## Summary
We don't enable E501 by default, but `line-length` is a useful example
for configuration, so we now set `--extend-select` in the tutorial with
a note to that effect.
I've also updated all the outputs to match the latest CLI behavior, and
changed the example from `List` to `Sequence` because `List` now spits
out two diagnostics (one for the import, one for the usage), which IMO
is confusing for beginners.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7448
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7892
I've removed automatic dangling comment formatting, we're doing manual
dangling comment formatting everywhere anyway (the
assert-all-comments-formatted ensures this) and dangling comments would
break the formatting there.
## Test Plan
New test file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Split out of #8044: In preview style, ellipsis are also collapsed in
non-stub files. This should only affect function/class contexts since
for other statements stub are generally not used. I've updated our tests
to use `pass` instead to reflect this, which makes tracking the preview
style changes much easier.
## Summary
Given an expression like `[x for (x) in y]`, we weren't skipping over
parentheses when searching for the `in` between `(x)` and `y`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8053.
## Summary
In #6157 a warning was introduced when users use `ruff: noqa`
suppression in-line instead of at the file-level. I had this trigger
today after forgetting about it, and the warning is an excellent
improvement.
I knew immediately what the issue was because I raised it previously,
but on reading the warning I'm not sure it would be so obvious to all
users. This PR extends the error with a short sentence explaining that
line-level suppression should omit the `ruff:` prefix.
## Test Plan
Not sure it's necessary for such a trivial change :)
**Summary** `ruff format --diff` is similar to `ruff format --check`,
but we don't only error with the list of file that would be formatted,
but also show a diff between the unformatted input and the formatted
output.
```console
$ ruff format --diff scratch.py scratch.pyi scratch.ipynb
warning: `ruff format` is not yet stable, and subject to change in future versions.
--- scratch.ipynb
+++ scratch.ipynb
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
import numpy
-maths = (numpy.arange(100)**2).sum()
-stats= numpy.asarray([1,2,3,4]).median()
+
+maths = (numpy.arange(100) ** 2).sum()
+stats = numpy.asarray([1, 2, 3, 4]).median()
--- scratch.py
+++ scratch.py
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
x = 1
-y=2
+y = 2
z = 3
2 files would be reformatted, 1 file left unchanged
```
With `--diff`, the summary message gets printed to stderr to allow e.g.
`ruff format --diff . > format.patch`.
At the moment, jupyter notebooks are formatted as code diffs, while
everything else is a real diff that could be applied. This means that
the diffs containing jupyter notebooks are not real diffs and can't be
applied. We could change this to json diffs, but they are hard to read.
We could also split the diff option into a human diff option, where we
deviate from the machine readable diff constraints, and a proper machine
readable, appliable diff output that you can pipe into other tools.
To make the tests work, the results (and errors, if any) are sorted
before printing them. Previously, the print order was random, i.e. two
identical runs could have different output.
Open question: Should this go into the markdown docs? Or will this be
subsumed by the integration of the formatter into `ruff check`?
**Test plan** Fixtures for the change and no change cases, including a
jupyter notebook and for file input and stdin.
Fixes#7231
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
**Summary** Insert a newline after nested function and class
definitions, unless there is a trailing own line comment.
We need to e.g. format
```python
if platform.system() == "Linux":
if sys.version > (3, 10):
def f():
print("old")
else:
def f():
print("new")
f()
```
as
```python
if platform.system() == "Linux":
if sys.version > (3, 10):
def f():
print("old")
else:
def f():
print("new")
f()
```
even though `f()` is directly preceded by an if statement, not a
function or class definition. See the comments and fixtures for trailing
own line comment handling.
**Test Plan** I checked that the new content of `newlines.py` matches
black's formatting.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
When linting, we store a map from file path to fixes, which we then use
to show a fix summary in the printer.
In the printer, we assume that if the map is non-empty, then we have at
least one fix. But this isn't enforced by the fix struct, since you can
have an entry from (file path) to (empty fix table). In practice, this
only bites us when linting from `stdin`, since when linting across
multiple files, we have an `AddAssign` on `Diagnostics` that avoids
adding empty entries to the map. When linting from `stdin`, we create
the map directly, and so it _is_ possible to have a non-empty map that
doesn't contain any fixes, leading to a panic.
This PR introduces a dedicated struct to make these constraints part of
the formal interface.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8027.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` (notice two failures are removed)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7968, I introduced a
regression whereby we started to treat imports used _only_ in type
annotation bounds (with `__future__` annotations) as unused.
The root of the issue is that I started using `visit_annotation` for
these bounds. So we'd queue up the bound in the list of deferred type
parameters, then when visiting, we'd further queue it up in the list of
deferred type annotations... Which we'd then never visit, since deferred
type annotations are visited _before_ deferred type parameters.
Anyway, the better solution here is to use a dedicated flag for these,
since they have slightly different behavior than type annotations.
I've also fixed what I _think_ is a bug whereby we previously failed to
resolve `Callable` in:
```python
type RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]
from collections.abc import Callable
```
IIUC, the values in type aliases should be evaluated lazily, like type
parameters.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8017.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Rule B005 of flake8-bugbear docs has a typo in one of the examples that
leads to a confusion in the correctness of `.strip()` method
```python
# Wrong output (used in docs)
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "ex"
# Correct output
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "e"
```
## Summary
Fix a typo in the docs for quote style.
> a = "a string without any quotes"
> b = "It's monday morning"
> Ruff will change a to use single quotes when using quote-style =
"single". However, a will be unchanged, as converting to single quotes
would require the inner ' to be escaped, which leads to less readable
code: 'It\'s monday morning'.
It should read "However, **b** will be unchanged".
## Test Plan
N/A.
## Summary
### What it does
This rule triggers an error when a bare raise statement is not in an
except or finally block.
### Why is this bad?
If raise statement is not in an except or finally block, there is no
active exception to
re-raise, so it will fail with a `RuntimeError` exception.
### Example
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise
```
Use instead:
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise ValueError(f"{x} is not positive")
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared ruff and pylint outputs on pylint's tests.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/stable/user_guide/messages/error/misplaced-bare-raise.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/exceptions.py#L339)
See the provided breaking changes note for details.
Removes support for the deprecated `--format`option in the `ruff check`
CLI, `format` inference as `output-format` in the configuration file,
and the `RUFF_FORMAT` environment variable.
The error message for use of `format` in the configuration file could be
better, but would require some awkward serde wrappers and it seems hard
to present the correct schema to the user still.
## Summary
Given `type RecordOrThings = Record | int | str`, the right-hand side
won't be evaluated at runtime. Same goes for `Record` in `type
RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]`. This PR modifies the
visitation logic to treat them as typing-only.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7966.
