as useful for contributors
* Remove compare with pip script, we don't need it anymore
I think this closes#817.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jo <10510431+j178@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
When a `pyproject.toml` is provided directly to `uv pip compile`, we
were failing to resolve recursive extras. The solution I settled on here
is to flatten them recursively when determining the requirements
upfront.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1987.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
For a venv created by `virtualenv`, the `pyvenv.cfg` file specifies the
full version string in the `version_info` field:
```
home = /Users/x/.rye/py/cpython@3.12.1/install/bin
implementation = CPython
version_info = 3.12.1.final.0
virtualenv = 20.25.0
include-system-site-packages = false
base-prefix = /Users/x/.rye/py/cpython@3.12.1/install
base-exec-prefix = /Users/x/.rye/py/cpython@3.12.1/install
base-executable = /Users/x/.rye/py/cpython@3.12.1/install/bin/python3
```
The relevant code can be found here:
4ca8a20c17/src/virtualenv/create/creator.py (L167)
This PR changes `pyvenv.cfg` created by uv for better compatibility with
`virtualenv`.
## Test Plan
```sh
uv venv
cat .venv/pyvenv.cfg
```
I previously add `spawn_blocking` to the version map construction as it
had become a bottleneck
(https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/1163/files#diff-704ceeaedada99f90369eac535713ec82e19550bff166cd44745d7277ecae527R116).
With the zero copy deserialization, this has become so fast we don't
need to move it to the thread pool anymore. I've also checked
`DataWithCachePolicy` but it seems to still take a significant amount of
time. Span visualization:
Resolving jupyter warm:
Resolving jupyter cold:
I've also updated the instrumentation a little.
We don't seem cpu bound for the cold cache (top) and refresh case
(bottom) from jupyter:
